The formation of large-scale collaborative resource management institutions: Clarifying the roles of stakeholders, science, and institutions

Policy Studies Journal

Volumn 33, Issue 4, 2005, Pages 583-612

  Heikkila, Tanya ^a   Gerlak, Andrea K ^b  

^a Och Spine at New York Presbyterian Hospitals   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF ARIZONA   (United States)

Author keywords

CALFED Bay Delta Program; Chesapeake Bay Program; Collaborative environmental governance; Comprehensive Everglades Restoration Plan; Institutional change; Northwest Power and Conservation Council; Policy entrepreneurs; Scientific information

Indexed keywords

INSTITUTIONAL FRAMEWORK; REGIONAL PLANNING; RESOURCE MANAGEMENT; STAKEHOLDER;

NORTH AMERICA; UNITED STATES;

EID: 28244478571     PISSN: 0190292X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1541-0072.2005.00134.x     Document Type: Review

References (112)

1. Alliance for the Chesapeake Bay. 2003. Chesapeake 2004: A Blueprint for Success [Online]. http://www.acb-online.org/pubs/projects/ deliverables-148-4-2003.pdf (July 3, 2005).
2. Associated Press. 1979. "Commercial Salmon Fishermen Angered by a Government Order..." Domestic News, July 27, 1979.
3. Baland, Jean-Marie, and Jean-Philippe Platteau. 1996. Halting Degradation of Natural Resources: Is There a Role for Rural Communities? Oxford: Clarendon Press.
4. Bancroft, G. Thomas. 1989. "Status and Conservation of Wading Birds in the Everglades." American Birds (Winter): 1258-65.
5. Birkland, Thomas A. 1998. "Focusing Events, Mobilization, and Agenda Setting." Journal of Public Policy 18 (1): 53-74.
6. Blomquist, William. 1992. Dividing the Waters: Governing Groundwater in Southern California. San Francisco: ICS Press.
7. Blumm, Michael C., and Loraine F. Bodi. 1996. "Commentary." In The Northwest Salmon Crisis: A Documentary History, ed. Joseph Cone, and Sandy Ridlington. Corvallis: Oregon State University Press, 262-264.
8. Breitmeier, Helmut. 1997. "International Organizations and Global Environmental Governance." In Global Governance: Drawing Insights from the Environmental Experience, ed. Oran R. Young. Cambridge: MIT Press, pp. 83-107.
9. CALFED Bay-Delta Program. 2000. Final Programmatic Environmental Impact Statement and Environmental Record of Decision (ROD).
10. California Bay-Delta Authority. 2005. California Bay-Delta Authority website at http://calwater.ca.gov (accessed August 24, 2005).
11. California Bay-Delta Authority 2005. Mission statement [Online]. http:// calwater.ca.gov/Aboutcalfed/AboutCalfed.shtml (accessed August 24, 2005).
12. Center for Columbia River History. 1998. Interview with Pat Ford: Columbia River Dissenters Series [Online]. http://www.ccrh.org/oral/ ohsoh/fordp.htm (June 30, 2005).
13. Central Valley Improvement Act. 1992. Pub. L. no. 102-575, 106 stat. 4600.
14. Chesapeake Bay Research Coordination Act of 1980. 1980. Pub. L. no. 96-460, 16 USC §3001.
15. Chesapeake Bay Program. 1983. "1983 Chesapeake Bay Agreement" [online] http://www.chesapeakebay.net/pubs/ 1983.ChesapeakeBayAgreement.pdf (accessed August 24, 2005).
16. Chesapeake Bay Program. 1999a. Chesapeake 2000 [Online]. http:// www.chesapeakebay.net/pubs/diesapeake2000agreement.pdf (accessed August 24, 2005).
17. Chesapeake Bay Program. 1999b. Environmental Outcome-based Management: Using Environmental Goals and Measures in the Chesapeake Bay Program. Annapolis, MD: U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Chesapeake Bay Program Office.
18. Chesapeake Bay Program. 2005. Chesapeake Bay Program website at http:// www.chesapeakebay.net/ (accessed August 24, 2005).
