Stimulus control of visual fixation duration in a single saccade paradigm

Acta Psychologica

Volumn 99, Issue 2, 1998, Pages 163-176

  Sanders, A F ^a   Van Duren, L L ^a  

^a VU UNIVERSITY AMSTERDAM   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Direct vs. strategic control; Fixation time

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; ARTICLE; BIOLOGICAL MODEL; EYE FIXATION; HUMAN; PHYSIOLOGY; PSYCHOMOTOR PERFORMANCE; REACTION TIME; REFERENCE VALUE; SACCADIC EYE MOVEMENT; VISION;

ADULT; ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; FIXATION, OCULAR; HUMANS; MODELS, NEUROLOGICAL; PSYCHOMOTOR PERFORMANCE; REACTION TIME; REFERENCE VALUES; SACCADES; VISUAL PERCEPTION;

EID: 0032114041     PISSN: 00016918     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0001-6918(98)00009-2     Document Type: Article

References (31)

1. Berger, G.O., 1886. Über den Einfluss der Reizstärke auf die Dauer einfacher psychischer Vorgänge mit besonderer Rücksicht auf Lichtreize. Philosophische Studien 3, 38-93.
2. De Jong, F., Sanders, A.F., 1986. Relative signal frequency imbalance does not affect perceptual encoding in choice reactions. Acta Psychologica 62, 211-223.
3. Donders, F.C., 1969. On the speed of mental processes (Koster, W.G., Trans.). Acta Psychologica 30 (92-130) Original work published: 1868: Over de snelheid van psychische processen Onderzoekingen gedaan in het physiologisch laboratorium van de Utrechtse Hoogeschool. Tweede Reeks 11.
4. Eriksen, B.A., Eriksen, C.W., 1974. Effects of noise letters upon the identification of a target letter in a non-search task. Perception & Psychophysics 16, 143-149.
5. Houtmans, M.J.M., Sanders, A.F., 1983. Is information acquisition during large saccades possible? Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society 21, 127-130.
6. Inhoff, A.W., 1986. Preparing sequences of saccades under choice reaction conditions. Acta Psychologica 61, 211-228.
7. Inhoff, A.W., Rayner, K., 1986. Parafoveal wordprocessing during eye fixations in reading: Effects of word frequency. Perception & Psychophysics 40, 431-439.
8. Lashley, K.S., 1929. Brain Mechanisms and Intelligence. University of Chicago Press, Chicago.
9. Los, S.A., 1994. Procedural differences in processing intact and degraded stimuli. Memory and Cognition 22, 145-156.
10. Matin, E., 1974. Saccadic suppression: A review and an analysis. Psychological Bulletin 81, 899-917.
11. Miller, J., 1982. Discrete versus continuous stage models of human information processing: In search of partial output. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance 8, 273-296.
12. Nattkemper, D., Prinz, W., 1990. Local and global control of saccade amplitude and fixation duration in continuous visual search. In: Groner, R., d'Ydewalle, G., Parham, R. (Eds.), From Eye to Mind: Information acquisition in Perception. Elsevier, Amsterdam.
13. Navon, D., 1977. Forest before trees: The precedence of global features in visual perception. Cognitive Psychology 9, 353-383.
14. Ollman, R.T., 1966. Fast guesses in choice reaction time. Psychonomic Science 6, 155-156.
15. Rayner, K., Pollatsek, A., 1981. Eye movement control during reading: Evidence for direct control. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 33A, 351-373.
16. Rayner, K., Pollatsek, A., 1989. The Psychology of Reading. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ.
17. Russo, J.E., 1978. Adaptation of cognitive processes in the eye movement system. In: Senders, J.W., Fisher, D.F., Monty, R.A. (Eds.), Eye Movements and the Higher Psychological Functions. Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ.
18. Sanders, A.F., 1963. The Selective Process in the Functional Visual Field. Van Gorcum, Assen, The Netherlands.
19. Sanders, A.F., 1972. Foreperiod duration and the time course of preparation. Acta Psychologica 36, 60-71.
20. Sanders, A.F., 1990. Issues and trends in the debate on discrete vs. continuous processing of information. Acta Psychologica 74, 1-45.
21. Sanders, A.F., 1993. On the output of a visual fixation. In: Baddeley, A.D., Weiskrantz, L. (Eds.), Attention: Selection, Awareness and Control. Clarendon Press, Oxford, pp. 36-52.
22. Sanders, A.F., 1998. Elements of Human Performance: Attention and Reaction Processes in Human Skill. Erlbaum, Mawhaw, NJ.
23. Sanders, A.F., Houtmans, M.J.M., 1985. There is no central stimulus encoding during saccadic eye shifts: A case against general parallel processing notions. Acta Psychologica 60, 323-338.
24. Sanders, A.F., Rath, A., 1991. Perceptual processing and speed-accuracy trade-off. Acta Psychologica 77, 275-291.
25. Stoffels, E.J., 1996. On stage robustness and response selection routes: Further evidence. Acta Psychologica 91, 67-88.
26. van Duren, L.L., 1994. Signal processing during eye fixations and saccades. Doctoral Dissertation, Free University, Amsterdam.
27. van Duren, L.L. and Sanders, A.F., 1988, On the robustness of the additive factors stage structure in blocked and mixed choice reaction designs. Acta Psychologica, 69, 83-94.
28. van Duren, L.L., Sanders, A.F., 1995. Signal processing during and across saccades. Acta Psychologica 89, 121-147.
29. Verwey, W.B., 1996. Bufferloading and chunking in sequential keypressing. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance 22, 544-562.
30. Wundt, W., 1883. Über psychologische Methoden. Philosophische Studien 10, 1-38.
31. Zingale, C.M., Kowler, E., 1987. Planning sequences of saccades. Vision Research 27, 1327-1341.