Visual Estimation of Spatial Requirements for Locomotion in Novice Wheelchair Users

Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied

Volumn 10, Issue 1, 2004, Pages 55-66

  Higuchi, Takahiro ^a,b   Takada, Hajime ^a   Matsuura, Yoshifusa ^a   Imanaka, Kuniyasu ^b  

^a YOKOHAMA NATIONAL UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

^b TOKYO METROPOLITAN UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 1842424539     PISSN: 1076898X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1037/1076-898X.10.1.55     Document Type: Article

References (40)

1. Berti, A., & Frassinetti, F. (2000). When far becomes near: Remapping of space by tool use. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 12, 415-420.
2. Botvinick, M., & Cohen, J. (1998). Rubber hands "feel" touch that eyes see. Nature, 391, 756.
3. Buckley, S. M., & Bhambhani, Y. N. (1998). The effect of wheelchair camber on physiological and perceptual responses in younger and older men. Adapted Physical Activity Quarterly, 15, 25-35.
4. Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
5. Cooper, R. A. (1998). Wheelchair selection and configuration. New York: Demos Medical.
6. Farnè, A., & Làdavas, E. (2000). Dynamic size-change of hand peripersonal space following tool use. Neuroreport, 11, 1645-1649.
7. Farnè, A., Pavani, F., Meneghello, F., & Làdavas, E. (2000). Left tactile extinction following visual stimulation of a rubber hand. Brain, 123, 2350-2360.
8. Fitzpatrick, P., Carello, C., & Turvey, M. T. (1994). Eigenvalues of the inertia tensor and exteroception by the "muscular sense." Neuroscience, 69, 551-568.
9. Flascher, O. M., Shaw, R. E., Kader, E. E., & Aromin, T. A. (1995). Intentional perceptual scaling means π = 1. In B. G. Bardy, R. J. Bootsma, & Y. Guiard (Eds.), Studies in perception and action III (pp. 133-136). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
10. Gaal, R. P., Rebholtz, N., Hotchkiss, R. D., & Pfaelzer, P. F. (1997). Wheelchair rider injuries: Causes and consequences for wheelchair design and selection. Journal of Rehabilitation Research and Development, 34, 58-71.
11. Gibson, J. J. (1979). The ecological approach to visual perception. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
12. Gooey, K., Bradfield, O., Talbot, J., Morgan, D. L., & Proske, U. (2000). Effects of body orientation, load and vibration on sensing position and movement at the human elbow joint. Experimental Brain Research, 133, 340-348.
13. Graziano, M. S. A., & Botvinick, M. M. (1999). How the brain represents the body: Insights from neurophysiology and psychology. In D. Gopher & A. Koriat (Eds.), Attention and performance XVII - Cognitive regulation of performance: Interaction of theory and application (pp. 136-157). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
14. Graziano, M. S. A., & Gross, C. G. (1995). The representation of extrapersonal space: A possible role for bimodal, visual-tactile neurons. In M. S. Gazzaniga (Ed.), The cognitive neurosciences (pp. 1021-1034). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
15. Groot, S. D., Veeger, H. E. J., Hollander, A. P., & van der Woude, L. H. V. (2002). Wheelchair propulsion technique and mechanical efficiency after 3 wk of practice. Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise, 34, 756-766.
16. Groot, S. D., Veeger, H. E. J., Hollander, A. P., & van der Woude, L. H. V. (2003). Short-term adaptations in co-ordination during the initial phase of learning manual wheelchair propulsion. Journal of Electromyography and Kinesiology, 13, 217-228.
17. Hall, L. A., & McCloskey, D. I. (1983). Detections of movements imposed on finger, elbow and shoulder joints. Journal of Physiology, 335, 519-533.
18. Hirose, N., & Nishio, A. (2001). The process of adaptation to perceiving new action capabilities. Ecological Psychology, 13, 49-69.
