Cost-effective treatment of patients with symptomatic cholelithiasis and possible common bile duct stones

Journal of the American College of Surgeons

Volumn 212, Issue 6, 2011, Pages

  Brown, Lisa M ^a   Rogers, Stanley J ^a   Cello, John P ^a   Brasel, Karen J ^b   Inadomi, John M ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^b MEDICAL COLLEGE OF WISCONSIN   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ABDOMINAL ABSCESS; ABDOMINAL BLEEDING; ARTICLE; BILE LEAKAGE; CHOLANGITIS; CHOLECYSTECTOMY; CHOLEDOCHOTOMY; CHOLELITHIASIS; COMMON BILE DUCT STONE; COST EFFECTIVENESS ANALYSIS; DIAGNOSTIC TEST ACCURACY STUDY; ENDOSCOPIC ECHOGRAPHY; ENDOSCOPIC RETROGRADE CHOLANGIOPANCREATOGRAPHY; HOSPITALIZATION COST; HUMAN; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; INTESTINE PERFORATION; LENGTH OF STAY; MAGNETIC RESONANCE CHOLANGIOPANCREATOGRAPHY; MORBIDITY; MORTALITY; PANCREATITIS; PEROPERATIVE CARE; POSTOPERATIVE CARE; PREOPERATIVE CARE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REOPERATION; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; WOUND INFECTION;

EID: 79957581433     PISSN: 10727515     EISSN: 18791190     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2011.02.017     Document Type: Article

References (62)

