Multi-fidelity optimization for sheet metal forming process

Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization

Volumn 44, Issue 1, 2011, Pages 111-124

  Sun, Guangyong ^a,b   Li, Guangyao ^a   Zhou, Shiwei ^b   Xu, Wei ^c   Yang, Xujing ^a   Li, Qing ^b  

^a HUNAN UNIVERSITY   (China)

^b UNIVERSITY OF SYDNEY   (Australia)

^c UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY SYDNEY   (Australia)

Author keywords

Drawbead design; Moving least squares (MLS); Multi fidelity optimization; Multiobjective optimization; Response surface method (RSM); Sheet metal forming

Indexed keywords

DRAWBEAD DESIGN; MOVING LEAST SQUARES; MULTI OBJECTIVE; MULTI-FIDELITY OPTIMIZATION; RESPONSE SURFACE METHOD; SHEET-METAL FORMING;

COMPUTATIONAL EFFICIENCY; DESIGN; DRAWING (FORMING); FINITE ELEMENT METHOD; LEAST SQUARES APPROXIMATIONS; METAL FORMING; SHEET METAL; SURFACE PROPERTIES;

MULTIOBJECTIVE OPTIMIZATION;

EID: 79958110874     PISSN: 1615147X     EISSN: 16151488     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s00158-010-0596-5     Document Type: Article

References (43)

