Perception and action

Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Cognitive Science

Volumn 1, Issue 6, 2010, Pages 800-810

  Creem Regehr, Sarah H ^a   Kunz, Benjamin R ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF UTAH   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 79957492739     PISSN: 19395078     EISSN: 19395086     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/wcs.82     Document Type: Article

References (85)

1. Previc FH. The neuropsychology of 3-D space. Psychol Bull 1998, 124:123-164.
2. Cutting JE, Vishton PM. Perceiving layout and knowing distances: the integration, relative potency, and contextual use of different information about depth. In: Epstein W, Rogers S, eds. Perception of Space and Motion. New York, NY: Academic Press; 1995, 69-117.
3. Ungerleider LG, Mishkin M. Two cortical visual systems. In: Ingle DJ, Goodale MA, Mansfield RJW, eds. Analysis of Visual Behavior. Cambridge,MA: TheMIT Press; 1982, 549-586.
4. Goodale M, Milner AD. Separate visual pathways for perception and action. Trends Neurosci 1992, 15:20-25.
5. Bridgeman B, Gemmer A, Forsman T, Huemer V. Processing spatial information in the sensorimotor branch of the visual system. Vision Res 2000, 40:3539-3552.
6. Aglioti S, DeSouza JFX, Goodale M. Size-contrast illusions deceive the eye but not the hand. Curr Biol 1995, 5(6):679-685.
7. Carey DP. Do action systems resist visual illusions? Trends Cogn Sci 2001, 5:109-113.
8. Glover S. Separate visual representations in the planning and control of action. Behav Brain Sci 2004, 27:3-78.
9. Franz VH. Action does not resist visual illusions. Trends Cogn Sci 2001, 5:457-459.
10. Smeets JBJ, Brenner E. 10 years of illusions. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 2006, 32(6):1501-1504.
11. Karnath HO, Perenin MT. Cortical control of visually guided reaching: evidence from patients with optic ataxia. Cereb Cortex 2005, 15(10):1561-1569.
12. Connolly JD, Andersen RA, Goodale MA. FMRI evidence for a 'parietal reach region' in the human brain. Exp Brain Res 2003, 153(2):140-145.
13. Culham JC, Danckert SL, De Souza JFX, Gati JS, Menon RS, Goodale MA. Visually guided grasping produces fMRI activation in dorsal but not ventral stream brain areas. Exp Brain Res 2003, 153:158-170.
14. Culham JC, Valyear KF. Human parietal cortex in action. Curr Opin Neurobiol 2006, 16(2):205-212.
15. James TW, Culham JC, Humphrey GK, Milner AD, Goodale MA. Ventral occipital lesions impair object recognition but not object-directed grasping: a fMRI study. Brain 2003, 126:2463-2475.
16. Proffitt DR, Bhalla M, Gossweiler R, Midgett J. Perceiving geographical slant. Psychon Bull Rev 1995, 2(4):409-428.
17. Andre J, Rogers S. Using verbal and blind-walking distance estimates to investigate the two visual systems hypothesis. Percept Psychophys 2006, 68(3):353-361.
18. Philbeck JW, Loomis JM. Comparison of two indicators of perceived egocentric distance under full-cue and reduced-cue conditions. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 1997, 23(1):72-85.
19. Jeannerod M, Jacob P. Visual cognition: a new look at the two-visual systems model. Neuropsychologia 2005, 43(2):301-312.
20. Creem SH, Proffitt DR. Defining the cortical visual systems: "what", "where", and "how". Acta Psychol 2001, 107:43-68.
21. Rizzolatti G, Matelli M. Two different streams from the dorsal visual system: anatomy and functions. Exp Brain Res 2003, 153(2):146-157.
22. Johnson SH, Grafton ST. From "acting on" to "acting with": the functional anatomy of object-oriented action schemata. Prog Brain Res 2003, 142:127-139.
23. Milner AD, Goodale M. Two visual system re-viewed. Neuropsychologia 2008, 46:774-785.
24. Rieser JJ, Ashmead DH, Taylor CR, Youngquist GA. Visual perception and the guidance of locomotion without vision to previously seen targets. Perception 1990, 19:675-689.
25. Loomis JM, Philbeck JW. Measuring spatial perception with spatial updating and action. In: Klatzky RL, Behrmann M, MacWhinney B, eds. Embodiment, Egospace, and Action. New York, NY: Taylor & Francis; 2008.
26. Rieser JJ, Pick HL, Ashmead DH, Garing AE. Calibration of human locomotion and models of perceptualmotor organization. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 1995, 21(3):480-497.
27. Durgin FH, Pelah A, Fox LF, Lewis J, Kane R, Walley KA. Self-motion perception during locomotor recalibration: more than meets the eye. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 2005, 31(3):398-419.
