Examining the criterion-related validity of the employee screening questionnaire: A three-sample investigation

International Journal of Selection and Assessment

Volumn 19, Issue 2, 2011, Pages 222-228

  Iliescu, Dragos ^a   Ilie, Alexandra ^b   Ispas, Dan ^c  

^a National School of Political Studies and Public Administration   (Romania)

^b UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH FLORIDA   (United States)

^c ILLINOIS STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 79955964323     PISSN: 0965075X     EISSN: 14682389     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1468-2389.2011.00550.x     Document Type: Article

References (40)

1. Aguinis, H. (2004). Regression analysis for categorical moderators. New York: Guilford.
2. Alliger, G. M., & Dwight, S. A. (2000). A metaanalytic investigation of the susceptibility of integrity tests to faking and coaching. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 60, 59-72.
3. Bartram, D. (2007). Increasing validity with forced-choice criterion measurement format. International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 15, 263-272.
4. Bass, B. M. (1957). Faking by sales applicants of a forced-choice personality inventory. Journal of Applied Psychology, 41, 403-404.
5. Bean, E. (1987). More firms use attitude tests to keep thieves off the payroll. The Wall Street Journal, 219, 41.
6. Bennett, R. J., & Robinson, S. L. (2000). Development of a measure of workplace deviance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 85, 349-360.
7. Berry, C. M., Page, R. C., & Sackett, P. R. (2007). Effects of self-deceptive enhancement on personality-job performance relationships. International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 15, 94-109.
8. Cattell, R. B. (1994). Sixteen personality factor questionnaire. Champaign, IL: IPAT.
9. Coyne, I., & Bartram, D. (2000). Personnel managers perceptions of dishonesty in the workplace. Human Resource Management Journal, 10, 38-45.
10. Coyne, I., & Bartram, D. (2002). Assessing the effectiveness of integrity tests: A review. International Journal of Testing, 2, 15-34.
11. Fox, S., Spector, P. E., Goh, A., & Bruursema, K. (2007). Does your coworker know what you're doing? Convergence of self- and peer-reports of counterproductive work behavior. International Journal of Stress Management, 14, 41-60.
12. Hambleton, R. K. (2005). Issues, designs, and technical guidelines for adapting tests into multiple languages and cultures. In R. K. Hambleton, P. F. Merenda, & C. D. Spielberger (Eds.), Adapting educational and psychological tests for cross-cultural assessment (pp. 3-38). New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum.
13. Hogan, J., & Hogan, R. (1989). How to measure employee reliability. Journal of Applied Psychology, 74, 273-279.
14. Hogan, R., & Hogan, J. (1995). Hogan personality inventory manual (2nd ed.). Tulsa, OK: Hogan Assessment Systems.
15. International Test Commission (ITC). (2008). International Test Commission Guidelines for Translating and Adapting Tests. Punta Gorda, FL: ITC. Retrieved from
16. Ispas, D., Ilie, A., Iliescu, D., Johnson, R. E., & Harris, M. M. (2010). Fairness reactions to selection methods: A Romanian study. International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 18, 102-110.
17. Jackson, D. N. (1984). Personality research form. Port Huron, MI: Sigma Assessment Systems.
18. Jackson, D. N. (1994). Jackson personality inventory-revised manual. Port Huron, MI: Sigma Assessment Systems.
19. Jackson, D. N. (2009a). Technical manual for the employee screening questionnaire 2. Port Huron, MI: Sigma Assessment Systems.
20. Jackson, D. N. (2009b). Employee screening questionnaire 2: Technical manual. Port Huron, MI: Sigma Assessment Systems.
21. Jackson, D. N., Iliescu, D., & Andreescu, M. (2010). Technical manual for the Romanian version of the employee screening questionnaire 2. Cluj-Napoca: DirectPrint.
22. Jackson, D. N., Paunonen, S. V., & Tremblay, P. F. (2000). Six factor personality questionnaire manual. Port Huron, MI: Sigma Assessment Systems.
23. Jackson, D. N., Wroblewski, V. R., & Ashton, M. C. (2000). The impact of faking on employment tests: Does forced-choice offer a solution? Human Performance, 13, 371-388.
24. Jones, J. W., & Joy, D. S. (1991). Empirical investigation of job applicants' reactions to taking a preemployment honesty test. In J. W. Jones (Ed.), Preemployment honesty testing: Current research and future directions (pp. 121-131). Connecticut: Quorum Books.
25. Lee, K., & Ashton, M. C. (2004). Psychometric properties of the HEXACO Personality Inventory. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 39, 329-358.
26. Meyer, J. P., & Allen, N. J. (1991). A three-component conceptualization of organizational commitment. Human Resource Management Review, 1, 61-89.
27. Ones, D. S., & Dilchert, S. (2005). A review of Giotto. In B. S. Plake, J. C. Impara, & R. A. Spies (Eds.), Mental measurements yearbook (16th ed., pp. 414-416). Lincoln, NE: University of Nebraska Press.
28. Ones, D. S., & Viswesvaran, C. (1998). Gender, age, and race differences on overt integrity tests: Results across four large scale job applicant data sets. Journal of Applied Psychology, 83, 35-42.
29. Ones, D. S., & Viswesvaran, C. (2001). Integrity tests and other criterion-focused occupational personality scales (COPS) used in personnel selection. International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 9, 31-39.
30. Ones, D. S., Viswesvaran, C., & Schmidt, F. L. (2003). Personality and absenteeism: A meta-analysis of integrity tests. European Journal of Personality, 17, 19-38.
31. Ones, D. S., Viswesvaran, C., & Schmidt, F. (1993). Comprehensive metaanalysis of integrity test validities: Findings and implications for personnel selection and theories of job performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 78, 679-703.
32. Rothstein, M. G., & Goffin, R. D. (2006). The use of personality measures in personnel selection: What does current research support. Human Resource Management Review, 16, 155-180.
33. Sackett, P., & DeVore, C. (2001). Counterproductive behaviors at work. In N. Anderson, D. Ones, H. Sinagil, & V. Chockalingam (Eds.), Handbook of industrial, work, & organizational psychology (Vol. 1, pp. 145-164). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
34. Sackett, P. R., Berry, C. M., Wiemann, S., & Laczo, R. M. (2006). Citizenship and counterproductive work behavior: Clarifying relationship between the two domains. Human Performance, 19, 441-464.
35. Sackett, P. R., Burris, L. R., & Callahan, C. (1989). Integrity testing for personnel selection: An update. Personnel Psychology, 42, 491-529.
36. Sackett, P. R., & Harris, M. M. (1984). Honesty testing for personnel selection: A review and critique. Personnel Psychology, 37, 221-245.
37. Salgado, J. F. (2002). The Big Five personality dimensions and counterproductive behaviors. International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 10, 117-125.
38. Schmidt, F. L., & Hunter, J. E. (1998). The validity and utility of selection methods in personnel psychology: Practical and theoretical implications of 85 years of research findings. Psychological Bulletin, 124, 262-274.
39. Spector, P. (1997). Job satisfaction: Application, assessment, cause, and consequences. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
40. Viswesvaran, C., Deller, J., & Ones, D. S. (2007). Personality measures in personnel selection: Some new contributions. International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 15, 354-358.