Jerusalem artichoke (Helianthus tuberosus), a medicinal salt-resistant plant has high adaptability and multiple-use values

Journal of Medicinal Plants Research

Volumn 5, Issue 8, 2011, Pages 1275-1282

  Ma, Xiao Yong ^a   Zhang, Li Hua ^b   Shao, Hong Bo ^b,e   Xu, Gang ^b   Zhang, Feng ^a   Ni, Fu Tai ^c   Brestic, M ^d  

^a SHANXI UNIVERSITY   (China)

^b YANTAI INSTITUTE OF COASTAL ZONE RESEARCH   (China)

^c JILIN NORMAL UNIVERSITY   (China)

^d SLOVAK UNIVERSITY OF AGRICULTURE IN NITRA   (Slovakia)

^e QINGDAO UNIVERSITY OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY   (China)

Author keywords

Ecological improvement; Helianthus tuberosus; Medicinal plant; Salinization

Indexed keywords

ANTIDIABETIC AGENT; ANTINEOPLASTIC AGENT; ANTIOBESITY AGENT; HELIANGIN; HELIANTHUS TUBEROSUS EXTRACT; PLANT EXTRACT; UNCLASSIFIED DRUG;

BIOFUEL PRODUCTION; BIOLOGICAL ACTIVITY; DIABETES MELLITUS; DRUG MECHANISM; ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT; FOOD COMPOSITION; FOOD INDUSTRY; FORAGE CROP; HUMAN; JERUSALEM ARTICHOKE; NONHUMAN; OBESITY; PHYTOCHEMISTRY; PLANT GROWTH; PLANT TUBER; PLANT YIELD; REVIEW;

ASTERACEAE; HELIANTHUS; HELIANTHUS TUBEROSUS; MAGNOLIOPHYTA;

EID: 79957687736     PISSN: 19960875     EISSN: 19960875     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Review

References (63)

