Spatial variation in local pollen flow and mating success in a Picea abies clone archive and their implications for a novel "breeding without breeding" strategy

Tree Genetics and Genomes

Volumn 7, Issue 3, 2011, Pages 499-509

  Shimono, Ayako ^a   Wang, Xiao Ru ^a   Torimaru, Takeshi ^b   Lindgren, Dag ^c   Karlsson, Bo ^d  

^a UMEÅ UNIVERSITY   (Sweden)

^b HIROSAKI UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

^c SWEDISH UNIVERSITY OF AGRICULTURAL SCIENCES   (Sweden)

^d THE FORESTRY RESEARCH INSTITUTE OF SWEDEN   (Sweden)

Author keywords

Breeding strategy; Male reproductive success; Paternity assignment; Pollen dispersal; SSR markers

Indexed keywords

PICEA ABIES;

EID: 79956128998     PISSN: 16142942     EISSN: 16142950     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s11295-010-0351-5     Document Type: Article

References (42)

1. Besnard G, Achere V, Rampant PF, Favre JM, Jeandroz S (2003) A set of cross-species amplifying microsatellite markers developed from DNA sequence databanks in Picea (Pinaceae). Mol Ecol Notes 3: 380-383.
2. Brenner CH (1997) Symbolic kinship program. Genetics 145: 535-542.
3. Burczyk JL, Prat D (1997) Male reproductive success in Pseudotsuga menziesii (Mirb.) Franco: the effects of spatial structure and flowering characteristics. Heredity 79: 638-647.
4. Burczyk J, Adams WT, Shimizu JY (1996) Mating patterns and pollen dispersal in a natural Knobcone pine (Pinus attenuata Lemmon) stand. Heredity 77: 251-260.
5. Burczyk J, Lewandowski A, Chałupka W (2004) Local pollen dispersal and distant gene flow in Norway spruce (Picea abies [L.] Karst.). For Ecol Manage 197: 39-48.
6. Danusevicius D, Lindgren D (2002) Efficiency of selection based on phenotype, clone and progeny testing in long-term breeding. Silvae Genet 51: 19-26.
7. El-Kassaby YA, Lstiburek M (2009) Breeding without breeding. Genet Res 91: 111-120.
8. El-Kassaby YA, Lstibůrek M, Liewlaksaneeyanawin C, Slavov GT, Howe GT (2007) Breeding without breeding: approach, example, and proof of concept. In: Isik F (ed) Proceedings of the IUFRO division 2 joint conference: low input breeding and conservation of forest genetic resources. Antalya, Turkey, pp 43-54.
9. Erickson VJ, Adams WT (1989) Mating success in a coastal Douglas-fir seed orchards as affected by distance and floral phenology. Can J For Res 19: 1248-1255.
10. Evett IW, Weir BS (1998) Interpreting DNA evidence: statistical genetics for forensic scientists. Sinauer Associates, Sunderland.
11. Goto S, Miyahara F, Ide Y (2002) Monitoring male reproductive success in a Japanese black pine clonal seed orchard with RAPD markers. Can J For Res 32: 983-988.
12. Goudet J (1995) FSTAT (Version 1. 2): a computer program to calculate F-statistics. J Hered 86: 485-486.
13. Hardy OJ, Vekemans X (2002) SPAGEDi: a versatile computer program to analyse spatial genetic structure at the individual or population levels. Mol Ecol Notes 2: 618-620.
14. Hardy OJ, Gonzalez-Martinez SC, Colas B, Freville H, Mignot A, Olivieri I (2004) Fine-scale genetic structure and gene dispersal in Centaurea corymbosa (Asteraceae). II. Correlated paternity within and among sibships. Genetics 168: 1601-1614.
15. Hodgetts RB, Aleksiuk MA, Brown A, Clarke C, Macdonald E, Nadeem S et al (2001) Development of microsatellite markers for white spruce (Picea glauca) and related species. Theor Appl Genet 102: 1252-1258.
16. Hoffmann JP (2003) Generalized linear models: an applied approach. Allyn & Bacon, Boston.
17. Kalinowski ST, Taper ML, Marshall TC (2007) Revising how the computer program CERVUS accommodates genotyping error increases success in paternity assignment. Mol Ecol 16: 1099-1106.
18. Kang KS, Bila AD, Harju AM, Lindgren D (2003) Estimation of fertility variation in forest tree populations. Forestry 76: 330-344.
19. Karlsson B, Rosvall O (1993) Breeding programs in Sweden-Norway spruce: proceedings of the Nordic group for tree breeding: progeny testing and breeding strategies. Edinburgh, Scotland, pp 128-134.
