Genetic differences within natural and planted stands of Quercus petraea

Central European Journal of Biology

Volumn 6, Issue 4, 2011, Pages 597-605

  Dostálek, Jiří ^a   Frantík, Tomáš ^a   Lukášová, Miroslava ^a  

^a SILVA TAROUCA RESEARCH INSTITUTE FOR LANDSCAPE AND ORNAMENTAL GARDENING   (Czech Republic)

Author keywords

Forest management; Genetic differences among populations; Genetic structure within a population; Microsatellites; Quercus petraea

Indexed keywords

QUERCUS PETRAEA;

EID: 79956333572     PISSN: 1895104X     EISSN: 16443632     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2478/s11535-011-0034-8     Document Type: Article

References (35)

1. Ledig F. T., Human impacts on genetic diversity in forest ecosystems, Oikos, 1992, 63, 87-108.
2. Bradshaw R. H. W., Past anthropogenic influence on European forests and some possible genetic con sequences, Forest Ecol. Manag., 2004, 197, 203-212.
3. Finkeldey R., Ziehe M., Genetic implications of silvicultural regimes, Forest Ecol. Manag., 2004, 197, 231-244.
4. Savolainen O., Kärkkäinen K., Effect of forest management on gene pools, New Forests, 1992, 6, 329-345.
5. Stern K., Über die Erhaltung wertvoller Herkünfte der forstlich genutzten Baumarten, Mitt. Deutsch. Dendrol. Ges., 1968, 63, 27-37, (in German).
6. Woessner R. A., Interprovenance crosses of loblolly pine, In: Fowler D. J., Yeatman C. W., (Eds.), Proceedings of 14th Meeting of the Canadian Tree Improvement Association, Fredricton, New Brunswick, 1975, 17-23.
7. Petit R. J., Kremer A., Wagner D. B., Geographic structure of chloroplast DNA polymorphism in European oaks, Theor. Appl. Genet., 1993, 87, 122-128.
8. Lexer C., Heinze B., Gerber S., Steinkellner H., Ziegenhagen B., Kremer A., et al., Microsatellite analysis of anonymous seed lot samples from oak: a promising approach to monitor the number of different seed parents and pollen donors, In: Gillet E. M., (Ed.), Which DNA Marker for Which Purpose? Final Compendium of the Research Project Development, optimisation and validation of molecular tools for assessment of biodiversity in forest trees in the European Union, DGXII Biotechnology FW IV Research Programme Molecular Tools for Biodiversity, 1999, http://webdoc. sub. gwdg. de/ebook/y/1999/whichmarker/index. htm.
9. Wang X.-R., Szmidt A. E., Molecular markers in population genetics of forest trees, Scand. J. For. Res., 2001, 16, 199-220.
10. Streiff R., Labbe T., Bacilieri R., Steinkellner H., Gloessl J., Kremer A., Within-population genetic structure in Quercus robur L. and Quercus petraea (Matt.) Liebl. assessed with isozymes and microsatellites, Mol. Ecol., 1998, 7, 317-328.
11. Finkeldey R., Genetic Variation of Oaks (Quercus spp.) in Switzerland. 2. Genetic structures in "pure" and "mixed" forests of pedunculate oak (Q. robur L.) and sessile oak (Q. petraea (Matt.) Liebl.), Silvae Genet., 2001, 50, 22-30.
12. Bakker E. G., van Dam B. C., van Eeuwijk F. A., Jacobsen E., Genetic variation and structure of indigenous Quercus robur L. populations, In: Bakker E. G., (Ed.), Towards molecular tools for management of oak forests. Genetic studies on indigenous Quercus robur L. and Q. petraea (Matt.) Liebl. populations, Alterra Green World Research, Wageningen, 2001, 44-58.
13. Cottrell J. E., Munro R. C., Tabbener H. E., Milner A. D., Forrest G. I., Lowe A. J., Comparison of finescale genetic structure using nuclear microsatellites within two British oakwoods differing in population history, Forest Ecol. Manag., 2003, 176, 287-303.
14. Bruschi P., Vendramin G. G., Bussotti F., Grossoni P., Morphological and molecular diversity among Italian populations of Quercus petraea (Fagaceae), Ann. Bot., 2003, 91, 707-716.
15. Bodénès C., Labbé T., Pradère S., Kremer A., General vs. local differentiation between two closely related white oak species, Mol. Ecol., 1997, 6, 713-724.