28. Pick HL Jr, Rieser JJ, Wagner D, Garing AE. The recalibration of rotational locomotion. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 1999, 25:1179-1188.
29. Bruggeman H, Pick JHL, Rieser JJ. Learning to throw on a rotating carousel: Recalibration based on limb dynamics and projectile kinematics. Exp Brain Res 2005, 163(2):188-197.
30. Durgin FH, Fox LF, Kim DH. Not letting the left leg know what the right leg is doing: limb specific locomotor adaptation to sensory-cue conflict. Psychol Sci 2003, 14:567-572.
31. Proffitt DR, Stefanucci J, Banton T, Epstein W. The role of effort in perceiving distance. Psychol Sci 2003, 14:106-112.
32. Richardson AE, Waller D. The effect of feedback training on distance estimation in virtual environments. Appl Cogn Psychol 2005, 19:1089-1108.
33. Hutchison JJ, Loomis JM. Does energy expenditure affect the perception of egocentric distance? A failure to replicate experiment 1 of Proffitt, Stefanucci, Banton and Epstein (2003) Spanish. J Psychol 2006, 9(2):332-339.
34. Ooi TL, Wu B, He ZJ. Perceptual space in the dark affected by the intrinsic bias of the visual system. Perception 2006, 35:605-624.
35. He ZJ, Wu B, Ooi TL, Yarbrough G, Wu J. Judging egocentric distance on the ground: occlusion and surface integration. Perception 2004, 33:789-806.
36. Philbeck JW, Behrmann M, Black SE, Ebert P. Intact spatial updating during locomotion after right posterior parietal lesions. Neuropsychologia 2000, 38(7):950-963.
37. Berti A, Frassinetti F. When far becomes near: remapping of space by tool use. J Cogn Neurosci 2000, 12(3):415-420.
38. Barsalou LW. Grounded cognition. Annu Rev Psychol 2008, 59:617-645.
39. PrinzW. A common-coding approach to perception and action. In: Neurmann O, Prinz W, eds. Relationships Between Perception and Action: Current Approaches. New York, NY: Springer-Verlag; 1990, 167-201.
40. Hommel B, Musseler J, Aschersleben G, Prinz W. The theory of event coding (TEC): a framework for perception and action planning. Behav Brain Sci 2001, 24:849-878.
41. Jeannerod M. The mechanism of self-recognition in human. Behav Brain Res 2003, 142:1-15.
42. Parsons LM. Temporal and kinematic properties of motor behavior reflected in mentally simulated action. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 1994, 20:709-730.
43. Grezes J, Decety J. Functional anatomy of execution, mental simulation, observation, and verb generation of actions: a meta-analysis. Hum Brain Mapp 2001, 12:1-19.
44. Rizzolatti G, Craighero L. The mirror-neuron system. Annu Rev Neurosci 2004, 27:169-192.
45. Kohler E, Keysers C, Umilta MA, Fogassi L, Gallese V, Rizzolatti G. Hearing sounds, understanding actions: action representation in mirror neurons. Science 2002, 297:846-848.
46. Umiltà MA, Kohler E, Gallese V, Fogassi L, Fadiga L, et al. I know what you are doing: a neurophysiological study. Neuron 2001, 32:91-101.
47. Decety J, Grezes J. The power of simulation: imagining one's own and other's behaviour. Soc Cogn Neurosci 2006, 1079:4-14.
48. Buccino G, Binkofski F, Fink GR, Fadiga L, Fogassi L, et al. Action observation activates premotor and parietal areas in a somatotopic manner: an fMRI study. Eur J Neurosci 2001, 13:400-404.
49. Calvo-Merino B, Glaser DE, Grezes J, Passingham RE, Haggard P. Action observation and acquired motor skills: an fMRI study with expert dancers. Cereb Cortex 2005, 15:1243-1249.
50. Decety J, Jackson PL. The functional architecture of human empathy. Behav Cogn Neurosci Rev 2004, 3(2):71-100.
51. Ramachandran VS, Rogers-Ramachandran D. Synaesthesia in phantom limbs induced with mirrors. Proc R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 1996, 236:377-386.
52. Holmes NP, Crozier G, Spence C. When mirrors lie: visual capture of arm position impairs reaching performance. Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci 2004, 4(2):193-200.
53. Holmes NP, Spence C. Beyond the body schema: visual, prosthetic, and technological contributions to bodily perception and awareness. In: Knoblich G, Thornton I, Grosjean M, Shiffrar M, eds. Human Body Perception from the Inside Out. New York, NY: Oxford University Press; 2006.
54. Botvinick M, Cohen J. Rubber hands "feel" touch that eyes see. Nature 1998, 391:756.
55. Iriki A, Tanaka M, Iwamura Y. Coding of modified body schema during tool use by macaque post-central neurons. Neuroreport 1996, 7:2325-2330.
56. Witt JK, Proffitt DR, Epstein W. Tool use affects perceived distance but only when you intend to use it. J ExpPsychol Hum Percept Perform 2005, 31:880-888.
