Attention and gaze shifting in dual-task and go/no-go performance with vocal responding

Acta Psychologica

Volumn 137, Issue 3, 2011, Pages 261-268

  Lamers, Martijn J M ^a   Roelofs, Ardi ^a  

^a RADBOUD UNIVERSITY NIJMEGEN   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Attentional control; Dual task performance; Eye tracking; Flanker task; Go no go task

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; ARTICLE; ATTENTION; EYE MOVEMENT; FEMALE; HUMAN; MALE; NEUROPSYCHOLOGICAL TEST; PHOTOSTIMULATION; PHYSIOLOGY; PSYCHOMOTOR PERFORMANCE; REACTION TIME; SPEECH; VISION;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; ATTENTION; EYE MOVEMENTS; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; NEUROPSYCHOLOGICAL TESTS; PHOTIC STIMULATION; PSYCHOMOTOR PERFORMANCE; REACTION TIME; SPEECH; VISUAL PERCEPTION;

EID: 79958086065     PISSN: 00016918     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2010.12.005     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. Brown S., Heathcote A. QMLE: Fast, robust, and efficient estimation of distribution functions based on quantiles. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers 2003, 35:485-492.
2. Eriksen B.A., Eriksen C.W. Effects of noise letters upon the identification of a target letter in a nonsearch task. Perception & Psychophysics 1974, 16:143-149.
3. Korvorst M., Roelofs A., Levelt W.J.M. Incrementality in naming and reading complex numerals: Evidence from eyetracking. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 2006, 59:296-311.
4. Lamers M.J.M., Roelofs A. Role of Gestalt grouping in selective attention: Evidence from the Stroop task. Perception & Psychophysics 2007, 69:1305-1314.
5. Lamers M., Roelofs A. Attentional control adjustments in Eriksen and Stroop task performance can be independent of response conflict. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 2010, 25:1-26.
6. Lamers M., Roelofs A., Rabeling-Keus I. Selective attention and response set in the Stroop task. Memory & Cognition 2010, 38:893-904.
7. Levelt W.J.M., Meyer A.S. Word for word: Multiple lexical access in speech production. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology 2000, 12:433-452.
8. Luce R.D. Response times: Their role in inferring elementary mental organization 1986, Oxford University Press, New York.
9. Meyer D.E., Kieras D.E. A computational theory of executive cognitive processes and multiple-task performance: Part 1. Basic mechanisms. Psychological Review 1997, 104:3-65.
10. Meyer D.E., Kieras D.E. A computational theory of executive cognitive processes and multiple-task performance: Part 2. Accounts of psychological refractory-period phenomena. Psychological Review 1997, 104:749-791.
11. Meyer A.S., Roelofs A., Levelt W.J.M. Word length effects in object naming: the role of a response criterion. Journal of Memory and Language 2003, 48:131-147.
12. Meyer A.S., Van der Meulen F.F. Phonological priming effects on speech onset latencies and viewing times in object naming. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 2000, 7:314-319.
13. Rabbitt Errors and error correction in choice-response tasks. Journal of Experimental Psychology 1966, 71:264-272.
14. Ratcliff R. Group reaction time distributions and an analysis of distribution statistics. Psychological Bulletin 1979, 86:446-461.
15. Rayner K. Eye movements in reading and information processing: 20years of research. Psychological Bulletin 1998, 124:372-422.
16. Roelofs A. Goal-referenced selection of verbal action: Modeling attentional control in the Stroop task. Psychological Review 2003, 110:88-125.
17. Roelofs A. Attention and gaze control in picture naming, word reading, and word categorizing. Journal of Memory and Language 2007, 57:232-251.
18. Roelofs A. Attention, gaze shifting, and dual-task interference from phonological encoding in spoken word planning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 2008, 34:1580-1598.
19. Roelofs A. Dynamics of the attentional control of word retrieval: Analyses of response time distributions. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 2008, 137:303-323.
20. Roelofs A. Tracing attention and the activation flow in spoken word planning using eye movements. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Learning, Memory, and Cognition 2008, 34:353-368.
21. Sanders A.F. Elements of human performance: Reaction processes and attention in human skill 1998, LEA, London.
22. Sanders A.F., Lamers J.M. The Eriksen flanker effect revisited. Acta Psychologica 2002, 109:41-56.
23. Sanders A.F., Rath A.M. Perceptual processing and speed-accuracy trade-off. Acta Psychologica 1991, 77:275-291.
24. Sanders A.F., Van Duren L.L. Stimulus control of visual fixation duration in a single saccade paradigm. Acta Psychologica 1998, 99:163-176.
25. Schneider D., Verbruggen F. Inhibition of irrelevant category-response mappings. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 2008, 61:1629-1640.
26. Van Duren L.L., Sanders A.F. Signal processing during and across saccades. Acta Psychologica 1995, 89:121-147.
27. Verbruggen F., Notebaert W., Liefooghe B., Vandierendonck A. Stimulus- and response-conflict-induced cognitive control in the flanker task. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 2006, 13:328-333.
28. Winer B.J., Brown D.R., Michels K.M. Statistical principles in experimental design 1991, McGraw-Hill, New York.
29. Woodworth R.S. Experimental psychology 1938, Holt, New York.
30. Wright R.D., Ward L.M. Orienting of attention 2008, Oxford University Press, Oxford.