Impact of an informed choice invitation on uptake of screening for diabetes in primary care (DICISION): Randomised trial

BMJ (Online)

Volumn 340, Issue 7757, 2010, Pages 1176-

  Marteau, Theresa M ^a   Mann, Eleanor ^a   Toby Prevost, A ^a   Vasconcelos, Joana C ^b   Kellar, Ian ^b   Sanderson, Simon ^b   Parker, Michael ^c   Griffin, Simon ^d   Sutton, Stephen ^b   Kinmonth, Ann Louise ^b  

^a KING'S COLLEGE LONDON   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CAMBRIDGE   (United Kingdom)

^c UNIVERSITY OF OXFORD   (United Kingdom)

^d ADDENBROOKE S HOSPITAL   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; BEHAVIOR; CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; COST BENEFIT ANALYSIS; DIABETES MELLITUS; FEMALE; GENERAL PRACTICE; HUMAN; INFORMED CONSENT; LIFESTYLE; MALE; MOTIVATION; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PREVENTIVE HEALTH SERVICE; PRIMARY MEDICAL CARE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; RISK ASSESSMENT; SCREENING;

ADULT; AGED; CHOICE BEHAVIOR; CLUSTER ANALYSIS; DECISION MAKING; DIABETES MELLITUS, TYPE 2; FAMILY PRACTICE; FEMALE; HEALTH PROMOTION; HUMANS; INFORMED CONSENT; LIFE STYLE; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; MOTIVATION; PATIENT ACCEPTANCE OF HEALTH CARE; RISK FACTORS;

EID: 77953949776     PISSN: None     EISSN: 17561833     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1136/bmj.c2138     Document Type: Article

References (43)