57. Proffitt DR. Embodied perception and the economy of action. Perspect Psychol Sci 2006, 1(2):110-122.
58. Stefanucci JK, Proffitt DR, Clore G, Parekh N. Skating down a steeper slope: fear influences the perception of geographical slant. Perception 2008, 37:321-323.
59. Durgin FH, Baird JA, Greenburg M, Russell R, Shaughnessy K, Waymouth S. Who is being deceived? The experimental demands of wearing a backpack. Psychonom Bull Rev 2009, 16:964-969.
60. Woods AJ, Philbeck JW, Danoff JV. The various perceptions of distance: an alternative view of how effort affects distance judgments. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 2009, 35(4):1104-1117.
61. Gibson JJ. The Ecological Approach to Visual Perception. Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin; 1979.
62. von Helmholtz H. The origin and correct interpretation of our sense impressions. In: Kahl R, ed. Selected Writings of Hermann von Helmholtz.Middletown, CT: Wesleyan University Press; 1971.
63. Warren WH, Whang S. Visual guidance of walking through apertures: body-scaled information for affordances. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 1987, 13:371-383.
64. Mark LS. Eyeheight-scaled information about affordances: a study of sitting and stair climbing. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 1987, 13:367-384.
65. Higuchi T, Takada H, Matsuura Y, Imanaka K. Visual estimation of spatial requirements for locomotion in novice wheelchair users. J Exp Psychol Appl 2004, 10(1):55-66.
66. Michaels CF. Affordances: four points of debate. Ecol Psychol 2003, 15(2):135-148.
67. Creem SH, Proffitt DR. Grasping objects by their handles: a necessary interaction between cognition and action. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 2001, 27:218-228.
68. Buxbaum LJ, Kyle KM, Tang K, Detre JA. Neural substrates of knowledge of hand postures for object grasping and functional object use: evidence from fMRI. Brain Res 2006, 1117:175-185.
69. Tucker M, Ellis R. The potentiation of grasp types during visual object categorization. Visual Cogn 2001, 8:769-800.
70. Grezes J, Tucker M, Armony JL, Ellis R, Passingham RE. Objects automatically potentiate action: an fMRI study of implicit processing. Eur J Neurosci 2003, 17:2735-2740.
71. Chao LL, Martin A. Representation of manipulable man-made objects in the dorsal stream. Neuroimage 2000, 12:478-484.
72. Lewis JW. Cortical networks related to human tool use. Neuroscientist 2006, 12(3):211-231.
73. Creem-Regehr SH, Lee JN. Neural representations of graspable objects: are tools special? Cogn Brain Res 2005, 22:457-469.
74. Lewis JW, Brefczynski JA, Phinney RE, Binder JR, DeYoe EA. Human brain regions involved in recognizing environmental sounds. Cereb Cortex 2006, 14:1008-1021.
75. Creem-Regehr SH, Dilda V, Vicchrilli AE, Federer F, Lee JN. The influence of complex action knowledge on representations of novel graspable objects: evidence from functionalmagnetic resonance imaging. J Int Neuropsychol Soc 2007, 13:1009-1020.
76. Valyear KF, Cavina-Pratesi C, Stiglick AJ, Culham JC. Does tool-related fMRI activity within the intraparietal sulcus reflect the plan to grasp? NeuroImage 2007, 36:T94-T108.
77. Frey SH. Tool use, communicative gesture and cerebral asymmetries in the modern human brain. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B 2008, 363:1951-1957.
78. Johnson-Frey SH, Newman-Norlund R, Grafton ST. A distributed left hemisphere network active during planning of everyday tool use skills. Cereb Cortex 2005, 15:681-695.
79. Fridman EA, Immisch I, Hanakawa T, Bohlhalter S, Waldvogel D, et al. The role of the dorsal stream for gesture production. Neuroimage 2006, 29:417-428.
80. Buxbaum LJ, Johnson-Frey SH, Bartlett-Williams M. Deficient internal models for planning handobject interactions in apraxia. Neuropsychologia 2005, 43:917-929.
81. Klatzky RL, Behrmann M, MacWhinney B, eds. Embodiment, Ego-space, and Action. New York, NY: Taylor & Francis; 2008.
82. Knoblich G, Thornton IM, Grosjean M, Shiffrar M, eds. Human Body Perception from the Inside Out. New York, NY: Oxford University Press; 2006.
83. Loomis JM, Da Silva JA, Philbeck JW, Fukusima SS. Visual perception of location and distance. Curr Dir Psychol Sci 1996, 5(3):72-77.
84. Milner AD, Goodale MA. The Visual Brain in Action. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 1995.
85. Rieser JJ. Dynamic spatial orientation and the coupling of representation and action. In: Golledge RG, ed. Wayfinding Behavior. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press; 1999, 168-190.