Retraction: Rtt107 phosphorylation promotes localisation to DNA Double-Stranded Breaks (DSBs) and recombinational repair between sister chromatids (PLoS ONE (2011) 6:5 (e20152) DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0020152);Rtt107 phosphorylation promotes localisation to DNA double-stranded breaks (DSBs) and recombinational repair between sister chromatids

PLoS ONE

Volumn 6, Issue 5, 2011, Pages

  Ullal, Pranav ^a   Vilella Mitjana, Felipe ^a   Jarmuz, Adam ^a   Aragón, Luis ^a  

^a IMPERIAL COLLEGE LONDON   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CELL PROTEIN; DNA; ENDONUCLEASE; HO ENDONUCLEASE; PROTEIN MEC1; PROTEIN RTT101; PROTEIN RTT107; PROTEIN SLX4; PROTEIN SMC5; PROTEIN SMC6; UNCLASSIFIED DRUG; CELL CYCLE PROTEIN; ESC4 PROTEIN, S CEREVISIAE; MEC1 PROTEIN, S CEREVISIAE; NUCLEAR PROTEIN; PROTEIN SERINE THREONINE KINASE; RHC18 PROTEIN, S CEREVISIAE; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE PROTEIN; SIGNAL PEPTIDE; SMC5 PROTEIN, S CEREVISIAE;

ARTICLE; COMPLEX FORMATION; CONTROLLED STUDY; DNA REPAIR; DOUBLE STRANDED DNA BREAK; GENETIC RECOMBINATION; NONHUMAN; PROTEIN ANALYSIS; PROTEIN ASSEMBLY; PROTEIN FUNCTION; PROTEIN INDUCTION; PROTEIN LOCALIZATION; PROTEIN PHOSPHORYLATION; PROTEIN PROTEIN INTERACTION; SIGNAL TRANSDUCTION; SISTER CHROMATID; YEAST; ENZYMOLOGY; GENETICS; METABOLISM; PHOSPHORYLATION; PROTEIN TRANSPORT; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE; SISTER CHROMATID EXCHANGE;

CELL CYCLE PROTEINS; DNA BREAKS, DOUBLE-STRANDED; DNA REPAIR; ENDONUCLEASES; INTRACELLULAR SIGNALING PEPTIDES AND PROTEINS; NUCLEAR PROTEINS; PHOSPHORYLATION; PROTEIN TRANSPORT; PROTEIN-SERINE-THREONINE KINASES; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE PROTEINS; SISTER CHROMATID EXCHANGE;

EID: 79957512884     PISSN: None     EISSN: 19326203     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0176035     Document Type: Erratum

References (34)

