Rho signaling pathway and apical constriction in the early lens placode

Genesis

Volumn 49, Issue 5, 2011, Pages 368-379

  Borges, Ricardo Moraes ^a   Lamers, Marcelo Lazzaron ^b   Forti, Fabio Luis ^a   dos Santos, Marinilce Fagundes ^a   Yan, Chao Yun Irene ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SÃO PAULO   (Brazil)

^b FEDERAL UNIVERSITY OF RIO GRANDE DO SUL   (Brazil)

Author keywords

Apical cell constriction; Epithelial invagination; Lens placode; Morphogenesis; Rho GTPase

Indexed keywords

ACTIN; MYOSIN II; RHO GUANINE NUCLEOTIDE BINDING PROTEIN; RHO KINASE;

ACTIN POLYMERIZATION; ANIMAL EXPERIMENT; APICAL CONSTRICTION; ARTICLE; CELL FUNCTION; CHICK; CONTROLLED STUDY; ECTODERM; EMBRYO; EMBRYO (ANATOMY); EMBRYO CELL; EMBRYO DEVELOPMENT; EYE DEVELOPMENT; LENS; LENS PLACODE; NONHUMAN; NUCLEOTIDE SEQUENCE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROTEIN EXPRESSION; PROTEIN FUNCTION; PROTEIN LOCALIZATION; SIGNAL TRANSDUCTION;

ACTINS; ACTOMYOSIN; ADP RIBOSE TRANSFERASES; AMIDES; ANIMALS; BOTULINUM TOXINS; CHICK EMBRYO; CHICKENS; CYTOCHALASIN D; CYTOSKELETON; ECTODERM; ENZYME INHIBITORS; FEMALE; FLUORESCENT ANTIBODY TECHNIQUE; HETEROCYCLIC COMPOUNDS WITH 4 OR MORE RINGS; IMMUNOHISTOCHEMISTRY; LENS, CRYSTALLINE; MYOSIN TYPE II; NUCLEIC ACID SYNTHESIS INHIBITORS; PYRIDINES; RHO GTP-BINDING PROTEINS; RHO-ASSOCIATED KINASES; SIGNAL TRANSDUCTION;

EID: 79956022112     PISSN: 1526954X     EISSN: 1526968X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/dvg.20723     Document Type: Article

References (50)

