The Dutch health insurance reform: Switching between insurers, a comparison between the general population and the chronically ill and disabled

BMC Health Services Research

Volumn 8, Issue , 2008, Pages

  De Jong, Judith D ^a   Van Den Brink Muinen, Atie ^a   Groenewegen, Peter P ^a,b  

^a NETHERLANDS INSTITUTE FOR HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH   (Netherlands)

^b UTRECHT UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CHRONIC PATIENT; COMPARATIVE STUDY; DISABLED PERSON; HEALTH CARE POLICY; HEALTH CARE QUALITY; HEALTH CARE SYSTEM; HEALTH INSURANCE; HEALTH STATUS; HEALTH SURVEY; HUMAN; CHRONIC DISEASE; CONSUMER; DECISION MAKING; ECONOMICS; HEALTH CARE COST; LEGAL ASPECT; NETHERLANDS; QUESTIONNAIRE; STATISTICS;

CHOICE BEHAVIOR; CHRONIC DISEASE; CONSUMER SATISFACTION; DISABLED PERSONS; HEALTH CARE COSTS; HEALTH CARE REFORM; HUMANS; INSURANCE, HEALTH; NETHERLANDS; QUESTIONNAIRES;

EID: 41749098080     PISSN: None     EISSN: 14726963     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1186/1472-6963-8-58     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. Health insurance reform in the Netherlands. Y Bartholomée H Maarse, Eurohealth 2006 12 2 7 9
2. Elasticities of market shares and social health insurance choice in Germany: a dynamic panel data approach. M Tamm H Tauchmann J Wasem S Gress, Health Econ 2007 16 3 243 56 10.1002/hec.1167 16981190
3. OECD, Reviews of health systems: Switzerland Paris: OECD 2006
4. Consumer mobility in social health insurance markets: a five-country comparison. T Laske-Aldershof E Schut K Beck S Gress A Shmueli C Van de Voorde, Applied Health Economics and Health Policy 2004 3 229 241 10.2165/00148365- 200403040-00006
5. AC Enthoven, Introducing market forces into health care: a tale of two countries Presented at the fourth European conference on health economics. Paris 2002
6. Analyzing the evidence on European health care reforms. RB Saltman J Figueras, Health Affairs 1998 17 85 108 10.1377/hlthaff.17.2.85 9558787
7. Comparative institutional response to economic policy: managed competition and governmentality. DW Light, Social Science and Medicine 2001 52 1151 1166 10.1016/S0277-9536(00)00236-7
8. Do consumers know how their health plan works? PJ Cunningham C Denk M Sinclair, Health Affairs 2001 20 159 166 10.1377/hlthaff.20.2.159 11260939
9. Consumer choice in Dutch health insurance after reform. H Maarse R Ter Meulen, Health Care Anal 2006 14 37 49 10.1007/s10728-006-0010-z 17137018
10. The emergence of a market society: changing mechanisms of stratification in China. V Nee, American Journal of Sociology 1996 101 908 949 10.1086/230784
11. Income attainment during transformation processes: a meta-analysis of the market transition theory. W-J Verhoeven W Jansen J Dessens, European Sociological Review 2005 21 201 226 10.1093/esr/jci020
12. AO Hirschman, Exit, voice and loyalty Cambridge: Harvard University Press 1970
13. Kiesbeter.nl. http://www.kiesbeter.nl
14. Dutch Healthcare authority, Monitor Zorgverzekeringsmarkt. De balans 2007 Utrecht: NZa 2007
15. EM Smidt EM Malin, Beitragrückzahlung in der GKV überlegungen zu Effekten einer Erprobungsregelung und erste empirische Ergebnisse Gesundheitssystementwicklung in den USA und Deutschland. Baden-Baden: Nomos Verlagsgesellschaft, Behrens J, Braun B, Morone J, Stone D, 1996
16. Free choice of sickness funds in regulated competition: evidence from Germany and the Netherlands. S Gress PP Groenewegen JJ Kerssens B Braun J Wasem, Health Policy 2002 60 235 254 10.1016/S0168-8510(01)00193-2 11965333
17. RG Frank K Lamirand, Choice, price competition and complexity in markets for health insurance Lausanne, Department of Econometrics and Political Economics 2006
18. De keuze van ziekenfondsverzekerden voor een zorgverzekeraar. Kerssens Delnoij Van der Schee, TSG 2002 80 1 35 42
19. No exit? The effect of health status on dissatisfaction and disenrollment from health plans. M Schlesinger B Druss T Thomas, Health Services Research 1999 34 2 547 576 10357290
20. The Dutch health insurance reform: the role of collectives. PP Groenewegen JD de Jong, Eurohealth 2007 2 10 13
21. B Schwartz, The paradox of choice. Why more is less New York: HarperCollins Publishers 2005
22. Kerngegevens Zorg 2005. Nationaal Panel Chronisch zieken en Gehandicapten. H Calsbeek P Spreeuwenberg PM Rijken, 2003 [Core data Care. National Panel of Chronically ill and Disabled 2005] Utrecht, NIVEL 2006
23. T Laske-Aldershof FT Schut, Monitor verzekerdenmobiliteit Rotterdam, iBMG 2005
24. E van der Schee RD Friele DMJ Delnoij, Weinig mensen veranderen van ziekenfonds Utrecht, NIVEL 2005
25. JD de Jong DMJ Delnoij PP Groenewegen, Verzekerdenmobiliteit is hoog. Ook ouderen zijn overgestapt Utrecht, NIVEL 2006
26. OC Damman M Hendriks DMJ Delnoij P Spreeuwenberg, Ervaringen van verzekerden met de zorg en de zorgverzekeraars: meting 2006 voor Utrecht, NIVEL; 2006 http://www.kiesBeter.nl
27. L van Ruth JD de Jong PP Groenewegen, De rol van collectiviteiten in het nieuwe zorgstelsel Utrecht, NIVEL 2007
28. JD de Jong PP Groenewegen, Percentage overstappers van zorgverzekeraar valt terug. Collectivisering zet door Utrecht, NIVEL 2007
29. Revisiting the behavioural model and access to medical care: Does it matter? RA Andersen, J Health Soc Behav 1995 36 1 10 10.2307/2137284 7738325