1. SA Asgari M Pereira BF Rolfe M Dingle PD Hodgson 2008 Statistical analysis of finite element modeling in sheet metal forming and springback analysis J Mater Process Technol 203 1-3 129 136 10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2007.09. 073 (Pubitemid 351697684)
2. M Azaouzi H Naceur A Delameziere JL Batoz S Belouettar 2008 An Heuristic Optimization Algorithm for the blank shape design of high precision metallic parts obtained by a particular stamping process Finite Elem Anal Des 44 14 842 850 10.1016/j.finel.2008.06.008
3. T Belytschko Y Krongauz D Organ M Fleming P Krysl 1996 Meshless methods: An overview and recent developments Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 139 1-4 3 47 0891.73075 10.1016/S0045-7825(96)01078-X (Pubitemid 126382692)
4. P Breitkopf H Naceur A Rassineux P Villon 2005 Moving least squares response surface approximation: Formulation and metal forming applications Comput Struct 83 17-18 1411 1428 10.1016/j.compstruc.2004.07.011 (Pubitemid 40574504)
5. S Chengzhi C Guanlong L Zhongqin 2005 Determining the optimum variable blank-holder forces using adaptive response surface methodology (ARSM) Int J Adv Manuf Tech 26 1-2 23 29 10.1007/s00170-003-1979-1 (Pubitemid 40963659)
6. Choi KK, Youn BD, Yang RJ (2001) Moving least square method for reliability-based design optimization. In: Proceedings of the 4th World Congress of Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization, Dalian
7. CH Chuang RJ Yang G Li K Mallela P Pothuraju 2008 Multidisciplinary design optimization on vehicle tailor rolled blank design Struct Multidiscipl Optim 35 6 551 560 10.1007/s00158-007-0152-0 (Pubitemid 351601294)
8. YQ Guo JL Batoz H Naceur S Bouabdallah F Mercier O Barlet 2000 Recent developments on the analysis and optimum design of sheet metal forming parts using a simplified inverse approach Comput Struct 78 133 148 10.1016/S0045-7949(00)00095-X
9. R Hino F Yoshida VV Toropov 2006 Optimum blank design for sheet metal forming based on the interaction of high- and low-fidelity FE models Arch Appl Mech 75 10-12 679 691 1168.74420 10.1007/s00419-006-0047-3 (Pubitemid 44495632)
10. A Hirahara R Hino F Yoshida VV Toropov 2008 Numerical optimization of sheet metal forming process using new fracture criterion Int J Mod Phys B 22 31-32 5692 5698 10.1142/S0217979208051029
11. W Hu LG Yao ZZ Hua 2008 Optimization of sheet metal forming processes by adaptive response surface based on intelligent sampling method J Mater Process Technol 197 1-3 77 88 10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2007.06.018 (Pubitemid 350251137)
12. Y Huang ZY Lo R Du 2006 Minimization of the thickness variation in multi-step sheet metal stamping J Mater Process Technol 177 1-3 84 86 10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2006.03.225 (Pubitemid 44038209)
13. J Jakumeit M Herdy M Nitsche 2005 Parameter optimization of the sheet metal forming process using an iterative parallel Kriging algorithm Struct Multidiscipl Optim 29 6 498 507 10.1007/s00158-004-0455-3 (Pubitemid 40878863)
14. T Jansson L Nilsson M Redhe 2003 Using surrogate models and response surfaces in structural optimization - with application to crashworthiness design and sheet metal forming Struct Multidiscipl Optim 25 2 129 140 10.1007/s00158-002-0279-y
15. T Jansson A Andersson L Nilsson 2005 Optimization of draw-in for an automotive sheet metal part An evaluation using surrogate models and response surfaces J Mater Process Technol 159 3 426 434 10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2004.06.011 (Pubitemid 40072612)
16. O Kayabasi B Ekici 2007 Automated design methodology for automobile side panel die using an effective optimization approach Mater Des 28 10 2665 2672 10.1016/j.matdes.2006.10.011 (Pubitemid 47010274)
17. HS Kim M Koc J Ni 2007 A hybrid multi-fidelity approach to the optimal design of warm forming processes using a knowledge-based artificial neural network Int J Mach Tools Manuf 47 2 211 222 10.1016/j.ijmachtools.2006.04.007 (Pubitemid 44755345)
18. DL Knill AA Giunta CA Baker B Grossman WH Mason RT Haftka LT Watson 1999 Response surface models combining linear and Euler aerodynamics for supersonic transport design J Aircr 36 1 75 86 10.2514/2.2415
19. S Kok N Stander 1999 Optimization of a sheet metal forming process using successive multipoint approximations Struct Optim 18 4 277 295 10.1007/BF01223312 (Pubitemid 30530114)
20. XT Liao Q Li XJ Yang WG Zhang W Li 2008 Multiobjective optimization for crash safety design of vehicles using stepwise regression model Struct Multidiscipl Optim 35 6 561 569 10.1007/s00158-007-0163-x
21. L Liu WX Liu DA Cartes 2008 Particle swarm optimization-based parameter identification applied to permanent magnet synchronous motors Eng Appl Artif Intell 21 7 1092 1100 10.1016/j.engappai.2007.10.002
