Clinicians' concerns about decision support interventions for patients facing breast cancer surgery options: Understanding the challenge of implementing shared decision-making

Health Expectations

Volumn 14, Issue 2, 2011, Pages 133-146

  Caldon, Lisa J M ^a   Collins, Karen A ^b   Reed, Malcolm W ^a   Sivell, Stephanie ^c   Austoker, Joan ^d   Clements, Alison M ^d   Patnick, Julietta ^d,e   Elwyn, Glyn ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SHEFFIELD   (United Kingdom)

^b SHEFFIELD HALLAM UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

^c CARDIFF UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

^d UNIVERSITY OF OXFORD   (United Kingdom)

^e NATIONAL HEALTH SERVICE   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Breast cancer; Breast conservation surgery; Breast conservation therapy; Decision aids; Decision support technology; Decision making; Implementation science; Mastectomy; Patient decision support interventions; Patient involvement; Shared decision making

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; BREAST TUMOR; DECISION SUPPORT SYSTEM; DOCTOR PATIENT RELATION; FEMALE; HEALTH PERSONNEL ATTITUDE; HUMAN; INTERNET; INTERVIEW; MALE; MASTECTOMY; METHODOLOGY; PATIENT EDUCATION; PHYSICIAN; PSYCHOLOGICAL ASPECT; UNITED KINGDOM;

ATTITUDE OF HEALTH PERSONNEL; BREAST NEOPLASMS; DECISION SUPPORT SYSTEMS, CLINICAL; FEMALE; GREAT BRITAIN; HUMANS; INTERNET; INTERVIEWS AS TOPIC; MALE; MASTECTOMY; PATIENT EDUCATION AS TOPIC; PHYSICIAN-PATIENT RELATIONS; PHYSICIANS;

EID: 79956205287     PISSN: 13696513     EISSN: 13697625     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1369-7625.2010.00633.x     Document Type: Article

References (40)

