Children’s Website Structure and Navigation

Multimodal Semiotics: Functional Analysis in Contexts of Education

Volumn , Issue , 2008, Pages 216-236

  Djonov, Emilia ^a  

^a NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 79955908961     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: None     Document Type: Chapter

References (75)

1. Badre, A. N. (2002). Shaping Web Usability: Interaction Design in Context. Boston/San Francisco/New York/Toronto/Montreal/London/Munich/Paris/Madrid/Capetown/Sydney/Tokyo/Singapore/Mexico City: Addison-Wesley.
2. Baldry, A. and Thibault, P. (2006). Multimodal Transcription and Text Analysis. London: Equinox.
3. Callow, J. and Unsworth, L. (1997). ‘Equity in the videosphere’. Southern Review, 30 (3): 268–86.
4. Clarke, R. J. (2001). ‘Towards a systemic semiotic approach to multimedia interface design’. In L. Kecheng, R. J. Clarke, P. B. Andersen and R. K. Stamper (eds), Information, Organisation and Technology: Studies in Organisational Semiotics (pp. 247–70). Boston/Dordrecht/London: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
5. Cockburn, A. and Jones, S. (1996). ‘Which way now? Analysing and easing inadequacies in WWW navigation’. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 45 (1): 105–29.
6. Cockburn, A. and McKenzie, B. (2001). ‘What do web users do? An empirical analysis of web use’. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 54 (6): 903–22.
7. Cockburn, A., McKenzie, B., and JasonSmith, M. (2002). ‘Pushing back: evaluating a new behaviour for the back and forward buttons in web browsers’. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 57 (5): 397–414.
8. Coorough, C. (2001). Multimedia and the Web: Creating Digital Excitement. Orlando, Florida: Harcourt, Inc.
9. Djonov, E. (2005). ‘Analysing the organisation of information in websites: From hypermedia design to systemic functional hypermedia discourse analysis’. PhD Thesis, University of New South Wales, Sydney. Available online: http://www.library.unsw.edu.au/~thesis/adt-NUN/public/adt-NUN20060519.090529/index.html.
10. Djonov, E. (2007). ‘Website hierarchy and the interaction between content organization, webpage and navigation design: a systemic functional hypermedia discourse analysis perspective’. Information Design Journal + Document Design, 15 (2): 144–62.
11. Downes, T. and Fatouros, C. (1995). Learning in an Electronic World: Computers in the Classroom. Newtown, NSW: Primary English Teaching Association.
12. Edwards, D. M. and Hardman, L. (1989). ‘Lost in hyperspace’: Cognitive mapping and navigation in a hypertext environment. In R. McAleese (ed.), Hypertext: Theory into Practice. (pp. 105–25). Oxford: Intellect Books.
13. Elm, W. C. and Woods, D. D. (1985). ‘Getting lost: a case study of interface design’. Proceedings of the Human Factors Society 29th Annual Meeting, 29: 927–31.
14. Fleming, J. (1998). Web Navigation: Designing the User Experience. Sebastopol, CA: O’Reilly & Associates, Inc.
15. Halliday, M. A. K. (1973). Explorations in the Functions of Language. London: Edward Arnold.
16. Halliday, M. A. K. (1978). Language as Social Semiotic. London: Edward Arnold.
17. Halliday, M. A. K. (1994). An Introduction to Functional Grammar (Second edn). London: Edward Arnold.
18. Halliday, M. A. K. and Hasan, R. (1976). Cohesion in English. London/New York: Longman.
19. Halliday, M. A. K. and Hasan, R. (1985). Language, Context, and Text: Aspects of Language in a Social-Semiotic Perspective. Geelong, Victoria: Deakin University Press.
20. Halliday, M. A. K. and Matthiessen, C. M. I. M. (1999). Construing Experience through Meaning: a Language-Based Approach to Cognition. London: Cassell.
21. Halliday, M. A. K. and Matthiessen, C. M. I. M. (2004). An Introduction to Functional Grammar (Third edn). London: Edward Arnold.
22. Harrison, C. (2002). ‘Hypertext links: whither thou goest, and why’. First Monday: Peer Reviewed Journal on the Internet, 10 (7). Retrieved 30 October, 2006, from http://firstmonday.org/issues/issue7_10/harrison
23. Hodge, R. and Kress, G. (1988). Social-Semiotics. Cambridge: Polity Press.
24. Jewitt, C. (2006). Technology, Literacy and Learning: A Multimodal Approach. Oxon/New York: Routledge.
25. Kok, A. K. C. (2004). ‘Multisemiotic mediation in hypertext’. In K. O’Halloran (ed.), Multimodal Discourse Analysis (pp. 131–59). London/New York: Continuum.
26. Kress, G. (2003). Literacy in the New Media Age. London/New York: Routledge.
27. Kress, G., Jewitt, C., Bourne, J., Franks, A., Hardcastle, J., Jones, K., and Reid, E. (2005). English in Urban Classrooms: A Multimodal Perspective on Teaching and Learning. London/New York: Routledge Falmer.
28. Kress, G., Jewitt, C., Ogborn, J., and Tsatsarelis, C. (2001). Multimodal Teaching and Learning: The Rhetorics of the Science Classroom. London and New York: Continuum.
29. Kress, G. and van Leeuwen, T. (2001). Multimodal Discourse: The Modes and Media of Contemporary Communication. London: Edward Arnold.
30. Kress, G. and van Leeuwen, T. (2006 [1996]). Reading Images: The Grammar of Visual Design. London: Routledge.
