What U.S. law enforcement officers know and believe about eyewitness factors, eyewitness interviews and identification procedures

Applied Cognitive Psychology

Volumn 25, Issue 3, 2011, Pages 488-500

  Wise, Richard A ^a   Safer, Martin A ^b   Maro, Christina M ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF NORTH DAKOTA   (United States)

^b CATHOLIC UNIVERSITY OF AMERICA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; HUMAN; INTERVIEW; KNOWLEDGE; LAW ENFORCEMENT; MEDICAL PERSONNEL; PRIORITY JOURNAL; TRAINING; UNITED STATES; WITNESS;

EID: 79956195468     PISSN: 08884080     EISSN: 10990720     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/acp.1717     Document Type: Article

References (45)

1. Benton, T. R., Ross, D. F., Bradshaw, E., Thomas, W. N., & Bradshaw, G. S. (2006). Eyewitness memory is still not common sense: Comparing jurors, judges, and law enforcement to eyewitness experts. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 20, 115-129. DOI: 10.1002/acp.1171
2. Brigham, J. C., & Wolfskeil, M. P. (1983). Opinions of attorneys and law enforcement personnel on the accuracy of eyewitness identification. Law and Human Behavior, 7, 337-349. DOI: 10.1007/BF01044736
3. Charman, S., & Wells, G. L. (2007). Applied lineup theory. In R. C. L. Lindsay, D. F. Ross, J. D. Read, & M. P. Toglia (Eds.), The handbook of eyewitness psychology: Vol. 2. Memory for people (pp. 219-254). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
4. Cutler, B. L., & Penrod, S. D. (1995). Mistaken identifications: The eyewitness, psychology, and the law. New York: Cambridge University Press.
5. Cutler, B. L., Penrod, S. D., & Martens, T. K. (1987). Improving the reliability of eyewitness identifications: Putting context into context. Journal of Applied Psychology, 72, 629-637. DOI: 10.1037/ 0021-9010. 72.4.629
6. Dando, C. J., Wilcock, R., & Milne, R. (2008). The cognitive interview: Inexperienced police officers' perceptions of their witness/victim interviewing practices. Legal and Criminological Psychology, 13, 59-70. DOI: 10.1348/135532506X162498
7. Deffenbacher, K. A., Bornstein, B. H., & Penrod, S. D. (2004). A meta-analytic review of the effects of high stress on eyewitness memory. Law and Human Behavior, 28, 687-706. DOI: 10.1007/s10979-004-0565-x
8. Dysart, J. E., & Lindsay, R. C. L. (2007). Show-up identifications: Suggestive technique or reliable method? In R. C. L. Lindsay, D. F. Ross, J. D. Read, & M. P. Toglia (Eds.), The handbook of eyewitness psychology: Vol. 2. Memory for people (pp. 137-153). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
9. Fisher, R. P. (1995). Interviewing victims and witnesses of crime. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 1, 732-764. DOI: 10.1037/1076-8971.1.4.732
10. Fisher, S. Z. (2007). Eyewitness identification reform in Massachusetts (Working Paper 07-07). Boston: Boston University School of Law. Available:
11. Fisher, R. P., & Geiselman, R. E. (1992). Memory-enhancing techniques for investigative interviewing: The cognitive interview. Springfield, IL: Charles C. Thomas.
12. Fisher, R. P., & Schreiber, N. (2007). Interview protocols for improving eyewitness memory. In M. P. Toglia, J. D. Read, D. F. Ross, & R. C. L. Lindsay (Eds.), The handbook of eyewitness psychology: Vol. 1. Memory for events (pp. 53-80). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
13. Gaertner, S., & Harrington, J. (2009). Successful eyewitness identification reform: Ramsey County's blind sequential lineup protocol. The Police Chief, 76, Available:
14. Granhag, P. A., Strömwall, L. A., & Hartwig, M. (2005). Eyewitness testimony: Tracing the beliefs of Swedish legal professionals. Behavioral Sciences and the Law, 23, 709-727. DOI: 10.1002/bsl.670
15. Haynes, A. B., Weiser, T. G., Berry, W. R., Lipsitz, S. R., Breizat, A. S., Dellinger, E. P., et al. (2009). A surgical safety checklist to reduce morbidity and mortality in a global population. The New England Journal of Medicine, 360, 491-499. DOI: 10.1056/NEJMsa0810119
16. Huff, C. R. (1987). Wrongful conviction: Societal tolerance of injustice. Research in Social Problems and Public Policy, 4, 99-115.
17. Inbau, F. E., Reid, J. E., Buckley, J. P., & Jayne, B. C. (2001). Criminal interrogation and confessions. Gaithersburg, MD: Aspen Publishers.
18. The Innocence Project. (2010). Criminal Justice Reform Commissions. Available:
19. Karagiorgakis, A. (2009). Police officer beliefs about factors that influence eyewitness memory Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation. Claremont, CA: Claremont Graduate University.
20. Kassin, S. M. (1998). Eyewitness identification procedures: The fifth rule. Law and Human Behavior, 22, 649-653. DOI: 10.1023/A:1025702722645
21. Kassin, S. M., Tubb, V. A., Hosch, H. M., & Memon, A. (2001). On the 'general acceptance' of eyewitness testimony research: A new survey of the experts. American Psychologist, 56, 405-416. DOI: 10.1037//0003-066X.56.5.405
