An actor-oriented dynamic network approach: The case of interorganizational network evolution

Organizational Research Methods

Volumn 10, Issue 3, 2007, Pages 463-482

  Van De Bunt, Gerhard G ^a   Groenewegen, Peter ^a  

^a VU UNIVERSITY AMSTERDAM   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Actor oriented models; Empirical test; Interfirm network dynamics

Indexed keywords

EID: 34250378787     PISSN: 10944281     EISSN: 15527425     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/1094428107300203     Document Type: Article

References (52)

1. Agresti, A. (2002). Categorical data analysis. New York: Wiley.
2. Ahuja, G. (2000). The duality of collaboration: Inducements and opportunities in the formation of interfirm linkages. Strategic Management Journal, 21 (3). 317-343.
3. Anderson, C., Wasserman, S.S., & Crouch, B. (1999). A p* primer: Logit models for social networks. Social Networks, 21 (1). 37-66.
4. Baerveldt, C., & Snijders, T.A.B. (1994). Influences on and from the segmentation of networks: Hypotheses and tests. Social Networks, 16 (3). 213-232.
5. Borgatti, S.P., & Foster, P.C. (2003). The network paradigm in organizational research: A review and typology. Journal of Management, 29 (6). 991-1013.
6. Brass, D.J., Galaskiewicz, J., Greve, H.R., & Tsai, W. (2004). Taking stock of networks and organizations: A multilevel perspective. Academy of Management Journal, 47 (6). 795-819.
7. Chen, H.-F. (2002). Stochastic approximation and its applications. Dordrecht, South Africa: Kluwer.
8. Chung, S., Singh, H., & Lee, K. (2000). Complementarity, status similarity and social capital as drivers of alliance formation. Strategic Management Journal, 21 (1). 1-22.
9. Degenne, A., & Forś, M. (1999). Introducing social networks. London: Sage.
10. Doreian, P., & Stokman, F. N. (Eds.). (1996). Evolution of social networks: Part I. Special double issue of Journal of Mathematical Sociology, 21 ( 1, 2 ).
11. Doreian, P., & Stokman, F. N. (Eds.). (2003). Evolution of social networks: Part III. Special double issue of Journal of Mathematical Sociology, 27 ( 2, 3 ).
12. Ebers, M. (1999). The dynamics of inter-organizational relationships. In S. B. Andrews & D. Knoke (Eds.), Research in the sociology of organizations 6: Networks in and around organizations (pp. 31-56). Stamford, CT: JAI Press.
13. Gulati, R. (1995). Social structure and alliance formation patterns: A longitudinal analysis. Administrative Science Quarterly, 40 (4). 619-652.
14. Gulati, R. (1999). Network location and learning: The influence of network resources and firm capabilities on alliance formation. Strategic Management Journal, 20 (5). 397-420.
15. Gulati, R., & Gargiulo, M. (1999). Where do interorganizational networks come from ? American Journal of Sociology, 104 (5). 1439-1493.
16. Hagedoorn, J. (2006). Understanding the cross-level embeddedness of interfirm partnership formation. Academy of Management Review, 31 (3). 670-680.
17. Holland, P.W., & Leinhardt, S. (1977). A dynamic model for social networks. Journal of Mathematical Sociology, 5 (1). 5-20.
18. Holland, P.W., & Leinhardt, S. (1981). An exponential family of probability distributions for directed graphs. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 76, 33-50.
19. Jones, P.B.C. (2000). The commercialization of bioinformatics. Electronic Journal of Biotechnology, 3 (2). 20.
20. Leenders, R.T.A.J. (1995). Structure and influence: Statistical models for the dynamics of actor attributes, network structure and their interdependence. Amsterdam: Thesis.
21. Leenders, R.T.A.J. (1996). Models of network dynamics: A Markovian framework. Journal of Mathematical Sociology, 20 (1). 1-21.
22. Kogut, B. (2000). The network as knowledge: Generative rules and the emergence of structure. Strategic Management Journal, 21 (3). 405-425.
23. Macy, M.W., & Willer, R. (2002). From factors to actors: Computational sociology and agent-based modeling. Annual Review of Sociology, 28 (1). 143-166.
24. Maddala, G.S. (1983). Limited-dependent and qualitative variables in econometrics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
25. McFadden, D. (1973). Conditional logit analysis of qualitative choice behavior. In P. Zaremba (Ed.), Frontiers in econometrics (pp. 105-142). New York: Academic Press.
26. Powell, W.W. (1998). Learning from collaboration: Knowledge and networks in the biotechnology and pharmaceutical industries. California Management Review, 40 (3). 228-240.
