Optimization of draw-in for an automotive sheet metal part: An evaluation using surrogate models and response surfaces

Journal of Materials Processing Technology

Volumn 159, Issue 3, 2005, Pages 426-434

  Jansson, T ^a   Andersson, A ^b,c   Nilsson, L ^a  

^a LINKÖPING UNIVERSITY   (Sweden)

^b VOLVO CAR CORPORATION   (Sweden)

^c LUND UNIVERSITY   (Sweden)

Author keywords

Draw bead; Draw in; Optimization; Response surfaces; Sheet metal forming; Simulation; Space mapping

Indexed keywords

AUTOMOTIVE SHEET METAL; DRAW BEAD; DRAW-IN; RESPONSE SURFACES; SHEET METAL FORMING; SURROGATE MODELS;

CALIBRATION; COMPUTATIONAL GEOMETRY; DEEP DRAWING; FINITE ELEMENT METHOD; MAPPING; OPTIMIZATION; SURFACES;

SHEET METAL;

EID: 11344283786     PISSN: 09240136     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2004.06.011     Document Type: Article

References (39)

1. A. Makinouchi Sheet metal forming simulation in industry J. Mater. Process. Technol. 60 1996 19 26
2. A. Makinouchi, C. Teodosiu, and T. Nakagawa Advance in FEM simulation and its related technologies in sheet metal forming CIRP Annals-Manuf. Technol. 47 2 1998 641 649
3. A. Andersson, Use of FE-analysis in predicting and verifying the design of an automotive component forming process, with special regard to macro geometric defects, Licentiate thesis, Div. of Prod. and Mat. Eng., LTH, Lund, 2001.
4. L. Fratini, and F. Micari Investigating effective blank holder force paths to improve the maximum component height in deep drawing processes NUMISHEET '99 Besancone 1999
5. Z.-Q. Lin, Y.-X. Bao, G.-L. Chen, and G. Liu Study on the drawbead setting of the large deformation and bending area in a cover panel NUMISHEET '99 Besancon 1999
6. T. Meinders, B. Carleer, H. Geijselaers, and J. Huétink The implementation of an equivalent drawbead model in a finite-element code for sheet metal forming Besancon J. Mater. Process. Technol. 83 2 1998 234 244
7. H. Naceur, Y. Guo, C. Batoz, and C. Knopf-Lenoir Optimization of drawbead restraining forces and drawbead design in sheet metal forming process Int. J. Mech. Sci. 43 2 2001 2407 2434
8. R. Myers, and D. Montgomery Response Surface Methodology 1995 John Wiley New York
9. W. Roux, N. Stander, and R.T. Haftka Response surface approximations for structural optimization Int. J. Numer. Methods Eng. 42 2 1998 517 534
10. N. Stander, W. Roux, S. Pattabiraman, and R. Dhulipudi Response surface approximations for design optimization problems in nonlinear dynamics Proceedings of the ASME Pressure Vessels and Piping Conference Boston 1999, PVP-99-0304524-7 1999 275 284
11. S. Kok, and N. Stander Optimization of a sheet metal forming process using successive multipoint approximations Boston 1999, PVP-99-0304524-7 Struct. Optimization 18 2 1999 277 295
12. Y. Abe, K. Mori, and O. Ebilhara Optimisation of the distribution of wall thickness in the multistage sheet metal forming of wheel disks J. Mater. Process. Technol. 125-126 2 2002 792 797
13. E. Doege, and L.-E. Elend Design and application of pliable blank holder systems for the optimization of process conditions in sheet metal forming J. Mater. Process. Technol. 111 2 2001 182 187
14. G. Gantar, T. Pepelnjak, and K. Kuzman Optimization of sheet metal forming processes by the use of numerical simulations J. Mater. Process. Technol. 130-131 2 2002 54 59
15. Y.Q. Guo, J.L. Batoz, H. Naceur, S. Bouabdallah, F. Mercier, and O. Bartlet Recent developments on the analysis and optimum design of sheet metal forming parts using a simplified inverse approach Comput. Struct. 78 2 2000 133 148
16. R. Hino, F. Yoshida, and V. Toropov Optimization of blank design for deep drawing process based on the interaction of high and low fidelity models Proceedings of the 9th AIAA/ISSMO Symposium on Multidisciplinary Analysis and Optimization Atlanta, 4-6 September 2002, AIAA 2002-5564 2002
17. M.R. Jensen, F.F. Damborg, K.B. Nielsen, and J. Danckert Optimization of the draw-die design in conventional deep-drawing in order to minimise tool wear Atlanta, 4-6 September 2002, AIAA 2002-5564 J. Mater. Process. Technol. 83 2 1998 106 114
