Shared decision making in the Netherlands, is the time ripe for nationwide, structural implementation?

Zeitschrift fur Evidenz, Fortbildung und Qualitat im Gesundheitswesen

Volumn 105, Issue 4, 2011, Pages 283-288

  Van Der Weijden, Trudy ^a   Van Veenendaal, Haske ^b   Drenthen, Ton ^c   Versluijs, Martine ^d   Stalmeier, Peep ^e   Loon, Marije Koelewijn Van ^a   Stiggelbout, Anne ^f   Timmermans, Danielle ^g  

^a MAASTRICHT UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

^b Dutch Institute for Healthcare Improvement CBO   (Netherlands)

^c DUTCH COLLEGE OF GENERAL PRACTITIONERS   (Netherlands)

^d Federation of Patients and Consumer Organisations in the Netherlands (NPCF)   (Netherlands)

^e RADBOUD UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER   (Netherlands)

^f LEIDEN UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER   (Netherlands)

^g VU UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

health policy; patient information; patient participation; patient preferences; quality assurance in healthcare; shared decision making

Indexed keywords

EID: 79957617337     PISSN: 18659217     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.zefq.2011.04.005     Document Type: Article

References (16)

1. Van den Brink-Muinen A, van Dulmen AM, Schellevis FG, Bensing JM. Tweede nationale studie naar ziekten en verrichtingen in de huisartspraktijk. Oog voor communicatie: huisarts-patient communicatie in Nederland. [Second national Survey of diseases and performance in general practice. View on communication: general practitioner - patient communication in the Netherlands.]: NIVEL Utrecht; the Netherlands, 2004.
2. De Jong JD, Van den Brink-Muinen A, Groenewegen PP. The Dutch health insurance reform: switching between insurers, a comparison between the general population and the chronically ill and disabled. BMC Health Services Research 2008;8:58.
3. Moser A, Korstjens I, van der Weijden T, Tange H. Themes affecting health-care consumers' choice of a hospital for elective surgery when receiving web-based comparative consumer information. Pat Educ Couns 2010;78:365-71.
4. Dute JCJ, Gevers JKM, Hubben JH, Legemaate J, Roscam-Abbing HDC, Sluijters B, et al., De evaluatie van de WGBO [The evaluation of the Law on the Medical Treatment Agreement]. ZonMW, Den Haag, the Netherlands, 2000.
5. Abma TA, Broerse JEW. Patient participation as dialogue: setting research agendas. Health Expectations 2010;13:160-73.
6. Boivin A, Currie K, Fervers B, Gracia J, James M, Marshall C, et al., on behalf of GIN Public [the Guideline International Network Patient and Public InvolvementWorking Group]. Patient and public involvement in guidelines: international experiences and future perspectives. Qual Saf Health Care 2010;19:e22.
7. Stiggelbout AM, Jansen SJT, Otten W, Baas-Thijssen MCM, Van Slooten H, Van de Velde CJH. How important is the opinion of significant others to cancer patients' adjuvant chemotherapy decision-making? Support Care Cancer 2007;15:319-25.
8. Stiggelbout AM, Molewijk AC, Otten W, Van Bockel JH, Bruijninckx CMA, Van der Salm I, et al. The impact of individualized evidence-based decision support on aneurysm patients' decision-making, ideals of autonomy, and quality of life. Med Decis Making 2008;28:751-62.
9. Knops AM, Ubbink DT, Legemate DA, de Haes JC, Goossens A. Information communicated with patients in decision making about their abdominal aortic aneurysm. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 2010;39:708-13.
10. van Tol-Geerdink JJ, Leer JW, van Lin ENJTh, Schimmel EC, Huizenga H, van Daal WAJ, et al. Offering a treatment choice in the irradiation of prostate cancer leads to better informed and more active patients, without harm to well-being. International Journal of Radiation Oncology, Biology, Physics 2008;70:442-8.
11. Dekker N, Hermens RPGM, Elwyn G, van der Weijden T, Nagengast FM, van Duijvendijk P, et al. Improving calculation, interpretation and communication of familial colorectal cancer risk: a randomized controlled trial. Implementation Science 2010;5:6.
12. van Peperstraten AM, Nelen LDM, Grol RPTM, Zielhuis G, Adang A, Stalmeier PFM, et al. Patient empowerment for prevention of twins after in vitro fertilisation: randomized controlled trial. BMJ 2010;340:c2501, doi:10.1136/bmj.c2501.
13. Koelewijn - van Loon MS, van der Weijden T, van Steenkiste B, Ronda G, Winkens B, Severens JL, et al. Involving patients in cardiovascular risk management using nurse-led clinics: a cluster-randomised controlled trial in primary care. Can Med Ass J 2009;181:E267-74.
14. Van der Weijden T, van Veenendaal H, Timmermans DRM. Shared decision making in the Netherlands. Zeitschrift für Ärztliche Fortbildung und Qualitätssicherung 2007;101:241-6.
15. Ubbink DTh, Knops AM, Legemate DA, Bossuyt PMM, de Haes JCJM, Goossens A. Stand van zaken. Kiezen tussen verschillende behandelopties; hoe informeer ik mijn patiënt? [State of the art. Choosing between different treatment options, how to inform my patient?]. Ned Tijdschr Geneesk 2009;153:B344.
16. Raats CJ, van Veenendaal H, Versluijs MM, Burgers JS. A generic tool for development of decision aids based on clinical practice guidelines. Patient Educ Couns 2008;73:413-7.