22. A Makinouchi 1996 Sheet metal forming simulation in industry J Mater Process Technol 60 1-4 19 26 10.1016/0924-0136(96)02303-5 (Pubitemid 126383254)
23. BH Mason RT Haftka ER Johnson GL Farley 1998 Variable complexity design of composite fuselage frames by response surface techniques Thin-Walled Struct 32 4 235 261 10.1016/S0263-8231(98)00016-0 (Pubitemid 128415404)
24. H Naceur YQ Guo JL Batoz C Knopf-Lenoir 2001 Optimization of drawbead restraining forces and drawbead design in sheet metal forming process Int J Mech Sci 43 10 2407 2434 0988.74532 10.1016/S0020-7403(01)00014-5 (Pubitemid 32798380)
25. H Naceur A Delameziere JL Batoz YQ Guo C Knopf-Lenoir 2004 Some improvements on the optimum process design in deep drawing using the inverse approach J Mater Process Technol 146 2 250 262 10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2003.11.015
26. H Naceur S Ben-Elechi JL Batoz C Knopf-Lenoir 2008 Response surface methodology for the rapid design of aluminum sheet metal forming parameters Mater Des 29 781 790 10.1016/j.matdes.2007.01.018 (Pubitemid 351218058)
27. T Ohata Y Nakamura T Katayama E Nakamachi K Nakano 1996 Development of optimum process design system by numerical simulation J Mater Process Technol 60 1-4 543 548 10.1016/0924-0136(96)02384-9 (Pubitemid 126383334)
28. T Ohata Y Nakamura T Katayama E Nakamachi 2003 Development of optimum process design system for sheet fabrication using response surface method J Mater Process Technol 143 Sp. Iss. SI 667 672 10.1016/S0924-0136(03)00314-5
29. SK Panthi N Ramakrishnan KK Pathak JS Chouhan 2007 An analysis of springback in sheet metal bending using finite element method (FEM) J Mater Process Technol 186 1-3 120 124 10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2006.12.026 (Pubitemid 46330723)
30. Simpson TW, Toropov VV, Balabanov V, Viana FAC (2008) Design and analysis of computer experiments in multidisciplinary design optimization: a review of how far we have come - or not. In: Proceedings of the 12th AIAA/ISSMO multidisciplinary analysis and optimization conference, Victoria, Canada, 10-12 September 2008
31. CZ Sun GL Chen ZQ Lin YX Zhao 2004 Novel algorithm for determining optimal blankholder forces in deep drawing of aluminum alloy sheet Trans Nonferr Met Soc China 14 4 675 680
32. GY Sun GY Li ZH Gong XY Cui XJ Yang Q Li 2010 Multiobjective robust optimization method for drawbead design Mater Des 31 4 1917 1929 10.1016/j.matdes.2009.10.050
33. GY Sun GY Li SJ Hou SW Zhou W Li Q Li 2010 Crashworthiness design for functionally graded foam-filled thin-walled structures Mater Sci Eng A 527 7-8 1911 1919
34. GY Sun GY Li M Stone Q Li 2010 A two-stage multi-fidelity optimization procedure for honeycomb-type cellular materials Comput Mater Sci 49 500 511 10.1016/j.commatsci.2010.05.041
35. BT Tang JX Sun Z Zhao J Chen XY Ruan 2006 Optimization of drawbead design in sheet forming using one step finite element method coupled with response surface methodology Int J Adv Manuf Tech 31 3-4 225 234 10.1007/s00170-005-0208- 5 (Pubitemid 44770859)
36. BT Tang Z Zhao XY Lu ZQ Wang XW Zhao SY Chen 2007 Fast thickness prediction and blank design in sheet metal forming based on an enhanced inverse analysis method Int J Mech Sci 49 9 1018 1028 10.1016/j.ijmecsci.2007.02.003 (Pubitemid 46978356)
37. Toropov VV, Markine VL (1996). The Use of Simplified Numerical Models as Mid-Range Approximations. In: Proceedings of the 6-th AIAA/USAF/NASA/ISSMO Symposium on Multidisciplinary Analysis and Optimization, Bellevue WA, September 4-6 1996, Part 2, 952-958. ISBN 1-56347-218-X
38. R Vitali RT Haftka BV Sankar 2002 Multi-fidelity design of stiffened composite panel with a crack Struct Multidiscipl Optim 23 5 347 356 10.1007/s00158-002-0195-1 (Pubitemid 34777410)
39. PM Watson KC Gupta 1996 EM-ANN models for microstrip vias and interconnects in dataset circuits IEEE Trans Microwave Theor Tech 44 12 2495 2503 10.1109/22.554584 (Pubitemid 126770811)
40. DL Wei ZS Cui J Chen 2008 Optimization and tolerance prediction of sheet metal forming process using response surface model Comput Mater Sci 42 2 228 233 10.1016/j.commatsci.2007.07.014 (Pubitemid 351335256)
41. RJ Yang CJ Chen CH Lee 1996 Bead pattern optimization Struct Optim 12 4 217 221 10.1007/BF01197359 (Pubitemid 126650486)
42. N Zabaras G Ganapathysubramanian Q Li 2003 A continuum sensitivity method for the design of multi-stage metal processes Int J Mech Sci 45 2 325 358 1116.74405 10.1016/S0020-7403(03)00048-1
43. PM Zadeh VV Toropov AS Wood 2009 Metamodel-based collaborative optimization framework Struct Multidiscipl Optim 38 2 103 115 10.1007/s00158-008-0286-8