View the label before you view the movie: A field experiment into the impact of Portion size and Guideline Daily Amounts labelling on soft drinks in cinemas

BMC Public Health

Volumn 11, Issue , 2011, Pages

  Vermeer, Willemijn M ^a   Steenhuis, Ingrid H M ^a   Leeuwis, Franca H ^a   Bos, Arjan E R ^b   De Boer, Michiel ^a   Seidell, Jacob C ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF AMSTERDAM   (Netherlands)

^b MAASTRICHT UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Environmental interventions; Food labelling; Obesity prevention; Portion sizes

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; AUDIOVISUAL EQUIPMENT; CARBONATED BEVERAGE; FEMALE; FOOD PACKAGING; HUMAN; LEISURE; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; NETHERLANDS; OBESITY; PRACTICE GUIDELINE; QUESTIONNAIRE;

CARBONATED BEVERAGES; FEMALE; FOOD LABELING; GUIDELINES AS TOPIC; HUMANS; LEISURE ACTIVITIES; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; MOTION PICTURES AS TOPIC; NETHERLANDS; OBESITY; QUESTIONNAIRES;

EID: 79957919034     PISSN: None     EISSN: 14712458     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1186/1471-2458-11-438     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. Size makes a difference. J Matthiessen S Fagt A Biltoft-Jensen AM Beck L Ovesen, Public Health Nutr 2003 6 1 65 72 12581467 (Pubitemid 36236135)
2. Changes in beverage intake between 1977 and 2001. SJ Nielsen BM Popkin, Am J Prev Med 2004 27 3 205 210 10.1016/j.amepre.2004.05.005 15450632 (Pubitemid 39278319)
3. Small, medium, large or supersize: trends in food portion sizes in The Netherlands. IHM Steenhuis FH Leeuwis WM Vermeer, Public Health Nutr 2009 852 857
4. Expanding portion sizes in the US marketplace: implications for nutrition counseling. LR Young M Nestle, J Am Diet Assoc 2003 103 2 231 234 10.1053/jada.2003.50027 12589331 (Pubitemid 38375926)
5. Intake of sugar-sweetened beverages and weight gain: a systematic review. VS Malik MB Schulze FB Hu, The American journal of clinical nutrition 2006 84 2 274 288 16895873 (Pubitemid 44699135)
6. The effect of increased beverage portion size on energy intake at a meal. JE Flood LS Roe BJ Rolls, J Am Diet Assoc 2006 106 12 1984 1990 discussion 1990-1981 10.1016/j.jada.2006.09.005 17126628 (Pubitemid 44779445)
7. Portion Distortion: A Study of College Students. R Bryant L Dundes, J Cons Aff 2005 39 2 399 408 10.1111/j.1745-6606.2005.00021.x (Pubitemid 43934277)
8. Portion Distortion: Typical Portion Sizes Selected by Young Adults. J Schwartz C Byrd-Bredbenner, J Am Diet Assoc 2006 106 9 1412 1418 10.1016/j.jada.2006.06.006 16963346 (Pubitemid 44331738)
9. A front-of-pack nutrition logo: a quantitative and qualitative process evaluation in the Netherlands. EL Vyth IH Steenhuis SF Mallant ZL Mol J Brug M Temminghoff GI Feunekes L Jansen H Verhagen JC Seidell, J Health Commun 2009 14 7 631 645 10.1080/10810730903204247 19851915
10. The origin of Guideline Daily Amounts and the Food Standards Agency's guidance on what counts as 'a lot' and 'a little'. M Rayner P Scarborough C Williams, Public Health Nutr 2004 7 4 549 556 15153261 (Pubitemid 38787520)
11. Making sense of Guideline Daily Amounts. http://www.eufic.org/article/en/ artid/Making-sense-of-Guideline-Daily-Amounts/
12. Portion size: review and framework for interventions. IHM Steenhuis WM Vermeer, The international journal of behavioral nutrition and physical activity 2009 6 58 10.1186/1479-5868-6-58 19698102
13. From the point-of-purchase perspective: a qualitative study of the feasibility of interventions aimed at portion-size. WM Vermeer IHM Steenhuis JC Seidell, Health Policy 2009 90 1 73 80 10.1016/j.healthpol.2008.07.006 18762350
14. Portion size: a qualitative study of consumers' attitudes toward point-of-purchase interventions aimed at portion size. WM Vermeer IHM Steenhuis JC Seidell, Health Educ Res 2010 25 1 109 120 10.1093/her/cyp051 19748992
15. Portion size labelling and intended soft drink consumption: the impact of labelling format and size portfolio. WM Vermeer IHM Steenhuis FH Leeuwis AE Bos M de Boer JC Seidell, J Nutr Educ Behav 2010 42 6 422 426 10.1016/j.jneb.2010. 02.002 21070979
16. The effect of single serving versus entire package nutritional information on consumption norms and actual consumption of a snack food. B Antonuk LG Block, J Nutr Educ Behav 2006 38 6 365 370 10.1016/j.jneb.2006.05.016 17142193 (Pubitemid 44827889)
17. Calorie labelling and food choices: a first look at the effects on low-income people in New York City. B Elbel R Kersh VL Brescoll LB Dixon, Health affairs (Project Hope) 2009 28 6 1110 1121 10.1377/hlthaff.28.6.w1110
18. Effect of portion size information on food intake. O Ueland AV Cardello EP Merrill LL Lesher, J Am Diet Assoc 2009 109 1 124 127 10.1016/j.jada.2008.10. 002 19103332 (Pubitemid 352841477)
19. The Supersizing of America: Portion Size and the Obesity Epidemic. BJ Rolls, Nutr Today 2003 38 2 42 53 10.1097/00017285-200303000-00004 12698053
20. Dutch Eating Behaviour Questionnaire. Manual incuding Child DEBQ (DEBQ-C]. T van Strien, Amsterdam: Boom Test Publishers 2 2007
21. Eating styles and energy intake in young women. DJ Anschutz T Van Strien MO Van De Ven RC Engels, Appetite 2009 53 1 119 122 10.1016/j.appet.2009.03.016 19481836
22. Eating style, overeating, and overweight in a representative Dutch sample. Does external eating play a role? T van Strien CP Herman MW Verheijden, Appetite 2009 52 2 380 387 10.1016/j.appet.2008.11.010 19100301
23. Gender Differences in Food Choice: The Contribution of Health Beliefs and Dieting. J Wardle AM Haase A Steptoe M Nillapun K Jonwutiwes F Bellisle, Ann Behav Med 2004 27 2 107 116 10.1207/s15324796abm2702-5 15053018 (Pubitemid 38364890)
24. Information-seeking about health in a community sample of adults: correlates and associations with other health-related practices. W Rakowski AR Assaf RC Lefebvre TM Lasater M Niknian RA Carleton, Health Educ Q 1990 17 4 379 393 2262319
25. Effect of point-of-purchase calorie labelling on restaurant and cafeteria food choices: A review of the literature. LJ Harnack SA French, The international journal of behavioral nutrition and physical activity 2008 5 51 10.1186/1479-5868-5-51 18950529