Is Cognition Enough to Explain Cognitive Development?

Topics in Cognitive Science

Volumn 2, Issue 4, 2010, Pages 725-735

  Smith, Linda B ^a   Sheya, Adam ^a  

^a INDIANA UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Cognitive development; Dynamic systems; Perception action

Indexed keywords

CHILD; CHILD DEVELOPMENT; COGNITION; HISTORY; HUMAN; MOTOR ACTIVITY; PHYSIOLOGY; PSYCHOLOGY; SENSATION; TRENDS;

CHILD; CHILD DEVELOPMENT; COGNITION; COGNITIVE SCIENCE; HISTORY, 20TH CENTURY; HISTORY, 21ST CENTURY; HUMANS; MOTOR ACTIVITY; SENSATION;

EID: 79957837980     PISSN: 17568757     EISSN: 17568765     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1756-8765.2010.01091.x     Document Type: Article

References (75)

1. Anderson, M. (2003). Embodied cognition: A field guide. Artificial Intelligence, 149, 91-130.
2. Ballard, D., Hayhoe, M., Pook, P., & Rao, R. (1997). Deictic codes for the embodiment of cognition. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 20, 723-767.
3. Barrett, T. M., & Needham, A. (2008). Developmental differences in infants' use of an object's shape to grasp it securely. Developmental Psychobiology, 50, 97-106.
4. Barsalou, L., Breazeal, C., & Smith, L. B. (2007). Cognition as coordinated noncognition. Cognitive Processing, 8, 79-91.
5. Barsalou, L. W., Pecher, D., Zeelenberg, R., Simmons, W. K., & Hamann, S. B. (2005). Multimodal simulation in conceptual processing. In W. Ahn, R. L. Goldstone, B. C. Love, A. Mark-man, & P. Wolff (Eds.), Categorization inside and outside the lab: Festschrift in honor of Douglas L. Medin (pp. 249-270). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
6. Barsalou, L. W., Simmons, W. K., Barbey, A. K., & Wilson, C. D. (2003). Grounding conceptual knowledge in modality-specific systems. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 7, 84-91.
7. Beer, R. D. (1995). A dynamical systems perspective on agent-environment interaction. Artificial Intelligence, 72, 173-215.
8. Bertenthal, B., Campos, J., & Barrett, K. (1984) Self-produced locomotion: An organizer of emotional, cognitive and social development in infancy. In R. Emde & R. Harmon (Eds.), Continuities and discontinuities in development (pp. 175-210). New York: Plenum Press.
9. Biederman, I. (1987). Recognition-by-components: A theory of human image understanding. Psychological Review, 94, 115-117.
10. Blumberg, M. S. (2005). Basic instinct: The genesis of behavior. New York: Thunder's Mouth Press.
11. Brooks, R. A. (1991). New approaches to robotics. Science, 253, 1227-1232.
12. Bullmore, E. T., & Sporns, O. (2009). Complex brain networks: Graph-theoretical analysis of structural and functional systems. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 10, 186-198.
13. Bushnell, E., & Boudreau, J. P. (1993). Motor development and the mind: The potential role of motor abilities as a determinant of aspects of perceptual development. Child Development, 64, 1005-1021.
14. Chao, L., & Martin, A. (2000). Representation of manipulable man-made objects in the dorsal stream. Neuroimage, 12, 478-484.
15. Chomsky, N. (1975). Reflections on language. New York: Pantheon.
16. Clark, A. (1997). Being there: Putting brain, body and world together again. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
17. Clark, A. (2008). Supersizing the mind: Embodiment, action and cognitive extension. New York: Oxford University Press.
18. Elman, J. L., Bates, E. A., Johnson, M. H., & Karmiloff-Smith, A. (1996). Rethinking innateness: A connectionist perspective on development. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
19. Fitzpatrick, P., Needham, A., Natale, L., & Metta, G. (2008). Shared challenges in object perception for robots and infants. Infant and Child Development, 17, 7-24.
20. Fodor, J. A. (1975). The language of thought. New York: Crowell.
21. Fodor, J. A. (1981). The mind-body problem. Scientific American, 244(1), 114-123.
22. Ghazanfar, A. A., & Schroeder, C. E. (2006). Is neocortex essentially multisensory? Trends in Cognitive Science, 10, 278-285.
23. González, J. C., Bach-y-Rita, P., & Haase, S. J. (2005). Perceptual recalibration in sensory substitution and perceptual modification. Pragmatics & Cognition, 13(3), 481-500.
24. Harman, K. L., Humphrey, G. K., & Goodale, M. A. (1999). Active manual control of object views facilitates visual recognition. Current Biology, 9(22), 1315-1318.
