Momentum and Turbulent Kinetic Energy Budgets Within the Park Avenue Street Canyon During the Joint Urban 2003 Field Campaign

Boundary-Layer Meteorology

Volumn 140, Issue 1, 2011, Pages 143-162

  Nelson, Matthew A ^a   Pardyjak, Eric R ^b   Klein, Petra ^c  

^a LOS ALAMOS NATIONAL LABORATORY   (United States)

^b University of Utah   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF OKLAHOMA   (United States)

Author keywords

Momentum budget; Street canyon; Turbulent kinetic energy budget; Urban turbulence

Indexed keywords

BUOYANCY TERM; DOMINANT CONTRIBUTIONS; FIELD CAMPAIGN; JOINT URBAN 2003; MOMENTUM BUDGET; OKLAHOMA CITY; PHYSICAL PROCESS; PRINCIPAL DIRECTIONS; SONIC ANEMOMETER; STREET CANYON; TURBULENT KINETIC ENERGY; URBAN CANOPIES; URBAN STREET CANYON; URBAN TURBULENCE;

ANEMOMETERS; BUDGET CONTROL; ELECTRON ENERGY LOSS SPECTROSCOPY; KINETICS; MOMENTUM;

KINETIC ENERGY;

BOUNDARY LAYER; BUOYANCY; ENERGY BUDGET; GRADIENT ANALYSIS; KINETIC ENERGY; STREET CANYON; TURBULENCE; TURBULENT FLOW; URBAN ATMOSPHERE;

OKLAHOMA [OKLAHOMA (STT)]; OKLAHOMA [UNITED STATES]; UNITED STATES;

EID: 79958034331     PISSN: 00068314     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s10546-011-9610-8     Document Type: Article

References (31)

