Political-Administrative relations in collaborative environmental management

International Journal of Public Administration

Volumn 34, Issue 7, 2011, Pages 424-435

  Weible, Christopher M ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO   (United States)

Author keywords

Collaborative institutions; Interjurisdictional governance; Network analysis; Policy networks

Indexed keywords

EID: 79958017068     PISSN: 01900692     EISSN: 15324265     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/01900692.2011.569916     Document Type: Article

References (69)

1. Adam, Silke & Kriesi, H. (2007). The network approach. In P.A. Sabatier (Ed.) Theories of the policy process, 2nd ed. (pp. 129-154). Boulder, CO: Westview.
2. Agranoff, R., & McGuire, M. (2003). Collaborative public management: New strategies for local governments. Washington, D.C.: Georgetown University Press.
3. Ajzen, I. (1988). Attitudes, personality, and behavior. Chicago: Dorsey Press.
4. Appleby, P. (1945). Government is different. InJ. Shafritz & A. Hyde (Eds.), Classics of public administration, 4th ed. (pp.122-126). New York: Harcourt Brace College Publishers.
5. Bandura, A. (1986). Social foundations of thought and action: A social cognitive theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
6. Berardo, R. (2005). The east central Florida regional water supply planning initiative: Creating collaboration. In Scholz, J. T., & Stiftel, B. (Eds.), Adaptive governance and water conflict. Washington, D.C.: Resources for the Future Press.
7. Berardo, R. (2009). Generalized trust in multi-organizational policy arenas: Studying its emergence from a network perspective. Political Research Quarterly, 62(1), 178-189.
8. Bogdanor, V. (Ed.). (1991). Blackwell encyclopedia of political science. Cambridge, MA: Blackwell.
9. Borgatti, S.P., Everett, M.G., & Freeman, L.C. (2002). Ucinet 6 for Windows. Cambridge, MA: Analytic Technologies.
10. Carpenter, D., Esterling, K., & Lazer, D. (2004). Friends, brokers, and transitivity: Who informs whom in Washington politics? The Journal of Politics, 66(1), 224-246.
11. Converse, P. (1964). The nature of belief systems in mass publics. In Apter (Ed.), Ideology and discontent (pp. 206-261). New York: Free Press.
12. Deci, E.L. (1972). Intrinsic motivation, extrinsic reinforcement, and inequity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 22, 113-120.
13. Dedekorkut, A. (2005). Tampa Bay water wars: From conflict to collaboration? In Scholz, J.T., & Stiftel, B. (Eds.), Adaptive governance and water conflict: New institutions for collaborative planning. Washington, DC: Resources for the Future.
14. deLeon, P., & Varda, D.M. (2009). Toward a theory of collaborative policy networks: Identifying structural tendencies. Policy Studies Journal, 37(1), 59-74.
15. Demir, T., & Nyhan, R. C. (2008). The politics-administration dichotomy: An empirical search for correspondence between theory and practice. Public Administration Review, 68 (1), 81-96.
16. El Ansari, W., Phillips, C. J., & Hammick, M. (2001). Collaboration and partnerships: Developing the evidence base. Health and Social Care in the Community, 9(4), 215-227.
17. Feiock, R. C. (Ed.). (2004). Metropolitan governance: Conflict, competition, and cooperation. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.
18. Festinger, L. (1957). A Theory of cognitive dissonance. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
19. Frederickson, H.G. (2006). Transcending the community: Local leadership in a world of shared power. Public Management, 87(10): 8-15.
20. Hanneman, R. (2001). Introduction to social network methods. Retrieved March 3, 2011, from http://faculty.ucr.edu/~hanneman/Soc157/TEXT/TextIndex.html.
21. Heikkila, T., & Gerlak, A.K. (2005). The formation of large-scale collaborative resource management institutions: Clarifying the roles of stakeholders, science, and institutions. The Policy Studies Journal, 33(4), 583-611.
22. Hurwitz, J., & Peffley, M. (1987). How are foreign policy attitudes structured? A hierarchical model. American Political Science Review, 81(December), 1099-1120.
23. Kettl, D.F. (2000). The transformation of governance: Globalization, devolution, and the role of government, Public Administration Review, 60(6), 488-497.
24. Knoke, D., Pappi, F.U., Broadbent, J., & Tsujinaka, Y. (1996). Comparing policy networks: Labor politics in the US, Germany, and Japan. New York: Cambridge University Press.
25. Koontz, T.M., & Thomas, C.W. (2006). What do we know and need to know about the environmental outcomes of collaborative management. Public Administration Review, 66(6 supplement),111-121.
26. Koontz, T.M., Steelman, T.A., Carmin, J., Korfmacher, K.S., Moseley, C., & Thomas, C.W. (2004). Collaborative environmental management: What roles of government? Washington, D.C.: Resources for the Future Press.
27. Leach, W.D. (2002). Surveying diverse stakeholder groups. Society and Natural Resources, 15(7 August), 641-649.
28. Leach, W.D. (2006). Collaborative public management and democracy: Evidence from western watershed partnerships. Public Administration Review, 66(6 supplement),100-110.
29. Leach, W.D., & Sabatier, P.A. (2005). To trust an adversary: Integrating rational and psychological models of collaborative policymaking. American Political Science Review, 99(4, November), 491-503.
30. Leach, W.D., Pelkey, N.W., & Sabatier, P.A. (2002). Stakeholder partnerships as collaborative policymaking: Evaluation criteria applied to watershed management in California and Washington. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 21(4, Fall), 645-670.
31. Lilienthall, D.E. (1944). TVA: Democracy on the march. New York: Harper and Brothers.
32. Lord, C.G., Ross, L., & Lepper, M.R. (1979). Biased assimilation and attitude polarization: The effects of prior theories on subsequently considered evidence. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 37(1), 2098-2109.