25. Hein, A., & Diamond, R. M. (1972). Locomotory space as a prerequisite for acquiring visually guided reaching in kittens. Journal of Comparative and Physiological Psychology, 81(3), 394-398.
26. Held, R., & Hein, A. (1963). Movement-produced stimulation in the development of visually guided behavior. Journal of Comparative and Physiological Psychology, 56(5), 872-876.
27. Honey, C. J., Kötter, R., Breakspear, M., & Sporns, O. (2007). Network structure of cerebral cortex shapes functional connectivity on multiple time scales. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 104, 10240-10245.
28. James, K. H. (2009) Sensori-motor experience leads to changes in visual processing in the developing brain. Developmental Science, 13, 279-288.
29. Karmiloff-Smith, A. (1996). Beyond modularity: A developmental perspective on cognitive science. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
30. Keil, F. (1981). Children's thinking: What never develops? Cognition, 10(1-3), 159-166.
31. Keil, F. C. (1994). The birth and nurturance of concepts by domains: The origins of concepts of living things. In L. A. Hirschfeld & S. A. Gelman (Eds.), Mapping the mind: Domain specificity in cognition and culture (pp. 234-254). New York: Cambridge University Press.
32. Landrigan, D. T., & Forsyth, G. A. (1974). Regulation and production of movement effects in exploration-recognition performance. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 103(6), 1124-1130.
33. Lungarella, M., Pegors, T., Bulwinkle, D., & Sporns, O. (2005). Methods for quantifying the informational structure of sensory and motor data. Neuroinformatics, 3, 243-262.
34. Lungarella, M., & Sporns, O. (2006). Mapping information flow in sensorimotor networks. PLoS Computational Biology, 2, 1301-1312.
35. Mandler, J. M., Bauer, P. J., & McDonough, L. (1991). Separating the sheep from the goats: Differentiating global categories. Cognitive Psychology, 23(2), 263-298.
36. Marr, D., & Nishihara, H. K. (1978). Representation and recognition of spatial-organization of 3-dimensional shapes. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London, Series B: Biological Sciences, 200, 269-294.
37. Martin, A., & Chao, L. L. (2001). Semantic memory and the brain: Structure and processes. Current Opinion in Neurobiology Special Issue: Cognitive Neuroscience, 11(2), 194-201.
38. McIntosh, A. R., Fitzpatrick, S. M., & Friston, K. J. (2001). On the marriage of cognition and neuroscience. Neuroimage, 14, 1231-1237.
39. Metta, G., & Fitzpatrick, P. (2003). Early integration of vision and manipulation. Adaptive Behavior, Vol 11, 109-128.
40. Namy, L. L., Smith, L. B., & Gershkoff-Stowe, L. (1997). Young children discovery of spatial classification. Cognitive Development, 12(2), 163-184.
41. Needham, A., Barrett, T., & Peterman, K. (2002). A pick me up for infants' exploratory skills: Early simulated experiences reaching for objects using 'sticky' mittens enhances young infants' object exploration skills. Infant Behavior and Development, 25, 279-295.
42. Nelson, K. (1973). Some evidence for the cognitive primacy of categorization and its functional basis. Merrill Palmer Quarterly, 19(1), 21-39.
43. O'Regan, J. K., & Noe, A. (2001). A sensorimotor account of vision and visual consciousness. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 24, 939-1031.
44. Pfeifer, R., & Scheier, C. (1999). Understanding intelligence. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
45. Piaget, J. (1952). The origins of intelligence in children. Oxford, England: International Universities Press.
46. Port, R., & Van Gelder, T. (1995). Mind as motion. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
47. Pulvermüller, F., Hauk, O., Nikulin, V. V., & Llmoniemi, R. J. (2005). Functional links between motor and language systems. European Journal of Neuroscience, 21(3), 793-797.
48. Pylyshyn, Z. W. (1980). Computation and cognition: Issues in the foundations of cognitive science. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 3(1), 111-169.
49. Rabinovich, M., Huerta, R., & Laurent, G. (2008). Transient dynamics for neural processing. Science, 32, 48-50.
50. Rakison, D. H., & Butterworth, G. E. (1998). Infants' attention to object structure in early categorization. Developmental Psychology, 34(6), 1310-1325.
