DNA shape, genetic codes, and evolution

Current Opinion in Structural Biology

Volumn 21, Issue 3, 2011, Pages 342-347

  Parker, Stephen C J ^a   Tullius, Thomas D ^b  

^a NATIONAL HUMAN GENOME RESEARCH INSTITUTE   (United States)

^b BOSTON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

AMINO ACID SEQUENCE; BIOLOGICAL ACTIVITY; DISEASE ASSOCIATION; DNA BASE COMPOSITION; DNA SEQUENCE; DNA SHAPE; DNA STRUCTURE; GENETIC CODE; GENETIC VARIABILITY; HUMAN; HUMAN GENOME; MOLECULAR EVOLUTION; MOLECULAR RECOGNITION; NON INSULIN DEPENDENT DIABETES MELLITUS; NUCLEOSOME; PANCREAS ISLET DISEASE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROTEIN CODING SEQUENCE; PROTEIN DNA INTERACTION; PROTEIN NONCODING SEQUENCE; REVIEW; SEQUENCE ALIGNMENT; SINGLE NUCLEOTIDE POLYMORPHISM; SYSTEMS BIOLOGY;

ANIMALS; BASE SEQUENCE; DNA; EVOLUTION, MOLECULAR; GENETIC CODE; GENETIC PREDISPOSITION TO DISEASE; GENOME; HUMANS; NUCLEOSOMES; POLYMORPHISM, SINGLE NUCLEOTIDE;

EID: 79958051799     PISSN: 0959440X     EISSN: 1879033X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.sbi.2011.03.002     Document Type: Review

References (54)