33. Lubell, M. N. (2003). Collaborative institutions, belief-systems, and perceived policy effectiveness. Political Research Quarterly, 56(3), 309-323.
34. Lynn, L. (2001). The myth of the bureaucratic paradigm: What public administration really stood for. Public Administration Review, 61(2), 144.
35. Margerum, R.D., & Born, S.M. (1995). Integrated environmental management: Moving from theory to practice. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, 3(1), 371-392.
36. McLean, I. (1996). Oxford concise dictionary of politics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
37. Munro, Geoffrey D., & Ditto, P.H. (1997). Biased assimilation, attitude polarization, and affect in reactions to stereotype-relevant scientific information. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 23(6), 636-653.
38. Munro, G.D., Ditto, P.H., Lockhart, L.K., Fagerlin, A., Gready, M. & Peterson, E. (2002). Biased assimilation of sociopolitical arguments: evaluating the 1996 U.S. presidential debate. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 24(1), 15-26.
39. O'Leary, R., Gerard, C., & Bingham, L.B. (2006). Introduction to the symposium on collaborative public management. Public Administration Review, 66(6 supplement), 6-9.
40. Ostrom. E., (2005). Understanding institutional diversity. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
41. Ostrom, E., Gardner, R., & Walker, J. (1994). Rules, games and commonpool resources. Ann Arbor, MI: The University of Michigan Press.
42. Peffley, M., & Hurwitz, J. (1985). A hierarchical model of attitude constraint. American Journal of Political Science, 29, 871-890.
43. Provan, K.G., & Milward, H.B. (1995). A preliminary theory of network effectiveness: A comparative study of four community mental health systems. Administrative Science Quarterly, 40(1), 1-33.
44. Putnam, R. (1976). The comparative study of political elite. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
45. Rhodes, R.A.W. (1997). Understanding governance: Policy networks, governance, reflexivity and accountability. Philadelphia: Open University Press.
46. Sabatier, P.A., & Jenkins-Smith, H.C. (Eds.). (1993). Policy change and learning: An advocacy coalition approach. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
47. Sabatier, P.A., Focht, W., Lubell, M.N., Trachtenberg, Z., Vedlitz, A., & Matlock, M. (Eds.). (2005). Swimming upstream: Collaborative approaches to watershed management. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
48. Schneider, M., Teske, P., & Mintrom, M. (1995). Public entrepreneurs: agents for change in American government. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
49. Schneider, M., Scholz, J., Lubell, M., Mindruta, D., & Edwardsen, D. (2003). Building consensual institutions: Networks and the National Estuary Program. American Journal of Political Science, 47(1), 143-58.
50. Scholz, J.T., & Feiock, R. (Eds). (2009). Self-organizing governance. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
51. Scott, J. (1991). Social network analysis: A handbook. Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications.
52. Simon, H. (1996). The sciences of the artificial, 3rd ed. MIT Press.
53. Svara, J.H. (1985). Political supremacy and administrative expertise. Management Science and Policy Analysis, 3(Summer), 3-7.
54. Svara, J. H. (1999). Complementarity of politics and administration as a legitimate alternative to the dichotomy model. Administration & Society, 30(6), 676-705.
55. Svara, J.H. (2006). The search for meaning in political-administrative relations in local government. International Journal of Public Administration, 29(12), 1065-1090.
56. Thatcher, M. (1998). The development of policy network analyses: From modest origins to overarching frameworks. Journal of Theoretical Politics, 10(4), 389-416.
57. Wasserman, S., & Faust, K. (1994). Social network analysis: Methods and applications. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
58. Waugh, W.L., & Streib, G. (2006). Collaboration and leadership for effective emergency management. Public Administration Review Special Issue on Collaborative Management 66 (December): 131-140.
59. Weight, D.S. (1990). Federalism, intergovernmental relations, and intergovernmental management: Historical reflections and contemporary comparisons. Public Administration Review, 50 (March/April), 168-178.
60. Weiner, B. (1986). An attributional theory of motivation and emotion. New York: Springer-Verlag.
61. Weber, E.P. (2003). Bringing society back in. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.
62. Weible, C.M. (2007). An advocacy coalition framework approach to stakeholder analysis: Understanding the political context of California marine protected area policy. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 17(1), 95-117.
63. Weible, C.M., & Moore R.H. (2010). Analytics and beliefs: Competing explanations for defining problems and choosing allies and opponents in collaborative environmental management. Public Administration Review, 70(5), 756-766.
64. Weible, C.M., Pattison, A., & Sabatier, P.A. (2010). Harnessing expertbased information for learning and the sustainable management of complex socio-ecological systems. Environmental Science & Policy, 13(6), 522-534.
65. Wilson, W. (1887). The study of administration. Political Science Quarterly, 2(2), 197-222.
66. Wondoleck, J.M., & Yaffee, S.L. (2000). Making collaboration work: Lessons from innovation in natural resource management. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
67. Workman, S., Jones, B.D., & A.E. Jochim. (2009). Information processing and policy dynamics. Policy Studies Journal, 37(1), 75-93.
68. Zafonte, M., & Sabatier, P.A. (1998). Shared beliefs and imposed interdependencies as determinants of ally networks in overlapping subsystems. Journal of Theoretical Politics, 10(4), 473-505.
69. Zeemering, E.S. (2008). Governing inter local cooperation: City council interests and the implications for public management. Public Administration Review, 68(4), 731-741.