Relationship between cancellous bone density and mandibular canal depiction

Implant Dentistry

Volumn 18, Issue 2, 2009, Pages 112-118

  Naitoh, Munetaka ^a   Katsumata, Akitoshi ^b   Kubota, Yukinobu ^a   Hayashi, Masanori ^a   Ariji, Eiichiro ^a  

^a AICHI GAKUIN UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

^b ASAHI UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

Author keywords

Computed tomography; Digital panoramic image; Hounsfield units; Mandibular canal

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; BONE DENSITY; FEMALE; HISTOLOGY; HUMAN; MALE; MANDIBLE; MANDIBULAR NERVE; METHODOLOGY; MIDDLE AGED; PANORAMIC RADIOGRAPHY; PHYSIOLOGY; RADIOGRAPHY; SPIRAL COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY; TOOTH RADIOGRAPHY;

ADULT; AGED; BONE DENSITY; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MANDIBLE; MANDIBULAR NERVE; MIDDLE AGED; RADIOGRAPHY, DENTAL, DIGITAL; RADIOGRAPHY, PANORAMIC; TOMOGRAPHY, SPIRAL COMPUTED;

EID: 67650170719     PISSN: 10566163     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/ID.0b013e318198da7e     Document Type: Article

References (9)

1. Wyatt CCL, Pharoah MJ. Imaging techniques and image interpretation for dental implant treatment. Int J Prosthodont. 1998;11:442-452.
2. Naitoh M, Hiraiwa Y, Aimiya H, et al. Bifid mandibular canal in Japanese. Implant Dent. 2007;16:24-32.
3. Naitoh M, Kurosu Y, Inagaki K, Kat-sumata A, Noguchi T, Ariji E. Assessment of mandibular buccal and lingual cortical bones in postmenopausal women. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2007;104:545-550.
4. Gijbels F, De Meyer A-M, Bou Serhal C, et al. The subjective image quality of direct digital and conventional panoramic radiography. Clin Oral Invest. 2000;4:162-167.
5. Naitoh M, Katsumata A, Nohara E, et al. Measurement accuracy of reconstructed 2-D images obtained by multi-slice helical CT. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2004;15:570-574.
6. Klinge B, Petersson A, Maly P. Location of the mandibular canal: Comparison of macroscopic findings, conventional radiography, and computed tomography. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 1989;4:327-332.
7. Lindh C, Petersson A, Klinge B. Measurements of distances related to the mandibular canal in radiograph. Clin Oral Implant Res. 1995;6:96-103.
8. Norton MB, Gamble C. Bone classification: an objective scale of bone density using the computerized tomography scan. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2001;12: 79-84.
9. Misch CE. Bone density: A key determinant for clinical success. In: Misch CE, ed. Contemporary Implant Dentistry. 2nd ed. St Louis, MO: Mosby; 1999:109-118.