Joint registries

Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery - Series B

Volumn 92, Issue 6, 2010, Pages 749-750

  Horan, F T ^a  

^a NONE   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTHROPLASTY; EDITORIAL; HEALTH CARE ORGANIZATION; MEDICAL AUDIT; MEDICAL INFORMATION SYSTEM; MEDICAL PRACTICE; MEDICAL RECORD; ORTHOPEDICS; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PATIENT MONITORING; PRACTICE GUIDELINE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REGISTRATION; SURGEON;

ARTHROPLASTY, REPLACEMENT; HUMANS; REGISTRIES; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 77953174979     PISSN: 0301620X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1302/0301-620X.92B6.24549     Document Type: Editorial

References (17)

1. Pellegrini VD Jr, Marx C, Rankin EA, et al. Position statement in support of National Joint Registries. J Bone Joint Surg [Am] 2009;91-A:2983.
2. Gioe TJ, Killeen KK, Mehle S, Grimm K. Implementation and application of a community total joint registry: a twelve-year history. J Bone Joint Surg [Am] 2006;88-A:1399-1404 (Pubitemid 43837139)
3. Robertsson O, Lewold S, Knutson K, Lidgren L. The Swedish Knee Arthroplasty Project. Acta Orthop Scand 2000;71:7-18.
4. Lubega N, Mkandawire NC, Sibande GC, Norrish AR, Harrison WJ. Joint replacement in Malawi: establishment of a National Joint Registry. J Bone Joint Surg [Br] 2009;91-B:341-343
5. Havelin LI, Engesaeter LB, Espehaug B, et al. The Norwegian Arthroplasty Register: 11 years and 73,000 arthroplasties. Acta Orthop Scand 2000;71:337-353
6. Söderman P, Malchau H, Herberts P. Outcome after total hip arthroplasty: Part I. General health evaluation in relation to definition of failure in the Swedish National Total Hip Arthroplasty Register. Acta Orthop Scand 2000;71:354-359
7. Söderman P, Malchau H. Validity and reliability of Swedish WOMAC osteoarthritis index: a self-administered disease-specific questionnaire (WOMAC) versus generic instruments (SF-36 and NHP). Acta Orthop Scand 2000;71:39-46.
8. Söderman P, Malchau H, Herberts P, et al. Outcome after total hip arthroplasty: Part II. Disease-specific follow-up and the Swedish National Total Hip Arthroplasty Register. Acta Orthop Scand 2001;72:113-119
9. Söderman P, Malchau H, Herberts P, Johnell O. Are the findings in the Swedish National Total Hip Arthroplasty Register valid? A comparison between the Swedish National Total Hip Arthroplasty Register, the National Discharge Register, and the National Death Register. J Arthroplasty 2000;15:884-889
10. Söderman P. On the validity of the results from the Swedish National Total Hip Arthroplasty Register. Acta Orthop Scand 2000;71:1-33.
11. Hooper GJ, Hooper NM, Rothwell AG, Hobbs T. Bilateral total joint arthroplasty: the early results from the New Zealand National Joint Registry. J Arthroplasty 2009;24:1174-1177
12. Hosman AH, Mason RB, Hobbs T, Rothwell AG. A New Zealand national joint registry review of 202 total ankle replacements followed for up to 6 years. Acta Orthop 2007;24:584-591 (Pubitemid 350034933)
13. Baker PN, van der Meulen JH, Lewsey J, Gregg PJ. The role of pain and function in determining patient satisfaction after total knee replacement: data from the National Joint Registry for England and Wales. J Bone Joint Surg [Br] 2007;89-B:893-900. (Pubitemid 47322786)
14. Labek G, Stöckl B, Janda W, et al. Quality of datasets for outcome measurement, market monitoring and assessment of artificial joint implants. European Arthroplasty Register (EAR), EFORT, 2009. http://www.ear.efort.org/ getdoc/b9c91f8a-4deb-4bf1-a0cfdafafe58a85a/EBOOKQualityofDatasetsfinal.aspx (date last accessed 11 February 2010).
15. European Arthroplasty Register (EAR). Handbook for the development and operation of an outcome register for medical devices. European Arthroplasty Register (EAR), EFORT, 2009. http://www.ear.efort.org/getdoc/932a6677-3167-4615- 80f5-2b3c5df9c824/HandbookRegisterdevelopmentfinal.aspx (date last accessed 11 February 2010).
16. Havelin LI. The Norwegian Joint Registry. Bull Hosp Jt Dis 1999;58:139-147
17. Hardoon SL, Lewsey JD, Gregg PJ, Reeves BC, van der Meulen JHP. Continuous monitoring of the performance of hip prostheses. J Bone Joint Surg [Br] 2006;88-B:716-720