Vectorized algorithms for spiking neural network simulation

Neural Computation

Volumn 23, Issue 6, 2011, Pages 1503-1535

  Brette, Romain ^a,b   Goodman, Dan F M ^a,b  

^a UNIVERSITÉ PARIS DESCARTES   (France)

^b ECOLE NORMALE SUPÉRIEURE   (France)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ACTION POTENTIAL; ALGORITHM; ARTIFICIAL NEURAL NETWORK; BIOLOGICAL MODEL; COMPUTER SIMULATION; LETTER; NERVE CELL; NERVE CELL NETWORK; PHYSIOLOGY; SYNAPSE;

ACTION POTENTIALS; ALGORITHMS; COMPUTER SIMULATION; MODELS, NEUROLOGICAL; NERVE NET; NEURAL NETWORKS (COMPUTER); NEURONS; SYNAPSES;

EID: 79958292145     PISSN: 08997667     EISSN: 1530888X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1162/NECO_a_00123     Document Type: Letter

References (47)

1. Bower, J. M., & D. Beeman (1998). The book of GENESIS: Exploring realistic neural models with the GEneral NEural SImulation System (2nd ed.). Berlin: Springer.
2. Brette, R., Rudolph, M., Carnevale, T., Hines, M., Beeman, D., et al. (2007). Simulation of networks of spiking neurons: A review of tools and strategies. Journal of Computational Neuroscience, 23, 349-398.
3. Cannon, R. C, Gewaltig, M., Gleeson, P., Bhalla, U. S., Cornelis, N. H., et al. (2007). Interoperability of neuroscience modeling software: Current status and future directions. Neuroinformatics, 5(2), 127-138.
4. Carnevale, N. T., & Hines, M. L. (2006). The NEURON book. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
5. Davison, A. P., Briderle, D., Eppler, J., Kremkow, J., Muller, E., et al. (2008). PyNN: A common interface for neuronal network simulators. Frontiers in Neuroinformatics, 2, 11.
6. Deneve, S. (2008). Bayesian spiking neurons I: Inference. Neural Computation, 20(1), 91-117.
7. Destexhe, A., Mainen, Z., & Sejnowski, T. (1994a). An efficient method for computing synaptic conductances based on a kinetic model of receptor binding. Neural Computation, 6(1), 14-18.
8. Destexhe, A., Mainen, Z. F., & Sejnowski, T. J. (1994b). Synthesis of models for excitable membranes, synaptic transmission and neuromodulation using a common kinetic formalism. Journal of Computational Neuroscience, 1(3), 195-230.
9. D'Haene, M., & Schrauwen, B. (2010). Fast and exact simulation methods applied on a broad range of neuron models. Neural Computation, 22(6), 1468-1472.
10. Djurfeldt, M., Djurfeldt, M., & Lansner, A. (2007). Workshop report: 1st INCF Workshop on Large-Scale Modeling of the Nervous System. Available online at http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/npre.2007.262.1.
11. Eppler, J. M., Helias, M., Muller, E., Diesmann, M., & Gewaltig, M. (2008). PyNEST: A convenient interface to the NEST simulator. Frontiers in Neuroinformatics, 2,12.
12. Garny, A., Nickerson, D. P., Cooper, J., dos Santos, R. W., Miller, A. K., et al. (2008). CellML and associated tools and techniques. Philosophical Transactions. Series A, Mathematical, Physical, and Engineering Sciences, 366(1878), 3017-3043.
13. Gerstner, W., & Kistler, W. M. (2002). Spikingneuron models: Single neurons, populations, plasticity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
14. Gewaltig, O., & Diesmann, M. (2007). NEST (NEural Simulation Tool). Scholarpe-dia, 2(4), 1430.
15. Giugliano, M. (2000). Synthesis of generalized algorithms for the fast computation of synaptic conductances with Markov kinetic models in large network simulations. Neural Computation, 12(4), 903-931.
16. Giugliano, M., Bove, M., & Grattarola, M. (1999). Fast calculation of short-term depressing synaptic conductances. Neural Computation, 11(6), 1413-1426.
17. Goddard, N. H., Hucka, M., Howell, F., Cornelis, H., Shankar, K., et al. (2001). Towards NeuroML: Model description methods for collaborative modelling in neuroscience. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biolomcal Sciences, 356,1209-1228.
18. Goodman, D., & Brette, R. (2008). Brian: A simulator for spiking neural networks in Python. Frontiers in Neuroinformatics, 2, 5.
19. Goodman, D. F. M., & Brette, R. (2009). The Brian simulator. Frontiers in Neuroscience, 3(2), 192-197.
20. Hanuschkin, A., Kunkel, S., Helias, M., Morrison, A., & Diesmann, M. (2010). A general and efficient method for incorporating precise spike times in globally time-driven simulations. Frontiers in Neuroinformatics, 4(0), 12.