1. Petelin JB. Laparoscopic common bile duct exploration. Surg Endosc 2003;17:1705-1715.
2. Verbesey JE, Birkett DH. Common bile duct exploration for choledocholithiasis. Surg Clin North Am 2008;88:1315-1328.
3. Caddy GR, Tham TC. Gallstone disease: symptoms, diagnosis and endoscopic management of common bile duct stones. Best Pract Res Clin Gastroenterol 2006;20:1085-1101. (Pubitemid 44774802)
4. NIH state-of-the-science statement on endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) for diagnosis and therapy. NIH Consens State Sci Statements 2002;19:1-26.
5. Martin DJ, Vernon DR, Toouli J. Surgical versus endoscopic treatment of bile duct stones. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2006(2):CD003327.
6. Cuschieri A, Lezoche E, Morino M, et al. E.A.E.S. multicenter prospective randomized trial comparing two-stage vs single-stage management of patients with gallstone disease and ductal calculi. Surg Endosc 1999;13:952-957. (Pubitemid 29471352)
7. Rhodes M, Sussman L, Cohen L, LewisMP. Randomised trial of laparoscopic exploration of common bile duct versus postoperative endoscopic retrograde cholangiography for common bile duct stones. Lancet 1998;351:159-161.
8. Poulose BK, Speroff T, Holzman MD. Optimizing choledocholithiasis management: a cost-effectiveness analysis. Arch Surg 2007;142:43-48; discussion 49.
9. Urbach DR, Khajanchee YS, Jobe BA, et al. Cost-effective management of common bile duct stones: a decision analysis of the use of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP), intraoperative cholangiography, and laparoscopic bile duct exploration. Surg Endosc 2001;15:4-13. (Pubitemid 32118959)
10. Bailey AA, Bourke MJ, Williams SJ, et al. A prospective randomized trial of cannulation technique in ERCP: effects on technical success and post-ERCP pancreatitis. Endoscopy 2008; 40:296-301. (Pubitemid 351524377)
11. Katsinelos P, Paroutoglou G, Kountouras J, et al. A comparative study of standard ERCP catheter and hydrophilic guide wire in the selective cannulation of the common bile duct. Endoscopy 2008;40:302-307. (Pubitemid 351524378)
12. Khatibian M, Sotoudehmanesh R, Ali-Asgari A, et al. Needle-knife fistulotomy versus standard method for cannulation of common bile duct: a randomized controlled trial. Arch Iran Med 2008;11:16-20. (Pubitemid 351233544)
13. Kaffes AJ, Bourke MJ, Ding S, et al. A prospective, randomized, placebo-controlled trial of transdermal glyceryl trinitrate in ERCP: effects on technical success and post-ERCP pancreatitis. Gastrointest Endosc 2006;64:351-357. (Pubitemid 44233561)
14. Abraham NS, Williams SP, Thompson K, et al. 5F sphincterotomes and 4F sphincterotomes are equivalent for the selective cannulation of the common bile duct. Gastrointest Endosc 2006;63:615-621.
15. Tang SJ, Haber GB, Kortan P, et al. Precut papillotomy versus persistence in difficult biliary cannulation: a prospective randomized trial. Endoscopy 2005;37:58-65.
16. Stabuc B, Drobne D, Ferkolj I, et al. Acute biliary pancreatitis: detection of common bile duct stones with endoscopic ultrasound. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol 2008;20:1171-1175.
17. Katsinelos P, Kountouras J, Paroutoglou G, et al. Combination of endoprostheses and oral ursodeoxycholic acid or placebo in the treatment of difficult to extract common bile duct stones. Dig Liver Dis 2008;40:453-459.
18. Heo JH, Kang DH, Jung HJ, et al. Endoscopic sphincterotomy plus large-balloon dilation versus endoscopic sphincterotomy for removal of bile-duct stones. Gastrointest Endosc 2007;66:720-726; quiz 768, 771.
19. Suc B, Escat J, Cherqui D, et al. Surgery vs endoscopy as primary treatment in symptomatic patients with suspected common bile duct stones: a multicenter randomized trial. French Associations for Surgical Research. Arch Surg 1998;133:702-708. (Pubitemid 28324148)
20. Stain SC, Cohen H, Tsuishoysha M, Donovan AJ. Choledocholithiasis. Endoscopic sphincterotomy or common bile duct exploration. Ann Surg 1991;213:627-633; discussion 633-634.
21. Stiegmann GV, Goff JS, Mansour A, et al. Precholecystectomy endoscopic cholangiography and stone removal is not superior to cholecystectomy, cholangiography, and common duct exploration. Am J Surg 1992;163:227-230. (Pubitemid 23059262)
22. Hammarstrom LE, Holmin T, Stridbeck H, Ihse I. Long-term follow-up of a prospective randomized study of endoscopic versus surgical treatment of bile duct calculi in patients with gallbladder in situ. Br J Surg 1995;82:1516-1521.
23. Targarona EM, Ayuso RM, Bordas JM, et al. Randomised trial of endoscopic sphincterotomy with gallbladder left in situ versus open surgery for common bile duct calculi in high-risk patients. Lancet 1996;347:926-929. (Pubitemid 26102547)
24. Kapoor R, Kaushik SP, Saraswat VA, et al. Prospective randomized trial comparing endoscopic sphincterotomy followed by surgery with surgery alone in good risk patients with choledocholithiasis. HPB Surg 1996;9:145-148. (Pubitemid 26138797)
25. Freeman ML, Nelson DB, Sherman S, et al. Complications of endoscopic biliary sphincterotomy. N Engl J Med 1996;335:909-918. (Pubitemid 26314443)
26. Christensen M, Matzen P, Schulze S, Rosenberg J. Complications of ERCP: a prospective study. Gastrointest Endosc 2004;60:721-731. (Pubitemid 39550929)
27. Videhult P, Sandblom G, Rasmussen IC. How reliable is intraoperative cholangiography as a method for detecting common bile duct stones? A prospective population-based study on 1171 patients. Surg Endosc 2009;23:304-312.
28. Tinoco R, Tinoco A, El-Kadre L, et al. Laparoscopic common bile duct exploration. Ann Surg 2008;247:674-679. (Pubitemid 351440619)
29. Berthou J, Dron B, Charbonneau P, et al. Evaluation of laparoscopic treatment of common bile duct stones in a prospective series of 505 patients: indications and results. Surg Endosc 2007;21:1970-1974. (Pubitemid 47620286)
30. Bove A, Bongarzoni G, Palone G, et al. Why is there recurrence after transcystic laparoscopic bile duct clearance? Risk factor analysis. Surg Endosc 2009;23:1470-1475.
31. Stromberg C, Nilsson M, Leijonmarck CE. Stone clearance and risk factors for failure in laparoscopic transcystic exploration of the common bile duct. Surg Endosc 2008;22:1194-1199.