19. Clarke, Alice L., and George H. Dalrymple. 2003. "$7.8 Billion for Everglades Restoration: Why Do Environmentalists Look So Worried?" Population and Environment 24 (6): 541-69.
20. Cobb, Roger W., and Charles D. Elder. 1972. Participation in American Politics: The Dynamics of Agenda Building. Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
21. Commission for a Sustainable South Florida. 1994-1999. Archive page at http://www.state.Fl.us./everglades/gcssf/gcssf.html (accessed August 24, 2005).
22. Comprehensive Everglades Restoration Plan website. 2005. "Rescuing an endangered ecosystem - the journey to restore America's Everglades" at http://www.evergladesplan.org/ (accessed August 24, 2005).
23. Cone, Joseph. 1995. A Common Fate: Endangered Salmon and the People of the Pacific Northwest. New York: Henry Holt and Company.
24. Connick, Sarah. 2003. "The Use of Collaborative Processes in the Making of California Water Policy: The San Francisco Estuary Project, the CALFED Bay-Delta Program, and the Sacramento Area Water Forum." Ph.D. diss. University of California.
25. Connick, Sarah, and Judith Innes. 2003. "Outcomes of Collaborative Water Policy Making: Applying Complexity Thinking to Evaluation." Journal of Environmental Planning and Management 46 (2): 177-97.
26. Costanza, Robert, and Jack Greer. 1995. "The Chesapeake Bay and Its Watershed: A Model for Sustainable Ecosystem Management?" In Barriers and Bridges to the Renewal of Ecosystems and Institutions, ed. Lance H. Gunderson, C. S. Holling, and Stephen S. Light. New York: Columbia University Press, 169-213.
27. Doyle, Mary. 2001. "Implementing Everglades Restoration." Journal of Land Use and Environmental Law 17: 59-66.
28. The Economist. 1989. "Everglades: Render Back to Nature." December 9, 1989, 50.
29. Endangered Species Act of 1973, Pub. L. no. 93-205, 87 Stat. 884 (1973).
30. Epstein, Edward. 2004. "Bipartisan Bid to End State's Water Wars." San Francisco Chronicle, May 6, 2004, B1.
31. Ernst, Howard R. 2003. Chesapeake Bay Blues: Science, Politics, and the Struggle to Save the Bay. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.
32. Everglades National Park Protection and Expansion Act. 1989. Pub. L. 101-929.
33. Frederick, Peter, Don Axelrad, Tom Atkson, and Curt Pollman. 2005. "Contaminants Research and Policy: The Everglades Mercury Story." National Wetlands Newsletter 27 (1): 3-6.
34. Federal Water Pollution Control Act (Clean Water Act) Amendments of 1972, Pub. L. no. 92-500, 86 Stat. 816 (1972).
35. Grunwald, Michael. 2002. "A Rescue Plan, Bold and Uncertain." The Washington Post, June 23, 2002, A01.
36. Haas, Peter. 1992. "Epistemic Communities and International Policy Coordination." International Organization 46 (1): 1-36.
37. Hammond, Allen. 1971. "NSF Prods Scientists to Coordinate Bay Research, but Academic Rivalries Snag Badly Needed Studies." Science 172 (3985): 827-30.
38. Hayes, David J. 2001-02. "Land Conservation and Restoration: Moving to the Landscape Level." Virginia Environmental Law Journal 21: 11253-62.
39. Hennessey, Timothy M. 1997. "Institutional Design for the Management of Estuarine Ecosystems: The Chesapeake Bay." In Ecosystem Function and Human Activities: Reconciling Economic and Ecology, ed. Norman L. Christensen, and David Simpson. New York: Chapman & Hall, 199-223.
40. Hinrichsen, Don. 1995. "Waterworld: A Hundred Years of Plumbing, Plantations and Politics in the Everglades." Amicus Journal 17 (2): 23-7.
41. Holden, Constance. 1971. "Chesapeake Bay." Science 172 (3985): 825-7.
42. Horton, Tom. 2003. Turning the Tide: Saving the Chesapeake Bay. Washington, DC: Island Press.
43. Imperial, Mark. 2004. Collaboration and Performance Management in Network Settings: Lessons from Three Watershed Governance Efforts. Washington, DC: The IBM Center for the Business of Government.