1. Lawrence Z. Building on the best - choice, responsiveness and equity in the NHS. Health Expectations, 2004; 7: 176-179.
2. Department of Health. Building on the best: choice, responsiveness and equity in the NHS. The Stationery Office; 2008.
3. Lantz PM, Janz NK, Fagerlin A et al. Satisfaction with surgery outcomes and the decision process in a population-based sample of women with breast cancer. Health Services Research, 2005; 40: 745-767.
4. Hack TF, Degner LF, Watson P, Sinha L. Do patients benefit from participating in medical decision making? Longitudinal follow-up of women with breast cancer Psychooncology, 2006; 15: 9-19.
5. Street RL Jr, Voigt B. Patient participation in deciding breast cancer treatment and subsequent quality of life. Medical Decision Making, 1997; 17: 298-306.
6. Deadman JM, Leinster SJ, Owens RG, Dewey ME, Slade PD. Taking responsibility for cancer treatment. Social Science and Medicine, 2001; 53: 669-677.
7. Fallowfield LJ, Hall A, Maguire P, Baum M, A'Hern RP. A question of choice: results of a prospective 3-year follow-up study of women with breast cancer. The Breast, 1994; 3: 202-208.
8. Moyer A. Psychosocial outcomes of breast-conserving surgery versus mastectomy: a meta-analytic review. Health Psychology, 1997; 16: 284-298.
9. Stewart MA. Effective physician-patient communication and health outcomes: a review. CMAJ, 1995; 9: 1423-1433.
10. Moyer A, Salovey P. Patient participation in treatment decision making and the psychological consequences of breast cancer surgery. Womens Health, 1998; 4: 103-116.
11. Elwyn G, Edwards A, Kinnersley P, Grol R. Shared decision making and the concept of equipoise: the competences of involving patients in healthcare choices. British Journal of General Practice, 2000; 50: 892-899.
12. O'Connor AM, Mulley AG Jr, Wennberg JE. Standard consultations are not enough to ensure decision quality regarding preference-sensitive options. Journal of the National Cancer Institute, 2003; 8: 570-571.
13. Elwyn G, Frosch D, Rollnick S. Dual equipoise shared decision making: definitions for decision and behaviour support interventions. Implementation Science, 2009; 4: 75.
14. O'Connor AM, Rostom A, Fiset V et al. Decision aids for patients facing health treatment or screening decisions: systematic review. BMJ, 1999; 7212: 731-734.
15. O'Connor AM, Stacey D, Entwistle V et al. Decision aids for people facing health treatment or screening decisions. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, 2003; 2: CD001431.
16. Waljee JF, Rogers MA, Alderman AK. Decision aids and breast cancer: do they influence choice for surgery and knowledge of treatment options? Journal of Clinical Oncology, 2007; 9: 1067-1073.
17. Fisher B, Anderson S, Bryant J et al. Twenty-year follow-up of a randomized trial comparing total mastectomy, lumpectomy, and lumpectomy plus irradiation for the treatment of invasive breast cancer. New England Journal of Medicine, 2002; 16: 1233-1241.
18. van Dongen JA, Voogd AC, Fentiman IS et al. Long-term results of a randomized trial comparing breast-conserving therapy with mastectomy: European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer 10801 trial. Journal of the National Cancer Institute, 2000; 14: 1143-1150.
19. Veronesi U, Cascinelli N, Mariani L et al. Twenty-year follow-up of a randomized study comparing breast-conserving surgery with radical mastectomy for early breast cancer. New England Journal of Medicine, 2002; 16: 1227-1232.
20. Irwig L, Bennetts A. Quality of life after breast conservation or mastectomy: a systematic review. The Australian and New Zealand Journal of Surgery, 1997; 67: 750-754.
21. McCready D, Holloway C, Shelley W et al. Surgical management of early stage invasive breast cancer: a practice guideline. Canadian Journal of Surgery, 2005; 48: 185-194.
22. Fallowfield LJ, Hall A, Maguire GP, Baum M. Psychological outcomes of different treatment policies in women with early breast cancer outside a clinical trial. BMJ, 1990; 6752: 575-580.
23. Hughes KK. Decision making by patients with breast cancer: the role of information in treatment selection. Oncology Nursing Forum, 1993; 20: 623-628.
24. Molenaar S, Oort F, Sprangers M et al. Predictors of patients' choices for breast-conserving therapy or mastectomy: a prospective study. British Journal of Cancer, 2004; 11: 2123-2130.
25. Kotwall CA, Maxwell JG, Covington DL, Churchill P, Smith SE, Covan EK. Clinicopathologic factors and patient perceptions associated with surgical breast-conserving treatment. Annals of Surgical Oncology, 1996; 3: 169-175.
26. Schou I, Ekeberg O, Ruland CM, Karesen R. Do women newly diagnosed with breast cancer and consulting surgeon assess decision-making equally? Breast, 2002; 11: 434-441.
27. Evans R, Elwyn G, Edwards A. Making interactive decision support for patients a reality. Informatics in Primary Care, 2004; 12: 109-113.
28. Graham ID, Logan J, Bennett CL et al. Physicians' intentions and use of three patient decision aids. BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making, 2007; 7: 20.
29. Legare F, Ratte S, Gravel K, Graham ID. Barriers and facilitators to implementing shared decision-making in clinical practice: update of a systematic review of health professionals' perceptions. Patient Education and Counseling, 2008; 73: 526-535.
30. Say RE, Thomson R. The importance of patient preferences in treatment decisions - challenges for doctors. BMJ, 2003; 7414: 542-545.
31. Holmes-Rovner M, Valade D, Orlowski C, Draus C, Nabozny-Valerio B, Keiser S. Implementing shared decision-making in routine practice: barriers and opportunities. Health Expectations, 2000; 3: 182-191.
32. Feldman-Stewart D, Brennenstuhl S, McIssac K et al. A systematic review of information in decision aids. Health Expectations, 2007; 10: 46-61.
33. Elwyn G, O'Connor A, Stacey D et al. Developing a quality criteria framework for patient decision aids: online international Delphi consensus process. BMJ, 2006; 7565: 417.
34. Silvia KA, Ozanne EM, Sepucha KR. Implementing breast cancer decision aids in community sites: barriers and resources. Health Expectations, 2008; 11: 46-53.
35. Richie J, Spencer L, O'Connor W. Carrying out qualitative analysis. In: Richie J, Lewis J (eds) Qualitative Research Practice, 1st edn. London: Sage Publications, 2003: 219-262.
36. Schwartz KL, Roe T, Northrup J, Meza J, Seifeldin R, Neale AV. Family medicine patients' use of the Internet for health information: a MetroNet study. Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine, 2006; 19: 39-45.
37. Elwyn G, Legare F, Weijden T, Edwards A, May C. Arduous implementation: does the Normalisation Process Model explain why it's so difficult to embed decision support technologies for patients in routine clinical practice. Implementation Science, 2008; 3: 57.
38. Silvia KA, Sepucha KR. Decision aids in routine practice: lessons from the breast cancer initiative. Health Expectations, 2006; 9: 255-264.
39. Gravel K, Legare F, Graham ID. Barriers and facilitators to implementing shared decision-making in clinical practice: a systematic review of health professionals' perceptions. Implementation Science, 2006; 1: 16.
40. McMullan M. Patients using the Internet to obtain health information: how this affects the patient-health professional relationship. Patient Education and Counseling, 2006; 63: 24-28.