Widespread compensatory evolution conserves DNA-encoded nucleosome organization in yeast

PLoS Computational Biology

Volumn 6, Issue 12, 2010, Pages

  Kenigsberg, Ephraim ^a   Bar, Amir ^a   Segal, Eran ^a   Tanay, Amos ^a  

^a WEIZMANN INSTITUTE OF SCIENCE   (Israel)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CONSERVATION; DYNAMICS; GENES; GENOME; NUCLEIC ACIDS;

COMPENSATORY DYNAMICS; ENCODINGS; EVOLUTIONARY DYNAMICS; EVOLUTIONARY MODELS; GENOMIC INFORMATION; GENOMIC LOCUS; GENOMIC POSITIONS; GENOMICS; NUCLEOSOMES; YEAST GENOME;

YEAST;

FUNGAL DNA;

AMINO ACID SUBSTITUTION; ARTICLE; AT RICH SEQUENCE; BASE PAIRING; BINDING SITE; CONTROLLED STUDY; DNA BASE COMPOSITION; DNA SEQUENCE; EVOLUTIONARY ADAPTATION; FUNCTIONAL GENOMICS; FUNGAL GENOME; GENE CONTROL; GENE FREQUENCY; GENE LOCUS; GENETIC CODE; GENETIC CONSERVATION; GENETIC GAIN; GENETIC HETEROGENEITY; GENETIC MODEL; GENETIC ORGANIZATION; GENETIC SELECTION; LOSS OF FUNCTION MUTATION; MOLECULAR DYNAMICS; MOLECULAR EVOLUTION; NONHUMAN; NUCLEOSOME; QUANTITATIVE ANALYSIS; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE; SINGLE NUCLEOTIDE POLYMORPHISM; TRANSCRIPTION INITIATION SITE; YEAST CELL; BIOLOGICAL MODEL; BIOLOGY; GENETICS; MUTATION; SEQUENCE ALIGNMENT;

BASE COMPOSITION; COMPUTATIONAL BIOLOGY; DNA, FUNGAL; EVOLUTION, MOLECULAR; GENE FREQUENCY; MODELS, GENETIC; MUTATION; NUCLEOSOMES; POLYMORPHISM, SINGLE NUCLEOTIDE; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE; SEQUENCE ALIGNMENT; SEQUENCE ANALYSIS, DNA;

EID: 78651240895     PISSN: 1553734X     EISSN: 15537358     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1001039     Document Type: Article

References (52)

