From microactions to macrostructure and back: A structurational approach to the evolution of organizational networks

Human Communication Research

Volumn 37, Issue 3, 2011, Pages 404-433

  Whitbred, Robert ^a   Fonti, Fabio ^b   Steglich, Christian ^c   Contractor, Noshir ^d  

^a CLEVELAND STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b FREE UNIVERSITY OF BOZEN BOLZANO   (Italy)

^c UNIVERSITY OF GRONINGEN   (Netherlands)

^d NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 79958228222     PISSN: 03603989     EISSN: 14682958     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1468-2958.2011.01404.x     Document Type: Article

References (143)

1. Ahuja, G., Soda, G., & Zaheer, A. (2007). Call for papers: The genesis and dynamics of networks. Organization Science, 18, 1024-1025.
2. Albrecht, T. L., & Adelman, M. B. (1984). Social support and life stress: New directions for communication research. Human Communication Research, 11, 3-32.
3. Albrecht, T. L., & Bach, B. W. (1997). Communication in complex organizations: A relational approach. New York: Harcourt Brace.
4. Albrecht, T. L., & Hall, B. (1991). Relational and content differences between elites and outsiders in innovation networks. Human Communication Research, 17, 535-561.
5. Allen, T. J. (1978). Managing the flow of technology: Technology transfer and the dissemination of technological information within the R&D organization. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
6. Archer, M. S. (1982). Morphogenesis versus structuration: On combining structure and action. British Journal of Sociology, 35, 455-483.
7. Barley, S. R. (1986). Technology as an occasion for structuring: Evidence from observations of CT scanners and the social order of radiology departments. Administrative Science Quarterly, 31, 78-108.
8. Barley, S. R. (1990). The alignment of technology and structure through roles and networks. Administrative Science Quarterly, 35, 61-103.
9. Barley, S. R., & Tolbert, P. S. (1997). Institutionalization and structuration: Studying the links between action and institution. Organization Studies, 18, 93-117.
10. Barnett, G. (1988). Precise procedures for longitudinal network analysis. In G. Barnett & J. Woelfel (Eds.), Readings in the Galileo system: Theory, methods and applications (pp. 333-368). Dubuque, IA: Kendall/Hunt.
11. Bastien, D. T., McPhee, R. D., & Bolton, K. A. (1995). A study and extended theory of the structuration of climate. Communication Monographs, 62, 87-109.
12. Berger, C. R. (1987). Communicating under uncertainty. In M. E. Roloff & G. R. Miller (Eds.), Interpersonal processes: New directions in communication research (pp. 39-62). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
13. Berger, C. R., & Calabrese, R. J. (1975). Some explorations in interpersonal communication and beyond: Toward a developmental theory of interpersonal communication. Human Communication Research, 1, 99-112.
14. Black, L. J., Carlile, P. R., & Repenning, N. P. (2004). A dynamic theory of expertise and occupational boundaries in new technology implementation: Building on Barley's study of CT scanning. Administrative Science Quarterly, 49, 572-607.
15. Blau, P. M. (1964). Exchange and power in social life. New York: Wiley.
16. Boer, P., Huisman, M., Snijders, T. A. B., & Zeggelink, E. P. (2003). StOCNET: An open software system for the advanced statistical analysis of social networks, Version 1.4. Groningen, The Netherlands: ProGAMMA/ICS.
17. Borgatti, S. P., & Foster, P. C. (2003). The network paradigm in organizational research: A review and typology. Journal of Management, 29, 991-1013.
18. Bourdieu, P. (1977). Outline of a theory of practice. London: Cambridge University Press.
19. Bourdieu, P. (1990). The logic of practice. Cambridge, UK: Polity Press.
20. Brass, D. J. (1981). Structural relationships, job characteristics, and worker satisfaction and performance. Administrative Science Quarterly, 26, 331-348.
21. Brass, D. J. (1984). Being in the right place at the right time: A structural analysis of individual differences in an organization. Administrative Science Quarterly, 29, 518-539.
