Policy and practice developments in the implementation of shared decision making: An international perspective

Zeitschrift fur Evidenz, Fortbildung und Qualitat im Gesundheitswesen

Volumn 105, Issue 4, 2011, Pages 229-233

  Härter, Martin ^a   Van Der Weijden, Trudy ^b,c   Elwyn, Glyn ^d  

^a UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER HAMBURG EPPENDORF   (Germany)

^b MAASTRICHT UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

^c Cardiff University ^*  (Netherlands)

^d CARDIFF UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 79957597022     PISSN: 18659217     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.zefq.2011.04.018     Document Type: Editorial

References (20)

1. President's Commission for the Study of Ethical Problems in Medicine and Biomedical and Behavioral Research. Making Health Care Decisions: The Ethical and Legal Implications of Informed Consent in the Patient-Practitioner Relationship. Washington, DC: President's Commission; 1982.
2. Charles C, Gafni A, Whelan T. Shared decision-making in the medical encounter: wht does it mean? (or it takes at least two to tango). Soc Sci Med 1997;44:681-92.
3. Makoul G, Clayman M. An integrative model of shared decision making in medical encounters. Patient Educ Couns 2006;60:301-12. (Pubitemid 43287935)
4. Elwyn G, Leitner S, Coulter A, Walker E, Watson P, Thomson R. Implementing shared decision making in the NHS. BMJ 2010;341:c5146.
5. Edwards A, Elwyn G, editors. Shared decision-making. Achieving evidence-based patient choice. Oxford University Press; 2009.
6. O'Connor A, Bennett C, Stacey D, Barry M, Col N, Eden K, et al. Decision aids for people facing health treatment or screening decisions. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2009;3:CD001431.
7. Bieber C, Nicolai J, Hartmann M, Blumenstiel K, Ringel N, Schneider A, et al. Training physicians in shared decision-making - Who can be reached and what is achieved? Patient Educ Couns 2009;77(1):48-54.
8. Légaré F, Bekker H, Desroches S, Politi M, Stacey D, Borduas F, et al. Effective continuing professional development for translating shared decision making in primary care: A study protocol. Implement Sci 2010;27(5):83.
9. van der Weijden T, Légaré F, Boivin A, Burgers JS, van Veenendaal H, Stiggelbout AM, et al. How to integrate individual patient values and preferences in clinical practice guidelines? A research protocol. Implement Sci 2010;5:10.
10. Gravel K, Légaré F, Graham I. Barriers and facilitators to implementing shared decision-making in clinical practice: a systematic review of health professionals' perceptions. Implement Sci 2006;1:16.
11. Elwyn G, Légaré F, van der Weijden T, Edwards A, May C. Arduous implementation: does the Normalisation Process Model explain why it's so difficult to embed decision support technologies for patients in routine clinical practice. Implement Sci 2008; 3:57.
12. Caldon LJ, Collins KA, Reed MW, Sivell S, Austoker J, Clements AM, et al., Bres-Dex Group. Clinicians' concerns about decision support interventions for patients facing breast cancer surgery options: understanding the challenge of implementing shared decision-making. Health Expect 2010 Oct 28, doi: 10.1111/j.1369-7625.2010.00633.x.
13. Härter M, Loh A, editors. Shared decision-making in diverse healthcare systems - translating research and health policy into practice. Z ärztl Fortbild Qual Gesundh wes (ZaeFQ) 2007:4.
14. Elwyn G, O'Connor A, Stacey D, Volk R, Edwards A, Coulter A, et al., on behalf of the International Patient Decision Aids Standards (IPDAS) Collaboration. Developing a quality criteria framework for patient decision aids: online international Delphi consensus process. BMJ 2006;333(7565): 417.
15. Bekker HL. The loss of reason in patient decision aid research: do checklists damage the quality of informed choice interventions? Patient Educ Couns 2010;78(3):357-64.
16. Boivin A, Currie K, Fervers B, Gracia J, James M, Marshall C, et al., on behalf of GIN Public [the Guideline International Network Patient and Public Involvement Working Group]. Patient and public involvement in guidelines: international experiences and future perspectives. Qual Saf Health Care 2010;19:e22.
17. Salzburg Global Seminar. Salzburg statement on shared decision making. BMJ 2011; 342:d1745.
18. Elwyn G, O'Connor A, Bennett C, Newcombe R, Politi M, Durand M, et al. Assessing the quality of decision support technologies using the International Patient Decision Aid Standards instrument (IPDASi) [Internet]. PLoS One. 2009; 4(3).(available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2649534/).
19. http://www.health.org.uk/areas-of-work/improvement-programmes/ shared-decision-making/.
20. Fleuren M, Wiefferink K, Paulussen T. Determinants of innovations. Int J Qual Health Care 2004;16:107-23.