20. Kimoto S (1967) Some quantitative analysis on the chrysomelid fauna of Ryukyu Archipelago. Esakia 6: 27-54.
21. Kjaer ED (1996) Estimation of effective population number in a Picea abies (Karst) seed orchard based on flower assessment. Scand J Forest Res 11: 111-121.
22. Lindgren D (2009) Picea abies breeding in Sweden is based on clone testing. Dendrobiology 61 Supplement: 79-82.
23. Lindgren D, Nilsson J-E (1985) Calculations concerning selection intensity. Dept. of Forest Genetics and Plant Physiology. The Swedish University of Agricultural Science, Umeå.
24. Loiselle BA, Sork VL, Nason J, Graham C (1995) Spatial genetic structure of a tropical understory shrub, Psychotria officinalis (Rubiaceae). Am J Bot 82: 1420-1425.
25. Mantel N (1967) The detection of disease clustering and a generalized regression approach. Cancer Res 27: 209-220.
26. Marshall TC, Slate J, Kruuk LEB, Pemberton JM (1998) Statistical confidence for likelihood-based paternity inference in natural populations. Mol Ecol 7: 639-655.
27. Moriguchi Y, Tsuchiya S, Iwata H, Itoo S, Tani N, Taira H et al (2007) Factors influencing male reproductive success in a Cryptomeria japonica seed orchard revealed by microsatellite marker analysis. Silvae Genet 56: 207-214.
28. Nikkanen T, Ruotsalainen S (2000) Variation in flowering abundance and its impact on the genetic diversity of the seed crop in a Norway spruce seed orchard. Silva Fenn 34: 205-222.
29. Pakkad G, Ueno S, Yoshimaru H (2008) Gene flow pattern and mating system in a small population of Quercus semiserrata Roxb. (Fagaceae). For Ecol Manage 255: 3819-3826.
30. Pakkanen A, Nikkanen T, Pulkkinen P (2000) Annual variation in pollen contamination and outcrossing in a Picea abies seed orchard. Scand J Forest Res 15: 399-404.
31. Pena SDJ, Chakraborty R (1994) Paternity testing in the DNA era. Trends Genet 10: 204-209.
32. Pfeiffer A, Olivieri AM, Morgante M (1997) Identification and characterization of microsatellites in Norway spruce (Picea abies K). Genome 40: 411-419.
33. Pluess AR, Sork VL, Dolan B, Davis FW, Grivet D, Merg K et al (2009) Short distance pollen movement in a wind-pollinated tree, Quercus lobata (Fagaceae). For Ecol Manage 258: 735-744.
34. Robledo-Arnuncio JJ, Alia R, Gil L (2004) Increased selfing and correlated paternity in a small population of a predominantly outcrossing conifer, Pinus sylvestris. Mol Ecol 13: 2567-2577.
35. Robledo-Arnuncio JJ, Austerlitz F, Smouse PE (2007) POLDISP: a software package for indirect estimation of contemporary pollen dispersal. Mol Ecol Notes 7: 763-766.
36. Scotti I, Paglia GP, Magni F, Morgante M (2002) Efficient development of dinucleotide microsatellite markers in Norway spruce (Picea abies Karst.) through dot-blot selection. Theor Appl Genet 104: 1035-1041.
37. Shen HH, Rudin D, Lindgren D (1981) Study of the pollination pattern in a Scots pine seed orchard by means of isozyme analysis. Silvae Genet 30: 7-15.
38. Stoehr MU, Newton CH (2002) Evaluation of mating dynamics in a lodgepole pine seed orchard using chloroplast DNA markers. Can J For Res 32: 469-476.
39. Streiff R, Ducousso A, Lexer C, Steinkellner H, Gloessl J, Kremer A (1999) Pollen dispersal inferred from paternity analysis in a mixed oak stand of Quercus robur L. and Q. petraea (Matt.) Liebl. Mol Ecol 8: 831-841.
40. Tomita M, Saito H, Suyama Y (2008) Effect of local stand density on reproductive processes of the sub-boreal conifer Picea jezoensis Carr. (Pinaceae). For Ecol Manage 256: 1350-1355.
41. Torimaru T, Wang XR, Fries A, Andersson B, Lindgren D (2009) Evaluation of pollen contamination in an advanced Scots pine seed orchard. Silvae Genet 58: 262-269.
42. Wang XR, Torimaru T, Lindgren D, Fries A (2010) Marker-based parentage analysis facilitates low input 'breeding without breeding' strategies for forest trees. Tree Genet Genomes 6: 227-235.