The reactions of mock jurors to the department of justice guidelines for the collection and preservation of eyewitness evidence

Basic and Applied Social Psychology

Volumn 27, Issue 2, 2005, Pages 155-162

  Lampinen, James M ^a,c   Judges, Donald P ^a   Odegard, Timothy N ^b   Hamilton, Sarah ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ARKANSAS   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT ARLINGTON   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF ARKANSAS   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 20744438347     PISSN: 01973533     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1207/s15324834basp2702_6     Document Type: Article

References (43)

1. Anthony, T., Cooper, C., & Mullen, B. (1992). Cross-racial facial identification: A social cognitive integration. Personality & Social Psychology Bulletin, 18, 296-301.
2. Bothwell, R. K., Brigham, J. C., & Malpass, R. S. (1989). Cross-racial identifications. Personality and Psychology Bulletin, 15, 19-25.
3. Chaiken, S. (1980). Heuristic versus systematic information processing and the use of source versus message cues in persuasion. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 39, 752-766.
4. Chaiken, S. (1987). The heuristic model of persuasion. In M. P. Zanna, J. M. Olson, & C. P. Herman (Eds.), Social influence: The Ontario symposium (Vol. 5, pp. 3-39). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
5. Chance, J., & Goldstein, A. G. (1996). The other-race effect and eyewitness identification. In S. L. Sporer, R. S. Malpass, & G. Koehnken (Eds.), Psychological issues in eyewitness identification (pp. 153-176). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
6. Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Hillsdale NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
7. Connors, E., Lundregan, T., Miller, N., & McEwen, T. (1996). Convicted by juries, exonerated by science: Case studies in the use of DNA evidence to establish innocence after trial. Washington, DC: National Institute of Justice.
8. Cutler, B. L., Dexter, H. R., & Penrod, S. D. (1989). Expert testimony and jury decision making: An empirical analysis. Behavioral Sciences and the Law, 7, 215-225.
9. Cutler, B. L., & Penrod, S. D. (1995). Mistaken identifications: The eyewitness, psychology, and law. New York: Cambridge University Press.
10. Deffenbacher, K. (1983). The influence of arousal on reliability of testimony. In S. M. A. Lloyd-Bostock & B. D. Clifford (Eds.), Evaluating witness evidence: Recent psychological research and new perspectives (pp. 235-251). Chichester, England: Wiley.
11. Doyle, J. M. (1999, October). Eyewitnesses, social scientists, and their adversaries. In Norman J. Pinkel (Chair), Psychological expertise and criminal justice. Symposium sponsored by the American Psychological Association and the American Bar Association, Arlington, VA.
12. Doyle, J. M., Larson, M. R., & DiTraglia, C. M. (2001). The eyes have it -Or do they? New guides for better eyewitness identification procedures. Criminal Justice, 16, 12-19.
13. Ebbesen, E., & Flowe, S. (2005). Simultaneous versus sequential lineups: What do we really know? Retrieved 20 February 2005, from http://www.psy.ucsd.edu/%7eeebbesen/simseq.htm.
14. Federal Rules of Evidence for United States Courts and Magistrates. (2004). Ithaca, NY: Legal Information Institute.
15. Garrioch, L., & Brimacombe, C. A. E. (2001). Lineup administrators' expectations: Their impact on eyewitness confidence. Law and Human Behavior, 25, 299-315.
16. Groscup, J. L., Penrod, S. D., Studebaker, C. A., Huss, M. T., & O'Neil, K. M. (2002). The effects of Daubert on the admissibility of expert testimony in state and federal criminal cases. Psychology, Public Policy and the Law, 8, 339-372.
17. Hovland, C. I., Janis, I. L., & Kelley, H. H. (1953). Communication and persuasion. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
18. Judges, D. P. (2000). Two cheers for the Department of Justice's Eyewitness evidence: A guide for law enforcement. Arkansas Law Review, 53, 231-297.
19. Kramer, T. H., Buckout, R., Fox, P., Widman, E., & Tusche, B. (1991). Effects of stress of recall. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 5, 483-488.