22. Brass, D. J. (1995). A social network perspective on human resources management. Research in Personnel and Human Resources Management, 13, 39-79.
23. Burns, T., & Stalker, G. M. (1961). The management of innovation. London: Tavistock.
24. Burrell, G., & Morgan, G. (1979). Sociological paradigms and organizational analysis. London: Heinemann.
25. Burt, R. S. (1992). Structural holes: The social structure of competition. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
26. Burt, R. S. (2005). Brokerage and closure: An introduction to social capital. Oxford, NY: Oxford University Press.
27. Carrington, P. J., Scott, J., & Wasserman, S. (2005). Models and methods in social network analysis. New York: Cambridge University Press.
28. Conrath, D. W. (1973). Communication environment and its relationship to organizational structure. Management Science, 20, 586-603.
29. Constant, D., Sproull, L., & Kiesler, S. (1996). The kindness of strangers: The usefulness of electronic weak ties for technical advice. Organization Science, 7, 119-135.
30. Contractor, N., & Eisenberg, E. M. (1990). Communication networks and new media in organizations. In J. Fulk & C. W. Steinfield (Eds.), Organizations and communication technology (pp. 145-174). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
31. Contractor, N., & Grant, S. (1996). The emergence of shared interpretations in organizations: A self-organizing perspective. In J. H. Watt & C. A. VanLear (Eds.), Dynamic patterns in communication processes (pp. 216-230). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
32. Contractor, N., Monge, P. R., & Leonardi, P. (2011). Multidimensional networks and the dynamics of sociomateriality: Bringing technology inside the network. International Journal of Communication, 5, 682-720.
33. Contractor, N., & Seibold, D. (1993). Theoretical frameworks for the study of structuring processes in group decision support systems: Adaptive structuration theory and self-organizing systems theory. Human Communication Research, 19, 528-563.
34. Contractor, N., Wasserman, S., & Faust, K. (2006). Testing multi-theoretical multilevel hypotheses about organizational networks: An analytic framework and empirical example. Academy of Management Review, 31, 681-703.
35. Contractor, N., & Whitbred, R. (1997). Decision development in work groups: A comparison of contingency and self-organizing systems perspectives. In G. Barnett & L. Thayer (Eds.), Organizational communication: Emerging perspectives (The renaissance in systems thinking) (Vol. 5, pp. 83-104). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
36. Corman, S. R. (1996). Cellular automata as models of unintended consequences of organizational communication. In J. H. Watt & C. A. VanLear (Eds.), Dynamic patterns in communication processes (pp. 191-212). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
37. Corman, S. R., & Scott, C. R. (1994). Perceived networks, activity, foci, and observable communication in social collectives. Communication Theory, 4, 171-190.
38. Crowston, K. (1997). A coordination theory approach to organizational process design. Organization Science, 8, 157-175.
39. Daft, R. L., & Weick, K. E. (1984). Toward a model of organizations as interpretation systems. Academy of Management Review, 9, 284-295.
40. Dekker, D., Franses, P. H., & Krackhardt, D. (2003). An equilibrium-correction model for dynamic network data. Journal of Mathematical Sociology, 27, 193-215.
41. DeSanctis, G., Lewis, H., & Desharnais, G. (1992). Using computing in quality team meetings. Journal of Management Information Systems, 8, 7-26.
42. DeSanctis, G., & Monge, P. R. (1999). Introduction to the special issue: Communication processes for virtual organizations. Organization Science, 10, 693-703.
43. DeSanctis, G., & Poole, M. S. (1994). Capturing the complexity in advanced technology use: Adaptive structuration theory. Organization Science, 5(2), 121-147.
44. DiMaggio, P., Hargittai, E., Neuman, W. R., & Robinson, J. P. (2001). Social implications of the Internet. Annual Review of Sociology, 27, 307-336.
45. Durham, F. D. (2002). Anti-communism, race, and structuration: Newspaper coverage of the labor and desegregation movements in the south, 1932-40 and 1953-61. Journalism and Communication Monographs, 4, 48-107.
