Shared Decision Making Guidance Reminders in Practice (SDM-GRIP)

Patient Education and Counseling

Volumn 85, Issue 2, 2011, Pages 219-224

  Holmes Rovner, Margaret ^a   Kelly Blake, Karen ^a   Dwamena, Francesca ^a   Dontje, Katherine ^b   Henry, Rebecca C ^a   Olomu, Adesuwa ^a   Rovner, David R ^a   Rothert, Marilyn L ^b  

^a MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Coronary artery disease; Implementation research; Percutaneous coronary intervention; Shared decision making

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AMBULATORY CARE; ARTICLE; CARDIOLOGIST; CLINICAL ARTICLE; COMMUNICATION SKILL; CONTROLLED STUDY; CORONARY ARTERY BYPASS GRAFT; CORONARY ARTERY DISEASE; FEMALE; HEALTH CARE PERSONNEL; HUMAN; MALE; MEDICAL DECISION MAKING; MEDICAL EDUCATION; PATIENT DECISION MAKING; PERCUTANEOUS CORONARY INTERVENTION; PRACTICE GUIDELINE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROCESS DEVELOPMENT; REIMBURSEMENT; TEACHING ROUND;

COMMUNICATION; CORONARY DISEASE; DECISION MAKING; DECISION SUPPORT TECHNIQUES; EVIDENCE-BASED MEDICINE; HUMANS; INSERVICE TRAINING; PATIENT PARTICIPATION; PHYSICIAN-PATIENT RELATIONS; PRIMARY HEALTH CARE; PROGRAM EVALUATION; QUESTIONNAIRES;

EID: 79957610030     PISSN: 07383991     EISSN: 18735134     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.pec.2010.12.028     Document Type: Article

References (40)