20. Laugherty, K. R., Alexander, J. F., & Lane, A. B. (1971). Recognition of human faces: Effects of target exposure time, target position, pose position and type of photograph. Journal of Applied Psychology, 55, 477-483.
21. Levi, A. M., & Lindsay, R. C. L. (2001). Lineup and photospread procedures: Issues concerning policy recommendations. Psychology, Public Policy and the Law, 7, 776-790.
22. Lindsay, R. C. L., & Wells, G. L. (1980). What price justice? Exploring the relationship between lineup fairness and identification accuracy. Law and Human Behavior, 4, 303-314.
23. Lindsay, R. C. L., & Wells, G. L. (1985). Improving eyewitness identification from lineups: Simultaneous versus sequential lineup presentations. Journal of Applied Psychology, 70, 556-564.
24. Liu, J. H., & Shure, G. H. (1993). Due process orientation does not always mean political liberalism. Law and Human Behavior, 17, 343-360.
25. Loftus, E. F. (1980). Impact of expert psychological testimony on the unreliability of eyewitness identifications. Journal of Applied Psychology, 65, 9-15.
26. Loftus, E. F., & Burns, T. E. (1982). Mental shock can cause retrograde amnesia. Memory and Cognition, 10, 318-323.
27. Malpass, R. S. (1974). Racial bias in eyewitness identification. Personality & Social Psychology Bulletin, 1, 42-44.
28. Malpass, R. S., & Devine, P. G. (1981). Eyewitness identification: Lineup instructions and the absence of the offender. Journal of Applied Psychology, 66, 482-489.
29. McGuire, W. J. (1985). Attitudes and attitude change. In G. Lindzey & E. Aronson (Eds.), The handbook of social psychology (Vol. 2, pp. 238-241). New York: Random House.
30. New Jersey Department of Law and Public Safety. (2001). Attorney general guidelines for preparing and conducting photo and live lineup identification procedures. Trenton: New Jersey Division of Criminal Justice.
31. Petty, R. E., & Cacioppo, J. T. (1986). Communication and persuasion: Central and peripheral routes to attitude change. New York: Springer-Verlag.
32. Phillips, M. R., McAuliff, B. D., Kovera, M. B., & Cutler, B. L. (1999). Double-blind photoarray administration as a safeguard against investigator bias. Journal of Applied Psychology, 84, 940-951.
33. Platz, S. J., & Hosch, H. M. (1988). Cross-racial/ethnic eyewitness identification: A field study. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 18, 972-984.
34. Read, J. D., Vokey, J. R., & Hammersley, R. (1990). Changing photos of faces: Effects of exposure, duration and photo similarity on recognition and the accuracy-confidence relationship. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 16, 870-882.
35. Schroeder, D. A., Steel, J. E., Woodell, A. J., & Bembenek, A. F. (2003). Justice in social dilemmas. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 7, 374-387.
36. Steblay, N., Dysart, J., Fulero, S., & Lindsay, R. C. L. (2001). Eyewitness accuracy rates in sequential and simultaneous lineup presentations: A meta-analytic comparison. Law and Human Behavior, 25, 459-473.
37. Technical Working Group on Eyewitness Evidence. (1999). Eyewitness evidence: A guide for law enforcement. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice.
38. Wells, G. L. (1978). Applied eyewitness testimony research: System variables and estimator variables. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 36, 1546-1557.
39. Wells, G. L. (1993). What do we know about eyewitness identifications? American Psychologist, 48, 553-571.
40. Wells, G. L., Malpass, R. S., Lindsay, R. C. L., Fisher, R. P., Turtle, J. W., & Fulero, S. M. (2000). From the lab to the police station: A successful application of eyewitness research. American Psychologist, 55, 581-598.
41. Wells, G. L., & Olson, E. A. (2003). Eyewitness testimony. Annual Review of Psychology, 54, 277-295.
42. Wells, G. L., & Seelau, E. P. (1995). Eyewitness identification: Psychological research and legal policy on lineups. Psychology, Public Policy and the Law, 1, 765-791.
43. Wells, G. L., Small, M., Penrod, S., Malpass, R. S., Fulero, S. M., & Brimacombe, C. A. E. (1998). Eyewitness identification procedures: Recommendations for lineups and photospreads. Law and Human Behavior, 22, 603-647.