The scaffolded mind: The why of embodied cognition?

European Journal of Social Psychology

Volumn 39, Issue 7, 2009, Pages 1272-1275

  Garcia Marques, Leonel ^a   Ferreira, Mario Boto ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF LISBON   (Portugal)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 79956168601     PISSN: 00462772     EISSN: 10990992     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/ejsp.694     Document Type: Editorial

References (23)

1. Baumeister, R. (2005). The cultural animal: Human nature, meaning, and social life. New York: Oxford University Press.
2. Brown, D. E. (1991). Human universals. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.
3. Bugental, D. (2000). Acquisition of the algorithms of social life: A domain based approach. Psychological Bulletin, 126, 187-219.
4. Buss, D. M., Haselton, M. G., Shackelford, T. K., Bleske, A. L., & Wakefield, J. C. (1998). Adaptations, exaptations, and spandrels. American Psychologist, 53, 533-548.
5. Dennett, D. C. (1995). Darwin's dangerous idea: Evolution and the meanings of life. New York: Simon & Schuster.
6. Fiske, A. P. (2002). The four elementary forms of sociality: Framework for a united theory of social relations. Psychological Review, 99, 689-723.
7. Gould, S. J. (1991). Exaptation: A crucial tool for evolutionary psychology. Journal of Social Issues, 47, 43-65.
8. Gould, S. J., & Vrba, E. S. (1982). Exaptation - a missing term in the science of form higher mental processes are grounded in early experience of the physical world. Paleobiology, 8, 4-15.
9. Gould, S. J. (1997). The exaptive excellence of spandrels as a term and prototype. Proceedings of National Academy of Sciences USA, 94, 10750-10755.
10. Gould, S. J., & Lewontin, R. C. (1979). The spandrels of San Marco and the Panglossian Paradigm: A critique of the adaptationist programme. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London, Series B, 205, 581-598.
11. Huggins, J. S. (2000). First computer bug. Retrieved 16 January 2009, from http://www.jamesshuggins.com/h/tek1/first_computer_bug.htm
12. Kenrick, D. T., Li, N., & Butner, J. E. (2003). Dynamical evolutionary psychology: Individual decision-rules and emergent social norms. Psychological Review, 110, 3-28.
13. Lakoff, G. (1987). Women, fire, and dangerous things: What categories reveal about the mind. Chicago, IL: Chicago Press.
14. Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M. (1980). Metaphors we live by. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
15. Neuberg, S. L., Kenrick, D. T., Maner, J. K., & Schaller, M. (2004). From evolved motives to everyday mentation: Evolution, goals, and cognition. In J. P. Forgas, & K. D. Williams (Eds.), Social motivation: Conscious and unconscious processes (pp. 133-152). New York: Cambridge University Press.
16. Ross, L., & Nisbett, R. E. (1991). The person and the situation. New York: McGraw-Hill.
17. Schaller, M., Park, J. H., & Faulkner, J. (2003). Prehistoric dangers and contemporary prejudices. European Review of Social Psychology, 14, 105-137.
18. Semin, G. R., & Smith, E. R. (2002). Interfaces of social psychology with situated and embodied cognition. Cognitive Systems Research, 3, 385-396.
19. Simon, H. (1969). The sciences of the artificial (1st ed.). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
20. Simon, H. (1983). Reason in human affairs. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
21. Smith, E. R., & Semin, G. R. (2004). Socially situated cognition: Cognition in its social context. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 36, 53-117.
22. Williams, L. E., Huang, J. Y., & Bargh, J. A. (2009). The scaffolded mind: Higher mental processes are grounded in early experience of the physical world. European Journal of Social Psychology, 39, 1257-1267. DOI: 10.1002/ejsp.665
23. Wilson, M. (2002). Six views of embodied cognition. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 9, 625-636.