Prudent evidence-fettered shared decision making

Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice

Volumn 16, Issue 2, 2010, Pages 376-381

  Bogdan Lovis, Elizabeth ^a   Holmes Rovner, Margaret ^a  

^a MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Autonomy; Behavioural economics; Equipoise; Evidence based medicine; Frugal default; Shared decision making

Indexed keywords

BEHAVIORAL MEDICINE; CLINICAL DECISION MAKING; CLINICAL EFFECTIVENESS; CONSUMER ATTITUDE; CORONARY ARTERY DISEASE; COST BENEFIT ANALYSIS; DIRECTIVE COUNSELING; DOCTOR PATIENT RELATION; EVIDENCE BASED MEDICINE; HEALTH CARE PERSONNEL; HEALTH CARE POLICY; HEALTH CARE UTILIZATION; HEALTH ECONOMICS; HUMAN; MEDICAL ETHICS; PATIENT ATTITUDE; PATIENT AUTONOMY; PATIENT CARE; PERCUTANEOUS CORONARY INTERVENTION; PRIMARY MEDICAL CARE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RESOURCE ALLOCATION; REVIEW; SELF CARE AGENCY; STABLE ANGINA PECTORIS; STRATEGIC PLANNING;

BEHAVIOR; DECISION MAKING; EVIDENCE-BASED MEDICINE; HEALTH RESOURCES; HUMANS; PATIENT PARTICIPATION; PERSONAL AUTONOMY; PRIMARY HEALTH CARE; SOCIAL SCIENCES;

EID: 77950486018     PISSN: 13561294     EISSN: 13652753     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2753.2010.01403.x     Document Type: Review

References (47)

