Validation of data in the Norwegian Arthroplasty Register and the Norwegian Patient Register: 5,134 Primary total hip arthroplasties and revisions operated at a single hospital between 1987 and 2003

Acta Orthopaedica

Volumn 76, Issue 6, 2005, Pages 823-828

  Arthursson, Astvaldur J ^a   Furnes, Ove ^b   Espehaug, Birgitte ^b   Havelin, Leif I ^b,c   Söreide, Jon A ^a,c  

^a STAVANGER UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (Norway)

^b HAUKELAND UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (Norway)

^c UNIVERSITY OF BERGEN   (Norway)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; COMPARATIVE STUDY; CONTROLLED STUDY; DEVICE REMOVAL; DISEASE REGISTRY; EVALUATION; HIP ARTHROPLASTY; HUMAN; KAPLAN MEIER METHOD; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MEDICAL DOCUMENTATION; MEDICAL INFORMATION; MEDICAL RECORD; PROSTHESIS FIXATION; SURGEON; SURGICAL TECHNIQUE; SURVIVAL RATE; TOTAL HIP PROSTHESIS; VALIDATION PROCESS; CLINICAL COMPETENCE; NORWAY; PROSTHESIS FAILURE; REGISTER; REOPERATION; STANDARD; STATISTICS;

ARTHROPLASTY, REPLACEMENT, HIP; CLINICAL COMPETENCE; HUMANS; NORWAY; PROSTHESIS FAILURE; REGISTRIES; REOPERATION;

EID: 33644867151     PISSN: 17453674     EISSN: 17453682     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/17453670510045435     Document Type: Article

References (21)

1. Arts D, de Keizer N, Scheffer G J, de Jonge E. Quality of data collected for severity of illness scores in the Dutch National Intensive Care Evaluation (NICE) registry. Intensive Care Med 2002; 28 (5): 656-9.
2. Bakken I J, Nyland K, Halsteinli V, Kvam U H, Skjeldestad F E. The Norwegian Patient Registry. Nor J Epidemiol 2004: 14 (1): 65-9.
3. Espehaug B, Furnes O, Havelin L I, Engesæter L B, Vollset S E, Kindseth O. Registration completeness i the Norwegian Arthroplasty Register. Acta Orthop 2006. Accepted.
4. Fender D, Harper W M, Gregg P J. The Trent regional arthroplasty study. Experiences with a hip register. J Bone Joint Surg (Br) 2000; 82 (7): 944-7.
5. Froen J F, Lund-Larsen F. Ten years of the Lubinus Interplanta hip prostheses. Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen 1998; 118 (18): 2767-71.
6. Garne J P, Aspegren K, Moller T. Validity of breast cancer registration from one hospital into the Swedish National Cancer Registry 1971-1991. Acta Oncol 1995; 34 (2): 153-6.
7. Goldberg J, Gelfand H M, Levy P S. Registry evaluation methods: a review and case study. Epidemiol Rev 1980; 2: 210-20.
8. Gunnarsson U, Seligsohn E, Jestin P, Påhlman L. Registration and validity of surgical complications in colorectal cancer surgery. Br J Surg 2003; 90 (4): 454-9.
9. Havelin L I. The Norwegian Joint Registry. Bull Hosp Jt Dis 1999; 58 (3): 139-47.
10. Havelin L I, Engesaeter L B, Espehaug B, Furnes O, Lie S A, Vollset S E. The Norwegian Arthroplasty Register: 11 years and 73,000 arthroplasties. Acta Orthop Scand 2000; 71 (4): 337-53.
11. Knatterud G L, Rockhold F W, George S L, Barton F B, Davis C E, Fairweather W R, Honohan T, Mowery R, O'Neill R. Guidelines for quality assurance in multicenter trials: a position paper. Control Clin Trials 1998; 19 (5): 477-93.
12. Pedersen A B, Johnsen S P, Overgaard S, Søballe K, Sørensen H T, Lucht U. Registration in the danish hip arthroplasty registry. Acta Orthop Scand 2004; 75 (4): 434-41.
13. Puolakka T J S, Pajamäki J, Pulkkinen P, Nevalainen. Cementless Biomet Total Hip prosthesis in the treatment of osteoarthrosis survivorship analysis. Publications of the national Agency for Medicines 3/1997.
14. Puolakka T J S, Pajamäki K J J, Halonen P J, Pulkkinen P O, Paavolainen P, Nevalainen J K. The Finnish Arthroplasty Register. Report of the hip register. Acta Orthop Scand 2001; 72 (5): 433-41.
15. Robertsson O, Dunbar M, Knutson K, Lewold, Lidgren L. Validation of the Swedish Knee Arthroplasty Register. A postal survey regarding 30,376 knees operated on between 1975 and 1995. Acta Orthop Scand 1999; 70 (5): 467-72.
16. Sachs M A, Synnerman J E. Quality registries are a gold-mine of information that should be better used. Knowledge of improvement is acquired by means of special projects. Lakartidningen 1999; 96 (20): 2438-40.
17. Söderman P. On the validity of the results from the Swedish National Total Hip Arthroplasty register. Acta Orthop Scand (Suppl 296) 2000; 71: 1-33.
18. Söderman P, Malchau H, Herberts P, Johnell O. Are the findings in the Swedish National Total Hip Arthroplasty Register valid? A comparison between the Swedish National Total Hip Arthroplasty Register, the National Discharge Register, and the National Death Register. J Arthroplasty 2000; 15 (7): 884-9.
19. Sörensen H T, Sabroe S, Olsen J. A framework for evaluation of secondary data sources for epidemiological research. Int J Epidemiol 1996; 25 (2): 435-42.
20. van der Putten E, van der Velden J W, Siers A, Hamersma E A M. A pilot study on the quality of data management in a cancer chnical trial. Control Clin Trials 1987; 8 (2): 96-100.
21. Vantongelen K, Rotmensz N, van der Schueren E. Quality control of validity of data collected in clinical trials. EORTC Study Group on Data Management (SGDM). Eur J Cancer Clin Oncol 1989; 25 (8): 1241-7.