1. King M.C., Wilson A.C. Evolution at two levels in humans and chimpanzees. Science 1975, 188:107-116.
2. Dobzhansky T. Nothing in biology makes sense except in the light of evolution. Am Biol Teach 1973, 35:125-129.
3. Parker S.C.J., Hansen L., Abaan H.O., Tullius T.D., Margulies E.H. Local DNA topography correlates with functional noncoding regions of the human genome. Science 2009, 324:389-392.
4. ENCODE Project Consortium Identification and analysis of functional elements in 1% of the human genome by the ENCODE pilot project. Nature 2007, 447:799-816.
5. Itzkovitz S., Hodis E., Segal E. Overlapping codes within protein-coding sequences. Genome Res 2010, 20:1582-1589.
6. Lampe X., Samad O.A., Guiguen A., Matis C., Remacle S., Picard J.J., Rijli F.M., Rezsohazy R. An ultraconserved Hox-Pbx responsive element resides in the coding sequence of Hoxa2 and is active in rhombomere 4. Nucleic Acids Res 2008, 36:3214-3225.
7. Dong X., Navratilova P., Fredman D., Drivenes Ø., Becker T.S., Lenhard B. Exonic remnants of whole-genome duplication reveal cis-regulatory function of coding exons. Nucleic Acids Res 2010, 38:1071-1085.
8. Barthel K.K.B., Liu X. A transcriptional enhancer from the coding region of ADAMTS5. PLoS One 2008, 3:e2184.
9. Tümpel S., Cambronero F., Sims C., Krumlauf R., Wiedemann L.M. A regulatory module embedded in the coding region of Hoxa2 controls expression in rhombomere 2. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2008, 105:20077-20082.
10. Chen H.P., Lin A., Bloom J.S., Khan A.H., Park C.C., Smith D.J. Screening reveals conserved and nonconserved transcriptional regulatory elements including an E3/E4 allele-dependent APOE coding region enhancer. Genomics 2008, 92:292-300.
11. Baisnée P.F., Baldi P., Brunak S., Pedersen A.G. Flexibility of the genetic code with respect to DNA structure. Bioinformatics 2001, 17:237-248.
12. Rohs R., West S.M., Liu P., Honig B. Nuance in the double-helix and its role in protein-DNA recognition. Curr Opin Struct Biol 2009, 19:171-177.
13. Gaffney D.J., Blekhman R., Majewski J. Selective constraints in experimentally defined primate regulatory regions. PLoS Genet 2008, 4:e1000157.
14. Sánchez-Gracia A., Romero-Pozuelo J., Ferrús A. Two frequenins in Drosophila: unveiling the evolutionary history of an unusual neuronal calcium sensor (NCS) duplication. BMC Evol Biol 2010, 10:54.
15. Nevarez P.A., DeBoever C.M., Freeland B.J., Quitt M.A., Bush E.C. Context dependent substitution biases vary within the human genome. BMC Bioinform 2010, 11:462.
16. Chen C.-H., Chuang T.-J., Liao B.-Y., Chen F.-C. Scanning for the signatures of positive selection for human-specific insertions and deletions. Genome Biol Evol 2009, 1:415-419.
17. Sathyapriya R., Vijayabaskar M.S., Vishveshwara S. Insights into protein-DNA interactions through structure network analysis. PLoS Comput Biol 2008, 4:e1000170.
18. Meader S., Ponting C.P., Lunter G. Massive turnover of functional sequence in human and other mammalian genomes. Genome Res 2010, 20:1335-1343.
19. Meireles-Filho A.C.A., Stark A. Comparative genomics of gene regulation-conservation and divergence of cis-regulatory information. Curr Opin Genet Dev 2009, 19:565-570.
20. Gardiner E.J., Hunter C.A., Lu X.-J., Willett P. A structural similarity analysis of double-helical DNA. J Mol Biol 2004, 343:879-889.
21. Greenbaum J.A., Pang B., Tullius T.D. Construction of a genome-scale structural map at single-nucleotide resolution. Genome Res 2007, 17:947-953.
22. Rohs R., West S.M., Sosinsky A., Liu P., Mann R.S., Honig B. The role of DNA shape in protein-DNA recognition. Nature 2009, 461:1248-1253.
23. Kitayner M., Rozenberg H., Rohs R., Suad O., Rabinovich D., Honig B., Shakked Z. Diversity in DNA recognition by p53 revealed by crystal structures with Hoogsteen base pairs. Nat Struct Mol Biol 2010, 17:423-429.
24. Stella S., Cascio D., Johnson R.C. The shape of the DNA minor groove directs binding by the DNA-bending protein Fis. Genes Dev 2010, 24:814-826.
25. Locasale J.W., Napoli A.A., Chen S., Berman H.M., Lawson C.L. Signatures of protein-DNA recognition in free DNA binding sites. J Mol Biol 2009, 386:1054-1065.
26. Li W.H., Wu C.I., Luo C.C. A new method for estimating synonymous and nonsynonymous rates of nucleotide substitution considering the relative likelihood of nucleotide and codon changes. Mol Biol Evol 1985, 2:150-174.
27. Jiang C., Pugh B.F. Nucleosome positioning and gene regulation: advances through genomics. Nat Rev Genet 2010, 10:161-172.
28. Radman-Livaja M., Rando O.J. Nucleosome positioning: how is it established, and why does it matter?. Dev Biol 2010, 339:258-266.
29. Segal E., Widom J. What controls nucleosome positions?. Trends Genet 2009, 25:335-343.
