Understanding of the benefits of coronary revascularization procedures among patients who are offered such procedures

American Heart Journal

Volumn 154, Issue 4, 2007, Pages 662-668

  Whittle, Jeff ^a   Conigliaro, Joseph ^b   Good, Chester B ^c   Kelley, Mary E ^d   Skanderson, Melissa ^c  

^a CLEMENT J ZABLOCKI VETERANS AFFAIRS MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

^b LEXINGTON VA MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

^c VETERANS AFFAIRS MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

^d EMORY UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ANGIOCARDIOGRAPHY; ARTICLE; CORONARY ARTERY BYPASS GRAFT; DEMOGRAPHY; ELECTIVE SURGERY; FEMALE; HEART MUSCLE REVASCULARIZATION; HOSPITAL ADMISSION; HUMAN; INTERVIEW; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; PERCUTANEOUS CORONARY INTERVENTION; PHYSICIAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; QUESTIONNAIRE; RISK BENEFIT ANALYSIS; SURVIVAL RATE;

AFRICAN AMERICANS; AGED; ANGIOPLASTY, BALLOON, CORONARY; ATTITUDE TO HEALTH; COMMUNICATION; CORONARY ARTERY BYPASS; CORONARY DISEASE; DECISION MAKING; FEMALE; HUMANS; INFORMED CONSENT; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PHYSICIAN-PATIENT RELATIONS; RISK ASSESSMENT;

EID: 34548831645     PISSN: 00028703     EISSN: 10976744     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.ahj.2007.04.065     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. Woolf S.H., Chan E.C.Y., Harris R., et al. Promoting informed choice: transforming health care to dispense knowledge for decision making. Ann Intern Med 143 (2005) 293-300
2. Whitney S.N. A new model of medical decisions: exploring the limits of shared decision making. Med Decis Making 23 (2003) 275-280
3. McNutt R.A. Shared medical decision making: problems, process, progress. JAMA 292 (2004) 2516-2518
4. Eddy D.M. Comparing benefits and harms: the balance sheet. JAMA 263 (1990) 2493-2505
5. Priluck I.A., Robertson D.M., and Buettner H. What patients recall of the preoperative discussion after retinal detachment surgery. Am J Ophthalmol 87 (1979) 620-623
6. Mark J.S., and Spiro H. Informed consent for colonoscopy. A prospective study. Arch Intern Med 150 (1990) 777-780
7. Lavelle-Jones C., Byrne D.J., Rice P., et al. Factors affecting quality of informed consent. Br Med J 306 (1993) 885-890
8. Hekkenberg R.J., Irish J.C., Rotstein L.E., et al. Informed consent in head and neck surgery: how much do patients actually remember?. J Otolaryngol 26 (1997) 155-159
9. Gutman J., and Gutman J. The right not to know and coronary angiography: is the common law of Australia consistent with patients' wishes?. J Law Med 10 (2002) 168-173
10. AHA. Heart disease and stroke statistics-2005 update (2005), American Heart Association, Dallas, TX
11. Landis J.R., and Koch G.G. The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics 33 (1977) 159-174
12. Cooper-Patrick L., Gallo J.J., Gonzales J.J., et al. Race, gender, and partnership in the patient-physician relationship. JAMA 282 (1999) 583-589
13. Carrozza Jr. J.P., and Sellke F.W. A 69-year-old woman with left main coronary artery disease. JAMA 292 (2004) 2506-2514
14. Liao L., Jollis J.G., Delong E.R., et al. Impact of an interactive video on decision making of patients with ischemic heart disease. J Gen Intern Med 11 (1996) 373-378
15. Deber R.B., Kraetschmer N., and Irvine J. What role do patients wish to play in treatment decision making?. Arch Intern Med 156 (1996) 1414-1420
16. Beresford N., Seymour L., Vincent C., et al. Risks of elective cardiac surgery: what do patients want to know?. Heart 86 (2001) 626-631
17. Mansell D., Poses R.M., Kazis L., et al. Clinical factors that influence patients' desire for participation in decisions about illness. Arch Intern Med 160 (2000) 2991-2996
18. Arora N.K., and McHorney C.A. Patient preferences for medical decision making: who really wants to participate?. Med Care 38 (2000) 335-341
19. Chassin M.R., Kosecoff J., Park R.E., et al. Does inappropriate use explain geographic variations in the use of health care services? A study of three procedures. JAMA 258 (1987) 2533-2537
20. Levinson W., Kao A., Kuby A., et al. Not all patients want to participate in decision making. A national study of public preferences. J Gen Intern Med 20 (2005) 531-535