Anticipatory baseline effects and information integration in visual world studies

Acta Psychologica

Volumn 137, Issue 2, 2011, Pages 201-207

  Barr, Dale J ^a   Gann, Timothy M ^b   Pierce, Russell S ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF GLASGOW   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

Eyetracking; Spoken language comprehension; Visual world

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; EYE MOVEMENT; FEMALE; HUMAN; MALE; PHOTOSTIMULATION; PHYSIOLOGY; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; REACTION TIME; SPEECH PERCEPTION;

ADULT; EYE MOVEMENTS; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; PHOTIC STIMULATION; REACTION TIME; SPEECH PERCEPTION;

EID: 79957956813     PISSN: 00016918     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2010.09.011     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. Allopenna P.D., Magnuson J.S., Tanenhaus M.K. Tracking the time-course of spoken word recognition using eye movements: Evidence for continuous mapping models. Journal of Memory and Language 1998, 38:419-439.
2. Altmann G.T., Kamide Y. Incremental interpretation at verbs: Restricting the domain of subsequent reference. Cognition 1999, 73:247-264.
3. Baayen R.H. languageR: Data sets and functions with "Analyzing Linguistic Data: A practical introduction to statistics". R package version 0.4 2007.
4. Baayen R.H., Davidson D.J., Bates D.M. Mixed-effects modeling with crossed random effects for subjects and items. Journal of Memory and Language 2008, 59:390-412.
5. Barr D.J. Analyzing 'visual world' eyetracking data using multilevel logistic regression. Journal of Memory and Language 2008, 59:457-474.
6. Barr D.J. Pragmatic expectations and linguistic evidence: Listeners anticipate but do not integrate common ground. Cognition 2008, 109:18-40.
7. Barr D.J., Keysar B. Perspective taking and the coordination of meaning in language use. Handbook of Psycholinguistics 2006, 901-938. Elsevier, Amsterdam, Netherlands. 2nd ed. M.J. Traxler, M.A. Gernsbacher (Eds.).
8. Bates D. lme4: Linear mixed-effects models using S4 classes. R package version 0.99875-9 2007.
9. Borsboom D., Mellenbergh G., van Heerden J. The concept of validity. Psychological Review 2004, 111:1061-1071.
10. Brown-Schmidt S. The role of executive function in perspective taking during online language comprehension. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 2009, 16:893-900.
11. Church B.A., Schacter D.L. Perceptual specificity of auditory priming: Implicit memory for voice intonation and fundamental frequency. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Learning, Memory, and Cognition 1994, 20:521-533.
12. Cooper R.M. The control of eye fixation by the meaning of spoken language: A new methodology for the real-time investigation of speech perception, memory, and language processing. Cognitive Psychology 1974, 6:84-107.
13. Dahan D., Tanenhaus M.K. Continuous mapping from sound to meaning in spoken-language comprehension: Immediate effects of verb-based thematic constraints. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Learning, Memory, and Cognition 2004, 30:498-513.
14. Fodor J.A. The modularity of mind: An essay on faculty psychology 1983, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
15. Goldinger S.D. Words and voices: Episodic traces in spoken word identification and recognition memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Learning, Memory, and Cognition 1996, 22:1166-1183.
16. Hanna J., Tanenhaus M.K., Trueswell J.C. The effects of common ground and perspective on domains of referential interpretation. Journal of Memory and Language 2003, 49:43-61.
17. Huettig F., McQueen J. The tug of war between phonological, semantic and shape information in language-mediated visual search. Journal of Memory and Language 2007, 57:460-482.
18. Keysar B., Barr D.J., Balin J.A., Brauner J.S. Taking perspective in conversation: The role of mutual knowledge in comprehension. Psychological Science 2000, 11:32-38.
19. Keysar B., Lin S., Barr D.J. Limits on theory of mind use in adults. Cognition 2003, 89:25-41.
20. Kronmüller E., Barr D.J. Perspective-free pragmatics: Broken precedents and the recovery-from-preemption hypothesis. Journal of Memory and Language 2007, 56:436-455.
21. Mirman D., Dixon J.A., Magnuson J.S. Statistical and computational models of the visual world paradigm: Growth curves and individual differences. Journal of Memory and Language 2008, 59:475-494.
22. Nadig A.S., Sedivy J.C. Evidence of perspective-taking constraints on children's on-line reference resolution. Psychological Science 2002, 13:329-336.
23. Nygaard L.C., Pisoni D.B. Talker-specific learning in speech perception. Perception & Psychophysics 1998, 60:355-376.
24. Stigler S.M. Statistics on the table: The history of statistical concepts and methods 1999, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.
25. Tanenhaus M.K., Frank A., Jaeger T.F., Masharov M., Salverda A.P. The art of the state: Mixed effect regression modeling in the visual world. The 21st CUNY Sentence Processing Conference. Chapel Hill, NC 2008.
26. Tanenhaus M.K., Spivey M.J., Eberhard K.M., Sedivy J.C. Integration of visual and linguistic information in spoken language comprehension. Science 1995, 268:1632-1634.