1. Rose G. Sick individuals and sick populations. Int J Epidemiol 2001;30:427-32.
2. Wood DA, Kinmonth AL, Davies GA, Yarwood J, Thompson SD, Pyke SDM, et al. Randomised controlled trial evaluating cardiovascular screening and intervention in general practice: principal results of British family heart study. BMJ 1994;308:313-20.
3. Jorgensen K, Gotzsche PC. Content of invitations for publicly funded screening mammography. BMJ 2006;332:538-41.
4. Marteau TM, Dormandy E, Michie S. A measure of informed choice. Health Expect 2001;4:99-108.
5. Marteau TM. Informed choice: a construct in search of a name. In: Edwards A, Elwyn G, eds. Shared decision-making in health care. Oxford University Press, 2009:87-94.
6. Cooke R, French D. How well do the theory of reasoned action and theory of planned behaviour predict intentions and attendance at screening programmes? A meta-analysis. Psychol Health 2008;23:745-65.
7. Marteau TM, Hankins M, Collins B. Perceptions of risk of cervical cancer and attitudes towards cervical screening: a comparison of smokers and non-smokers. Fam Pract 2002;19:18-22.
8. Tudor Hart J. The inverse care law. Lancet 1971;1:405-12.
9. Crockett R, Wienmann J, Hankins M, Marteau TM. Time orientation and health-related behaviour: measurement in general population samples. Psychol Health 2009;24:18.
10. Orbell S, Hagger M. Temporal framing and the decision to take part in type 2 diabetes screening: effects of individual differences in consideration of future consequences on persuasion. Health Psychol 2006;25:537-48.
11. Raffle AE. Information about screening - is it to achieve high uptake or to ensure informed choice? Health Expect 2001;4:92-8.
12. Griffin SJ, Little PS, Hales CN, Kinmonth AL, Wareham NJ. Diabetes risk score: towards earlier detection of type 2 diabetes in general practice. Diabetes Metab Res Rev 2000;16:164-71.
13. Adriaanse CA, Snoek FJ. The psychological impact of screening for type 2 diabetes. Diabetes Metab Res Rev 2006;22:20-5.
14. Holman RR, Paul SK, Bethel MA, Matthews DR, Neil HA. 10-year follow-up of intensive glucose control in type 2 diabetes. N Engl J Med 2008;359:1577-89.
15. Department of Health. Putting prevention first. Vascular checks: risk assessment and management. Stationery Office, 2008.
16. Kohro T, Furui Y, Mitsutake N, Fujii R, Morita H, Oku S, et al. The Japanese national health screening and intervention program aimed at preventing worsening of the metabolic syndrome. Int Heart J 2008;49:193-203.
17. Mann E, Prevost AT, Griffin S, Kellar I, Sutton S, Parker M, et al. Impact of an informed choice invitation on uptake of screening for diabetes in primary care (DICISION): trial protocol. BMC Public Health 2009;9:63.
18. Waugh N, Scotland G, McNamee P, Gillett M, Brennan A, Goyder E, et al. Screening for type 2 diabetes: literature review and economic modelling. Health Technol Assess 2007;11:iii-iv,ix-xi,1-125.
19. Muir J, Mant D, Jones L, Yudkin P, on behalf of the Imperial Cancer Research Fund OXCHECK study group. Effectiveness of health checks conducted by nurses in primary care: results of the OXCHECK study after one year. BMJ 1994;308:308-12.
20. Goyder EC. Screening for and prevention of type 2 diabetes. BMJ 2008;336:1140-1.
21. Echouffo-Tcheugui JB, Simmons RK, Williams KM, Barling RS, Prevost AT, Kinmonth AL, et al. The ADDITION-Cambridge trial protocol: a cluster-randomised controlled trial of screening for type 2 diabetes and intensive treatment for screen-detected patients. BMC Public Health 2009;9:136.
22. General Medical Council. Seeking patients' consent: the ethical considerations. GMC, 1998.
23. Gilhooley C, Green C. Protocol analysis: theoretical background. In: Richardson JTE, ed. Handbook of qualitative research methods for psychology and the social sciences. BPS Books, 1996:43-54.
24. Patel VL, Arocha JF, Diermeier M, How J, Mottur-Pilson C. Cognitive psychological studies of representation and use of clinical practice guidelines. Int J Med Inf 2001;63:147-67.
25. Skaner Y, Backlund L, Montgomery H, Bring J, Strender LE. General practitioners' reasoning when considering the diagnosis heart failure: a think-aloud study. BMC Fam Pract 2005;6:4. (Pubitemid 40300807)
26. Flesch [Java program]. 2.0 version, 2007.
27. Kellar I, Sutton S, Griffin S, Prevost AT, Kinmonth AL, Marteau TM. Evaluation of an informed choice invitation for type 2 diabetes screening. Patient Educ Couns 2008;72:232-8.
28. Fox R. Informed choice in screening programmes: do leaflets help? A critical literature review. J Public Health 2006;28:309-17. (Pubitemid 44863319)
29. Kim LG, Thompson SG, Marteau TM, Scott RA. Screening for abdominal aortic aneurysms: the effects of age and social deprivation on screening uptake, prevalence and attendance at follow-up in the MASS trial. J Med Screen 2004;11:50-3.
30. McCaffery K, Wardle J, Nadel M, Atkin W. Socioeconomic variation in participation in colorectal cancer screening. J Med Screen 2002;9:104-8. (Pubitemid 35205231)
31. Dormandy E, Michie S, Hooper R, Marteau T. Informed choice in antenatal Down syndrome screening: a cluster-randomised trial of combined versus separate visit testing. Patient Educ Couns 2006;61:56-64.
32. Trevena LJ, Irwig L, Barratt A. Randomized trial of a self-administered decision aid for colorectal cancer screening. J Med Screen 2008;15:76-82.
33. Mathieu E, Barratt A, Davey HM, McGeechan K, Howard K, Houssami N. Informed choice in mammography screening: a randomized trial of a decision aid for 70-year-old women. Arch Intern Med 2007;167:2039-46. (Pubitemid 350036702)
34. Shaw C, Abrams K, Marteau T. Psychological impact of predicting individuals' risks of illness: a systematic review. Soc Sci Med 1999;49:1571-98.
35. Goyder E, Wild S, Fischbacher C, Carlisle J, Peters J. Evaluating the impact of a national pilot screening programme for type 2 diabetes in deprived areas of England. Fam Pract 2008;25:370-5.
36. Marsh GN, Channing DM. Narrowing the health gap between a deprived and an endowed community. BMJ 1988;296:173-6.
37. Atri J, Falshaw M, Gregg R, Robson J, Omar RZ, Dixon S. Improving uptake of breast screening inmultiethnic populations: a randomised controlled trial using practice reception staff to contact nonattenders. BMJ 1997;315:1356-9.
38. Gallo C, Perrone F, De Placido S, Giusti C. Informed versus randomised consent to clinical trials. Lancet 1995;346:1060-4.
39. Kreuter MW, Bull FC, Clark EM, Oswald DL. Understanding how people process health information: a comparison of tailored and nontailored weight-loss materials. Health Psychol 1999;18:487-94.
40. Noar SM, Benac CN, Harris MS. Does tailoring matter? Meta-analytic review of tailored print health behavior change interventions. Psychol Bull 2007;133:673-93.
41. Office for National Statistics. Internet access: Households and individuals. Stat Bull 28 Aug;2009.
42. O'Connor AM, Stacey D, Entwistle V, Llewellyn-Thomas H, Rovner D, Holmes-Rovner M, et al. Decision aids for people facing health treatment or screening decisions. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2003;(2):CD001431.
43. Entwistle VA, Carter SM, Trevena L, Flitcroft K, Irwig L, McCaffery K, et al. Communicating about screening. BMJ 2008;337:a1591.