Comparison of the information in arthroplasty registers from different countries

Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery - Series B

Volumn 90, Issue 3, 2008, Pages 288-291

  Labek, G ^a   Stoica, C I ^a   Bohler N ^a  

^a INNSBRUCK MEDICAL UNIVERSITY   (Austria)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTHROPLASTY; COMPARATIVE STUDY; EVALUATION; HUMAN; IMPLANT REGISTRY; INTERNATIONAL COOPERATION; INTERVENTION STUDY; MEDICAL INFORMATION; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PUBLICATION; REGISTRATION; REOPERATION; REVIEW; SURGICAL APPROACH;

ARTHROPLASTY; HUMANS; INFORMATION SCIENCE; INTERNATIONAL COOPERATION; ORTHOPEDICS; REGISTRIES; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 41149083543     PISSN: 0301620X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1302/0301-620X.90B3.19556     Document Type: Review

References (26)

1. Robertsson O. Knee arthroplasty register. J Bone Joint Surg [Br] 2007;89-B:1-4.
2. Herberts P, Malchau H. Long-term registration has improved the guality of hip replacement: a review of the Swedish THR Register comparing 160,000 cases. Acta Orthop Scand 2000;71:111-21.
3. Herberts P, Malchau H. How outcome studies have changed total hip arthroplasty practices in Sweden. Clin Orthop 1997;344:44-60.
4. Malchau H, Garellick G, Eisler T, Kärrholm J, Herberts P. Presidential guest address: the Swedish Hip Registry: increasing the sensitivity by patient outcome data. Clin Orthop 2005;441:19-29.
5. Havelin LI, Engesaeter LB, Espehaug B, et al. The Norwegian Arthroplasty Register: 11 years and 73,000 arthroplasties. Acta Orthop Scand 2000;71:337-53.
6. Robertsson O, Dunbar MJ, Knutson K, Lewold S, Lidgren L. The Swedish Knee Arthroplasty Register: 25 years experience. Bull Hosp Jt Dis 1999;58:133-8.
7. Lucht U. The Danish Hip Arthroplasty Register. Acta Orthop Scand 2000;71:433-9.
8. Puolakka TJ, Pajamäki KJ, Halonen PJ, et al. The Finnish Arthroplasty Register: report of the hip register. Acta Orthop Scand 2001;72:433-41.
9. Furnes A, Lie SA, Havelin LI, Engesaeter LB, Vollset SE. The economic impact of failures in total hip replacement surgery: 28,997 cases from The Norwegian Arthroplasty Register 1987-1993. Acta Orthop Scand 1996;67:115-21.
10. Robertsson O, Lewold S, Knutson K, Lidgren L. The Swedish Knee Arthroplasty Project. Acta Orthop Scand 2000;71:7-18.
11. Espehaug B, Havelin LI, Engesaeter L, Vollset SE. The effect of hospital type and operating volume on the survival of hip replacements: a review of 39,505 primary total hip replacements reported to the Norwegian Arthroplasty Register, 1988-1996. Acta Orthop Scand 1999;70:12-18.
12. Pedersen AB, Johnsen S, Overgaard S, et al. Registration in the Danish Hip Arthroplasty Registry: completeness of total hip arthroplasties and positive predictive value of registered diagnosis and postoperative complications Acta Orthop Scand 2004;75:434-41.
13. Arthursson AJ, Furnes O, Espehaug B, Havelin LI, Söreide JA. Validation of data in the Norwegian Arthroplasty Register and the Norwegian Patient Register: 5,134 primary total hip arthroplasties and revisions operated at a single hospital between 1987 and 2003. Acta Orthop 2005;76:823-8.
14. Espehaug B, Furnes O, Havelin LI, et al. Registration completeness in the Norwegian Arthroplasty Register. Acta Orthop 2006;77:49-56.
15. Robertsson O, Dunbar M, Knutson K, Lewold S, Lidgren L. Validation of the Swedish Knee Arthroplasty Register: a postal survey regarding 30,376 knees operated on between 1975 and 1995. Acta Orthop Scand 1999;70:467-72.
16. Söderman P, Malchau H, Herberts P, Johnell O. Are the findings in the Swedish National Total Hip Arthroplasty Register valid?: a comparison between the Swedish National Total Hip Arthroplasty Register, the National Discharge Register, and the National Death Register. J Arthroplasty 2000;15:884-9.
17. Garrellik G, Malchau H, Herberts P. Survival of hip replacements: a comparison of a randomized trial and a registry. Clin Orthop 2000;375:157-67.
18. No authors listed. Arthroplasty registers and arthroplasty register resource on EFORT portal. http://www.efort.org/E/05/01-50.asp (date last accessed 19 January 2008).
19. Robertsson O, Ranstanm J. No bias of ignored bilaterality when analysing the revision risk of knee prostheses: analysis of a population based sample of 44,590 patients with 55,298 knee prostheses from the national Swedish Knee Arthroplasty Register. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 2003;1:1.
20. Havelin LI, Espehaug B, Vollset SE, Engesaeter LB. Early aseptic loosening of uncemented femoral components in primary total hip replacements: a review based on the Norwegian Arthroplasty Register. J Bone Joint Surg [Br] 1995;77-B:11-17.
21. Delaunay C, Kapandji AL. Survival analysis of cementless grit-blasted titanium total hip arthroplasties. J Bone Joint Surg [Br] 2001;83-B:408-13.
22. Delaunay C, Bonnomet F, North J, et al. Grit-blasted titanium femoral stem in cementless primary total hip arthroplasty: a 5- to 10-year multicenter study. J Arthroplasty 2001;16:47-54.
23. Pieringer H, Auersperg V, Böehler N. Long-term results of the cementless ALLOCLASSIC hip arthroplasty system using a 28-mm ceramic head with a retrospective comparison to a 32-mm head. J Arthroplasty 2006;21:967-74.
24. Pieringer H, Ausperg V, Griessler W, Böhler N. Long term results with the cementless Alloclassic brand hip arthroplasty system. J Arthroplasty 2003;18:321-8.
25. Zenz P, Pospisil C, Fertschak W, Schwägerl W. 10 years of cementless implantation of total hip endoprosthesis using Zweymüller's stem. Z Orthop Ihre Grenzgeb 1995;133:559-61 (in German).
26. Weissinger M, Helmrich C. Long term results with Zweymüller cement-free Alloclassic stem. Z Orthop Ihre Grenzgeb 2001;139:200-5 (in German).