44. Karkkainen, Bradley C. 2002. "Collaborative Ecosystem Governance: Scale, Complexity, and Dynanism." Virginia Environmental Law Journal 21: 189-243.
45. Kenney, Douglas S. 1997. Resource Management at the Watershed Level: An Assessment of the Changing Federal Role in the Emerging Era of Community-based Watershed Management. Denver, CO: Western Water Policy Review Advisory Commission.
46. Koehler, Cynthia. 2001. Putting it Back Together: Making Eco-system Restoration Work. San Francisco Bay Association. [Online] http:// www.savesfbay.org/atf/cf/{2D306CC1-EF35-48CC-B523-32B03A970AE5}/ PIBT.Report.pdf (accessed August 24, 2005).
47. Kingdon, John W. 1995. Agendas, Alternatives and Public Policies, 2nd edn. New York: HarperCollins.
48. Koontz, Tomas M., Toddi A. Steelman, JoAnn Carmin, Katrina Smith Korfmacher, Cassandra Moseley, and Craig W. Thomas. 2004. Collaborative Environmental Management: What Roles for Government? Washington, DC: Resources for the Future Press.
49. Leach, William D., Neil W. Pelkey, and Paul Sabatier. 2002. "Stakeholder Partnerships as Collaborative Policymaking: Evaluation Criteria Applied to Watershed Management in California and Washington." Journal of Policy Analysis and Management 21 (4): 645-70.
50. Lee, Kai. 1991. "Unconventional Power: Energy Efficiency and Environmental Rehabilitation under the Northwest Power Act." Annual Review of Energy and the Environment 16: 337-64.
51. Lee, Kai. 1993. Compass and Gyroscope: Integrating Science and Politics for the Environment. Washington, DC: Island Press.
52. Lee, Kai. 1995. "Deliberately Seeking Sustainability in the Columbia River Basin." In Barriers and Bridges to the Renewal of Ecosystems and Institutions, ed. Lance H. Gunderson, C. S. Holling, and Stephen S. Light. New York: Columbia University Press, 214-238.
53. Libecap, Gary D. (1994). "The Conditions for Successful Collective Action." Journal of Theoretical Politics 6 (4): 563-92.
54. Light, Stephen S., Lance H. Gunderson, and C. S. Holling. 1995. "The Everglades: Evolution of Management in a Turbulent Ecosystem." In Barriers and Bridges to the Renewal of Ecosystems and Institutions, ed. Lance H. Gunderson, C. S. Holling, and Stephen S. Light. New York: Columbia University Press, 103-68.
55. Lubell, Mark. 2004. "Collaborative Watershed Management: A View from the Grassroots." Policy Studies Journal 32 (3): 341-61.
56. Lubell, Mark, and John T. Scholz. 2001. "Cooperation, Reciprocity and the Collective-Action Heuristic." American Journal of Political Science 45 (1): 160-78.
57. Lubell, Mark, Mark Schneider, John T. Scholz, and Mihriye Mete. 2002. "Watershed Partnerships and the Emergence of Collective Action Institutions." American Journal of Political Science 46 (1): 148-63.
58. Martin, Glen. 1992a. "Sacramento Imperils Delta Water." The San Francisco Chronicle. February 10, p. C9.
59. Martin, Glen. 1992b. "State's Pump Drains the Delta of it's Lifeblood." The San Francisco Chronicle. July 15, p. A1.
60. McCay, Bonnie J. 2002. "Emergence of Institutions for the Commons: Contexts, Situations, and Events." In The Drama of the Commons, ed. Elinor Ostrom, Thomas Dietz, Nives Dolsak, Paul Stern, Paul Stonich, Susan Stonich, and Elke U. Weber. Washington, DC: National Academy Press, 361-402.
61. McClurg, Sue. 2004. A Briefing on the Bay-Delta and CALFED. Sacramento: Water Education Foundation.
62. Moreau, Ron. 1986. "Everglades Forever?" Newsweek, April 7, 1986, 72.
63. National Environment Policy. Act of 1969. 1969. Publ. L. no. 91-190, 83 Stat. 852.
64. National Research Council. 1986. Proceedings of the Conference on Common Property Resource Management, Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