27. Powell, W.W., Koput, K.W., Smith-Doerr, L., & Owen-Smith, J. (1999). Network position and firm performance: Organizational returns to collaboration in the biotechnology industry. In S. B. Andrews & D. Knoke (Eds.), Research in the sociology of organizations 6: Networks in and around organizations (pp. 129-159). Stamford, CT: JAI Press.
28. Reed, J. (2000). Trends in commercial biotechnology. New York: Oscar Gruss & Son.
29. Schweinberger, M. (2005). Statistical modeling of network panel data: Goodness-of-fit. (Submitted, draft version downloadable from http://ppswmm.ppsw.rug.nl/~schweinb/ )
30. Scott, J. (2000). Social network analysis: A handbook. London: Sage.
31. Snijders, T.A.B. (1995). Methods for longitudinal social network data: Review and Markov process models. In E.-M. Tiit, T. Kollo, & H. Niemi (Eds.), New trends in probability and statistics 3: Multivariate statistics and matrices in statistics (pp. 211-227). Vilnius / Utrecht: Tev/Vsp.
32. Snijders, T.A.B. (1996). Stochastic actor-oriented models for network chance. Journal of Mathematical Sociology, 21 (2). 149-172.
33. Snijders, T.A.B. (2001). The statistical evaluation of social network dynamics. In M. E. Sobel & M. P. Becker (Eds.), Sociological methodology - 2001 (pp. 361-395). London: Basil Blackwell.
34. Snijders, T.A.B. (2004). Explained variation in dynamic network models. Math́matiques, Informatique et Sciences Humaines/Mathematics and Social Sciences, 42 (168). 31-41.
35. Snijders, T.A.B. (2005). Models for longitudinal network data. In P. Carrington, J. Scott, & S. Wasserman (Eds.), Models and methods in social network analysis (pp. 215-247). New York: Cambridge University Press.
36. Snijders, T.A.B., Steglich, C.E.G., & Schweinberger, M. (2006). Modeling the co-evolution of networks and behavior. In K. van Montfort, H. Oud, & A. Satorra (Eds.), Longitudinal models in the behavioral and related sciences. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
37. Snijders, T.A.B., Steglich, C., Schweinberger, M., & Huisman, M. (2005). Manual for SIENA version 2.1 Groningen, Netherlands: ICS/Department of Sociology.
38. Snijders, T.A.B., & Van Duijn, M.A.J. (1997). Simulation for statistical inference in dynamic network models. In R. R. Conte, Hegselmann, & P. Terno (Eds.), Simulating social phenomena (pp. 493-512). Berlin, Germany: Springer.
39. Snijders, T.A.B., & Van Duijn, M.A.J. (2002). Conditional maximum likelihood estimation under various specifications of exponential random graph models. In J. Hagberg (Ed.), Contributions to social network analysis, information theory, and others topics in statistics: A festschrift in honour of Ove Frank (pp. 117-134). Stockholm: University of Stockholm Press.
40. Stokman, F. N., & Doreian, P. (Eds.). (2001). Evolution of social networks: Part II. Special issue of Journal of Mathematical Sociology, 23 ( 1 ).
41. Van de Bunt, G.G. (1999). Friends by choice: An actor-oriented statistical network model for friendship networks through time. Amsterdam: Thela Thesis.
42. Van de Bunt, G.G., Van Duijn, M.A.J. & Snijders, T.A.B. (1999). Friendship networks through time: An actor-oriented dynamic statistical network model, Computational and Mathematical Organization Theory, 5 (2). 167-192.
43. Van de Bunt, G.G., Wittek, R.P.M., & De Klepper, M.C. (2005). The evolution of intra-organizational trust networks: The case of a German paper factory: An empirical test of six trust mechanisms. International Sociology, 20 (3). 339-370.
44. Van Duijn, M.A.J., Snijders, T.A.B., & Zijlstra, B.J.H. (2004). P2: A random effects model with covariates for directed graphs. Statistica Neerlandica, 58 (2). 234-254.
45. Van Duijn, M.A.J., Zeggelink, E.P.H., Huisman, M., Stokman, F.N., & Wasseur, F.W. (2003). Evolution of sociology freshmen into a friendship network. Social Networks, 27 (2). 153-191.
46. Wasserman, S.S. (1980). Analyzing social networks as stochastic processes. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 75 (2). 280-294.
47. Wasserman, S.S. (1987). Conformity of two sociometric relations. Psychometrika, 52 (1). 3-18.
48. Wasserman, S.S., & Faust, K. (1994). Social network analysis: Methods and applications. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
49. Wasserman, S.S., & Iacobucci, D. (1988). Sequential social network data. Psychometrika, 53 (2). 261-282.
50. Wickelgren, I. (1999). Mining the genome for drugs. Science, 285, 998-1001.
51. Zeggelink, E.P.H. (1993). Strangers into friends: The evolution of friendship networks using an individual oriented modeling approach. Amsterdam: Thesis.
52. Zijlstra, B.J.H., Van Duijn, M.A.J., & Snijders, T.A.B. (2006). The multilevel p2 model - A random effects model for the analysis of multiple social networks. Methodology, 2, 42-47.