1. Ahmed MS, El-Sakhawy FS, Soliman SN, Abou HDMR (2005). Phytochemical and biological study of Helianthus tuberosus L. Egypt. J. Biomed. Sci., 18: 134-147.
2. Analysis of transpiration efficiency for wheat flag leaves. Environ. Exp.Bot., 64: 128-134.
3. Baba H, Yaoita Y, Kikuchi M (2005). Sesquiterpenoids from the Leaves of Helianthus tuberosus L. J. Tohoku Pharm. Univ., 52: 21-25.
4. Baldini M, Danuso F, Turi M, Vannozzi P (2004). Evaluation of new clones of Jerusalem artichoke (Helianthus tuberosus L.) for inulin and sugar yield from stalks and tubers. Ind. Crop. Prod., 19(1): 25-40.
5. Barta L, Rosta J (1958). Effect of Jerusalem artichoke honey-containing isocaloric diet on the sugar metabolism of diabetic children. Gyermekgyogyaszat., 9(8/9): 280-283.
6. Cabello HF, Durst F, Jorrin JV, Werck RD (1998). Coumarins in Helianthus tuberosus: characterization, induced accumulation and biosynthesis. Phytochem., 49(4): 1029-1036.
7. Caserta G, Cervigni T (1991). The use of Jerusalem artichoke stalks for the production of fructose or ethanol. Bioresource Technol., 35(3): 247-250.
8. Chekroun MB, Amzile J, Mokhtari A, El HNE, Prevost J, Fontanillas R (1996). Comparison of fructose production by 37 cultivars of Jerusalem artichoke (Helianthus tuberosus L.). New Zeal. J Crop Hort., 24(1): 115-120.
9. Cheng Y, Zhou WG, Gao CF, Lan K, Gao Y, Wu QY (2009). Biodiesel production from Jerusalem artichoke (Helianthus Tuberosus L.) tuber by heterotrophic microalgae Chlorella protothecoides. J. Chem. Technol. Biot., 84(5): 777-781.
10. Chittendon F (1951). RHS dictionary of plants plus supplement. Oxford University Press.
11. Cieslik E (1998) Mineral content of Jerusalem artichoke new tubers. Zesk. Nauk. AR Krak., 342(10): 23-30.
12. D'egidio MG, Cecchini C, Cervigni T, Donini B, Pignatelli V (1998). Production of fructose from cereal stems and polyannual cultures of Jerusalem artichoke. Ind. Crop. Prod., 7(2/3): 113-119.
13. Duke JA (1983). Handbook of energy crops. http://www.hort.purdue.edu/newcrop/duke_energy/Helianthus_tuberosus.html.
14. Editorial Committee of Chinese Forage Plant (1989). Forage Plant of China (Vol. 2). Beijing: Agricultural Press.
15. Facciola S (1990). Cornucopia-A source book of edible plants. Kampong Publications.
16. Fuchs A (1993). Inulin and inulin-containing crops. Studies in plant science, vol. 3. Amsterdam: Elsevier Sci. Publishers.
17. Griffaut B, Debiton E, Madelmont JC, Maurizis JC, Ledoigt G (2007). Stressed Jerusalem artichoke tubers (Helianthus tuberosus L.) excrete a protein fraction with specific cytotoxicity on plant and animal tumour cell. BBA-Gen. Subjects, 1770(9): 1324-1330.
18. Hua Y, Liu B, Zhao Z (2007). Biological production of fuels. China, Patent WO/2008/ 011811.
19. Huxley AJ, Griffiths M, Levy M (1992). The new royal horticultural society dictionary of gardening. London: Macmillan Publishers.
20. Incoll LD, Neales TF (1970). The stem as a temporary sink before tuberization in Helianthus tuberosus L. J. Exp. Bot., 21(2): 469-476.
21. Izsaki GNZ (2006). Macro- and micro-element content and uptake of Jerusalem artichoke (Helianthus tuberosus L.). Cereal Res. Commun., 34(1): 597-600.
22. Kays SJ, Nottingham S (2007). Biology and chemistry of Jeruslaem artichoke: Helianthus tuberosus L. CRC press, Boca Raton, FL.
23. Liu ZP, Liu L, Chen MD, Deng LQ, Zhao GM, Tang QZ, Xia TX (2003). Study on the irrigation systems in agriculture by seawater. J. Nat. Resour., 18(4): 423-429.
24. Long XH, Huang ZR, Zhang ZH, Li Q, Zed R, Liu ZP (2010). Seawater stress differentially affects germination, growth, photosynthesis, and ion concentration in genotypes of Jerusalem artichoke (Helianthus tuberosus L.). J. Plant Growth Regul., 29(2): 223-231.
25. Long XH, Mehta SK, Liu ZP (2008). Effect of NO3--N enrichment on seawater stress tolerance of Jerusalem artichoke (Helianthus tuberosus). Pedosphere, 18(1): 113-123.
26. Ma XY, Shangguan TL (2004). Species diversity of the forest communities in taiyue mountain, shanxi. J. Mountain Sci., 22: 606-612.
27. Margaritis A, Bajpai P, Cannell E (1981). Optimization studies for the bioconversion of Jerusalem artichoke tubers to ethanol and microbial biomass. Biotechnol Lett., 3(10): 595-599.
28. Matsuura H, Yoshihara T, Ichihara A (1993). Four new polyacetylenic glucosides, methyl beta-D-glucopyranosyl helianthenate CF, from Jerusalem artichoke (Helianthus tuberosus L.). Biosci. Biotech. Bioch., 57(9): 1492-1498.
29. Meijer W JM, Mathijssen E (1991). The relation between flower initiation and sink strength of stems and tubers of Jerusalem artichoke. Neth. J. Agric. Sci., 39(2): 123-135.
30. Meijer WJM, Mathijssen E (1992). Experimental and simulated production of inulin by chicory and Jerusalem artichoke. Ind. Crop. Prod., 1(2/4): 175-183.
31. Miyazawa M, Kameoka H (1983). Helianthol a, a sesquiterpene alcohol from Helianthus tuberosus. Phytochemi., 22(4): 1040-1042.
32. Monti A, Amaducci MT, Venturi G (2005). Growth response, leaf gas exchange and fructans accumulation of Jerusalem artichoke (Helianthus tuberosus L.) as affected by different water regimes. Eur. J. Agron., 23(2): 136-145.