1. Allwine KJ, Leach MJ, Stockham LW, Shinn JS, Hosker RP, Bowers JF, Pace JC (2004) Overview of Joint Urban 2003-an atmospheric dispersion study in Oklahoma City. In: Proceedings of the symposium on planning, nowcasting and forecast urban zone, American Meteorological Society, Seattle, WA, USA, p J7. 1.
2. Belcher SE (2005) Mixing and transport in urban areas. Philos Trans Roy Soc A 363: 2947-2968.
3. Bentham T, Britter R (2003) Spatially averaged flow within obstacle arrays. Atmos Environ 37: 2037-2043.
4. Brown MJ, Boswell D, Streit G, Nelson M, McPherson T, Hilton T, Pardyjak ER, Pol S, Ramamurthy P, Hansen B, Kastner-Klein P, Clark J, Moore A, Felton N, Strickland D, Brook D, Princevac M, Zajic D, Wayson R, MacDonald J, Fleming G, Storwold D (2004) Joint Urban 2003 street canyon experiment. In: Proceedings of the symposium on planning, nowcasting and forecast urban zone, American Meteorological Society, Seattle, WA, USA, p J7. 3.
5. Burian S, Han W, Brown M (2003) Morphological analyses using 3D building databases: Oklahoma City, Oklahoma. Technical Report, LA-UR-05-1821, LANL, Los Alamos NM, USA, 64 pp.
6. Chapra SC, Canale RP (1998) Numerical methods for engineers, 3rd edn. McGraw-Hill Companies, Boston, p 960.
7. Cheng H, Castro IP (2002) Near wall flow over urban-like roughness. Boundary-Layer Meteorol 104: 229-259.
8. Christen A, Rotach MW, Vogt R (2009) The budget of turbulent kinetic energy in the urban roughness sublayer. Boundary-Layer Meteorol 131: 193-222.
9. Dobre A, Arnold SJ, Smalley RJ, Boddy JWD, Barlow JF, Tomlin AS, Belcher SE (2005) Flow field measurements in the proximity of an urban intersection in London, UK. Atmos Environ 39: 4647-4657.
10. Gash JHC, Dolman AJ (2003) Sonic anemometer (co)sine response and flux measurement I. The potential for (co)sine error to affect sonic anemometer-based flux measurements. Agric For Meteorol 119: 195-207.
11. Gayev YA, Savory E (1999) Influence of street obstructions on flow processes within urban canyons. J Wind Eng Ind Aerodyn 82: 89-103.
12. Grimmond CSB, Oke TR (1999) Aerodynamic properties of urban areas derived from analysis of surface form. J Appl Meteorol 38: 1262-1292.
13. Hignett P (1992) Corrections to temperature measurements with a sonic anemometer. Boundary-Layer Meteorol 61: 175-187.
14. Klein P, Clark JV (2007) Flow variability in a North American downtown street canyon. J Appl Meteorol Climatol 46(6): 851-877.
15. Klein P, Leitl B, Schatzmann M (2007) Driving physical mechanisms of flow and dispersion in urban canopies. Int J Climatol 27(14): 1887-1907.
16. Leitl B, Schatzmann M (2005) Generation of wind tunnel data sets in support of the Joint Urban 2003 atmospheric dispersion study, Oklahoma City, July 2003-final report phase II 07-2005. Technical Report, Hamburg University, Hamburg, Germany. https://ju2003-dpg. dpg. army. mil/.
17. Louka P, Belcher SE, Harrison RG (2000) Coupling between air flow in streets and the well-developed boundary layer aloft. Atmos Environ 34: 2613-2621.
18. MacDonald RW (2000) Modelling the mean velocity profile in the urban canopy layer. Boundary-Layer Meteorol 97: 25-45.
19. Nakamura Y, Oke TR (1988) Wind, temperature and stability conditions in an east-west oriented urban canyon. Atmos Environ 22(12): 2691-2700.
20. Nelson MA, Pardyjak ER, Klewicki JC, Brown MJ (2007a) Properties of the wind field within the Oklahoma City Park Avenue street canyon. Part II: Spectra, co-spectra and quadrant analyses. J Appl Meteorol Climatol 46: 2055-2073.
21. Nelson MA, Pardyjak ER, Klewicki JC, Pol SU, Brown MJ (2007b) Properties of the wind field within the Oklahoma City Park Avenue street canyon. Part I: Mean flow and turbulence statistics. J Appl Meteorol Climatol 46: 2038-2054.
22. Panofsky HA, Dutton JA (1984) Atmospheric turbulence. Wiley, New York, p 397.
23. Pol SU, Brown MJ (2006) Flow patterns at the ends of a street canyon: measurements from the Joint Urban 2003 field experiment. In: Sixth symposium on the urban environment 14th joint conference on the applications of air pollution meteorology with the air and waste management association, American Meteorological Society, Atlanta, GA, USA.
24. Ramamurthy P, Pardyjak ER, Klewicki JC (2007) Observations of the effects of atmospheric stability on turbulence statistics deep within an urban street canyon. J Appl Meteorol Climatol 46(12): 2074-2085.
25. Roth M (2000) Review of atmospheric turbulence over cities. Q J R Meteorol Soc 126: 941-990.
26. Schotanus P, Nieuwstadt FTM, De Bruin HAR (1983) Temperature measurement with a sonic anemometer and its application to heat and moisture fluxes. Boundary-Layer Meteorol 26: 81-93.
27. Stull RB (1988) An introduction to boundary layer meteorology. Kluwer, Dordrecht, p 670.
28. Taylor GI (1938) The spectrum of turbulence. Proc Roy Soc Lond A 164(919): 476-490.
29. van der Mollen MK, Gash JHC, Elbers JA (2004) Sonic anemometer (co)sine response and flux measurement II. The effect of introducing an angle of attack dependent calibration. Agric For Meteorol 122: 95-109.
30. Wyngaard JC, Clifford SF (1977) Taylor's hypothesis and high frequency turbulence spectra. J Atmos Sci 34: 922-929.
31. Yeung PK, Zhou Y (1997) On the universality of the Kolmogorov constant in numerical simulations of turbulence. Technical Report, NASA/CR-97-206251, ICASE Report No. 97-64, NASA, Langley Research Center, Hampton, 16 pp.