16. Alberto F., Niort J., Deroy J., Lepais O., Vitalis R., Galop D., et al., Population differentiation of sessile oak at the altitudal front of migration in the French Pyrenees, Mol. Ecol., 2010, 9, 2626-2639.
17. Coart E., Lamote V., De Loose M., van Bockstaele E., Lootens P., Roldán-Ruiz I., AFLP markers demonstrate local genetic differentiation between two indigenous oak species [Quercus robur L. and Quercus petraea (Matt.) Liebl.]_in Flemish populations, Theor. Appl. Genet., 2002, 105, 431-439.
18. Muir G., Lowe A. J., Fleming C. C., Vogl J., High nuclear genetic diversity, high levels of outcrossing and low differentiation among remnant populations of Quercus petraea at the margin of its range in Ireland, Ann. Bot., 2004, 93, 691-697.
19. Siegismund H. R., Jensen J. S., Intrapopulation and interpopulation genetic variation of Quercus in Denmark, Scand. J. For. Res., 2001, 16, 103-116.
20. Pospíšková M., Dostálek J., Impact of forest management on genetic diversity of Quercus petraea populations: a case study from the Křivoklátsko Protected landscape area (Czech Republic), Biodiv. Res. Conserv., 2009, 13, 37-42.
21. Zanetto A., Kremer A., Geographical structure of gene diversity in Quercus petraea (Matt.) Liebl. I. Monolocus patterns of variation, Heredity, 1995, 75, 506-517.
22. Gregorius H.-R., Kownatzki D., Spatiogenetic characteristics of beech stands with different degrees of autochthony, BMC Ecology, 2005, 5, 8.
23. Kolbek J., (Ed.), Vegetace Chráněné krajinné oblasti a Biosférické rezervace Křivoklátsko. 3. Společenstva lesů, křovin, prameniš', balvaniš'a acidofilních lemů (Vegetation of the Protected landscape area and Biosphere reserve Křivoklátsko. 3. Plant communities of the forests, shrubs, forest springs, boulder screes and acidophilous fringes), Academia, Praha, 2003, (in Czech).
24. Janík D., Vrška T., Šamonil P., Unar P., Adam D., Hort L., et al., Struktura a ekologie doubrav Národního parku Podyjí na příkladu lokality Lipina (Structure and ecology of oak woods in the Podyjí National park as exemplified by the Lipina locality), Thayensia, 2007, 7, 175-206, (in Czech with English summary).
25. Steinkellner H., Fluch S., Turetschek E., Lexer C., Streiff R., Kremer A., et al., Identification and characterisation of (GA/CT)n - microsatellite loci from Quercus petraea, Plant Mol. Biol., 1997, 33, 1093-1096.
26. Kampfer S., Lexer C., Glössl J., Steinkellner H., Characterization of (GA)n microsatellite loci from Quercus robur, Hereditas, 1998, 129, 183-186.
27. Dow B. D., Ashley M. V., Howe H. F., Characterization of highly variable (GA/CT)n microsatellites in the bur oak, Quercus macrocarpa, Theor. Appl. Genet., 1995, 91, 137-141.
28. Excoffier L., Laval G., Schneider S., Arlequin ver. 3. 1: an integrated software package for population genetic analysis, Evol. Bioinform. Online, 2005, 1, 47-50.
29. Hardy O. J., Vekemans X., spagedi: a versatile computer program to analyse spatial genetic structure at the individual or population levels, Mol. Ecol. Notes, 2002, 2, 618-620.
30. Ritland K., Estimators of pairwise relatedness and individual inbreeding coefficients, Genet. Res., 1996, 67, 175-185.
31. Loiselle B. A., Sork V. L., Nason J., Graham C., Spatial genetic structure of a tropical understory shrub, Psychotria officinalis (Rubiaceae), Am. J. Bot., 1995, 82, 1420-1425.
32. Wright S., Evolution and the genetics of populations: Vol. 4, Variability within and among populations, The University of Chicago Press, Chicago, 1978.
33. Redkina N. N, Mullagulov R. Yu., Yanbaev Yu. A., Degen B., Fine spatial structure of allozyme genotypes in isolated population of pedunculate oak Quercus robur L. (Fagaceae), Russian J. Genet., 2008, 44, 997-999.
34. Sork V. L., Huang S., Wiener E., Macrogeographic and fine-scale genetic structure in a North American oak species, Quercus rubra L., Ann. Sci. For., 1993, 50, 261-270.
35. Montalvo A. M., Conard S. G., Conkle M. T., Hodgskiss P. D., Population structure, genetic diversity, and clone formation in Quercus chrysolepis (Fagaceae), Am. J. Bot., 1997, 84, 1553-1564.