Self-concept measurement with preadolescent children: Validation of a German version of the SDQ I;Erfassung des Selbstkonzepts im mittleren Kindesalter: Validierung einer deutschen Version des SDQ i

Zeitschrift fur Padagogische Psychologie

Volumn 25, Issue 2, 2011, Pages 131-144

  Arens, A Katrin ^a   Trautwein, Ulrich ^b   Hasselhorn, Marcus ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF GÖTTINGEN   (Germany)

^b UNIVERSITY OF TÜBINGEN   (Germany)

^c GERMAN INSTITUTE FOR INTERNATIONAL EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH   (Germany)

Author keywords

Preadolescent children; SDQ; Self concept; Self concept measurement

Indexed keywords

EID: 79956101532     PISSN: 10100652     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1024/1010-0652/a000030     Document Type: Article

References (39)

1. Asendorpf, J. B. & van Aken, M. A. G. (1993). Deutsche Version der Selbstkonzeptskalen von Harter. Zeitschrift für Entwicklungspsychologie und Pädagogische Psychologie, 25, 64-86.
2. Bandalos, D. L. & Finney, S. J. (2001). Item parceling issues in structural equation modeling. In: G. A. Marcoulides & R. E. Schumacker (Eds.), New developments and techniques in structural equation modeling (pp. 269-296). Mahwah, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Publishers.
3. Bong, M. & Clark, R. E. (1999). Comparison between self-concept and self-efficacy in academic motivation research. Educational Psychologist, 34, 139-153.
4. Bortz, J. (1999). Statistik für Sozialwissenschaftler. Berlin: Springer.
5. Byrne, B. M. (1996a). Academic self-concept: Its structure, measurement, and relation to academic achievement. In: B. A. Bracken (Ed.), Handbook of self-concept: developmental, social, and clinical considerations (pp. 287-316). New York: Wiley.
6. Byrne, B. M. (1996b). Measuring self-concept across the life span: Issues and instrumentation. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
7. Byrne, B. M. & Shavelson, R. J. (1996). On the structure of social self-concept for pre-, early, and late adolescents: A test of the Shavelson, Hubner, and Stanton (1976) model. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70, 599-613. (Pubitemid 126420698)
8. Harter, S. (1985). Manual for the Self-Perception Profile for Children: Revision of the Perceived Competence Scale for Children. Denver, CO. University of Denver.
9. Kline, R. B. (2005). Principles and practice of structural equation Modeling. New York: The Guildford Press.
10. Köller, O. (2004). Konsequenzen von Leistungsgruppierungen. Münster: Waxmann.
11. Marsh, H.W. (1986a). Negative item bias in rating scales for pre- adolescent children: A cognitive-developmental phenomenon. Developmental Psychology, 22, 37-49.
12. Marsh, H. W. (1986b). Verbal and math self-concepts: an internal/external frame of reference model. American Educational Research Journal, 23, 129-149.
13. Marsh, H. W. (1990a). Influences of internal and external frames of reference on the formation of math and English self-concepts. Journal of Educational Psychology, 82, 107-116.
14. Marsh, H. W. (1990b). Self Description Questionnaire - I (SDQ I). Manual. Macarthur, N.S.W. Australia: University of Western Sydney.
15. Marsh, H. W. (1990c). The structure of academic self-concept: The Marsh/Shavelson model. Journal of Educational Psychology, 82, 623-636.
16. Marsh, H. W. (1993a). Academic self-concept: Theory, measurement, and research. In: J. Suls (Ed.), Psychological perspectives on the self. The self in social perspective. (Volume 3, pp. 59-98). Hillsdale, NJ & London: Erlbaum.
17. Marsh, H. W. (1993b). The multidimensional structure of academic self-concept: Invariance over gender and age. American Educational Research Journal, 30, 841-860.
18. Marsh, H. W., Byrne, B. M. & Shavelson, R. J. (1988). A multi- faceted academic self-concept: Its hierarchical structure and its relation to academic achievement. Journal of Educational Psychology, 80, 336-380.
19. Marsh, H. W. & Craven, R. G. (1991). Self-other agreement on multiple dimensions of preadolescent self-concept: Inferences by teachers, mothers, and fathers. Journal of Educational Psychology, 83, 393-404.