46. Emerson, R. M. (1962). Power-dependence relations. American Sociological Review, 27, 31-41.
47. Emerson, R. M. (1972a). Exchange theory part I: A psychological basis for social exchange. In J. Berger, M. Zelditch, & B. Anderson (Eds.), Sociological theories in progress (Vol. 2, pp. 38-57). Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
48. Emerson, R. M. (1972b). Exchange theory part II: Exchange relations and networks. In J. Berger, M. Zelditch, & B. Anderson (Eds), Sociological theories in progress (Vol. 2, pp. 58-87). Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
49. Farace, R. V., Monge, P. R., & Russell, H. M. (1977). Communicating and organizing. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
50. Fararo, T. J., & Sunshine, M. H. (1964). A study of a biased friendship net. Syracuse, NY: Youth Development Center.
51. Feeley, T. H. (2000). Testing a communication network model of employee turnover based on centrality. Journal of Applied Communication Research, 28, 262-277.
52. Feeley, T. H., & Barnett, G. A. (1997). Predicting employee turnover from communication networks. Human Communication Research, 23, 370-387.
53. Feeley, T. H., Hwang, J., & Barnett, G. A. (2008). Predicting employee turnover from friendship and peer social networks. Journal of Applied Communication Research, 36, 56-73.
54. Feld, S. L. (1981). The focused organization of social ties. American Journal of Sociology, 86, 1015-1035.
55. Festinger, L., Schachter, S., & Back, K. (1950). Social pressures in informal groups: A study of a housing project. New York: Harper and Row.
56. Galaskiewicz, J. (2007). Has a network theory of organizational behavior lived up to its promises? Management and Organization Review, 3, 1-18.
57. Giddens, A. (1976). New rules of sociological method. New York: Basic Books.
58. Giddens, A. (1979). Central problems in social theory: Action, structure and contradiction in social analysis. Berkeley: University of California Press.
59. Giddens, A. (1984). The constitution of society. Berkeley: University of California Press.
60. Granovetter, M. (1985). Economic action and social structure: The problem of embeddedness. American Journal of Sociology, 91, 481-510.
61. Granovetter, M. (1992). Problems of explanations in economic sociology. In N. Nohria & R. G. Eccles (Eds.), Networks as organizations: Structure, form and action (pp. 25-66). Boston: Harvard Business School Press.
62. Haines, V. A. (1988). Social network analysis, structuration theory and the holism-individualism debate. Social Networks, 10, 157-182.
63. Halone, K. K. (2008). The structuration of racialized sport organizing. Journal of Communication Inquiry, 32, 22-42.
64. Haythornthwaite, C., & Wellman, B. (Eds.). (2001). The Internet in everyday life. American Behavioral Scientist, 45 (whole issue).
65. Heider, F. (1958). The psychology of interpersonal relations. New York: Wiley.
66. Hinds, P., & Kiesler, S. (1995). Communication across boundaries: Work, structure, and use of communication technologies in a large organization. Organization Science, 6, 373-393.
67. Hoffman, M. F., & Cowan, R. L. (2010). Be careful what you ask for: Structuration theory and work/life accommodation. Communication Studies, 61, 205-223.
68. Holland, P. W., & Leinhardt, S. (1972). The statistical analysis of local structure in social networks. In D. R. Heise (Ed.), Sociological methodology (pp. 1-45). San Francisco: Jossey Bass.
69. Homans, G. C. (1950). The human group. New York: Harcourt Brace.
70. Homans, G. C. (1974). Social behavior: Its elementary forms. New York: Harcourt Brace.
71. Jablin, F. M. (1979). Superior-subordinate communication: The state of the art. Psychological Bulletin, 86, 1201-1222.
72. Jablin, F. M. (1987). Formal organization structure. In F. M. Jablin, L. L. Putnam, K. H. Roberts, & L. W. Porter (Eds.), Handbook of organizational communication (pp. 389-419). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
73. Johnson, J. D. (1992). Approaches to organizational communication structure. Journal of Business Research, 25, 99-113.