19. Iriki, A., Tanaka, M., & Iwamura, Y. (1996). Coding of modified body schema during a tool use by macaque postcentral neurons. Neuroreport, 7, 2325-2330.
20. Jiang, Y., & Mark, L. S. (1994). The effect of gap depth on the perception of whether a gap is crossable. Perception and Psychophysics, 56, 691-700.
21. Kader, E. E., & Shaw, R. E. (2000). Toward an ecological field theory of perceptual control of locomotion. Ecological Psychology, 12, 141-180.
22. Konczak, J., Meeuwsen, H. J., & Cress, M. E. (1992). Changing affordances in stair climbing: The perception of maximum climbability in young and older adults. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 18, 691-697.
23. Lee, A. C., Harris, J. P., Atkinson, E. A., & Fowler, M. S. (2001). Disruption of estimation of body-scaled aperture width in hemiparkinson's disease. Neuropsychologia, 39, 1097-1104.
24. Maravita, A., Spence, C., Kennett, S., & Driver, J. (2002). Tool-use changes multimodal spatial interactions between vision and touch in normal humans. Cognition, 83, B25-B34.
25. Mark, L. S. (1987). Eyeheight-scaled information about affordances: A study of sitting and stair climbing. Journal of Experimental Psychology; Human Perception and Performance, 13, 361-370.
26. Mark, L. S., Balliett, J. A., Craver, K. D., Douglas, S. D., & Fox, T. (1990). What an actor must do in order to perceive the affordance for sitting. Ecological Psychology, 2, 325-366.
27. Mark, L. S., Jiang, Y., King, S. S., & Paasche, J. (1999). The impact of visual exploration of judgments of whether a gap is crossable. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 25, 287-295.
28. Pagano, C. C., Fitzpatrick, P., & Turvey, M. T. (1993). Tensorial basis to the constancy of perceived object extent over variations of dynamic touch. Perception and Psychophysics, 54, 43-54.
29. Patla, A. E., Niechwiej, E., Racco, V., & Goodale, M. A. (2002). Understanding the contribution of binocular vision to the control of adaptive locomotion. Experimental Brain Research, 142, 551-561.
30. Ramachandran, V. S., Rogers-Ramachandran, D., & Cobb, S. (1995). Touching the phantom limb. Nature, 377, 489-490.
31. Rorden, C., Heutink, J., Greenfield, E., & Robertson, I. H. (1999). When a rubber hand "feels" what the real hand cannot. Neuroreport, 10, 135-138.
32. Rossetti, Y., Meckler, C., & Prablanc, C. (1994). Is there an optimal arm posture? Deterioration of finger localization precision and comfort sensation in extreme arm-joint postures. Experimental Brain Research, 99, 131-136.
33. Savelsbergh, G. J. P., Dekker, L. D., Vermeer, A., & Hopkins, B. (1998). Locomoting through apertures of different width: A study of children with cerebral palsy. Pediatric Rehabilitation, 2, 5-13.
34. Solomon, H. Y., & Turvey, M. T. (1988). Haptically perceiving the distances reachable with hand-held objects. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 14, 404-427.
35. Turvey, M. T. (1996). Dynamic touch. American Psychologist, 51, 1134-1152.
36. Turvey, M. T., Burton, G., Amazeen, E. L., Butwill, M., & Carello, C. (1998). Perceiving the width and height of a hand-held object by dynamic touch. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 24, 35-48.
37. Warren, W. H., Jr. (1998). Visually controlled locomotion: 40 years later. Ecological Psychology, 10, 177-219.
38. Warren, W. H., Jr., & Whang, S. (1987). Visual guidance of walking through apertures: Body-scaled information for affordances. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 13, 371-383.
39. Webster, J. S., Rapport, L. J., Godlewski, M. C., & Abadee, P. S. (1994). Effect of attentional bias to right space on wheelchair mobility. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology, 16, 129-137.
40. Yamamoto, S., & Kitazawa, S. (2001). Sensation at the tips of invisible tools. Nature Neuroscience, 4, 979-980.