1. Afonso C, Henrique D. 2006. PAR3 acts as a molecular organizer to define the apical domain of chick neuroepithelial cells. J Cell Sci 119: 4293-4304.
2. Amano M, Ito M, Kimura K, Fukata Y, Chihara K, Nakano T, Matsuura Y, Kaibuchi K. 1996. Phosphorylation and activation of myosin by Rho-associated kinase (Rho-kinase). J Biol Chem 271: 20246-20249.
3. Azevedo A, Lunardi LO, Larson RE. 2004. Immunolocalization of myosin Va in the developing nervous system of embryonic chicks. Anat Embryol (Berl) 208: 395-402.
4. Bailey AP, Bhattacharyya S, Bronner-Fraser M, Streit A. 2006. Lens specification is the ground state of all sensory placodes, from which FGF promotes olfactory identity. Dev Cell 11: 505-517.
5. Barrett K, Leptin M, Settleman J. 1997. The Rho GTPase and a putative RhoGEF mediate a signaling pathway for the cell shape changes in Drosophila gastrulation. Cell 91: 905-915.
6. Baumann O. 2004. Spatial pattern of nonmuscle myosin-II distribution during the development of the Drosophila compound eye and implications for retinal morphogenesis. Dev Biol 269: 519-533.
7. Beane WS, Gross JM, McClay DR. 2006. RhoA regulates initiation of invagination, but not convergent extension, during sea urchin gastrulation. Dev Biol 292: 213-225.
8. Burridge K, Wennerberg K. 2004. Rho and Rac take center stage. Cell 116: 167-179.
9. Byers B, Porter KR. 1964. Oriented microtubules in elongating cells of the developing lens rudiment after induction. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 52: 1091-1099.
10. Chapman SC, Collignon J, Schoenwolf GC, Lumsden A. 2001. Improved method for chick whole-embryo culture using a filter paper carrier. Dev Dyn 220: 284-289.
11. Chauhan BK, Disanza A, Choi SY, Faber SC, Lou M, Beggs HE, Scita G, Zheng Y, Lang RA. 2009. Cdc42- and IRSp53-dependent contractile filopodia tether presumptive lens and retina to coordinate epithelial invagination. Development 136: 3657-3667.
12. Costa M, Wilson ET, Wieschaus E. 1994. A putative cell signal encoded by the folded gastrulation gene coordinates cell shape changes during Drosophila gastrulation. Cell 76: 1075-1089.
13. Dawes-Hoang RE, Parmar KM, Christiansen AE, Phelps CB, Brand AH, Wieschaus EF. 2005. folded gastrulation, cell shape change and the control of myosin localization. Development 132: 4165-4178.
14. Dietz ML, Bernaciak TM, Vendetti F, Kielec JM, Hildebrand JD. 2006. Differential actin-dependent localization modulates the evolutionarily conserved activity of Shroom family proteins. J Biol Chem 281: 20542-20554.
15. Donner AL, Lachke SA, Maas RL. 2006. Lens induction in vertebrates: Variations on a conserved theme of signaling events. Semin Cell Dev Biol 17: 676-685.
16. Forti FL, Armelin HA. 2007. Vasopressin triggers senescence in K-ras transformed cells via RhoA-dependent downregulation of cyclin D1. Endocr Relat Cancer 14: 1117-1125.
17. Fox DT, Peifer M. 2007. Abelson kinase (Abl) and RhoGEF2 regulate actin organization during cell constriction in Drosophila. Development 134: 567-578.
18. Greene LA, Farinelli SE, Cunningham ME, Park DS. 1998. Culture and experimental use of the PC12 rat pheochromocytoma cell line. In: Banker G, Goslin K, editor. Culturing nerve cells. Cambridge: MIT Press. pp 161-187.
19. Haigo SL, Hildebrand JD, Harland RM, Wallingford JB. 2003. Shroom induces apical constriction and is required for hingepoint formation during neural tube closure. Curr Biol 13: 2125-2137.
20. Hamburger V, Hamilton HL. 1951. A series of normal stages in the development of the chick embryo. J Morphol 88: 49-92.
21. Hendrix R, Madras N, Johnson R. 1993. Growth pressure can drive early chick lens geometries. Dev Dyn 196: 153-164.
22. Hildebrand JD. 2005. Shroom regulates epithelial cell shape via the apical positioning of an actomyosin network. J Cell Sci 118: 5191-5203.
23. Hildebrand JD, Soriano P. 1999. Shroom, a PDZ domain-containing actin-binding protein, is required for neural tube morphogenesis in mice. Cell 99: 485-497.
24. Kamisoyama H, Araki Y, Ikebe M. 1994. Mutagenesis of the phosphorylation site (serine 19) of smooth muscle myosin regulatory light chain and its effects on the properties of myosin. Biochemistry 33: 840-847.
25. Kinoshita N, Sasai N, Misaki K, Yonemura S. 2008. Apical accumulation of Rho in the neural plate is important for neural plate cell shape change and neural tube formation. Mol Biol Cell 19: 2289-2299.