18. J.-Y. Kim, N. Kim, and M.-S. Huh Optimum blank design of an automobile sub-frame J. Mater. Process. Technol. 101 2 2000 31 43
19. W. Kubli, and J. Reissner Optimization of sheet-metal forming processes using the special-purpose program AUTOFORM J. Mater. Process. Technol. 50 2 1995 292 305
20. T. Ohata, Y. Nakamura, T. Katayama, E. Nakamachi, and K. Nakano Development of optimum process design systems by numerical simulation J. Mater. Process. Technol. 60 2 1996 543 548
21. S.H. Park, J.W. Yoon, D.Y. Yang, and Y.H. Kim Optimum blank design in sheet metal forming by the deformation path iteration method Int. J. Mech. Sci. 41 2 1999 1217 1232
22. T. Pepelnjak, G. Gantar, and K. Kuzman Numerical simulations in optimization of product and forming process J. Mater. Process. Technol. 115 2 2001 122 126
23. A.D. Santos, J.F. Duarte, A. Reis, B. da Rocha, R. Neto, and R. Paiva The use of finite element simulation for optimization of metal forming and tool design J. Mater. Process. Technol. 119 2 2001 152 157
24. H. Shim, K. Son, and K. Kim Optimum blank shape design by sensitivity analysis J. Mater. Process. Technol. 104 2 2000 191 199
25. W. Sosnowski, I. Marczewska, and A. Marczewski Sensitivity based optimization of sheet metal forming tools J. Mater. Process. Technol. 124 2 2002 319 328
26. N. Stander The successive response surface method applied to sheet-metal forming K.J. Bathe Proceedings of the First MIT Conference on Computational Fluid and Solid Mechanics Boston, June 12-15, 2001 2001 Elsevier Science Ltd. Oxford
27. N. Stander Springback compensation in sheet metal forming using a successive response surface method Proceedings of the 9th AIAA/ISSMO Symposium on Multidisciplinary Analysis and Optimization 4-6 September 2002, Atlanta, AIAA 2002-5539 2002
28. M. Bakr, J. Bandler, K. Madsen, J. Rayas-Snchez, and J. Sondergaard Space mapping optimization of microwave circuits exploiting surrogate models 4-6 September 2002, Atlanta, AIAA 2002-5539 IEEE Trans. Microwave Theory Technol. 48 2 2000 2297 2306
29. S. Leary, A. Bhasker, and A. Keane A constraint mapping approach to the structural optimization of an expensive model using surrogates Proceedings of the Conference on Surrogate Modelling and Space Mapping for Engineering Optimization Lyngby 2000
30. M. Redhe, and L. Nilsson Using space mapping and surrogate models to optimize vehicle crashworthiness design Farrokh Mistree Proceedings of the 9th AIAA/ISSMO Symposium on Multidisciplinary Analysis and Optimization Atlanta 2002
31. K. Madsen, and J. Sondergaard Space mapping from a mathematical viewpoint Proceedings of the Conference on Surrogate Modelling and Space Mapping for Engineering Optimization Lyngby 2000
32. T. Jansson, L. Nilsson, and M. Redhe Using surrogate models and response surfaces in structural optimization with application to crashworthiness design and sheet metal forming Lyngby Struct. Multidisc. Optim. 25 2 2003 129 140
33. J.O. Hallquist LS-DYNA Theoretical Manual 1998 Livermore Software Technology Coporation Livermore
34. T. Belytschko, J. Lin, and C.S. Tsay Explicit algorithms for nonlinear dynamics of shells Comp. Meth. Appl. Eng. 42 2 1984 225 251
35. F. Barlat, and J. Lian Plastic behaviour and stretchability of sheet metals. Part I: A yield function for orthotropic sheet under plane stress conditions Int. J. Plast. 5 2 1989 51 66
36. N. Stander, K.J. Craig, and W. Roux LS-OPT User's Manual v. 2 2002 Livermore Software Technology Corporation Livermore
37. D. Nilsson, K. Trana, FE-analys av dragvulster-Implementering av dragvulster inom pltformingssimulering. CODEN:LUTMDN/ (TMMV-5129)/1-90/1998, Inst. för Mekanisk Teknologi och Verktygsmaskiner, Lunds Tekniska Högskola, 1998 (in Swedish).
38. K. Mattiasson, and M. Larsson Numerical procedures for 2D drawbead simulation 2001 Department of Structural Mechanics, Chalmers University of Technology Göteborg
39. XYZ Scientific Applications Inc. TrueGrid Manual 2001 XYZ Scientific Applications Inc. Livermore