51. Reeke, G. N., & Edelman, G. M. (1984). Selective networks and recognition automata. Annals of the New York Academy of Science, 426, 181-201.
52. Rogers, T., Patterson, K., & Graham, K. (2007). Colour knowledge in semantic dementia: It is not all black and white. Neuropsychologica, 45, 3285-3298.
53. Rougier, N. P., Noelle, D. C., Braver, T. S., Cohen, J. D., & O'Reilly, R. C. (2005). Prefrontal cortex and flexible cognitive control: Rules without symbols. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 102(20), 7338-7343.
54. Samuelson, L., & Smith, L. B. (2000). Grounding development in cognitive process. Child Development, 71, 98-106.
55. Sekuler, A. B., & Swimmer, M. B. (2000). Interactions between symmetry and elongation in determining reference frames for object perception. Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology/Revue Canadienne De Psychologie Expérimentale, 54(1), 42-45.
56. Sheya, A., & Smith, L. B. (2009) Development through sensory-motor coordinations. In J. Stewart, O. Gapenne, & E. Di Paolo (Eds.), Enaction: Towards a new paradigm for cognitive science. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
57. Sheya, A., & Smith, L. B. (2010) Changing priority maps in 12- to 18-month-olds: An emerging role for object properties. Psychological Bulletin & Review, 17(1), 22-28.
58. Smith, L. B. (2005). Action alters shape categories. Cognitive Science, 29(4), 665-679.
59. Smith, L. B. (2009) From fragments to geometric shape: Changes in visual object recognition between 18- and 24-months. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 18, 290-294.
60. Smith, L. B., & Breazeal, C. (2007). The dynamic lift of developmental process. Developmental Science, 10, 61-68.
61. Smith, L. B., Gasser, M., & Sandhofer, C. (1997) Learning to talk about the properties of objects: A network model of the development of dimensions. in: D. Medin & R. Goldstone (Eds.), The psychology of learning and motivation. (pp. 220-256). New York: Academic.
62. Smith, L. B., & Katz, D. B. (1996). Activity-dependent processes in cognitive development. In R. Gelman & T. Kit-Fong (Eds.), Perceptual and cognitive development. Handbook of perception and cognition (pp. 413-445). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
63. Smith, L. B., & Pereira, A. F. (2009). Shape, action, symbolic play, and words: Overlapping loops of cause and consequence in developmental process. In: S. Johnson (Ed.), Neo-constructivist approach to early development. (pp. 109-131). New York: Oxford University Press.
64. Sommerville, J. A., Woodward, A. L., & Needham, A. (2005). Action experience alters 3-month-old infants' perception of others' actions. Cognition, 96, B1-B11.
65. Soska, K. C., Adolph, K. E., & Johnson, S. P. (2010). Systems in development: Motor skill acquisition facilitates 3D object completion. Developmental Psychology, 46, 129-138.
66. Spencer, J. P., Blumberg, M. S., McMurray, R., Robinson, S. R., Samuelson, L. K., & Tomblin, J. B. (2009) Short arms and talking eggs: Why we should no longer abide the nativist-empiricist debate. Child Development Perspectives, 3, 79-87.
67. Spivey, M. (2007). The continuity of mind. New York: Oxford University Press.
68. Sporns, O. (2000). Synthetic approaches to cognitive neuroscience. Brain and Behavioral Sciences, 23, 548-549.
69. Sugarman, S. (1983). Children's early thought: Developments in classification. New York: Cambridge University Press.
70. Tani, J., Nishimoto, R., & Paine, R. W. (2008), Achieving 'organic compositionality' through self-organization: Reviews on brain-inspired robotics experiments. Neural Networks, 21, 584-603.
71. Thelen, E., & Smith, L. B. (1994). A dynamic systems approach to the development of cognition and action. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
72. Tononi, G. (2004). An information integration theory of consciousness. BMC Neuroscience, 5, 42.
73. Upadhyay, J., Silver, A., Knaus, T., Lindgren, A., Mathieu, D., Ki., D., & Tager-Flusberg, H. (2008). Effective and structural connectivity in the human auditory cortex. Neuroscience, 28(13), 3341-3349.
74. Wilson, M. (2002). Six views of embodied cognition. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 9(4), 625-636.
75. Yamashita, Y., & Tani, J. (2008), Emergence of functional hierarchy in a multiple timescale neural network model: A humanoid robot experiment. PLoS Computational Biology, 4(11), e1000220.