Responsiveness of the Brazilian-Portuguese version of the Oswestry Disability Index in subjects with low back pain

European Spine Journal

Volumn 17, Issue 8, 2008, Pages 1101-1106

  Coelho, Rodrigo A ^a   Siqueira, Fabiano B ^b   Ferreira, Paulo H ^c   Ferreira, Manuela L ^a  

^a PONTIFICAL CATHOLIC UNIVERSITY OF MINAS GERAIS   (Brazil)

^b CENTRO UNIVERSITÁRIO DE BELO HORIZONTE   (Brazil)

^c FEDERAL UNIVERSITY OF MINAS GERAIS   (Brazil)

Author keywords

Disability; Low back pain; Oswestry Disability Index; Responsiveness

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; CHRONIC PAIN; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CONSERVATIVE TREATMENT; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; DIAGNOSTIC VALUE; FEMALE; FUNCTIONAL ASSESSMENT; HUMAN; LIKERT SCALE; LOW BACK PAIN; MALE; OSWESTRY DISABILITY INDEX; PHYSICAL DISABILITY; PHYSIOTHERAPY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; QUESTIONNAIRE; RATING SCALE; RECEIVER OPERATING CHARACTERISTIC; TREATMENT OUTCOME; VISUAL ANALOG SCALE;

ADULT; AREA UNDER CURVE; BRAZIL; CHRONIC DISEASE; DISABILITY EVALUATION; FEMALE; HUMANS; LOW BACK PAIN; MALE; PAIN MEASUREMENT; PORTUGAL; QUALITY OF LIFE; QUESTIONNAIRES; RECOVERY OF FUNCTION; ROC CURVE; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY;

EID: 49249094308     PISSN: 09406719     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s00586-008-0690-1     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. G Anderson 1999 Epidemiological features of chronic low-back pain Lancet 354 581 585
2. DE Beaton 2000 Understanding the relevance of measured change through studies of responsiveness Spine 25 3192 3199
3. AJ Beurskens HC de Vet AJ Koke 1996 Responsiveness of functional status in low back pain: a comparison of different instruments Pain 65 71 76
4. C Bombardier 2000 Outcome assessments in the evaluation of treatment of spinal disorders: summary and general recommendations Spine 25 3100 3103
5. JT Chibnall RC Tait EM Andresen 2005 Race and socioeconomic differences in post-settlement outcomes for African-American and Caucasian workers compensation claimants with low back injuries Pain 114 462 472
6. M Davidson J Keating 2002 A comparison of five low back disability questionnaires: reliability and responsiveness Phys Ther 82 1 8 24
7. RA Deyo RM Centor 1986 Assessing the responsiveness of functional scales to clinical change: an analogy to diagnostic test performance J Chronic Dis 39 897 906
8. RA Deyo P Diehr DL Patrick 1991 Reproducibility and responsiveness of health status measures. Statistics and strategies for evaluation Control Clin Trials 12 Suppl 4 S142 S158
9. JC Fairbank J Couper JB Davies JP O'Brien 1980 The Oswestry low back pain questionnaire Physiotherapy 66 271 273
10. JC Fairbank PB Pynsent 2000 The Oswestry Disability Index Spine 25 2940 2952
11. JT Farrar RK Portenoy JA Berlin JL Kinman BL Strom 2000 Defining the clinically important difference in pain outcome measures Pain 88 287 294
12. Protocol FDA, G000137 (2002) A prospective, randomized clinical investigation of recombinant human bone morphogenetic protein-2 and compression resistant matrix with the CD Horizon spinal system for posterolateral lumbar fusion in patients with symptomatic degenerative disc disease. Medtronic Sofamor Danek, Memphis
13. D Fischer AL Stewart DA Bloch K Lorig D Laurent H Holman 1999 Capturing the patient's view of change as a clinical outcome measure JAMA 282 1157 1162
14. JW Frymoyer MH Pope JH Clements 1983 Risk factors in low-back pain: an epidemiological survey J Bone Joint Surg Am 65 213 218
15. M Grotle JI Brox NK Vollestad 2004 Concurrent comparison of responsiveness in pain and functional status measurements used for patients with low back pain Spine 29 E492 E501
16. M Grotle JI Brox NK Vollestad 2005 Functional status and disability questionnaires: what do they assess? A systematic review of back-specific outcome questionnaires Spine 30 130 140
17. O Hägg P Fritzell A Nordwall 2003 The clinical importance of changes in outcome scores after treatment for chronic low back pain Eur Spine J 12 12 20
18. HH Lauridsen J Hartvigsen C Manniche L Korsholm N Grunnet-Nilsson 2006 Danish version of the Oswestry Disability Index for patients with low back pain. Part 2: sensitivity, specificity and clinically significant improvement in two low back pain populations Eur Spine J 15 1717 1728
19. PL Loney PW Stratford 1999 The prevalence of low back pain in adults: a methodological review of the literature Phys Ther 79 384 396
20. AF Mannion A Junge D Grob J Dvorak JC Fairbank 2006 Development of a German version of the Oswestry Disability Index. Part 2: sensitivity to change after spinal surgery Eur Spine J 15 1 66 73
21. L Nusbaum J Natour MB Ferraz J Goldenberg 2001 Translation, adaptation and validation of the Roland-Morris questionnaire-Brazil Roland Morris Braz J Med Biol Res 34 203 210
22. M Perillo R Bulbulian 2003 Responsiveness of Bournemouth and Oswestry Questionnaires: a prospective pilot study J Manipulative Physiol Ther 26 77 86
23. P Rantanen 2001 Physical measurements and questionnaires as diagnostic tools in chronic low back pain J Rehabil Med 33 31 35
24. M Roland JC Fairbank 2000 The Roland-Morris disability questionnaire and the Oswestry disability questionnaire Spine 25 3115 3124
25. PW Stratford JM Binkley DL Riddle GH Guyatt 1998 Sensitivity to change of the Roland-Morris back pain questionnaire: part 1 Phys Ther 78 1186 1196
26. PW Stratford JM Binkley P Solomon C Gill E Finch 1994 Assessing change over time in patients with low back pain Phys Ther 74 528 533
27. ME Suarez-Almazor C Kendall JA Johnson K Skeith D Vincent 2000 Use of health status measures in patients with low back pain in clinical settings. Comparison of specific, generic and preference-based instruments Rheumatology 39 783 790
28. R Vigatto NMC Alexandre HR Filho 2007 Development of a Brazilian Portuguese version of the Oswestry Disability Index-cross-cultural adaptation, reliability, and validity Spine 32 4 481 486
29. TL Walsh B Hanscom JD Lurie J Weinsteim 2003 Is a condition-specific instrument for patients with low back pain/leg symptoms really necessary? Spine 28 6 607 615