Therapeutic change in interaction: Conversation analysis of a transforming sequence

Psychotherapy Research

Volumn 21, Issue 3, 2011, Pages 348-365

  Voutilainen, Liisa ^a   Peräkylä, Anssi ^a   Ruusuvuori, Johanna ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF HELSINKI   (Finland)

^b FINNISH INSTITUTE OF OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH   (Finland)

Author keywords

Cognitive constructivist therapy; Conversation analysis; Process research; Qualitative research methods

Indexed keywords

ADAPTIVE BEHAVIOR; ADULT; ARTICLE; ATTITUDE; COGNITIVE THERAPY; DEFENSE MECHANISM; EMOTION; FEMALE; HUMAN; HUMAN RELATION; METHODOLOGY; MOTHER CHILD RELATION; SELF CONCEPT; VERBAL BEHAVIOR;

ADAPTATION, PSYCHOLOGICAL; COGNITIVE THERAPY; DEFENSE MECHANISMS; EMOTIONS; FEMALE; HUMANS; MOTHER-CHILD RELATIONS; PROFESSIONAL-PATIENT RELATIONS; REJECTION (PSYCHOLOGY); SELF CONCEPT; VERBAL BEHAVIOR; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 79957924631     PISSN: 10503307     EISSN: 14684381     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/10503307.2011.573509     Document Type: Article

References (55)