74. Kirby, E. L., & Krone, K. J. (2002). "The policy exists, but you can't really use it": Communication and the structuration of work-family policies. Journal of Applied Communication Research, 30, 50-77.
75. Krackhardt, D. (1988). Predicting with networks: Nonparametric multiple-regression analysis of dyadic data. Social Networks, 10, 359-381.
76. Krackhardt, D., & Porter, L. (1985). When friends leave: A structural analysis of the relationship between turnover and stayer's attitudes. Administrative Science Quarterly, 30, 242-261.
77. Krackhardt, D., & Porter, L. (1986). The snowball effect: Turnover embedded in communication networks. Journal of Applied Psychology, 71, 50-55.
78. Kraut, R. E., Egido, C., & Galegher, J. (1990). Patterns of contact and communication in scientific research collaborations. In J. Galegher, R. E. Kraut, & C. Egido (Eds.), Intellectual teamwork: Social and technological foundations of cooperative work (pp. 149-192). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
79. Lambert, B. L. (2001). Automatic content analysis of pharmacist-patient interactions using the Theme Machine document clustering system. In M. West (Ed.), Progress in communication sciences, Vol. 17: Applications of computer content analysis (pp. 103-122). New York: Ablex.
80. Lawrence, P. R., & Lorsch, J. W. (1967). Organization and environment: Managing differentiation and integration. Boston: Harvard University Press.
81. Leonardi, P. M. (2009). Why do people reject new technologies and stymie organizational changes of which they are in favor? Exploring misalignments between social interactions and materiality. Human Communication Research, 35, 975-984.
82. Leonardi, P. M., & Barley, S. R. (2008). Materiality and change: Challenges to building better theory about technology and organizing. Information and Organization, 18, 159-176.
83. Leonardi, P. M., & Barley, S. R. (2010). What's under construction here: Social action, materiality, and power in constructivist studies of technology and organizing. Academy of Management Annals, 4, 1-51.
84. Levitt, R. E., Cohen, G. P., Kunz, J. C., Nass, C. I., Christiansen, T., & Jin, T. (1994). The virtual design team: Studying how organization structure and information processing tools affect team performance. In K. M. Carley & M. Prietula (Eds.), Computational organizational theory (pp. 1-18). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
85. Lin, Z. (1994). A theoretical evaluation of measures of organizational design: Interrelationship and performance predictability. In K. M. Carley & M. Prietula (Eds.), Computational organizational theory (pp. 113-159). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
86. Malone, T. W., & Crowston, K. (1994). The interdisciplinary study of coordination. ACM Computational Surveys, 26, 87-119.
87. McClelland, D. C. (1961). The achieving society. Princeton, NJ: Van Nostrand.
88. McPhee, R. D., & Corman, S. R. (1995). An activity-based theory of communication networks in organizations, applied to the case of a church. Communication Monographs, 62, 132-151.
89. McPherson, J. M., Smith-Lovin, L., & Cook, J. M. (2001). Birds of a feather: Homophily in social networks. Annual Review of Sociology, 27, 415-444.
90. Mintzberg, H. (1979). The structuring of organizations. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
91. Monge, P. R., & Contractor, N. (2003). Theories of communication networks. New York: Oxford University Press.
92. Monge, P. R., & Eisenberg, E. M. (1987). Emergent communication networks. In F. M. Jablin, L. L. Putnam, K. H. Roberts, & L. W. Porter (Eds.), Handbook of organizational communication (pp. 304-342). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
93. Monge, P. R., Rothman, L. W., Eisenberg, E. M., Miller, K. I., & Kirste, K. K. (1985). The dynamics of organizational proximity. Management Science, 31, 1129-1141.
94. O'Mahony, S., & Barley, S. R. (1999). Do digital telecommunications affect work and organization? The state of our knowledge. Research in Organizational Behavior, 21, 125-161.
95. Orlikowski, W. J. (2000). Using technology and constituting structures. Organizational Science, 3, 404-428.
96. Orlikowski, W. J. (2007). Sociomaterial practices: Exploring technology at work. Organization Studies, 28, 1435-1448.
