Learning designs: Bridging the gap between theory and practice

ASCILITE 2007 - The Australasian Society for Computers in Learning in Tertiary Education

Volumn , Issue , 2007, Pages 51-60

  Bennett, Sue ^a   Agostinho, Shirley ^a   Lockyer, Lori ^a   Kosta, Lisa ^a   Jones, Jennifer ^a   Koper, Rob ^b   Harper, Barry ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WOLLONGONG   (Australia)

^b OPEN UNIVERSITY OF THE NETHERLANDS   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Design; E learning; Education; Learning design; Online learning; Online teaching; University

Indexed keywords

DESIGN PROCESS; LEARNING DESIGNS; LEARNING OBJECT METADATA; ONLINE LEARNING; ONLINE TEACHING; RESEARCH AGENDA; THEORY AND PRACTICE; UNIVERSITY;

DESIGN; EDUCATION; INTEROPERABILITY; RESEARCH;

E-LEARNING;

EID: 79957617740     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (33)

1. rd Annual Conference of the Australasian Society for Computers in Learning in Tertiary Education (ASCILITE) (pp. 3-7). Sydney, Australia: Sydney University Press.
2. Agostinho, S., Bennett, S., Lockyer, L., & Harper, B. (2004). Developing a learning object metadata application profile based on LOM suitable for the Australian higher education context. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology. 20(2), 191-208. http://www.ascilite.org.au/ajet/ajet20/agostinho.html
3. Agostinho, S., Oliver, R., Harper, B., Hedberg, H., & Wills, S. (2002). A tool to evaluate the potential for an ICT-based learning design to foster high-quality learning. In A. Williamson, C. Gunn, A. Young & T. Clear (Eds.), Proceedings of Australasian Society for Computers in Learning in Tertiary Education. (pp. 29-38). Auckland, NZ: UNITEC.
4. Bates, A., & Poole, G. (2003). Effective teaching with technology in higher education. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
5. Bennett, S., Agostinho, S., Lockyer, L., & Harper, B. (2006). Supporting university teachers create pedagogically sound learning environments using learning designs and learning objects. IADIS International Journal on WWW/Internet, 4(1), 16-26. Retrieved July 1, 2006, from http://www.iadis.org/ijwi/
6. Bennett, S. Agostinho, S., & Lockyer, L. (2005). Reusable learning designs in university education. In T. C. Montgomerie & J. R. Parker (Eds.), Proceedings of the IASTED International Conference on Education and Technology (pp.102-106). Anaheim, CA: ACTA Press.
7. Bennett, S. & Lockyer, L. (2004). Becoming an online teacher: Adapting to a changed environment for teaching and learning in higher education. Educational Media International, 41(3), 231-244.
8. Biggs, J. (2003). Teaching for quality learning at university. OUP: Buckingham.
9. Boud. D., & Prosser, M. (2002). Key principles for high quality student learning in higher education: A framework for evaluation. Educational Media International, 39(3), 237-245.
10. Conole, G. & Fill, K. (2005). A learning design toolkit to create pedagogically effective learning activities. Journal of Interactive Media in Education. Retrieved October 21, 2005, from jime. open. ac. uk/2005/08
11. Dalziel, J. (2003). Implementing learning design: the learning activity management system (LAMS) In G. Crisp, D. Thiele, I. Scholten, S. Barker & J. Baron (Eds.), Proceedings of the 20th Annual Conference of the Australasian Society for Computers in Learning in Tertiary Education (pp.593-596). Adelaide, 7-10 December 2003.
12. Goodyear, P. (2005). Educational design and networked learning: Patterns, pattern languages and design practice. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 21(1), 82-101. http://www.ascilite.org.au/ajet/ajet21/goodyear.html
13. Heinrich, E. (2005, July 4-6). Exploring the use of the IMS Learning Design specification for facilitating formative assessment. In T. C. Montgomerie & J. R. Parker (Eds.), Proceedings of the IASTED International Conference on Education and Technology (pp. 22-27). Anaheim, CA: ACTA Press.
14. Herrington, J., Reeves, T., & Oliver, R. (2005). Online Learning as Information Delivery: Digital Myopia. Journal of Interactive Learning Research. 16(4), 353-367.
15. IEEE. (2002, 15 July 2002). Draft Standard for Learning Objects Metadata. Learning Technology Standards Committee of the IEEE. Retrieved March 13, 2003, from http://ltsc.ieee.org/doc/wg12/LOM_1484_12_1_v1_Final_Draft.pdf
16. Kalantzis, M. & Cope, W. (2005). Learning by design. Melbourne, Australia: VSIC and Common Ground.
17. Kearney, M. with Wright, R. (2002). Predict-Observe-Explain eShell. Retrieved July 23, 2004, from Learning Designs Web site: http://www.learningdesigns.uow.edu.au/tools/info/T3/index.html
18. Koper, R. (2001). Modeling units of study from a pedagogical perspective: The pedagogical model behind EML. Retrieved July 10, 2007 from http://hdl.handle.net/1820/36
19. Koper, R. (2005). Learning technologies in e-learning. In W. Jochems, J. van Merrienboer & R. Koper, Integrated e-learning: Implications for pedagogy, technology and organization (pp. 64-79). London: RoutledgeFalmer.
20. Koper, R. & Tattersall, C. (Eds.) (2005). Learning design: A handbook on modelling and delivering networked education and training. Berlin: Springer.
21. Laurillard, D. (2002). Rethinking university teaching. London: RoutledgeFalmer.
22. Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
23. Littlejohn, A. (2002). Improving continuing professional development in the use of ICT. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 18(2), 166-174.
24. Lockyer, L. & Bennett, S. J. (2006). Understanding roles within technology supported teaching and learning: implications for students, staff and institutions. In J. O'Donoghue (Eds.), Technology Supported Learning and Teaching: A Staff Perspective (pp. 210-223). Hershey, USA: Information Science Publishing.
25. Lockyer, L., Brown, I. M. & Blackall, D. R. (2003). A Learning Design to Support Multi-Literacy Development in K-12 Contexts. In A. Rossett (Eds.), Proceedings of the World Conference on ELearning in Corporate, Government, Healthcare, & Higher Education (pp. pp 1703-1706). Norfolk, VA: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education.
26. Lukasiak, J., Agostinho, S., Bennett, S., Lockyer, L., Harper, B., & Powley, B. (2005). Learning objects and learning designs: An integrated system for reusable, adaptive and sharable learning content. Association for Learning Technology Journal (ALT-J), 13(2), 151-169.
27. McNaught, C. (2003). The effectiveness of an institution-wide mentoring program for improving online teaching and learning. Journal of Computing in Higher Education, 15(1), 27-45.
28. Miles, M., & Huberman, A. (1994). Qualitative data analysis: An expanded sourcebook. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
29. Ramsden, P. (1992). Learning to teach in higher education. London: Routledge
30. Salmon, G. (2002). E-tivities: The key to active online learning. London: RoutledgeFalmer.
31. Silver, H. (2003). Does a university have a culture? Studies in Higher Education, 28(2), 157-169.
32. Taylor, J. (2003). Managing staff development for online education: A situated learning model. Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management, 25(1), 75-87.
33. Wilson, G. & Stacey, E. (2004). Online interaction impacts on learning: Teaching the teachers to teach online. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 20(1), 33-48. http://www.ascilite.org.au/ajet/ajet20/wilson.html