1. Angus, L., Levitt, H., & Hardtke, K. (1999). The Narrative Processes Coding System: research applications and implications for therapy. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 55(10), 1255-1270.
2. Antaki, C. (2008). Formulations in psychotherapy. In A. Peräkylä, C. Antaki, S. Vehviläinen & I. Leudar (Eds.), Conversation analysis and psychotherapy (pp. 26-42). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
3. Antaki, C., Barnes, R., & Leudar, I. (2005). Diagnostic formulations in psychotherapy. Discourse Studies, 7(6), 627-647.
4. Bercelli, F., Rossano, F., & Viaro,M. (2008). Clients' responses to therapists' re-interpretations. In A. Peräkylä, C. Antaki, S. Vehviläinen & I. Leudar (Eds.), Conversation analysis and psychotherapy (pp. 43-62). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
5. Boothe, B. (2001). Gesprächsanalyse in der Psychologie [Conversation analysis in psychology]. In K. Brinker, G. Anton, W. Heinemann & S.F. Sager (Eds.), Text- und Gesprächslinguistik. Linguistics of text and conversation. Ein internationales Handbuch zeitgenössicher Forschung (pp. 1655-1670). Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.
6. Buchholz, M.B. (Ed.) (1995). Psychotherapeutische Interaktion. Qualitative Studien zu Konversation und Metapher, Geste und Plan [Psychotherapeutic interaction. Qualitative studies on conversation and metaphor, gesture and plan]. Opladen: Westdeutscher Verlag.
7. Buttny, R. (1996). Clients' and therapist's joint construction of the clients' problems. Reseach on Language and Social Interaction, 29(2), 125-153.
8. Davis, K. (1986). The process of problem (re)formulation in psychotherapy. Sociology of Health and Illness, 8(1), 44-74.
9. Drew, P., & Heritage, J. (1992). Analyzing talk at work: an introduction. In P. Drew & J. Heritage (Eds.), Talk at work: interaction in institutional settings (pp. 3-65). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
10. Heritage, J., & Watson, R. (1979). Formulations as conversational objects. In G. Psathas (Ed.), Everyday language (pp. 123-162). New York: Irvington Press.
11. Heritage, J. (1984). Garfinkel and ethnomethodology. Cambridge: Polity Press.
12. Honos-Webb, L., Surko, M., Stiles, W.B., & Greenberg, L. S. (1999). Assimilation of voices in psychotherapy: The case of Jan. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 46, 448-460.
13. Hutchby, I. (2002). Resisting the incitement to talk in child counselling: Aspects of the utterance "I don't know". Discourse Studies, 4(2), 147-168.
14. Jefferson, G. (2004). Glossary of transcript symbols with an introduction. In G.H. Lerner (Ed.), Conversation analysis: Studies from the first generation (pp. 13-31). Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
15. Krause, M., de la Parra, G., Arístegui, R., Dagnino, P., Tomicic, A., Valdés, N., Echávarri, O., Strasser, K., Reyes, L., & Altimir, C. (2007). The evolution of therapeutic change studied through generic change indicators. Psychotherapy Research, 17(6), 673-689.
16. Laitila, A., Aaltonen, J., Wahlström, J., & Lynne, A. (2005). Narrative process modes as a bridging concept for the theory, research and clinical practice of systemic therapy. Journal of Family Therapy, 27(3), 202-216.
17. Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning. Legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
18. Leiman, M. (1997). Procedures as dialogical sequences: A revised version of the fundamental concept in Cognitive Analytic Therapy. British Journal of Medical Psychology, 70, 193-207.
19. Leiman, M., & Stiles, W.B. (2001). Dialogical sequence analysis and the zone of proximal development as conceptual enhancements to the assimilation model: The case of Jan revisited. Psychotherapy Research, 11(3), 311-330.
20. Lepper, G., & Mergenthaler, E. (2005). Exploring group processes. Psychotherapy Research, 15(4), 433-444.
21. Lepper, G., & Mergenthaler, E. (2007). Therapeutic collaboration: How does it work? Psychotherapy Research, 17(5), 576-587.
22. Lepper, G., & Mergenthaler, E. (2008). Observing therapeutic interaction in the "Lisa" case. Psychotherapy Research, 18(6), 634-644.
23. Leudar, I., Sharrock, W., Truckle, S., Colombino, T., Hayes, J., & Booth, K. (2008). Conversation of emotions: On turning play into psychoanalytic psychotherapy. In A. Peräkylä, C. Antaki, S. Vehviläinen & I. Leudar (Eds.), Conversation analysis and psychotherapy (pp. 152-72). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
24. Martin, C. (2004). From other to self. Learning as interactional change. Uppsala: Acta Universitatis Upsaliensis.
25. MacMartin, C. (2008). Resisting optimistic questions in narrative and solution-focused therapies. In A. Peräkylä, C. Antaki, S. Vehviläinen & I. Leudar (Eds.), Conversation analysis andpsychotherapy (pp. 80-99). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
26. Melander, H., & Sahlström, F. (2009). In tow of the blue whale. Learning as interactional changes in topical orientation. Journal of Pragmatics, 41, 1519-1537.
27. Mondada, L., & Pekarek Doehler, S. (2004). Second language acquisition as situated practice: Task accomplishment in the French second language classroom. The Modern Language Journal, 88(4), 501-518.
28. Muntigl, P., & Horvath, A. (2005). Language, psychotherapy and client change: An interdisciplinary perspective. In R. Wodak & P. Chilton (Eds.), A new agenda in (critical) discourse analysis (pp. 213-239). Amsterdam/ Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