22. Kebell, M. R. (2000). The law concerning the conduct of lineups in England and Wales: How well does it satisfy the recommendations of the American Psychology-Law Society? Law and Human Behavior, 24, 309-315. DOI: 10.1023/A:1005584020853
23. Klobuchar, A., Steblay, N. K., & Caligiuri, H. L. (2006). Improving eyewitness identifications: Hennepin county's blind sequential lineup pilot project. Cardozo Public Policy and Ethics Journal, 4, 381-413.
24. Koehnken, G., Malpass, R. S., & Wogalter, M. S. (1996). Forensic applications of line-up research. In R. S. M. S. L. Sporer, & G. Koeheken (Eds.), Psychological issues in eyewitness identification (pp. 205-231). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
25. Lampinen, J. M., Judges, D., Odegard, T. N., & Hamilton, S. (2005). The reactions of mock jurors to the Department of Justice Guidelines for the collection and preservation of eyewitness evidence. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 27, 155-162. DOI: 10.1207/s15324834basp2702-6
26. Loftus, E. F., & Loftus, G. R. (1980). On the performance of stored information in the human brain. American Psychologist, 35, 409-420.
27. Penrod, S. (2003). Eyewitness identification evidence: How well are witnesses and police performing? Criminal Justice Magazine, 18, 54. Available:
28. Rattner, A. (1988). Convicted but innocent: Wrongful conviction and the criminal justice system. Law and Human Behavior, 12, 283-293. DOI: 10.1007/BF01044385
29. Scheck, B., Neufeld, P., & Dwyer, J. (2000). Actual innocence: Five days to execution and other dispatches from the wrongly convicted. New York: Doubleday.
30. Shapiro, P. N., & Penrod, S. D. (1986). Meta-analysis of facial identification studies. Psychological Bulletin, 100, 139-156. DOI: 10.1037/0033-2909.100.2.139
31. Taslitz, A. E. (2005). Convicting the guilty, acquitting the innocent: The ABA takes a stand. Criminal Justice Magazine, 19, 18-31. Available:
32. Technical Working Group for Eyewitness Evidence [TWGfEE]. (1999). Eyewitness evidence: A guide for law enforcement (Report No. NCJ 178240). Washington, DC: United States Department of Justice, Offices of Justice Programs. Available:
33. Technical Working Group for Eyewitness Evidence [TWGfEE]. (2003). Eyewitness evidence: A trainer's manual for law enforcement (Report No. NCJ 188678). Washington, DC: United States Department of Justice, Office of Justice Programs. Available:
34. Wells, G. L., & Leippe, M. R. (1981). How do triers of fact infer the accuracy of eyewitness identifications? Using memory for peripheral detail can be misleading. Journal of Applied Psychology, 66, 682-687.
35. Wells, G. L., Malpass, R. S., Lindsay, R. C., Fisher, R. P., Turtle, J. W., & Fulero, S. M. (2000). From the lab to the police station: A successful application of eyewitness research. American Psychologist, 55, 581-598. DOI: 10.1037//0003-066X.55.6.581
36. Wells, G. L., Memon, A., & Penrod, S. D. (2006). Eyewitness evidence: Improving its probative value. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 7, 45-75. DOI: 10.1111/j.1529-1006.2006.00027.x
37. Wells, G. L., Small, M., Penrod, S., Malpass, R. S., Fulero, S. M., & Brimacombe, C. A. E. (1998). Eyewitness identifications procedures: Recommendations for lineups and photospreads. Law and Human Behavior, 22, 603-647. DOI: 10.1023/A:1025750605807
38. Wise, R. A., Dauphinais, K. A., & Safer, M. A. (2007). A tripartite solution to eyewitness error. The Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology, 97, 807-872.
39. Wise, R. A., Fishman, C. S., & Safer, M. A. (2009a). How to analyze the accuracy of eyewitness testimony in a criminal case. Connecticut Law Review, 42, 435-513. Available:
40. Wise, R. A., Pawlenko, N. B., Safer, M. A., & Meyer, D. (2009b). What U.S. prosecutors and defence attorneys know and believe about eyewitness testimony. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 23, 1266-1281. DOI: 10.1002/acp.1530
41. Wise, R. A., & Safer, M. A. (2004). What U.S. judges know and believe about eyewitness testimony. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 18, 427-443. DOI: 10.1002/acp.993
42. Winterdyk, J. (1988). Canadian police officers and eyewitness evidence: A time for reform. Canadian Police College Journal, 12, 175-191.
43. Wogalter, M. S., Malpass, R. S., & McQuiston, D. E. (2004). A national survey of US police on preparation and conduct of identification lineups. Psychology, Crime & Law, 10, 69-82. DOI: 10.1080/10683160410001641873
44. Wright, D. B., & Loftus, E. F. (2008). Eyewitness evidence. In G. Cohen, & M. A. Conway (Eds.), Memory in the real world (pp. 91-105). New York: Psychology Press.
45. Yarmey, A. D., & Jones, H. P. T. (1983). Is the psychology of eyewitness identification a matter of common sense? In S. Lloyd-Bostock, & B. R. Cliffords (Eds.), Evaluating witness evidence (pp. 13-40). Chichester, England: Wiley.