20. Marsh, H. W. & Craven, R. G. (2005). A reciprocal effects model of the causal ordering of self-concept and achievement. In: H. W. Marsh, R. G. Craven & D. M. McInerney (Eds.), International advances in self research: New frontiers for self-research (pp.17-51). Greenwich, Conn.: Information Age Publishing.
21. Marsh, H. W. & Craven, R. G. (2006). Reciprocal effects of self- concept and performance from a multidimensional perspective. Beyond seductive pleasure and unidimensional perspectives. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 1, 133-163.
22. Marsh, H. W., Craven, R. & Debus, R. (1999). Separation of competency and affect components of multiple dimensions of academic self-concept: A developmental perspective. Merrill-Palmer Quarterly, 45, 567-601.
23. Marsh, H. W. & Gouverent, P. J. (1989). Multidimensional self- concepts and perceptions of control: Construct validation of responses by children. Journal of Educational Psychology 81, 57-69.
24. Marsh, H. W. & Hattie, J. (1996). Theoretical perspectives on the structure of self-concept. In: B. A. Bracken (Ed.), Handbook of self-concept: Developmental, social, and clinical considerations (pp. 38-90). New York: Wiley.
25. Marsh, H. W. & Hau, K.-T. (2004). Explaining paradoxical relations between academic self-concepts and achievements: Cross-cultural generalizability of the internal/external frame of reference predictions across 26 countries. Journal of Educational Psychology, 96, 56-67. (Pubitemid 38397487)
26. Marsh, H. W., Kong, C.-K. & Hau, K.-T. (2001). Extension of the internal/external frame of reference model of self-concept formation: Importance of native and nonnative languages for Chinese students. Journal of Educational Psychology, 93, 453-553.
27. Marsh, H. W. & MacDonald-Holmes, I. W. (1990). Multidimensional self-concepts: Construct validation of responses of children. American Educational Research Journal, 27 89-117.
28. Marsh, H. W. & O'Mara, A. J. (2008). Self-Concept is as multi- disciplinary as it is multidimensional. In: H. W. Marsh, R. G. Craven & D. M. McInerney (Eds.), Self-processes, learning, and enabling human potential. Dynamic new approaches (pp. 87-115). Charlotte, NC: Information Age Publishing, Inc.
29. Marsh, H. W., Relich, J. D. & Smith, I. D. (1983). Self-concept: The construct validity of interpretations based upon the SDQ. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 45, 173-187.
30. Marsh, H. W., Smith, I. D. & Barnes, J. (1985). Multidimensional self-concepts: Relations with sex and academic achievement. Journal of Educational Psychology, 77, 581-596.
31. Marsh, H. W. & Yeung, A. S. (1997). Coursework selection: Relations to academic self-concept and achievement. American Educational Research Journal, 34, 691-720.
32. Möller, J., Pohlmann, B., Köller, O. & Marsh, H. W. (2009). Meta-analytic path analysis of the internal/external frame of reference model of academic achievement and academic self- concept. Review of Educational Research, 79, 1129-1167.
33. Muthen, L. K. & Muthen, B. O. (2007). Mplus 5[Computer software]. Los Angeles, CA: Muthen & Muthen. http://statmodel. com.
34. Schöne, C., Dickhäuser, O., Spinath, B. & Stiensmeier-Pelster, J. (2002). Skalen zur Erfassung des schulischen Fähigkeitsselbstkonzepts (SESSKO). Göttingen: Hogrefe.
35. Schwanzer, A. D., Trautwein, U., Lüdtke, O. & Sydow, H. (2005). Entwicklung eines Instruments zur Erfassung des Selbstkonzepts junger Erwachsener. Diagnostica, 51, 183-194. (Pubitemid 41634492)
36. Shavelson, R. J., Hubner, J. J. & Stanton, G. C. (1976). Self- concept: Validation of construct interpretations. Journal of Educational Research, 46, 407-441 .
37. Souvignier, E., Trenk-Hinterberger, I., Adam-Schwebe, S. & Gold, A. (2008). Frankfurter Leseverständnistest für 5. und 6. Klassen (FLVT 5-6). Göttingen: Hogrefe.
38. Trautwein, U. (2003). Schule und Selbstwert. Entwicklungsverlauf, Bedeutung von Kontextfaktoren und Effekte auf die Verhaltensebene. Münster: Waxmann.
39. Valentine, J. C., DuBois, D. L. & Cooper, H. (2004). The relation between self-beliefs and academic achievement: A meta-ana- lytic review. Educational Psychologist, 39, 111-131.