29. Peräkylä, A. (2004). Making links in psychoanalytic interpretations: a conversation analytic view. Psychotherapy Research, 14(3), 289-307.
30. Peräkylä, A. (2005). Patients' responses to interpretations. A dialogue between conversation analysis and psychoanalytic theory. Communication & Medicine, 2(2), 163-176.
31. Peräkylä, A. (2010). Shifting the perspective after the patient's response to an interpretation. International Journal of Psychoanalyis, 91(6), 1363-1384.
32. Peräkylä, A., Antaki, C., Vehviläinen, S., & Leudar, I. (2008). Analysing psychotherapy in practice. In A. Peräkylä, C. Antaki, S. Vehviläinen & I. Leudar (Eds.), Conversation Analysis and Psychotherapy (pp. 5-25). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
33. Peräkylä, A., & Vehviläinen, S. (2003). Conversation analysis and the professional stocks of interactional knowledge. Discourse and Society, 14(6), 727-750.
34. Pomerantz, A. (1984). Agreeing and disagreeing with assessment: Some features of preferred/dispreferred turn shapes. In J.M. Atkinson & J. Heritage (Eds.), Structures of social action: Studies in conversation analysis (pp. 57-101). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
35. Pomerantz, A. (1986). Extreme case formulations: a way of legitimizing claims. Human Studies, 9(2/3), 219-229.
36. Rachman, S. (1980). Emotional processing. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 18, 51-60.
37. Reyes, L., Aristegui, R., Krause, M., Strasser, K., Tomicic, A., Valde, N., Altimir, C., Ramirez, I., De La Parra, G., Dagnino, P., Echavarri, O., Vilches, O., & Ben-Dov, P. (2008). Language and therapeutic change: A speech acts analysis. Psychotherapy Research, 18(3), 355-362.
38. Sacks, H. (1992). In G. Jefferson (Ed.), Lectures on conversation, Volumes I and II. Oxford: Blackwell.
39. Sacks, H., Schegloff, E.A., & Jefferson, G. (1974). A simplest systematics for the organization of turn-taking for conversation. Language, 50, 696-735.
40. Schegloff, E.A. (2007). Sequence organization in interaction: A primer in conversation analyis, Volume 1. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
41. Sellman, J. (2008). Vuorovaikutus ääniterapiassa. Keskusteluanalyyttinen utkimus harjoittelun rakenteesta terapeutin antamasta alautteesta ja oppimisesta. [Interaction in voice therapy. A conversation analytical study of voice training, therapist's feedback and learning.] University of Helsinki: Publications of the Department of Speech Sciences 54.
42. Stiles, W.B. (2002). Assimilation of problematic experiences. In J.C. Norcross (Ed.), Psychotherapy relationships that work:Therapist contributions and responsiveness to patients (pp. 357-365). New York: Oxford University Press.
43. Stiles, W.B., Elliott, R., Llewelyn, S.P., FirthCozens, J.A., Margison, F.R., Shapiro, D.A., & Hardy, G. (1990). Assimilation of problematic experiences by clients in psychotherapy. Psychotherapy, 27, 411-420.
44. Streeck, U. (2001). "Ja, genau, genau". Bestätigungen als Versuche des Patienten, die Kompetenz des Psychotherapeuten als eigene zu deklarieren. Eine gesprächsanalytische Untersuchung. ["Yes, exactly, exactly". Acknowledgements as the patients' attempts to declare the competence of the psychotherapist as that of their own. A conversation analytical study.] Psychotherapie und Sozialwissenschaft, 1, 74-94.
45. Streeck, U. (2008). A psychotherapist's view of conversation analysis. In A. Peräkylä, C. Antaki, S. Vehviläinen & I. Leudar (Eds.), Conversation analysis and psychotherapy (pp. 173-187). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
46. Vehviläinen, S. (2003). Preparing and delivering interpretations in psychoanalytic interaction. Text, 23, 573-606.
47. Vehviläinen, S. (2008). Identifying and managing resistance in psychoanalytic interaction. In A. Peräkylä, C. Antaki, S. Vehviläinen & I. Leudar (Eds.), Conversation analysis and psychotherapy (pp. 120-138). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
48. Vehviläinen, S. (2009). Problems in the research problem: criticism and resistance in academic supervision encounters. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 6, 185-201.
49. Voutilainen, L., Peräkylä, A., & Ruusuvuori, J. (2010a). Recognition and interpretation: Responding to emotional experience in psychotherapy. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 43(1), 85-107.
50. Voutilainen, L., Peräkylä, A., & Ruusuvuori, J. (2010b). Professional non-neutrality: Criticising the third party in psychotherapy. Sociology of Health & Illness, 32(5), 798-816.
51. Vygotsky, L. (1978). Mind in Society: The development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
52. Warner, M.A. (1997). Does empathy cure? A theoretical consideration of empathy, processing, and personal narrative. In A.C. Bohart & L. Greenberg (Eds.), Empathy reconsidered: New directions in theory research & practice (pp. 125-141). Washington DC: APA Press.
53. Wenger, E. (1998). Communities of practice. Learning, meaning and identity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
54. Wootton, A. (1997). Interaction and the development of mind. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
55. Young, R.F., & Miller, E.R. (2004). Learning as changing participation: Discourse roles in ESL writing conferences. The Modern Language Journal, 88(4), 519-535.