1. Daley JM, Palmbos PL, Wu D, Wilson TE, (2005) Nonhomologous end joining in yeast. Annu Rev Genet 39: 431-451.
2. Paques F, Haber JE, (1999) Multiple pathways of recombination induced by double-strand breaks in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Microbiol Mol Biol Rev 63: 349-404.
3. Kadyk LC, Hartwell LH, (1992) Sister chromatids are preferred over homologs as substrates for recombinational repair in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Genetics 132: 387-402.
4. Guacci V, Koshland D, Strunnikov A, (1997) A direct link between sister chromatid cohesion and chromosome condensation revealed through the analysis of MCD1 in S. cerevisiae. Cell 91: 47-57.
5. Michaelis C, Ciosk R, Nasmyth K, (1997) Cohesins: chromosomal proteins that prevent premature separation of sister chromatids. Cell 91: 35-45.
6. Strom L, Lindroos HB, Shirahige K, Sjogren C, (2004) Postreplicative recruitment of cohesin to double-strand breaks is required for DNA repair. Mol Cell 16: 1003-1015.
7. Unal E, Arbel-Eden A, Sattler U, Shroff R, Lichten M, et al. (2004) DNA damage response pathway uses histone modification to assemble a double-strand break-specific cohesin domain. Mol Cell 16: 991-1002.
8. De Piccoli G, Cortes-Ledesma F, Ira G, Torres-Rosell J, Uhle S, et al. (2006) Smc5-Smc6 mediate DNA double-strand-break repair by promoting sister-chromatid recombination. Nat Cell Biol 8: 1032-1034.
9. Potts PR, Porteus MH, Yu H, (2006) Human SMC5/6 complex promotes sister chromatid homologous recombination by recruiting the SMC1/3 cohesin complex to double-strand breaks. EMBO J 25: 3377-3388.
10. Lindroos HB, Strom L, Itoh T, Katou Y, Shirahige K, et al. (2006) Chromosomal association of the Smc5/6 complex reveals that it functions in differently regulated pathways. Mol Cell 22: 755-767.
11. Lisby M, Barlow JH, Burgess RC, Rothstein R, (2004) Choreography of the DNA damage response: spatiotemporal relationships among checkpoint and repair proteins. Cell 118: 699-713.
12. Rouse J, Jackson SP, (2002) Interfaces between the detection, signaling, and repair of DNA damage. Science 297: 547-551.
13. Rouse J, (2004) Esc4p, a new target of Mec1p (ATR), promotes resumption of DNA synthesis after DNA damage. EMBO J 23: 1188-1197.
14. Roberts TM, Kobor MS, Bastin-Shanower SA, Ii M, Horte SA, et al. (2006) Slx4 regulates DNA damage checkpoint-dependent phosphorylation of the BRCT domain protein Rtt107/Esc4. Mol Biol Cell 17: 539-548.
15. Chin JK, Bashkirov VI, Heyer WD, Romesberg FE, (2006) Esc4/Rtt107 and the control of recombination during replication. DNA Repair (Amst) 5: 618-628.
16. Zappulla DC, Maharaj AS, Connelly JJ, Jockusch RA, Sternglanz R, (2006) Rtt107/Esc4 binds silent chromatin and DNA repair proteins using different BRCT motifs. BMC Mol Biol 7: 40.
17. Roberts TM, Zaidi IW, Vaisica JA, Peter M, Brown GW, (2008) Regulation of rtt107 recruitment to stalled DNA replication forks by the cullin rtt101 and the rtt109 acetyltransferase. Mol Biol Cell 19: 171-180.
18. Ohouo PY, Bastos de Oliveira FM, Almeida BS, Smolka MB, (2010) DNA damage signaling recruits the Rtt107-Slx4 scaffolds via Dpb11 to mediate replication stress response. Mol Cell 39: 300-306.
19. Strathern JN, Klar AJ, Hicks JB, Abraham JA, Ivy JM, et al. (1982) Homothallic switching of yeast mating type cassettes is initiated by a double-stranded cut in the MAT locus. Cell 31: 183-192.
20. Jensen R, Sprague GF Jr, Herskowitz I, (1983) Regulation of yeast mating-type interconversion: feedback control of HO gene expression by the mating-type locus. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 80: 3035-3039.
21. Haber JE, (1998) A locus control region regulates yeast recombination. Trends Genet 14: 317-321.
22. Melo JA, Cohen J, Toczyski DP, (2001) Two checkpoint complexes are independently recruited to sites of DNA damage in vivo. Genes Dev 15: 2809-2821.
23. Kim ST, Lim DS, Canman CE, Kastan MB, (1999) Substrate specificities and identification of putative substrates of ATM kinase family members. J Biol Chem 274: 37538-37543.
24. Verkade HM, Bugg SJ, Lindsay HD, Carr AM, O'Connell MJ, (1999) Rad18 is required for DNA repair and checkpoint responses in fission yeast. Mol Biol Cell 10: 2905-2918.
25. Torres-Rosell J, Machin F, Farmer S, Jarmuz A, Eydmann T, et al. (2005) SMC5 and SMC6 genes are required for the segregation of repetitive chromosome regions. Nat Cell Biol 7: 412-419.
26. Bork P, Hofmann K, Bucher P, Neuwald AF, Altschul SF, et al. (1997) A superfamily of conserved domains in DNA damage-responsive cell cycle checkpoint proteins. FASEB J 11: 68-76.
27. Mozlin AM, Fung CW, Symington LS, (2008) Role of the Saccharomyces cerevisiae Rad51 paralogs in sister chromatid recombination. Genetics 178: 113-126.
28. Manke IA, Lowery DM, Nguyen A, Yaffe MB, (2003) BRCT repeats as phosphopeptide-binding modules involved in protein targeting. Science 302: 636-639.
29. Sheedy DM, Dimitrova D, Rankin JK, Bass KL, Lee KM, et al. (2005) Brc1-mediated DNA repair and damage tolerance. Genetics 171: 457-468.
30. Herzberg K, Bashkirov VI, Rolfsmeier M, Haghnazari E, McDonald WH, et al. (2006) Phosphorylation of Rad55 on serines 2, 8, and 14 is required for efficient homologous recombination in the recovery of stalled replication forks. Mol Cell Biol 26: 8396-8409.
31. Torres-Rosell J, De Piccoli G, Cordon-Preciado V, Farmer S, Jarmuz A, et al. (2007) Anaphase onset before complete DNA replication with intact checkpoint responses. Science 315: 1411-1415.
32. Bermudez-Lopez M, Ceschia A, de Piccoli G, Colomina N, Pasero P, et al. (2010) The Smc5/6 complex is required for dissolution of DNA-mediated sister chromatid linkages. Nucleic Acids Res 38: 6502-6512.
33. Lee SE, Moore JK, Holmes A, Umezu K, Kolodner RD, et al. (1998) Saccharomyces Ku70, mre11/rad50 and RPA proteins regulate adaptation to G2/M arrest after DNA damage. Cell 94: 399-409.
34. Nelson JD, Denisenko O, Bomsztyk K, (2006) Protocol for the fast chromatin immunoprecipitation (ChIP) method. Nat Protoc 1: 179-185.