1. Mikkelsen TS, Ku M, Jaffe DB, Issac B, Lieberman E, et al. (2007) Genomewide maps of chromatin state in pluripotent and lineage-committed cells. Nature 448: 553-560.
2. Guttman M, Amit I, Garber M, French C, Lin MF, et al. (2009) Chromatin signature reveals over a thousand highly conserved large non-coding RNAs in mammals. Nature 458: 223-227.
3. Kapranov P, Willingham AT, Gingeras TR (2007) Genome-wide transcription and the implications for genomic organization. Nat Rev Genet 8: 413-423.
4. Birney E, Stamatoyannopoulos JA, Dutta A, Guigó R, Gingeras TR, et al. (2007) Identification and analysis of functional elements in 1% of the human genome by the ENCODE pilot project. Nature 447: 799-816.
5. Heintzman ND, Hon GC, Hawkins RD, Kheradpour P, Stark A, et al. (2009) Histone modifications at human enhancers reflect global cell-type-specific gene expression. Nature 459: 108-112.
6. Visel A, Blow MJ, Li Z, Zhang T, Akiyama JA, et al. (2009) ChIP-seq accurately predicts tissue-specific activity of enhancers. Nature 457: 854-858.
7. Kimura M (1985) The role of compensatory neutral mutations in molecular evolution. J Genet 64: 7-19.
8. Kirby DA, Muse SV, Stephan W (1995) Maintenance of pre-mRNA secondary structure by epistatic selection. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 92: 9047-9051.
9. Chen Y, Carlini DB, Baines JF, Parsch J, Braverman JM, et al. (1999) RNA secondary structure and compensatory evolution. Genes Genet Syst 74: 271-286.
10. Stephan W, Kirby Da (1993) RNA folding in Drosophila shows a distance effect for compensatory fitness interactions. Genetics 135: 97-103.
11. Tanay A (2006) Extensive low-affinity transcriptional interactions in the yeast genome. Genome Res 16: 962-972.
12. Bradley RK, Li X-Y, Trapnell C, Davidson S, Pachter L, et al. (2010) Binding site turnover produces pervasive quantitative changes in transcription factor binding between closely related Drosophila species. PLoS Biol 8: e1000343-e1000343.
13. Doniger SW, Fay JC (2007) Frequent gain and loss of functional transcription factor binding sites. PLoS Comp Biol 3: e99-e99.
14. Lusk RW, Eisen MB (2010) Evolutionary mirages: selection on binding site composition creates the illusion of conserved grammars in Drosophila enhancers. PLoS Genet 6: e1000829-e1000829.
15. Ludwig MZ, Patel NH, Kreitman M (1998) Functional analysis of eve stripe 2 enhancer evolution in Drosophila: rules governing conservation and change. BioSyst 958: 949-958.
16. Tsong AE, Tuch BB, Li H, Johnson AD (2006) Evolution of alternative transcriptional circuits with identical logic. Nature 443: 415-420.
17. Tanay A, Regev A, Shamir R (2005) Conservation and evolvability in regulatory networks: the evolution of ribosomal regulation in yeast. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 102: 7203-7208.
18. Satchwell SC, Drew HR, Travers AA (1986) Sequence periodicities in chicken nucleosome core DNAN 1. J Mol Biol 191: 659-675.
19. Segal E, Fondufe-Mittendorf Y, Chen L, Thaström A, Field Y, et al. (2006) A genomic code for nucleosome positioning. Nature 442: 772-778.
20. Yuan G-C, Liu Y-J, Dion MF, Slack MD, Wu LF, et al. (2005) Genome-scale identification of nucleosome positions in S. cerevisiae. Science 309: 626-630.
21. Kaplan N, Moore IK, Fondufe-Mittendorf Y, Gossett AJ, Tillo D, et al. (2008) The DNA-encoded nucleosome organization of a eukaryotic genome. Nature 458: 362-366.
22. Mavrich TN, Jiang C, Ioshikhes IP, Li X, Venters BJ, et al. (2008) Nucleosome organization in the Drosophila genome. Nature 453: 358-362.
23. Lee W, Tillo D, Bray N, Morse RH, Davis RW, et al. (2007) A high-resolution atlas of nucleosome occupancy in yeast. Nat Genet 39: 1235-1244.
24. Schones DE, Cui K, Cuddapah S, Roh T-Y, Barski A, et al. (2008) Dynamic regulation of nucleosome positioning in the human genome. Cell 132: 887-898.
25. Segal E, Widom J (2009) Poly (dA: dT) tracts: major determinants of nucleosome organization. Curr Opin Struct Biol 19: 65-71.