97. Orlikowski, W. J., & Robey, D. (1991). Information technology and the structuring of organizations. Information Systems Research, 2, 143-169.
98. Orlikowski, W. J., & Scott, S. V. (2008). Sociomateriality: Challenging the separation of technology, work and organization. Academy of Management Annals, 2, 433-474.
99. Pentland, B. T., & Feldman, M. S. (2007). Narrative networks: Patterns of technology and organization. Organization Science, 18, 781-795.
100. Perrow, C. (1967). A framework for the comparative analysis of organizations. American Sociological Review, 32, 194-208.
101. Perrow, C. (1986). Complex organizations. New York: McGraw-Hill.
102. Pfeffer, J. (1982). Organizations and organization theory. Marshfield, MA: Pitman Publishing.
103. Pollock, T., Whitbred, R., & Contractor, N. (2001). Social information processing and job characteristics: A simultaneous test of two theories with implications for job satisfaction. Human Communication Research, 26, 264-291.
104. Poole, M. S. (1994). The structuring of organizational climates. In L. Thayer & G. Barnett (Eds.), Organizational communication IV (pp. 74-113). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
105. Poole, M. S. (1997). A turn of the wheel: The case for renewal of systems inquiry in organizational communication research. In G. Barnett & L. Thayer (Eds.), Organization communication: Emerging perspectives V-The renaissance in systems thinking (pp. 47-63). Greenwich, CT: Ablex.
106. Poole, M. S., & DeSanctis, G. (1992). Microlevel structuration in computer-supported group decision-making. Human Communication Research, 91, 5-49.
107. Poole, M. S., & McPhee, R. D. (2005). Structuration theory. In S. May & D. Mumby (Eds.), Engaging organizational communication theory and research: Multiple perspectives (pp. 171-195). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
108. Poole, M. S., Seibold, D. R., & McPhee, R. D. (1986). Group decision-making as a structurational process. Quarterly Journal of Speech, 71, 74-102.
109. Powell, W. W., White, D. R., Koput, K. W., & Owen-Smith, J. (2005). Network dynamics and field evolution: The growth of interorganizational collaboration in the life sciences. American Journal of Sociology, 11, 1132-1205.
110. Pozzebon, M., & Pinsonneault, A. (2005). Challenges in conducting empirical work using structuration theory: Learning from IT research. Organizational Studies, 26, 1353-1376.
111. Prentice, C. M. (2008). The assimilation of in-laws: The impact of newcomers on the communication routines of families. Journal of Applied Communication Research, 36, 74-97.
112. Rapoport, A. (1953). Spread of information through a population with sociostructural bias: Assumption of transitivity. Bulletin of Mathematical Biophysics, 15, 523-533.
113. Rapoport, A. (1963). Mathematical models of social interaction. In R. D. Luce, R. R. Bush, & E. Galanter (Eds.), Handbook of mathematical psychology (Vol. 2, pp. 493-579). New York: Wiley.
114. Rice, R. E. (1993). Using network concepts to clarify sources and mechanisms of social influence. In G. Barnett & J. W. Richards (Eds.), Advances in communication network analysis (pp. 43-52). Norwood, MA: Ablex.
115. Rice, R. E. (1994). Network analysis and computer-mediated communication systems. In S. Wasserman & J. Galaskiewicz (Eds.), Advances in social network analysis: Research in the social and behavioral sciences (pp. 167-206). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
116. Rogers, E. M., & Agarwala-Rogers, R. (1976). Communication in organizations. New York: Free Press.
117. Rogers, E. M., & Kincaid, D. L. (1981). Communication networks: Towards a new paradigm for research. New York: Free Press.
118. Salancik, G. R. (1995). Wanted: A good network theory of organization. Administrative Science Quarterly, 40, 345-349.
119. Schweinberger, M. (2004). Statistical modeling of network dynamics given panel data: Goodness-of-fit tests. Unpublished manuscript, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.