33. Morimoto H, Sanno Y, Oshio H (1966). Chemical studies on heliangine. A new sesquiterpene lactone isolated from the leaves of Helianthus tuberosus L. Tetrahedron, 22(9): 3173-3179.
34. Nakagawa R, Yasokawa D, Ikeda T, Nagashima K (1996). Purification and characterization of two lectins from callus of Helianthus tuberosus. Biosci. Biotech. Bioch., 60(2): 259-262.
35. Negro MJ, Ballesteros I, Manzanares P, Oliva JM, Saez F, Ballesteros M (2006). Inulin-containing biomass for ethanol production. Appl. Biochem. Biotech., 132(1/3): 922-932.
36. Newton PJ, Myers BA, West DW (1991). Reduction in growth and yield of Jerusalem artichoke caused by soil salinity. Irrigation Sci., 12(4): 213-221.
37. Ohio Agricultural Research and Development Center (2008). Jerusalem artichoke.
38. Pan L, Sinden MR, Kennedy AH, Chai H, Watson LE, Graham TL, Kinghorn AD (2009). Bioactive constituents of Helianthus tuberosus (Jerusalem artichoke). Phytochem. Lett., 2(1): 15-18.
39. Parameswaran M (1999). Urban wastewater use in plant biomass production. Resour. Conserv. Recy., 27(1/2): 39-56.
40. Rakhimov DA, Arifkhodzhaev AO, Mezhlumyan LG, Yuldashev OM, Rozikova UA, Aikhodzhaeva N, Vakil MM (2003). Carbohydrates and proteins from Helianthus tuberosus. Chem. Nat. Comp., 39(3): 312-313.
41. Rawson HM, Long MJ, Munns R (1988). Growth and development in Na Cl-treated plants I. Leaf Na+ and Cl- concentrations do not determine gas exchange of leaf blades in barley. Aust. J. Plant Physiol., 15(4): 519-527.
42. Righetti L, Tassoni A, Bagni N (2008). Polyamines content in plant derived food: A comparison between soybean and Jerusalem artichoke. Food Chem., 111(4): 852-856.
43. Shao HB, Chu LY, Jaleel CA, Manivannan P, Panneerselvam R, Shao MA (2009).
44. Shao HB, Chu LY, Lu ZH, Kang CM (2008b). Primary antioxidant free radical scavenging and redox signaling pathways in higher plant cells. Int. J. Biol. Sci., 4:8-14.
45. Shao HB, Chu LY, Shao MA, Jaleel CA (2008a). Higher plant antioxidants and redox signaling under environmental stresses. Comptes Rendus Biologies, 331: 433-441.
46. Shao HB, Liang ZS, Shao MA (2006).Osmotic regulation of 10 wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) genotypes at soil water deficits. Biointerfaces, 47: 132-139.
47. Shao HB, Liang ZS, Shao MA, Hu ZM (2005). Dynamic changes of antioxidative. enzymes of 10 wheat genotypes at soil water deficits. Biointerfaces, 42: 187-195.
48. Slimestad R, Seljaasen R, Meijer K, Skar SL (2010). Norwegian-grown Jerusalem artichoke (Helianthus tuberosus L.): morphology and content of sugars and fructo-oligosaccharides in stems and tubers. J. Sci. Food Agric., 90(6): 956-964.
49. Spring O (1991). Sesquiterpene lactones from Helianthus tuberosus. Phytochem., 30(2): 519-522.
50. Szambelan K, Nowak J, Chrapkowska KJ (2004). Comparison of bacterial and yeast ethanol fermentation yield from Jerusalem artichoke (Helianthus tuberosus L.) tubers pulp and juices. Acta Sci. Pol., Technol. Aliment, 3(1): 45-53.
51. Tassoni A, Bagni N, Ferri M, Franceschetti M, Khomutov A, Marques MP, Fiuza SM, Simonian AR, Serafini FD (2010). Helianthus tuberosus and polyamine research: Past and recent applications of a classical growth model. Plant Physiol. Bioch., 48(7): 496-505.
52. Terzic S, Atlagic J (2009). Nitrogen and sugar content variability in tubers of Jerusalem artichoke (Helianthus tuberosus). Genetika, 41(3): 289-295.
53. nd edn. New York: Hafner Service Agency.
54. Voltolina G (1994). Valutazione bioagronomica di specie divese per la produzione di fruttosio ed inulina. L'Inform. Agrar., 33: 25-32.
55. Yildiz G, Sacakli P, Gungor T, Uysal H (2008). The effect of Jerusalem artichoke (Helianthus tuberosus L.) on blood parameters, liver enzymes and intestinal pH in laying hens. J. Anim. Veter. Adv., 7(10): 1297-1300.
56. Yoshihara T, Matsuura H, Ichihara A, Kikuta Y, Koda Y (1991). Tuber forming substances of Jerusalem artichoke (Helianthus tuberosus L.). Curr. Plant Sci. Biotechnol. Agric., 13: 286-290.
57. Zhang JF (2008). Principles and measures of ecological rehabilition in saline soil. Beijing: China Forestry Publishing House.
58. Zhang JT, Shangguan TL (1988). On division of the forest steppe border and forest-steppe belt of west north of Shanxi. Journal of Shanxi University (Natural Science Edition), 2: 68-73.
59. Zhao GM, Liu ZP, Chen MD, Guo SW (2008). Soil properties and yield of Jerusalem artichoke (Helianthus tuberosus L.) with seawater irrigation in North China Plain. Pedosphere, 18(2): 195-202.
60. Zhao GQ, Ma BL, Ren CZ (2007). Growth, gas exchange, chlorophyll fluorescence, and ion content of naked oat in response to salinity. Crop Sci., 47(1): 123-131.
61. Zhao H, Zhang ZB, Shao HB, Xu P, Foulkes MJ (2008).Genetic correlation and path analysis of transpiration efficiency for wheat flag leaves. Environ. Exp. Bot., 64: 128-134.
62. Zhang JT, Shangguan TL (1988). On division of the forest steppe border and forest-steppe belt of west north of Shanxi. J. Shanxi University (Natural Science Edition), 2: 68-73.
63. Ma XY, Shangguan TL (2004). Species diversity of the forest communities in taiyue mountain, shanxi. J. Mountain Sci., 22: 606-612.