Responsiveness of the Chinese version of the Oswestry disability index in patients with chronic low back pain

European Spine Journal

Volumn 20, Issue 3, 2011, Pages 475-481

  Ma, Chao ^a   Wu, Shaoling ^a   Xiao, Lingjun ^a   Xue, Yunlian ^a  

^a SUN YAT SEN UNIVERSITY   (China)

Author keywords

Disability; Low back pain; Oswestry disability index; Responsiveness

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; CHINESE; FEMALE; FOLLOW UP; HEALTH STATUS; HUMAN; LOW BACK PAIN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; OSWESTRY DISABILITY INDEX; PHYSIOTHERAPY; PRIORITY JOURNAL;

ADULT; AGED; CHINA; DISABILITY EVALUATION; FEMALE; HUMANS; LOW BACK PAIN; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; QUESTIONNAIRES; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; TRANSLATING;

EID: 79955935288     PISSN: 09406719     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s00586-010-1624-2     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. Beaton DE (2000) Understanding the relevance of measured change through studies of responsiveness. Spine 25:3192-3199 (PMID: 11124736)
2. Beurskens AJ, de Vet HC, Köke AJ (1996) Responsiveness of functional status in low back pain: a comparison of different instruments. Pain 65:71-76 (PMID: 8826492)
3. Coelho RA, Siqueira FB, Ferreira PH, Ferreira ML (2008) Responsiveness of the Brazilian-Portuguese version of the Oswestry Disability Index in subjects with low back pain. Eur Spine J 17:1101-1106. (PMID: 18512083). doi:10.1007/s00586-008-0690-1
4. Costa LO, Maher CG, Latimer J (2007) Self-report outcome measures for low back pain: searching for international cross-cultural adaptations. Spine 32:1028-1037 (PMID: 17450079)
5. Davidson M, Keating JL (2002) A comparison of five low back disability questionnaires: reliability and responsiveness. Phys Ther 82:8-24 (PMID: 11784274)
6. Deyo RA, Centor RM (1986) Assessing the responsiveness of functional scales to clinical change: an analogy to diagnostic test performance. J Chronic Dis 39:897-906 (PMID: 2947907)
7. Fairbank JC, Couper J, Davies JB, O'Brien JP (1980) The Oswestry low back pain questionnaire. Physiotherapy 66:271-273 (PMID: 6450426)
8. Fairbank JC, Pynsent PB (2000) The Oswestry Disability Index. Spine 25:2940-2952 (PMID: 11074683)
9. Frost H, Lamb SE, Stewart-Brown S (2008) Responsiveness of a patient specific outcome measure compared with the Oswestry Disability Index v2.1 and Roland and Morris Disability Questionnaire for patients with subacute and chronic low back pain. Spine 33:2450-2458 (PMID: 18824951)
10. Grotle M, Brox JI, Vøllestad NK (2004) Concurrent comparison of responsiveness in pain and functional status measurements used for patients with low back pain. Spine 29:E492-E501 (PMID: 15507789)
11. Guyatt GH, Berman LB, Townsend M, Taylor DW (1985) Should study subjects see their previous responses? J Chronic Dis 38:1003-1007 (PMID: 4066888)
12. Hashimoto H, Komagata M, Nakai O, Morishita M, Tokuhashi Y, Sano S, Nohara Y, Okajima Y (2006) Discriminative validity and responsiveness of the Oswestry Disability Index among Japanese outpatients with lumbar conditions. Eur Spine J 15:1645-1650. doi:10.1007/s00586-005-0022-7 (Pubitemid 44704859)
13. Hägg O, Fritzell P, Nordwall A (2003) The clinical importance of changes in outcome scores after treatment for chronic low back pain. Eur Spine J 12:12-20. doi:10.1007/s00586-002-0464-0 (Pubitemid 36286825)
14. Jin K, Sorock GS, Courtney T, Liang Y, Yao Z, Matz S, Ge L (2000) Risk factors for work-related low back pain in the People's Republic of China. Int J Occup Environ Health 6:26-33 (PMID: 10637534)
15. Lauridsen HH, Hartvigsen J, Manniche C, Korsholm L, Grunnet-Nilsson N (2006) Responsiveness and minimal clinically important difference for pain and disability instruments in low back pain patients. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 7:82. doi:10.1186/1471-2474-7-82
16. Liu H, Tao H, Luo Z (2009) Validation of the simplified Chinese version of the Oswestry Disability Index. Spine 34:1211-1217 (PMID: 19444069)
17. Li L, Wang HM, Shen Y (2003) Chinese SF-36 Health Survey: translation, cultural adaptation, validation, and normalization. J Epidemiol Community Health 57:259-263 (PMID: 12646540)
18. Mannion AF, Junge A, Grob D, Dvorak J, Fairbank JC (2006) Development of a German version of the Oswestry Disability Index. Part 2. Sensitivity to change after spinal surgery. Eur Spine J 15:66-73. doi:10.1007/s00586-004-0816-z
19. Merkesdal S, Mau W (2005) Prediction of costs-of-illness in patients with low back pain undergoing orthopedic outpatient rehabilitation. Int J Rehabil Res 28:119-126 (PMID: 15900181)
20. Norman GR, Stratford P, Regehr G (1997) Methodological problems in the retrospective computation of responsiveness to change: the lesson of Cronbach. J Clin Epidemiol 50:869-879 (PMID: 9291871)
21. Ostelo RW, Deyo RA, Stratford P, Waddell G, Croft P, Von Korff M, Bouter LM, de Vet HC (2008) Interpreting change scores for pain and functional status in low back pain: towards international consensus regarding minimal important change. Spine 33:90-94 (PMID: 18165753)
22. Taylor SJ, Taylor AE, Foy MA, Fogg AJ (1999) Responsiveness of common outcome measures for patients with low back pain. Spine 24:1805-1812 (PMID: 10488511)
23. Vianin M (2008) Psychometric properties and clinical usefulness of the Oswestry Disability Index. J Chiropr Med 7:161-163 (PMID: 19646379)
24. Walsh TL, Hanscom B, Lurie JD, Weinstein JN (2003) Is a condition-specific instrument for patients with low back pain/leg symptoms really necessary? The responsiveness of the Oswestry Disability Index, MODEMS, and the SF-36. Spine 28:607-615 (PMID: 12642770)
25. Wells G, Beaton D, Shea B, Boers M, Simon L, Strand V, Brooks P, Tugwell P (2001) Minimal clinically important differences: review of methods. J Rheumatol 28:406-412 (PMID:11246688)