65. National Research Council. 2003. Science and the Greater Everglades Ecosystem Restoration: An Assessment of the Critical Ecosystem Studies Initiative. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
66. New York Times. 1989. "Mercury in the Everglades Fish Worries Experts." March 14, 1989, sec. C: 5.
67. Nichols, Frederic H., James E. Cloern, Samuel N. Luoma, and David H. Peterson. 1986. "The Modification of an Estuary." Science 231 (4738): 567-73.
68. Northwest Power and Conservation Council. 2005. Northwest Power and Conservation Council website at http://www.nwcouncil.org/ (accessed August 24, 2005).
69. Northwest Power and Conservation Council. 2004. 20 Years of Progress: Columbia River Basin Fish and Wildlife Program, Northwest Power and Conservation Council. Portland: Northwest Power Planning Council.
70. Northwest Power Planning Council. 1994. Columbia River Basin Fish and Wildlife Program. Portland: Northwest Power Planning Council.
71. Northwest Power Planning Council. 2001. Technical Guide for Subbasin Planners. Portland: Northwest Power Planning Council.
72. Northwest Power Planning Council. 2003. Northwest Power Planning Council Briefing Book. Portland: Northwest Power Planning Council.
73. Ostrom, Elinor. 1990. Governing the Commons: The Evolution of Institutions for Collective Action. New York: Cambridge University Press.
74. Ostrom, Elinor. 1998. "A Behavioral Approach to the Rational Choice Theory of Collective Action." American Political Science Review 92 (1): 1-22.
75. Ostrom, Elinor. 2001. "Reformulating the Commons." In Protecting the Commons: A Framework for Resource Management in the Americas, ed. Joanna Burger, Elinor Ostrom, Richard B. Norgaard, David Policansky, and Bernard D. Goldstein. Washington, DC: Island Press, 17-41.
76. Ostrom, Elinor, Roy Gardner, and James Walker. 1994. Rules, Games, & Common-Pool Resources. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.
77. Oxnam, Geoff, and John P. Williams. 2001. "Saving the Chesapeake." Forum for Applied Research and Public Policy 16 (1): 96-102.
78. Pacific Northwest Electric Power Planning and Conservation Act, Pub. L. no. 96-501, 94 Stat. 2697 (1980).
79. Palmer, Michael T. 2004. "The Chesapeake Bay Restoration Act of 2000: New Requirements for Federal Agencies." William and Mary Environmental Law and Policy Review 28: 375-422.
80. Pitzer, Gary. 2004. "The CALFED Plan: Making It Happen." Western Water (January/February): 4-13.
81. Pitzer, Gary. 2005. "CALFED at a Crossroads: A Decade of the Bay-Delta Program." Western Water (March/April): 4-13.
82. Principles for Agreement on Bay-Delta Standards Between the State of Florida and the Federal Government (December 15, 1994).
83. Powers, E. Michael. 2005. "Infighting Swamps Everglades Cleanup." Engineering News-Record, April 11, 2005, 10.
84. Rieke, Elizabeth A. 1996. "The Bay-Delta Accord: A Stride Toward Sustainability" Colorado Law Review 67: 341-69.
85. River and Harbor Act of 1965, Pub. L. no. 89-298, 79 Stat. 1092 (1965).
86. Roe, Emery, and Michel van Eeten. 2002. "Reconciling Ecosystem Rehabilitation and Service Reliability Mandates in Large Technical Systems: Findings and Implications of Three Major U.S. Ecosystem Management Initiatives for Managing Human-dominated Aquatic-Terrestrial Ecosystems." Ecosystems 5: 509-28.
87. Sabatier, Paul A., and Hank C. Jenkins-Smith. 1993. Policy Change and Learning: An Advocacy Coalition Approach. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
88. San Francisco Estuary Project. 1987. San Francisco Estuary Project at http://www.abag.ca.gov./bayarea.sfep/sfep.html (accessed August 24, 2005).
89. Satchall, Michael. 1990. "Can the Everglades Still Be Saved?" U.S. News & World Report, April 2, 1990, 24.