120. Seibold, D. R., & Meyers, R. A. (2007). Group argument: A structuration perspective and research program. Small Group Communication Research, 38, 312-336.
121. Snijders, T. A. B. (2001). The statistical evaluation of social network dynamics. In E. Sobel & M. P. Becker (Eds.), Sociological methodology (pp. 361-395). Boston: Basil Blackwell.
122. Snijders, T. A. B. (2005). Models for longitudinal network data. In P. J. Carrington, J. Scott, & S. Wasserman (Eds.), Models and methods in social network analysis (pp. 215-247). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
123. Snijders, T. A. B., Steglich, C., Schweinberger, M., & Huisman, M. (2007). Manual for SIENA, version 3.1. Groningen, The Netherlands: ICS.
124. Snijders, T. A. B., van de Bunt, G. G., & Steglich, C. E. G. (2010). Introduction to stochastic actor-based models for network dynamics. Social Networks, 32, 44-60.
125. Staber, U., & Sydow, J. (2002). Organizational adaptive capacity: A structuration perspective. Journal of Management Inquiry, 11, 408-424.
126. Stohl, C. (1995). Organizational communication: Connectedness in action. In M. Knapp & J. Daly (Eds.), Interpersonal communication texts (Vol. 5). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
127. Su, C., Huang, M., & Contractor, N. (2010). Understanding the structures, antecedents, and outcomes of organizational learning and knowledge transfer: A multi-theoretical and multilevel network analysis. European Journal of International Management, 4, 576-601.
128. Sydow, J., & Windeler, A. (1998). Organizing and evaluating interfirm networks: A structurationist perspective on network processes and effectiveness. Organization Science, 9, 265-284.
129. Thompson, J. D. (1967). Organizations in action. New York: McGraw-Hill.
130. Vallaster, C., & de Chernatony, L. (2006). Internal branding and structuration: The role of leadership. European Journal of Marketing, 40, 761-784.
131. Van de Bunt, G., & Groenewegen, P. (2007). An actor-oriented dynamic approach network approach: The case of interorganizational network evolution. Organizational Research Methods, 10, 463-482.
132. Van de Ven, A. H., & Ferry, D. L. (1980). Measuring and assessing organizations. New York: Wiley.
133. Van den Bulte, C., & Moenaert, R. K. (1997). The effects of R&D team collocation on communication patterns among R&D marketing and manufacturing. Management Science, 44, S1-S18.
134. Wasserman, S., & Faust, K. (1994). Social network analysis: Methods and applications. New York: Cambridge University Press.
135. Wellman, B., Balaff, J., Dimitrova, D., Garton, L., Gulia, M., & Haythornthwaite, C. (1996). Computer networks as social networks: Collaborative work, telework, and virtual community. Annual Review of Sociology, 22, 213-238.
136. Whitbred, R. (2008). Social support and job satisfaction: The impact of relational maintenance obligations in organizations. Business Research Yearbook, 15, 736-741.
137. Witmer, D. F. (1997). Communication and recovery: Structuration as an ontological approach to organizational culture. Communication Monographs, 64, 324-341.
138. Yates, J. (1997). Using Giddens' structuration theory to inform business history. Business and Economic History, 26, 159-183.
139. Yates, J., & Orlikowski, W. J. (1992). Genres of organizational communication: A structurational approach to studying communication and media. Academy of Management Review, 17, 299-326.
140. Yates, J., & Orlikowski, W. J. (2002). Genre systems: Structuring interaction through communicative norms. Journal of Business Communication, 39, 13-35.
141. Yates, J., Orlikowski, W. J., & Okamura, K. (1999). Explicit and implicit structuring of genres in electronic communication: Reinforcement and change of social interaction. Organization Science, 10, 83-103.
142. Zack, M. H., & McKenney, J. L. (1995). Social context and interaction in ongoing computer-supported management groups. Organization Science, 8, 109-125.
143. Zahn, G. L. (1991). Face-to-face communication in an office setting: The effects of position, proximity, and exposure. Communication Research, 18, 737-754.