26. Kovács M, Wang F, Hu A, Zhang Y, Sellers JR. 2003. Functional divergence of human cytoplasmic myosin II: Kinetic characterization of the non-muscle IIA isoform. J Biol Chem 278: 38132-38140.
27. Lang RA. 2004. Pathways regulating lens induction in the mouse. Int J Dev Biol 48: 783-791.
28. Lecuit T, Lenne PF. 2007. Cell surface mechanics and the control of cell shape, tissue patterns and morphogenesis. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 8: 633-644.
29. Lee JY, Harland RM. 2007. Actomyosin contractility and microtubules drive apical constriction in Xenopus bottle cells. Dev Biol 311: 40-52.
30. Liu JP, Jessell TM. 1998. A role for rhoB in the delamination of neural crest cells from the dorsal neural tube. Development 125: 5055-5067.
31. McKeehan MS. 1951. Cytological aspects of embryonic lens induction in the chick. J Exp Zool 117: 31-63.
32. Momose T, Tonegawa A, Takeuchi J, Ogawa H, Umesono K, Yasuda K. 1999. Efficient targeting of gene expression in chick embryos by microelectroporation. Dev Growth Differ 41: 335-344.
33. Nance J, Munro EM, Priess JR. 2003. C. elegans PAR-3 and PAR-6 are required for apicobasal asymmetries associated with cell adhesion and gastrulation. Development 130: 5339-5350.
34. Nikolaidou KK, Barrett K. 2004. A Rho GTPase signaling pathway is used reiteratively in epithelial folding and potentially selects the outcome of Rho activation. Curr Biol 14: 1822-1826.
35. Nishimura T, Takeichi M. 2008. Shroom3-mediated recruitment of Rho kinases to the apical cell junctions regulates epithelial and neuroepithelial planar remodeling. Development 135: 1493-1502.
36. Pilot F, Lecuit T. 2005. Compartmentalized morphogenesis in epithelia: From cell to tissue shape. Dev Dyn 232: 685-694.
37. Plageman TF Jr, Chung MI, Lou M, Smith AN, Hildebrand JD, Wallingford JB, Lang RA. 2010. Pax6-dependent Shroom3 expression regulates apical constriction during lens placode invagination. Development 137: 405-415.
38. Popoff MR, Geny B. 2009. Multifaceted role of Rho, Rac, Cdc42, and Ras in intercellular junctions, lessons from toxins. Biochim Biophys Acta 1788: 797-812.
39. Sai X, Ladher RK. 2008. FGF signaling regulates cytoskeletal remodeling during epithelial morphogenesis. Curr Biol 18: 976-981.
40. Schook P. 1980a. Morphogenetic movements during the early development of the chick eye. An ultrastructural and spatial reconstructive study. A. Invagination of the lens placode. Acta Morphol Neerl Scand 18: 133-157, .
41. Schook P. 1980b. Morphogenetic movements during the early development of the chick eye. An ultrastructural and spatial reconstructive study. B. Invagination of the optic vesicle and fusion of its walls. Acta Morphol Neerl Scand 18: 159-180.
42. Selleck MAJ. 1996. Culture and microsurgical manipulation of the early avian embryo. In: Bronner-Fraser M, editor. Methods in avian embryology. San Diego: Academic Press. pp 1-19.
43. Shewan AM, Maddugoda M, Kraemer A, Stehbens SJ, Verma S, Kovacs EM, Yap AS. 2005. Myosin 2 is a key Rho kinase target necessary for the local concentration of E-cadherin at cell-cell contacts. Mol Biol Cell 16: 4531-4542.
44. Simoes S, Denholm B, Azevedo D, Sotillos S, Martin P, Skaer H, Hombria JC, Jacinto A. 2006. Compartmentalisation of Rho regulators directs cell invagination during tissue morphogenesis. Development 133: 4257-4267.
45. Straight AF, Cheung A, Limouze J, Chen I, Westwood NJ, Sellers JR, Mitchison TJ. 2003. Dissecting temporal and spatial control of cytokinesis with a myosin II Inhibitor. Science 299: 1743-1747.
46. Streit A, Sockanathan S, Perez L, Rex M, Scotting PJ, Sharpe PT, Lovell-Badge R, Stern CD. 1997. Preventing the loss of competence for neural induction: HGF/SF, L5 and Sox-2. Development 124: 1191-1202.
47. Vicente-Manzanares M, Ma X, Adelstein RS, Horwitz AR. 2009. Non-muscle myosin II takes centre stage in cell adhesion and migration. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 10: 778-790.
48. Wang Y, Riechmann V. 2007. The role of the actomyosin cytoskeleton in coordination of tissue growth during Drosophila oogenesis. Curr Biol 17: 1349-1355.
49. Wilde C, Aktories K. 2001. The Rho-ADP-ribosylating C3 exoenzyme from Clostridium botulinum and related C3-like transferases. Toxicon 39: 1647-1660.
50. Wrenn JT, Wessells NK. 1969. An ultrastructural study of lens invagination in the mouse. J Exp Zool 171: 359-367.