21. Hines, M. (1984). Efficient computation of branched nerve equations. International Journal of Bio-Medical Computing, 15(1), 69-76.
22. Hines, M. L., & Carnevale, N. T. (2000). Expanding NEURON's repertoire of mechanisms with NMODL. Neural Computation, 12(5), 995-1007.
23. Hines, M. L., Davison, A. P., & Muller, E. (2009). NEURON and Python. Frontiers in Neuroinformatics 3,1.
24. Hirsch, M., & Smale, S. (1974). Differential equations, dynamical systems, and linear algebra. Orlando, FL: Academic Press.
25. Izhikevich, E. M. (2006). Polychronization: Computation with spikes. Neural Computation, 18(2), 245-282.
26. Jahnke, A., Roth, U., & Schnauer, T. (1999). Digital simulation of spiking neural networks. In W. Maass & C. M. Bishop (Eds.), Pulsed neural networks (pp. 237-257). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
27. Köhn, J., & Wörgötter, F. (1998). Employing the Z-Transform to optimize the calculation of the synaptic conductance of NMDA and other synaptic channels in network simulations. Neural Computation, 10(7), 1639-1651.
28. Loebel, A., & Tsodyks, M. (2002). Computation by ensemble synchronization in recurrent networks with synaptic depression. Journal of Computational Neuroscience, 13(2), 111-124.
29. Lytton, W. W. (1996). Optimizing synaptic conductance calculation for network simulations. Neural Computation, 8(3), 501-509.
30. Markram, H., Wang, Y, & Tsodyks, M. (1998). Differential signaling via the same axon of neocortical pyramidal neurons. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 95(9), 5323-5328.
31. Mongillo, G., Barak, O, & Tsodyks, M. (2008). Synaptic theory of working memory. Science, 319(5869), 1543-1546.
32. Morrison, A., Aertsen, A., & Diesmann, M. (2007). Spike-timing-dependent plasticity in balanced random networks. Neural Computation, 19(6), 1437-1467.
33. Morrison, A., Diesmann, M., & Gerstner, W. (2008). Phenomenological models of synaptic plasticity based on spike timing. Biological Cybernetics, 98(6), 459-478.
34. Morrison, A., Mehring, C, Geisel, T., Aertsen, A., & Diesmann, M. (2005). Advancing the boundaries of high connectivity network simulation with distributed computing. Neural Computation, 17,1776-1801.
35. Morrison, A., Straube, S., Plesser, H. E., & Diesmann, M. (2007). Exact subthreshold integration with continuous spike times in discrete-time neural network simulations. Neural Computation, 19,47-79.
36. Morse, T. (2007). Model sharing in computational neuroscience. Scholarpedia, 2(4), 3036.
37. Owens, J. D., Luebke, D., Govindaraju, N., Harris, M., Krüger, J., et al. (2007). A survey of general-purpose computation on graphics hardware. Computer Graphics Forum, 26(1), 80-113.
38. Platkiewicz, J., & Brette, R. (2010). A threshold equation for action potential initiation. PLoS Comput. Biol, 6(7), e1000850.
39. Plesser, H. E., & Diesmann, M. (2009). Simplicity and efficiency of integrate-and-fire neuron models. Neural Computation, 21(2), 353-359.
40. Protopapas, A., Vanier, M., & Bower, J. (1998). Simulating large networks of neurons. In C. Koch & I. Segev (Eds.), Methods in neuronal modeling: From ions to networks (2nd ed.). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
41. Rossant, C, Goodman, D. F. M., Platkiewicz, J., & Brette, R. (2010). Automatic fitting of spiking neuron models to electrophysiological recordings. Frontiers in Neuroinformatics, 4, 2.
42. Rotter, S., & Diesmann, M. (1999). Exact digital simulation of time-invariant linear systems with applications to neuronal modeling. Biolomcal Cybernetics, 81(5-6), 381-402.
43. Sanchez-Montanez, M. A. (2001). Strategies for the optimization of large scale networks of integrate and fire neurons. Berlin: Springer-Verlag.
44. Schutter, E. D. (2008). Why are computational neuroscience and systems biology so separate? PLoS Comput. Biol., 4(5), e1000078.
45. Song, S., Miller, K. D., & Abbott, L. F. (2000). Competitive Hebbian learning through spike-timing-dependent synaptic plasticity. Nature Neurosci., 3,919-926.
46. Tsodyks, M. V., & Markram, H. (1997). The neural code between neocortical pyramidal neurons depends on neurotransmitter release probability. PNAS, 94(2), 719-723.
47. Tsodyks, M., Pawelzik, K., & Markram, H. (1998). Neural networks with dynamic synapses. Neural Computation, 10(4), 821-835.