Enhancing genomic learning through tabletop interaction

Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems - Proceedings

Volumn , Issue , 2011, Pages 2817-2826

  Shaer, Orit ^a   Strait, Megan ^b   Valdes, Consuelo ^a   Feng, Taili ^a   Lintz, Michael ^c   Wang, Heidi ^a  

^a WELLESLEY COLLEGE   (United States)

^b TUFTS UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c FRANKLIN W OLIN COLLEGE OF ENGINEERING   (United States)

Author keywords

Collaborative learning; Multi touch; Tabletop interaction

Indexed keywords

GENES; HUMAN COMPUTER INTERACTION;

BIOINFORMATIC TOOLS; COLLABORATIVE LEARNING; CONDITION; GENOMICS; INQUIRY-BASED LEARNING; MULTI-TOUCH; STUDENT LEARNING; STUDENT PERFORMANCE; TABLETOP INTERACTION; TABLETOP INTERFACES;

GENOME;

EID: 79958136459     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1145/1978942.1979361     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (33)

1. Antle, A. N., Droumeva, M., and Ha, D. Hands on what? Comparing children's mouse-based and tangible-based interaction. Proc. of IDC 2009. ACM Press (2009), 80-88.
2. Bolchini, D., Finkelstein, A., Perrone, V., Nagl, S. Better bioinformatics through usability analysis, Bioinformatics, 25(3) (2009), 406-12.
3. Fleck, R., Rogers, Y., Yuill, N., Marshall, P., Carr, A., Rick, J., and Bonnett, V. Actions speak loudly with words: unpacking collaboration around the table. Proc. of Interactive Tabletops and Surfaces, (2009).
4. Fjeld, M., Fredriksson, J., Ejdestig, M., Duca, F., Bötschi, K., Voegtli, B., and Juchli, P. Tangible user interface for chemistry education: comparative evaluation and re-design. Proc. of Human F actors in C omputing Systems, ACM Press (2007).
5. Gillet, A., Sanner, M., Stoffler, D., Goodsell, D., and Olson, A. Augmented Reality with Tangible AutoFabricated Models for Molecular Biology Applications. Proc. of Visualization 2004, IEEE (2004).
6. Gläser, T., Franke, J., Wintergerst, G., and Jagodzinski, R. Chemieraum: tangible chemistry in exhibition space. Proc. of TEI 2009, ACM (2009), 285-288.
7. Harris, A., Rick, J. Bonnett, V., Yuill, N., Fleck, R., Marshall, P., and Rogers, Y. Around the table: Are multiple-touch surfaces better than single-touch for children's collaborative interactions? Proc. of CSCL ACM Press (2009), 335-344.
8. Hart, S.G., and Stavenland, L.E. Development of NASA-TLX (Task Load Index): Results of empirical and theoretical research, in Human Mental Workload, Elsevier (1988), 139-183.
9. Horn, M.S., Tobiasz, M., Shen, C. Visualizing Biodiversity with Voronoi Treemaps. In Proc. Sixth International Symposium on Voronoi Diagrams in Science and Engineering (2009).
10. Hornecker, E., Marshall, P., Dalton, N.S., Rogers, Y. Collaboration and Interference: Awareness with Mice or Touch Input, Proc. of CSCW, ACM Press (2008).
11. Jacob, R. J., Girouard, A., Hirshfield, L. M., Horn, M. S., Shaer, O., Solovey, E. T., and Zigelbaum, J. Reality-based interaction: a framework for post-WIMP interfaces. Proc. of Human F actors in Computing Systems, ACM Press (2008).
12. Kirk, D., A. Sellen, S. Taylor, N. Villar, and S. Izadi. Putting the physical into the digital: Issues in designing hybrid interactive surfaces. Proc. of HCI, ACM Press (2009), 35-44.
13. Kirschner, F., Paas, F., and Kirschner, P.A. A cognitive load approach to collaborative learning: United brains from complex learning. E ducational Psychology Review, (2009) 21, 31-42.
14. Klemmer, S. R., Hartmann, B., and Takayama, L. How bodies matter: five themes for interaction design. Proc. of DIS 2006, ACM Press (2006).
15. Jacob, R. J., Girouard, A., Hirshfield, L. M., Horn, M. S., Shaer, O., Solovey, E. T., and Zigelbaum, J. Reality-based interaction: a framework for post-WIMP interfaces. Proc. Human F actors in Computing Systems (2008).
16. Meier, A., Spada, H., & Rummel, N. A rating scheme for assessing the quality of computer-supported collaboration processes. International Journal of Computer- Supported Collaborative Learning (2007), 2, 63-86.
17. Mirel, B. Supporting cognition in systems biology analysis: findings on users' processes and design implications, J Biomed D iscov Collab (2005), 27(2).
18. Morris, M.R., Brush, A.J.B., and Meyers, B. Reading revisited: evaluating the usability of digital display Surfaces for Active Reading Tasks. Proc. of IEEE Tabletop (2007), 79-86.
19. Ochs, E., Jacoby, S., and Gonzales, P. Interpretive journeys: how physicists talk and travel through graphic space. Configurations, (1994) 2, 151-171.
20. Patten, J., and Ishii, H. A comparison of spatial organization strategies in graphical and tangible user interfaces, Proc. of D esigning Augmented Reality E nvironments (2000), 41-50.
21. Paul, C.A. and Quinan, G. Behavior, neuroanatomy, genomics: what can we learn from mouse mutants?, Proc. of Workshop on Teaching Big Sciences at Small Colleges, (2009).
22. Piper, A.M., Hollan, J. Tabletop displays for small group study: affordances of paper and digital materials. Proc. of CHI 2009, ACM Press (2009).
23. Rogers, Y. and Lindley, S. Collaborating around large interactive displays: which way is best to meet? Interacting with Computers, 2004.
24. Roth, W. M. Gestures: their role in teaching and learning. Review of Educational Research, (2001) 71, 365-392.
25. Ryall, K., Forlines, C., Shen, C., Morris, M.R. Exploring the effects of group size and table size on interactions with tabletop shared-display groupware. Proc. of CSCW 2004. ACM Press (2004), 284-293. (Pubitemid 40928527)
26. Rubio, S., Diaz, E., Martin J., and Puente, J.M. Evaluation of subjective mental workload: a comparison of SWAT, NASA-TLX and workload profile methods, Appl. Psychol. Int. Rev. (2004) 53, 61-86. (Pubitemid 38169984)
27. Saraiya, P. and North, C. and Duca, K. An insight-based methodology for evaluating bioinformatics visualizations, Visualization and Computer Graphics, (2005) 11(4), 443-456. (Pubitemid 41049906)
28. Schkolne, S., Ishii, H., Schroder, P. Immersive design of DNA molecules with a tangible interface, Visualization, IEEE (2004), 227-234. (Pubitemid 40497929)
29. Shaer, O., Kol, G., Strait, M., Fan, C., Grevet, C., and Elfenbein, S. G-nome surfer: a tabletop interface for collaborative exploration of genomic data. Proc. of Human F actors in Computing Systems. ACM Press (2010).
30. Singer, S.R., Hilton M.L., and Schweingruber, H.A. America's lab report: investigations in high School science, National Research Council (2005).
31. Tanner, K., Chatman, L. S., and Allen, D. Cooperative learning in the science classroom - beyond students working in groups. Cell Biol. Educ. (2003) 2, 1.
32. Teaching big science at small colleges: genomics collaboration. http://serc.carleton.edu/genomics/
33. Woolgar, S. Time and documents in researcher interaction: some ways of making out what is happening in experimental science. Human Studies 10, 2-3(1988).