90. Schrope, Mark. 2001. "Save Our Swamp." Nature 405 (January): 128-30.
91. Schubel, J. R., and D. W. Pritchard. 1971. "Chesapeake Bay: A Second Look." Science 173 (4000): 943-5.
92. Shaw, Hank. 2005. "$100M in Delta Funds May Sink." Stockton Record, May 19, 2005.
93. South Florida Water Management District. 2003. Comprehensive Everglades Restoration Plan: Annual Report. West Palm Beach, Florida.
94. Taylor, Kim, Katharine L. Jacobs, and Samuel N. Luoma. 2003. "CALFED: An Experiment in Science and Decision-making." Environment 45 (1): 30-42.
95. Taylor, Michael, and Sara Singleton. 1993. "The Communal Resource: Transaction Costs and the Solution of Collective Action Problems." Politics and Society 21 (2): 195-214.
96. Thomas, Craig W. 2003. Bureaucratic Landscapes: Interagency Cooperation and the Preservation of Biodiversity. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
97. Turner, Wallace. 1981. "Fishing as a Way of Life Wanes on the Columbia." The New York Times, February 6, 1981, sec, A, col. 3.
98. United States Congress. House. Committee on Interstate and Foreign Commerce, Subcommittee on Energy and Power. Pacific Northwest Electric Power Planning: Hearings Before the Subcommittee on Energy and Power of the Committee on Interstate and Foreign Commerce, Hearings 30 July 1979, 19 Oct. 1979. 96th Congress, 1st Sess. Washington: US Government Printing Office, 1980.
99. U.S. Army Corps of Engineers and the South Florida Water Management District. 1999. Central and Southern Florida Project Comprehensive Review Study, Final Integrated Feasibility Report and Programmatic Environmental Impact Statement. Jacksonville, FL: U.S. Army Corps of Engineers.
100. U.S. Army Corps of Engineers and the South Florida Water Management District. 2003. Vision Statement for the Comprehensive Everglades Restoration Plan.
101. U.S. General Accounting Office. 2001. South Florida Ecosystem Restoration Substantial Progress Made in Developing a Strategic Plan, but Actions Still Needed. Washington, DC: General Accounting Office.
102. U.S. General Accounting Office. 2003. South Florida Ecosystem Restoration: Improved Science Coordination Needed to Increase the Likelihood of Success. Washington, DC: General Accounting Office.
103. Vasi, Ion B., and Michael Macy. 2003. "The Mobilizer's Dilemma: Crisis, Empowerment, and Collective Action." Social Forces 81 (3): 983-1002.
104. Vigmostad, Karen E., Nicole Mays, Allen Hance, and Allegra Cangelosi. 2005. Large-scale Ecosystem Restoration: Lessons for Existing and Emerging Initiatives. Washington, DC: Northeast Midwest Institute.
105. Volkman, John. 1997. A River in Common: The Columbia River, the Salmon Ecosystem, and Water Policy - Report to the Western Water Policy Review Advisory Commission. Springfield, VA: Western Water Policy Review Advisory Commission.
106. Voss, Michael. 2000. "The Central and Southern Florida Project Comprehensive Review Study: Restoring the Everglades." Ecology Law Quarterly 27: 751-70.
107. Walker, Jack L. 1977. "Setting the Agenda in the U.S. Senate: A Theory of Problem Selection." Journal of Political Science 7: 423-45.
108. Water Resources Development Act. 1992. Pub. L. no. 102-580, 106 Stat. 4797.
109. Water Resources Development Act. 1996. Pub. L. no. 104-303, 110 Stat. 3658.
110. Water Resources Development Act. 2000. Pub. L. no. 106-541, 114 Stat. 2572.
111. Wondolleck, Julia M., and Steven L. Yaffee. 2000. Making Collaboration Work: Lessons from Innovation in Natural Resource Management. Washington, DC: Island Press.
112. Wright, Patrick. 2001. "Fixing the Delta: The CALFED Bay-Delta Program and Water Policy Under the Davis Administration." Golden Gate University Law Review 31: 331-34.