Preoperative risk factors for common bile duct stones: Defining the patient at high risk in the laparoscopic cholecystectomy era

Journal of Laparoendoscopic and Advanced Surgical Techniques - Part A

Volumn 14, Issue 5, 2004, Pages 281-286

  Grande, Michele ^a,c   Torquati, Alfonso ^b   Tucci, Gianfranco ^a   Rulli, Francesco ^a   Adorisio, Ottavio ^a   Farinon, Attilio Maria ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ROME TOR VERGATA   (Italy)

^b VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^c TOR VERGATA UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (Italy)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ALKALINE PHOSPHATASE;

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; BILIRUBIN BLOOD LEVEL; CHOLECYSTECTOMY; CHOLELITHIASIS; COMMON BILE DUCT STONE; CORRELATION ANALYSIS; COST; DISEASE ASSOCIATION; DISEASE MODEL; FEMALE; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MATHEMATICAL COMPUTING; MULTIVARIATE ANALYSIS; OPERATION DURATION; PEROPERATIVE CHOLANGIOGRAPHY; PREDICTION; PREOPERATIVE PERIOD; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY; RISK ASSESSMENT; SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; STATISTICAL SIGNIFICANCE;

ADULT; AGED; CHOLANGIOGRAPHY; CHOLECYSTECTOMY, LAPAROSCOPIC; CHOLECYSTOLITHIASIS; CHOLEDOCHOLITHIASIS; CHOLEDOCHOSTOMY; COMMON BILE DUCT; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; MODELS, STATISTICAL; MULTIVARIATE ANALYSIS; PREDICTIVE VALUE OF TESTS; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; RISK FACTORS;

EID: 5344244805     PISSN: 10926429     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1089/lap.2004.14.281     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. Collins C, Maguire D, Ireland A, Fitzgerald E, O'Sullivan GC. A prospective study of common bile duct calculi in patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy: natural history of choledocholithiasis revisited. Ann Surg 2004; 239:28-33.
2. Menezes N, Marson LP, Debeaux AC, Muir IM, Auld CD. Prospective analysis of a scoring system to predict choledocholithiasis. Br J Surg 2000;87:1176-1181.
3. Santambrogio R, Bianchi P, Opocher E, Verga M, Montorsi M. Prevalence and laparoscopic ultrasound patterns of choledocholithiasis and biliary sludge during cholecystectomy. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech 1999;9: 129-134.
4. Voyles CR, Sanders DL, Hogan R. Common bile duct evaluation in the era of laparoscopic cholecystectomy: 1050 cases later. Ann Surg 1994;219:744-750, discussion 750-752.
5. Soper NJ, Dunnegan DL. Routine versus selective intraoperative cholangiography during laparoscopic cholecystectomy. World J Surg 1992;16:1133-1140.
6. Hauer-Jensen M, Karesen R, Nygaard K, et al. Prospective randomized study of routine intraoperative cholangiography during open cholecystectomy: long-term follow-up and multivariate analysis of predictors of choledocholithiasis. Surgery 1993;113:318-323.
7. Rojas-Ortega S, Arizpe-Bravo D, Marin Lopez ER, Cesin-Sanchez R, Roman GR, Gomez C. Transcystic common bile duct exploration in the management of patients with choledocholithiasis. J Gastrointest Surg 2003;7:492-496.
8. Patel AP, Lokey JS, Harris JB, et al. Current management of common bile duct stones in a teaching community hospital. Am Surg 2003;69:555-560, discussion 560-561.
9. Prat F, Meduri B, Ducot B, Chiche R, Salimbeni-Bartolini R, Pelletier G. Prediction of common bile duct stones by noninvasive tests. Ann Surg 1999;229:362-368.
10. Sarli L, Costi R, Gobbi S, Iusco D, Sgobba G, Roncoroni L. Scoring system to predict asymptomatic choledocholithiasis before laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a matched case-control study. Surg Endosc 2003;17:1396-1403.
11. Soto J, Barish M, Yucel E, Siegenberg D, Ferrucci J, Chuttani R. Magnetic resonance cholangiography: comparison with endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography. Gastroenterology 1996;110:589-597.
12. Hunerbein M, Stroszczynski C, Ulmer C, Handke T, Felix R, Schlag P. Prospective comparison of transcutaneous 3-dimensional US cholangiography, magnetic resonance cholangiography, and direct cholangiography in the evaluation of malignant biliary obstruction. Gastrointest Endosc 2003;58:853-858.
13. Harewood GC, Baron TH. Cost analysis of magnetic resonance cholangiography in the management of inoperable hilar biliary obstruction. Am J Gastroenterol 2002;97: 1152-1158.
14. Parker CB, DeLong ER. ROC methodology within a monbilirubin framework. Stat Med 2003;22:3473-3488.
15. Saltzstein EC, Peacock JB, Thomas MD. Preoperative bilirubin, alkaline phosphatase and amylase levels as predictors of common duct stones. Surg Gynecol Obstet 1982; 154:381-384.
16. Robertson GS, Jagger C, Johnson PR, et al. Selection criteria for preoperative endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography in the laparoscopic era. Arch Surg 1996;131: 89-94.
17. Barkun JS, Fried GM, Barkun AN, et al. Cholecystectomy without operative cholangiography: implications for common bile duct injury and retained common bile duct stones. Ann Surg 1993;218:371-377, discussion 377-379.
18. Clements D, Aslan S, Wilkins WE. Common bile duct gallstones; anicteric presentation in the elderly: under-recognized but important. Postgrad Med J 1990;66:878-879.
19. Huguier M, Bornet P, Charpak Y, Houry S, Chastang C. Selective contraindications based on multivariate analysis for operative cholangiography in biliary lithiasis. Surg Gynecol Obstet 1991;172:470-474.
20. Trondsen E, Edwin B, Reiertsen O, Faerden AE, Fagertun H, Rosseland AR. Prediction of common bile duct stones prior to cholecystectomy: a prospective validation of a discriminant analysis function. Arch Surg 1998;133:162-166.
21. Kama NA, Atli M, Doganay M, Kologlu M, Reis E, Dolapci M. Practical recommendations for the prediction and management of common bile duct stones in patients with gallstones. Surg Endosc 2001;15:942-945.
22. Kim KH, Kim W, Lee HI, Sung CK. Prediction of common bile duct stones: its validation in laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Hepatogastroenterology 1997;44:1574-1579.
23. Yip AW, Ng WS, Chow WC, Choi TK, Lam KH. Plea for selective operative cholangiography. J R Coll Surg Edinb 1991;36:21-24.
24. Flum DR, Dellinger EP, Cheadle A, Chan L, Koepsell T. Intraoperative cholangiography and risk of common bile duct injury during cholecystectomy. JAMA 2003;289: 1639-1644.
25. Talamini MA. Routine versus selective intraoperative cholangiography during cholecystectomy. JAMA 2003; 289:1691-1692.
26. Grace PA, Qureshi A, Burke P, et al. Selective cholangiography in laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Br J Surg 1993;80:244-246.
27. Madhavan KK, Macintyre IM, Wilson RG, Saunders JH, Nixon SJ, Hamer-Hodges DW. Role of intraoperative cholangiography in laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Br J Surg 1995;82:249-252.
28. Tham TC, Lichtenstein DR, Vandervoort J, et al. Role of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography for suspected choledocholithiasis in patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Gastrointest Endosc 1998;47:50-56.
29. Korman J, Cosgrove J, Furman M, Nathan I, Cohen J. The role of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography and cholangiography in the laparoscopic era. Ann Surg 1996;223:212-216.