32. Taylor CJ, Kong J, Ghusn M, et al. Laparoscopic bile duct exploration: results of 160 consecutive cases with 2-year follow up. ANZ J Surg 2007;77:440-445. (Pubitemid 46733804)
33. Johansson M, Thune A, Nelvin L, Lundell L. Randomized clinical trial of day-care versus overnight-stay laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Br J Surg 2006;93:40-45. (Pubitemid 43117302)
34. Keulemans Y, Eshuis J, de Haes H, et al. Laparoscopic cholecystectomy: day-care versus clinical observation. Ann Surg 1998;228:734-740. (Pubitemid 30191683)
35. Dirksen CD, Schmitz RF, Hans KM, et al. [Ambulatory laparoscopic cholecystectomy is as effective as hospitalization and from a social perspective less expensive: a randomized study]. Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd 2001;145:2434-2439.
36. Hollington P, Toogood GJ, Padbury RT. A prospective randomized trial of day-stay only versus overnight-stay laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Aust N Z J Surg 1999;69:841-843. (Pubitemid 30012913)
37. Lillemoe KD, Lin JW, Talamini MA, et al. Laparoscopic cholecystectomy as a "true" outpatient procedure: initial experience in 130 consecutive patients. J Gastrointest Surg 1999;3:44-49.
38. Calland JF, Tanaka K, Foley E, et al. Outpatient laparoscopic cholecystectomy: patient outcomes after implementation of a clinical pathway. Ann Surg 2001;233:704-715. (Pubitemid 32378655)
39. Chok KS, Yuen WK, Lau H, et al. Outpatient laparoscopic cholecystectomy in Hong Kong Chinese - an outcome analysis. Asian J Surg 2004;27:313-316. (Pubitemid 39424560)
40. Sasmal PK, Tantia O, Jain M, et al. Primary access-related complications in laparoscopic cholecystectomy via the closed technique: experience of a single surgical team over more than 15 years. Surg Endosc 2009;23:2407-2415.
41. Serra AS, Roig MP, Lledo JB, et al. The learning curve in ambulatory laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech 2002;12:320-324.
42. Campbell-Lloyd AJ, Martin DJ, Martin IJ. Long-term outcomes after laparoscopic bile duct exploration: a 5-year follow up of 150 consecutive patients. ANZ J Surg 2008;78:492-494. (Pubitemid 351777440)
43. Rogers SJ, Cello JP, Horn JK, et al. Prospective randomized trial of LC+LCBDE vs ERCP/S+LC for common bile duct stone disease. Arch Surg 2010;145:28-33.
44. Varadarajulu S, Eloubeidi MA, Wilcox CM, et al. Do all patients with abnormal intraoperative cholangiogram merit endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography? Surg Endosc 2006;20:801-805.
45. Barkun AN, Barkun JS, Fried GM, et al. Useful predictors of bile duct stones in patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy. McGill Gallstone Treatment Group. Ann Surg 1994;220:32-39. (Pubitemid 24205844)
46. Topal B, Fieuws S, Tomczyk K, et al. Clinical models are inaccurate in predicting bile duct stones in situ for patients with gallbladder. Surg Endosc 2009;23:38-44.
47. Shiozawa S, Tsuchiya A, Kim DH, et al. Useful predictive factors of common bile duct stones prior to laparoscopic cholecystectomy for gallstones. Hepatogastroenterology 2005;52:1662-1665. (Pubitemid 41745606)
48. Grande M, Torquati A, Tucci G, et al. Preoperative risk factors for common bile duct stones: defining the patient at high risk in the laparoscopic cholecystectomy era. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A 2004;14:281-286. (Pubitemid 39350458)
49. Yang MH, Chen TH, Wang SE, et al. Biochemical predictors for absence of common bile duct stones in patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Surg Endosc 2008;22:1620-1624.
50. Padda MS, Singh S, Tang SJ, Rockey DC. Liver test patterns in patients with acute calculous cholecystitis and/or choledocholithiasis. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 2009;29:1011-1018.
51. Massarweh NN, Devlin A, Elrod JA, et al. Surgeon knowledge, behavior, and opinions regarding intraoperative cholangiography. J Am Coll Surg 2008;207:821-830.
52. Catheline JM, Turner R, Paries J. Laparoscopic ultrasonography is a complement to cholangiography for the detection of choledocholithiasis at laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Br J Surg 2002;89:1235-1239. (Pubitemid 36002539)
53. Halpin VJ, Dunnegan D, Soper NJ. Laparoscopic intracorporeal ultrasound versus fluoroscopic intraoperative cholangiography: after the learning curve. Surg Endosc 2002;16:336-341. (Pubitemid 34112990)
54. Flum DR, Flowers C, Veenstra DL. A cost-effectiveness analysis of intraoperative cholangiography in the prevention of bile duct injury during laparoscopic cholecystectomy. J Am Coll Surg 2003;196:385-393. (Pubitemid 36343639)
55. Podnos YD, Gelfand DV, Dulkanchainun TS, et al. Is intraoperative cholangiography during laparoscopic cholecystectomy cost effective? Am J Surg 2001;182:663-669.
56. Nickkholgh A, Soltaniyekta S, Kalbasi H. Routine versus selective intraoperative cholangiography during laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a survey of 2,130 patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Surg Endosc 2006;20:868-874. (Pubitemid 43825187)
57. Ko CW, Lee SP. Epidemiology and natural history of common bile duct stones and prediction of disease. Gastrointest Endosc 2002;56:S165-169.
58. Collins C, Maguire D, Ireland A, et al. A prospective study of common bile duct calculi in patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy: natural history of choledocholithiasis revisited. Ann Surg 2004;239:28-33. (Pubitemid 38176369)
59. Sahai AV, Mauldin PD, Marsi V, et al. Bile duct stones and laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a decision analysis to assess the roles of intraoperative cholangiography, EUS, and ERCP. Gastrointest Endosc 1999;49:334-343. (Pubitemid 29135226)
60. Liberman MA, Phillips EH, Carroll BJ, et al. Cost-effective management of complicated choledocholithiasis: laparoscopic transcystic duct exploration or endoscopic sphincterotomy. J Am Coll Surg 1996;182:488-494. (Pubitemid 26176480)
61. Aube C, Delorme B, Yzet T, et al. MR cholangiopancreatography versus endoscopic sonography in suspected common bile duct lithiasis: a prospective, comparative study. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2005;184:55-62. (Pubitemid 40040905)
62. Verma D, Kapadia A, Eisen GM, Adler DG. EUS vs MRCP for detection of choledocholithiasis. Gastrointest Endosc 2006;64:248-254. (Pubitemid 44081901)