1. O'Connor A.M., Bennett C., Stacey D., Barry M.J., Col N.F., Eden K.B., et al. Do patient decision aids meet effectiveness criteria of the international patient decision aid standards collaboration? A systematic review and meta-analysis. Med Decis Making 2007, 27:554-574.
2. Holmes-Rovner M., Gruman J., Rovner D. Shared decision-making in the US: research & development outpaces delivery. Z Arztl Fortbild Qualitatssich 2007, 101:254-258.
3. Legare F., O'Connor A.M., Graham I.D., Saucier D., Cote L., Blais J., et al. Primary health care professionals' views on barriers and facilitators to the implementation of the Ottawa decision support framework in practice. Patient Educ Couns 2006, 63:380-390.
4. Elwyn G., Edwards A., Hood K., Robling M., Atwell C., Russell I., et al. Achieving involvement: process outcomes from a cluster randomized trial of shared decision making skill development and use of risk communication aids in general practice. Fam Pract 2004, 21:337-346.
5. Dwamena F.C., Gaulden C., Olomu A., Lewin S., Holmes-Rovner L.S.S.R. A systematic review of interventions for providers to promote a patient-centered approach 2008, European Association for Communication in Health Care, Oslo Norway.
6. Charles C., Gafni A., Whelan T. Decision-making in the physician-patient encounter: revisiting the shared treatment decision-making model. Soc Sci Med 1999, 49:651-661.
7. Street R.L., Makoul G., Arora N.K., Epstein R.M. How does communication heal? Pathways linking clinician-patient communication to health outcomes. Patient Educ Couns 2009, 74:295-301.
8. de H.H., Bensing J. Endpoints in medical communication research, proposing a framework of functions and outcomes. Patient Educ Couns 2009, 74:287-294.
9. Holmes-Rovner M., Valade D., Orlowski C., Draus C., Nabozny-Valerio B., Keiser S. Implementing shared decision-making in routine practice: barriers and opportunities. Health Expect 2000, 3:182-191.
10. Graham I.D., Logan J., O'Connor A., Weeks K.E., Aaron S., Cranney A., et al. A qualitative study of physicians' perceptions of three decision aids. Patient Educ Couns 2003, 50:279-283.
11. Gravel K., Legare F., Graham I.D. Barriers and facilitators to implementing shared decision-making in clinical practice: a systematic review of health professionals' perceptions. Implement Sci 2006, 1:16.
12. Hibbard J.H., Mahoney E.R., Stock R., Tusler M. Do increases in patient activation result in improved self-management behaviors?. Health Serv Res 2007, 42:1443-1463.
13. Gruman J., Rovner M.H., French M.E., Jeffress D., Sofaer S., Shaller D., et al. From patient education to patient engagement: implications for the field of patient education. Patient Educ Couns 2010, 78:350-356.
14. Bernstein S.J., Skarupski K.A., Grayson C.E., Starling M.R., Bates E.R., Eagle K.A. A randomized controlled trial of information-giving to patients referred for coronary angiography: effects on outcomes of care. Health Expect 1998, 1:50-61.
15. Lucas F.L., Siewers A.E., Malenka D.J., Wennberg D.E. Diagnostic-therapeutic cascade revisited: coronary angiography, coronary artery bypass graft surgery, and percutaneous coronary intervention in the modern era. Circulation 2008, 118:2797-2802.
16. Whittle J., Conigliaro J., Good C.B., Kelley M.E., Skanderson M. Understanding of the benefits of coronary revascularization procedures among patients who are offered such procedures. Am Heart J 2007, 154:662-668.
17. American Heart Association Live well: know the facts about heart conditions and plan for good health 2010, http://www%20heart%20org/HEARTORG/Conditions/Conditions_UCM_001087_SubHomePage%20jsp.
18. HealthWise Staff Heart disease: should I have angioplasty for stable angina? http://www%20healthwise%20net/health4u/Content/StdDocument%20aspx%3FDOCHWID-zx1814%26SECHWID=av2317.
19. Treatment choices for coronary artery disease 2002, Health Dialog/Foundation for Informed Medical Decision Making, Boston, MA.
20. Trikalinos T.A., Alsheikh-Ali A.A., Tatsioni A., Nallamothu B.K., Kent D.M. Percutaneous coronary interventions for non-acute coronary artery disease: a quantitative 20-year synopsis and a network meta-analysis. Lancet 2009, 373:911-918.
21. Bogdan-Lovis E.L., Holmes-Rovner M. Prudent evidence-fettered shared decision making. J Eval Clin Pract 2010, 16:376-381.
22. National Priorities Partnership Aligning our efforts to transform America's healthcare 2008, National Quality Forum, Washington, DC. National Priorities Partnership (Ed.).
23. The Lewin Group A path to a high performance U.S. health system 2009, The Lewin Group, Washington, DC.
24. Boden W.E., O'Rourke R.A., Teo K.K., Hartigan P.M., Maron D.J., Kostuk W.J., et al. Optimal medical therapy with or without PCI for stable coronary disease. N Engl J Med 2007, 356:1503-1516.
25. Weintraub W.S., Spertus J.A., Kolm P., Maron D.J., Zhang Z., Jurkovitz C., et al. Effect of PCI on quality of life in patients with stable coronary disease. N Engl J Med 2008, 359:677-687.
26. Rothberg M.B., Sivalingam S.K., Ashraf J., Visintainer P., Joelson J., Kleppel R., et al. Patients' and cardiologists' perceptions of the benefits of percutaneous coronary intervention for stable coronary disease. Ann Intern Med 2010, 153:307-313.
27. Holmboe E.S., Fiellin D.A., Cusanelli E., Remetz M., Krumholz H.M. Perceptions of benefit and risk of patients undergoing first-time elective percutaneous coronary revascularization. J Gen Intern Med 2000, 15:632-637.
28. Kee F., McDonald P., Gaffney B. Risks and benefits of coronary angioplasty: the patients perspective: a preliminary study. Qual Health Care 1997, 6:131-139.
29. Yusuf S., Zucker D., Peduzzi P., Fisher L.D., Takaro T., Kennedy J.W., et al. Effect of coronary artery bypass graft surgery on survival: overview of 10-year results from randomised trials by the coronary artery bypass graft surgery trialists collaboration. Lancet 1994, 344:563-570.
30. Howard G.S. Response-shift bias - a problem in evaluating interventions with pre-post self-reports. Eval Rev 1980, 4:93-106.
31. Lam T.C.M. A comparison of three retrospective self-reporting methods of measuring change in instructional practice. Am J Eval 2003, 24:65-80.
32. Davis G. Using a retrospective pre-post questionnaire to determine program impact. J Extension 2003, 41:100-106.
33. Legare F., Ratte S., Gravel K., Graham I.D. Barriers and facilitators to implementing shared decision-making in clinical practice: update of a systematic review of health professionals' perceptions. Patient Educ Couns 2008, 73:526-535.
34. Bernat J.L., Peterson L.M. Patient-centered informed consent in surgical practice. Arch Surg 2006, 141:86-92.
35. Laurence C., Gialamas A., Yelland L., Bubner T., Ryan P., Willson K., et al. A pragmatic cluster randomised controlled trial to evaluate the safety, clinical effectiveness, cost effectiveness and satisfaction with point of care testing in a general practice setting - rationale, design and baseline characteristics. Trials 2008, 9:50.
36. Watson D.B., Thomson R.G., Murtagh M.J. Professional centred shared decision making: patient decision aids in practice in primary care. BMC Health Serv Res 2008, 8:5.
37. Edwards A., Elwyn G., Hood K., Atwell C., Robling M., Houston H., et al. Patient-based outcome results from a cluster randomized trial of shared decision making skill development and use of risk communication aids in general practice. Fam Pract 2004, 21:347-354.
38. Whitehead C. The doctor dilemma in interprofessional education and care: how and why will physicians collaborate. Med Educ 2007, 41:1010-1016.
39. Schulman-Green D.J., Naik A.D., Bradley E.H., McCorkle R., Bogardus S.T. Goal setting as a shared decision making strategy among clinicians and their older patients. Patient Educ Couns 2006, 63:145-151.
40. O'Bryant S.E., Palav A., McCaffrey R.J. A review of symptoms commonly associated with menopause: implications for clinical neuropsychologists and other health care providers. Neuropsychol Rev 2003, 13:145-152.