1. Thompson, A. (2007) The meaning of patient involvement and participation in health care consultations: a taxonomy. Social Science and Medicine, 64, 1297 1310.
2. Whitney, S., McGuire, A. McCullough, L. (2004) A typology of shared decision making, informed consent, and simple consent. Annals of Internal Medicine, 140, 54 69.
3. Whitney, S., Holmes-Rovner, M., Brody, H., Schneider, C., McCullough, L., Volk, R. McGuire, A. (2008) Beyond shared decision making: an expanded typology of medical decisions. Medical Decision Making, 5, 699 705.
4. Coulter, A. (2002) The Autonomous Patient: Ending Paternalism in Medical Care.
5. McCaffery, K., Shepherd, L., Trevena, L., Juraskovs, I., Barratt, A., Butow, P., Hazell, K. Tattersall, M. (2007) Shared decision-making in Australia. German Journal for Evidence and Quality in Health Care, 101, 205 211.
6. Légaré, F., Stacey, D. Forest, P. G. (2007) Shared decision-making in Canada: update, challenges and where next! German Journal for Evidence and Quality in Health Care, 101, 213 222.
7. Moumjid, N., Brémond, A., Mignotte, H., Faure, A. Carrère, M. (2007) Shared decision-making in the physician-patient encounter in France: a general overview. German Journal for Evidence and Quality in Health Care, 101, 223 228.
8. Loh, A., Simon, D., Bieber, C., Eich, W. Harter, M. (2007) Patient and citizen participation in German health care-current state and future perspectives. German Journal for Evidence and Quality in Health Care, 101, 229 235.
9. Goss, C. Renzi, C. (2007) Patient and citizen participation in health care decisions in Italy. German Journal for Evidence and Quality in Health Care, 101, 236 240.
10. Van der Weijden, T., van Veenendaal, H. Timmermans, D. (2007) Shared decision-making in the Netherlands - current state and future perspectives. German Journal for Evidence and Quality in Health Care, 101, 241 246.
11. Evans, R., Edwards, A., Coulter, A. Elwyn, G. (2007) Prominent strategy but rare in practice: shared decision-making and patient decision support technologies in the UK. German Journal for Evidence and Quality in Health Care, 101, 247 253.
12. Holmes-Rovner, M., Gruman, J. Rovner, D. (2007) Shared decision-making in the US - research & development outpaces delivery. German Journal for Evidence and Quality in Health Care, 101, 254 258.
13. IOM (Institute of Medicine) (2009) Initial National Priorities for Comparative Effectiveness Research.
14. Docteur, E. Berenson, R. (2009) How does the quality of U.S. health care compare internationally? In Timely Analysis of Immediate Health Policy Issues, pp. 1 14. Robert Wood Johnson Foundation and Urban Institute. Available at: http://www.rwjf.org/qualityequality/product.jsp?id=47508 (last accessed 3 February 2010).
15. Elwyn, G., Edwards, A., Kinnersley, P. Grol, R. (2000) Shared decision-making and the concept of equipoise: the competencies of involving patients in healthcare choices. British Journal of General Practice, 50, 892 899.
16. OConnor, A. M., Bennett, C. L., Stacey, D., et al. Decision aids for people facing health treatment or screening decisions. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2009, Issue 3. Art. No.: CD001431. DOI: 10.1002/14651858. CD001431.pub2.
17. Fleck, L. (2009) Just Caring: Health Care Rationing and Democratic Deliberation.
18. Lambert, H., Gordon, E. Bogdan-Lovis, E. (2006) Introduction: gift horse or Trojan horse? Social science perspectives on evidence-based health care. Social Science and Medicine, 62, 2613 2620.
19. Brody, H., Miller, F. Bogdan-Lovis, E. (2005) Evidence-based medicine: watching out for its friends. Perspectives in Biology and Medicine, 48, 570 584.
20. Straus, S., Haynes, B., Glasziou, P., Dickersin, K. Guyatt, G. (2007) Misunderstandings, misperceptions and mistakes. Evidence-Based Medicine, 12, 2 3.
21. Thayler, R. Sunstein, C. (2008) Nudge: Improving Decisions about Health, Wealth, and Happiness.
22. Ubel, P. (2009) Free Market Madness: Why Human Nature is at Odds with Economics - And Why It Matters.
23. Wennberg, J. E. (2002) Unwarranted variations in healthcare delivery: implications for academic medical centres. British Medical Journal, 325, 961 964.
24. Wennberg, J. E., Fisher, E. Skinner, J. (2002) Geography and the debate over medicare reform. Health Affairs, Supplement Web Exclusives, w96 w114.
25. Wennberg, J. E. (2004) Practice variation and health care reform: connecting the dots. Health Affairs, Supplement Web Exclusives, w140 w144.
26. OConnor, A., Wennberg, J. E., Legare, F., Llewellyn-Thomas, H., Moulton, B., Sepucha, K., Sodano, A. King, J. (2007) Toward the tipping point: decision aids and informed patient choice. Health Affairs, 26, 716 725.
27. Tversky, A. Kahneman, D. (1981) The framing of decisions and the psychology of choice. Science, New Series, 211, 453 458.
28. Towle, A., Godolphin, W., Grams, G. LaMarre, A. (2006) Putting informed and shared decision making into practice. Health Expectations, 9, 321 332.
29. Mykhalovskiy, E. Weir, L. (2004) The problem of evidence-based medicine: directions for social science. Social Science and Medicine, 59, 1059 1069.
30. Elwyn G., Edwards, A., Hood, K., Robling, M., Atwell, C., Russell, I., Wensing, M. Grol, R. (2004) Achieving involvement: process outcomes from a cluster randomized controlled trial of shared decision making skill development and use of risk communication aids in general practice. Family Practice, 21, 337 346. (Pubitemid 39162002)
31. Coulter, A. (2007) When should you involve patients in treatment decisions? British Journal of General Practice, 57, 771 772.
32. Herman, E. Chomsky, N. (1988) Manufacturing Consent: The Political Economy of the Mass Media.
33. Faden, R. R. Beauchamp, T. A. (1986) A History and Theory of Informed Consent.
34. Thompson, A. (1995) Customizing the public for health care: whats in a label? In The Politics of Quality in the Public Sector (eds I. Kirkpatrick M. Martinez Lucio pp. 65 83.
35. Parsons, T. (1951) The Social System.
36. De Vries, R., Kane Low, L. Bogdan-Lovis, E. (2009) Choosing surgical birth: desire and the nature of bioethical advice. In Naturalized Bioethics: Toward Responsible Knowing and Practice (eds H. Lindemann, M. Verkerk M. Urban Walker pp. 42 64.
37. Brody, H. Thompson, J. (1981) The maximin strategy in modern obstetrics. The Journal of Family Practice, 12, 977 986.
38. Jørgensen, K., Brodersen, J., Hartling, O., Nielsen, M. Gøtzche, P. (2009) Informed choice requires information about both benefits and harms. Journal of Medical Ethics, 35, 268 269.
39. Lavender, T., Hofmeyr, G. J., Neilson, J. P., Kingdon, C. Gyte, G. M. (2006) Caesarean section for non-medical reasons at term. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, Issue 2. Art. No.: CD004660. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD004660. pub2.
40. American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (2007) Cesarean delivery on maternal request. ACOG Committee Opinion No. 394. Obstetrics and Gynecology, 110, 1501 1504.
41. FIGO (2002) Recommendations on Ethical Issues in Obstetrics and Gynaecology.
42. Viswanathan, M., Visco, A. G., Hartmann, K., et al. (2006) Cesarean delivery on maternal request. Evidence Report/Technology Assessment No. 133 Prepared by the RTI International-University of North Carolina Evidence-Based Practice Center under Contract NO. 290-02-0016.) AHRQ Publication No. 06-E009. Rockville, MD: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality.
43. Minkoff, H. (2006) The ethics of cesarean section by choice. Seminars in Perinatology, 30, 309 312.
44. Harer, W. B. (2000) Patient choice cesarean (editorial). American College of Obstetricians and Gynecology Clinical Review, 5, 15 16.
45. National Institute of Health (2006) NIH state-of-the-science conference statement: cesarean delivery on maternal request March 27-29, 2006. Obstetrics and Gynecology, 107, 1386 1397.
46. Kalish, R., McCullough, L. Chervenak, F. (2007) Is non-directive counseling for patient choice cesarean delivery ethically justified? Journal of Perinatology and Medicine, 35, 478 480.
47. Lo, B. Field, M. J. (eds 2009) Conflicts of Interest in Medical Research, Education, and Practice.