30. Ioshikhes I.P., Albert I., Zanton S.J., Pugh B.F. Nucleosome positions predicted through comparative genomics. Nat Genet 2006, 38:1210-1215.
31. Kaplan N., Moore I.K., Fondufe-Mittendorf Y., Gossett A.J., Tillo D., Field Y., Leproust E.M., Hughes T.R., Lieb J.D., Widom J., et al. The DNA-encoded nucleosome organization of a eukaryotic genome. Nature 2009, 458:362-366.
32. Tolstorukov M.Y., Colasanti A.V., McCandlish D.M., Olson W.K., Zhurkin V.B. A novel 'roll-and-slide' mechanism of DNA folding in chromatin: Implications for nucleosome positioning. J Mol Biol 2007, 371:725-738.
33. Tillo D., Hughes T.R. G+C content dominates intrinsic nucleosome occupancy. BMC Bioinform 2009, 10:442.
34. Hughes A., Rando O.J. Chromatin 'programming' by sequence-is there more to the nucleosome code than %GC?. J Biol 2009, 8:96.
35. Segal E., Widom J. Poly(dA:dT) tracts: major determinants of nucleosome organization. Curr Opin Struct Biol 2009, 19:65-71.
36. Sugihara F., Kasahara K., Kokubo T. Highly redundant function of multiple AT-rich sequences as core promoter elements in the TATA-less RPS5 promoter of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Nucleic Acids Res 2011, 39:59-75.
37. Miele V., Vaillant C., d'Aubenton-Carafa Y., Thermes C., Grange T. DNA physical properties determine nucleosome occupancy from yeast to fly. Nucleic Acids Res 2008, 36:3746-3756.
38. Babbitt G.A., Kim Y. Inferring natural selection on fine-scale chromatin organization in yeast. Mol Biol Evol 2008, 25:1714-1727.
39. Babbitt G.A., Tolstorukov M.Y., Kim Y. The molecular evolution of nucleosome positioning through sequence-dependent deformation of the DNA polymer. J Biomol Struct Dyn 2010, 27:765-780.
40. Kenigsberg E., Bar A., Segal E., Tanay A. Widespread compensatory evolution conserves DNA-encoded nucleosome organization in yeast. PLoS Comput Biol 2010, 6:e1001039.
41. Babbitt G.A., Cotter C.R. Functional conservation of nucleosome formation selectively biases presumably neutral molecular variation in yeast genomes. Genome Biol Evol 2011, 3:15-22.
42. Cohanim A.B., Haran T.E. The coexistence of the nucleosome positioning code with the genetic code on eukaryotic genomes. Nucleic Acids Res 2009, 37:6466-6476.
43. Cooper D.N., Chen J.-M., Ball E.V., Howells K., Mort M., Phillips A.D., Chuzhanova N., Krawczak M., Kehrer-Sawatzki H., Stenson P.D. Genes, mutations, and human inherited disease at the dawn of the age of personalized genomics. Hum Mut 2010, 31:631-655.
44. Feero W.G., Guttmacher A.E., Collins F.S. Genomic medicine-an updated primer. NEJM 2010, 362:2001-2011.
45. Hindorff L.A., Sethupathy P., Junkins H.A., Ramos E.M., Mehta J.P., Collins F.S., Manolio T.A. Potential etiologic and functional implications of genome-wide association loci for human diseases and traits. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2009, 106:9362-9367.
46. Stitzel M.L., Sethupathy P., Pearson D.S., Chines P.S., Song L., Erdos M.R., Welch R., Parker S.C.J., Boyle A.P., Scott L.J., et al. Global epigenomic analysis of primary human pancreatic islets provides insights into type 2 diabetes susceptibility loci. Cell Metab 2010, 12:443-455.
47. Sommer W.H., Lidström J., Sun H., Passer D., Eskay R., Parker S.C.J., Witt S.H., Zimmermann U.S., Nieratschker V., Rietschel M., et al. Human NPY promoter variation rs16147:T>C as a moderator of prefrontal NPY gene expression and negative affect. Hum Mut 2010, 31:E1594-1608.
48. Petrie K.L., Joyce G.F. Deep sequencing analysis of mutations resulting from the incorporation of dNTP analogs. Nucleic Acids Res 2010, 38:8095-8104.
49. Gerstein M.B., Lu Z.J., Van Nostrand E.L., Cheng C., Arshinoff B.I., Liu T., Yip K.Y., Robilotto R., Rechtsteiner A., Ikegami K., et al. Integrative analysis of the Caenorhabditis elegans genome by the modENCODE Project. Science 2010, 330:1775-1787.
50. modENCODE Consortium Identification of functional elements and regulatory circuits by Drosophila modENCODE. Science 2010, 330:1787-1797.
51. Weirauch M.T., Hughes T.R. Conserved expression without conserved regulatory sequence: the more things change, the more they stay the same. Trends Genet 2010, 26:66-74.
52. Schmidt D., Wilson M.D., Ballester B., Schwalie P.C., Brown G.D., Marshall A., Kutter C., Watt S., Martinez-Jimenez C.P., Mackay S., et al. Five-vertebrate ChIP-seq reveals the evolutionary dynamics of transcription factor binding. Science 2010, 328:1036-1040.
53. Grabherr M.G., Russell P., Meyer M., Mauceli E., Alföldi J., Di Palma F., Lindblad-Toh K. Genome-wide synteny through highly sensitive sequence alignment: Satsuma. Bioinformatics 2010, 26:1145-1151.
54. Kemena C., Notredame C. Upcoming challenges for multiple sequence alignment methods in the high-throughput era. Bioinformatics 2009, 25:2455-2465.