26. Field Y, Kaplan N, Fondufe-Mittendorf Y, Moore IK, Sharon E, et al. (2008) Distinct modes of regulation by chromatin encoded through nucleosome positioning signals. PLoS Comp Biol 4: e1000216-e1000216.
27. Segal E, Widom J (2009) What controls nucleosome positions? Trends Genet 25: 335-343.
28. Washietl S, Machné R, Goldman N (2008) Evolutionary footprints of nucleosome positions in yeast. Trends Genet 24: 583-587.
29. Warnecke T, Batada NN, Hurst LD (2008) The impact of the nucleosome code on protein-coding sequence evolution in yeast. PLoS Genet 4: e1000250- e1000250.
30. Babbitt GA, Kim Y (2008) Inferring natural selection on fine-scale chromatin organization in yeast. Mol Biol Evol 25: 1714-1727.
31. Sasaki S, Mello CC, Shimada A, Nakatani Y, Hashimoto S-I, et al. (2009) Chromatin-associated periodicity in genetic variation downstream of transcriptional start sites. Science 323: 401-404.
32. Tillo D, Hughes T (2009) G+C content dominates intrinsic nucleosome occupancy. BMC Bioinformatics 10: 442-442.
33. Cliften P, Sudarsanam P, Desikan A, Fulton L, Fulton B, et al. (2003) Finding functional features in Saccharomyces genomes by phylogenetic footprinting. Science 301: 71-76.
34. Kellis M, Patterson N, Endrizzi M, Birren B, Lander ES (2003) Sequencing and comparison of yeast species to identify genes and regulatory elements. Nature 423: 241-254.
35. Siepel A, Haussler D (2004) Phylogenetic estimation of context-dependent substitution rates by maximum likelihood. Mol Biol Evol 21: 468-488.
36. Hwang DG, Green P (2004) Bayesian Markov chain Monte Carlo sequence analysis reveals varying neutral substitution patterns in mammalian evolution. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 101: 13994-14001.
37. Tsankov AM, Thompson DA, Socha A, Regev A, Rando OJ (2010) The Role of Nucleosome Positioning in the Evolution of Gene Regulation. PLoS Biol 8: e1000414-e1000414.
38. Tirosh I, Sigal N, Barkai N (2010) Divergence of nucleosome positioning between two closely related yeast species: genetic basis and functional consequences. Mol Syst Biol 6: 365-365.
39. Liti G, Carter DM, Moses AM, Warringer J, Parts L, et al. (2009) Population genomics of domestic and wild yeasts. Nature 458: 337-341.
40. MacIsaac KD, Wang T, Gordon DB, Gifford DK, Stormo GD, et al. (2006) An improved map of conserved regulatory sites for Saccharomyces cerevisiae. BMC Bioinformatics 7: 113-113.
41. Poelwijk FJ, Kiviet DJ, Weinreich DM, Tans SJ (2007) Empirical fitness landscapes reveal accessible evolutionary paths. Nature 445: 383-386.
42. Meer MV, Kondrashov AS, Artzy-Randrup Y, Kondrashov FA (2010) Compensatory evolution in mitochondrial tRNAs navigates valleys of low fitness. Nature 464: 279-282.
43. Akashi H (1995) Inferring Weak Selection From Patterns of Polymorphism and Divergence at ''Silent'' Sites in Drosophila DNA. Genetics 139: 1067-1076.
44. Li W-H (1987) Models of nearly neutral mutations with particular implications for nonrandom usage of synonymous codons. J Mol Evol 24: 337-345.
45. Taylor CF, Higgs PG (2000) A population genetics model for multiple quantitative traits exhibiting pleiotropy and epistasis. J Theor Biol 203: 419-437.
46. Haag ES (2007) Compensatory vs. pseudocompensatory evolution in molecular and developmental interactions. Genetica 129: 45-55.
47. Bürger R (1998) Mathematical properties of mutation-selection models. Genetica 102-103: 279-298.
48. Rhead B, Karolchik D, Kuhn RM, Hinrichs AS, Zweig AS, et al. (2010) The UCSC Genome Browser database: update 2010. Nucleic Acids Res 38: D613-D619.
49. Cherry JM, Adler C, Ball C, Chervitz SA, Dwight SS, et al. (1998) SGD: Saccharomyces Genome Database. Nucleic Acids Res 26: 73-79.
50. Harbison CT, Gordon DB, Lee TI, Rinaldi NJ, Macisaac KD, et al. (2004) Transcriptional regulatory code of a eukaryotic genome. Nature 431: 99-104.
51. Kschischang FR, Frey BJ, Loeliger Ha (2001) Factor graphs and the sumproduct algorithm. IEEE Transactions on Information Theory 47: 498-519.
52. Kimura M (1962) On the probability of fixation of mutant genes in a population. Genetics 47: 713-719.