31. Krug, S. (2000). Don’t Make Me Think: A Common Sense Approach to Web Usability. Indianopolis, IN: New Riders.
32. Lemke, J. L. (1998a). Hypertext Semantics (Paper presented at the International Systemic Functional Congress 1998, Cardiff, Wales). Retrieved 14 November, 2006, from http://www-personal.umich.edu/~jaylemke/webs/hypertext/tsld001.htm
33. Lemke, J. L. (1998b). ‘Multiplying meaning: Visual and verbal semiotics in scientific text’. In J. R. Martin and R. Veel (eds), Reading Science: Critical and Functional Perspectives on Discourses of Science (pp. 87–113). London: Routledge.
34. Lemke, J. L. (2000). ‘Multimedia literacy demands of the scientific curriculum’. Linguistics and Education, 10 (3): 247–71.
35. Lemke, J. L. (2002a). ‘Multimedia semiotics: genres for science education and scientific literacy’. In M. J. Schleppegrel and M. C. Colombi (eds), Developing Advanced Literacy in First and Second Languages: Meaning with Power (pp. 21–44). London/Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
36. Lemke, J. L. (2002b). Travels in hypermodality. Visual Communication, 1(3), 299–325.
37. Martin, J. R. (1992). English Text: System and Structure. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company.
38. Martin, J. R. (1994). ‘Macro-genres: the ecology of the page’. Network, 21: 29–52.
39. Martin, J. R. (1995). ‘Text and clause: fractal resonance’. Text, 15 (1): 5–42.
40. Martin, J. R. (2002a). ‘Fair trade: negotiating meaning in multimodal texts’. In P. Coppock (ed.), The Semiotics of Writing: Transdisciplinary Perspectives on the Technology of Writing (pp. 311–38). Turnhout, Belgium: Brepols.
41. Martin, J. R. (2002b). ‘From little things big things grow: ecogenesis in school geography’. In R. Coe, L. Liingard and T. Teslenco (eds), The Rhetoric and Ideology of Genre (pp. 243–71). Cresskill, NJ: Hampton Press.
42. Martin, J. R. and Rose, D. (2003). Working with Discourse: Meaning Beyond the Clause. London: Continuum.
43. Martinec, R. (1998). ‘Cohesion in action’. Semiotica, 120 (1): 161–80.
44. Martinec, R. (2000). ‘Types of process in action’. Semiotica, 130 (3): 243–68.
45. Martinec, R. (2001). ‘Interpersonal resources in action’. Semiotica, 135 (1): 117–45.
46. Martinec, R. (2005). ‘Topics in multimodality’. In R. Hasan, C. M. I. M. Matthiessen and J. Webster (eds), Continuing Discourse on Language: A Functional Perspective (pp. 157–81). London: Equinox.
47. Matthiessen, C. M. I. M. (1995). Lexicogrammatical Cartography: English Systems. Tokyo: International Language Sciences Publishers.
48. New London Group. (1996). A pedagogy of multiliteracies: designing social futures. Harvard Educational Review, 66: 60–92.
49. New South Wales Board of Studies. (1993). Science and Technology K-6 Syllabus and Support Document. Retrieved 29 August, 2005, from http://k6.boardofstudies.nsw.edu.au/scitech/pdf_doc/k6_scitechsyll.pdf
50. Nielsen, J. (2000). Designing Web Usability: The Practice of Simplicity. Indianopolis, IN: New Riders Publishers.
51. Nielsen, J. and Tahir, M. (2002). Homepage Usability: 50 Websites Deconstructed. Indianopolis, IN: New Riders Publishing.
52. O’Halloran, K. (ed.). (2004). Multimodal Discourse Analysis. London/New York: Continuum.
53. O’Toole, M. (1994). The Language of Displayed Art. London: Leicester Universtiy Press.
54. Otter, M. and Johnson, H. (2000). ‘Lost in hyperspace: metrics and mental models’. Interacting with Computers, 13 (1): 1–40.
55. Pearrow, M. (2000). Web Site Usability Handbook. Rockland, MA: Charles River Media, Inc.
56. Ravelli, L. (2001). ‘Matching purpose with substance: adding meaning interface to usability studies’. In M. J. Wallace, A. Ellis and D. Newton (eds), Proceedings of the Moving Online II Conference (pp. 232–42). Gold Coast: Southern Cross University Press.
57. Rouet, J. F. and Lenoven, J. J. (1996). ‘Studying and learning with hypertext: Empirical studies and their implications’. In J.-F. Rouet, J. J. Lenoven, A. Dillon and R. J. Spiro (eds), Hypertext and Cognition (pp. 9–23). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
58. Sano, D. (1996). Designing Large-Scale Web Sites: A Visual Design Methodology. New York/Chichester/Brisbane/Toronto/Singapore: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
59. Simpson, A. and McKnight, C. (1990). ‘Navigation in hypertext: structural cues and mental maps’. In R. McAleese and C. Green (eds), Hypertext: State of the Art (pp. 73–83). Oxford, England/Norwood, NJ: Intellect/Ablex Publishing Corporation.
60. State Rail Authority of New South Wales. (2000–2002). Tracking Trains. Retrieved 30 November, 2002, from http://www.trackingtrains.com.au
61. Stenglin, M. (2002). ‘Comfort and security: a challenge for exhibition design’. In L. Kelly and J. Barrett (eds), Uncover: Graduate Research in the Museum Sector Conference (Vol. 1, pp. 23–30). Sydney: Australian Museum/University of Sydney.
62. Stenglin, M. (2004). ‘Packaging curiosities: towards a grammar of three-dimensional space’. PhD Thesis, University of Sydney, Sydney. Available online: http://ses.library.usyd.edu.au/handle/2123/635
63. Thibault, P. (1987). ‘An interview with Michael Halliday’. In R. Steele and T. Threadgold (eds), Language Topics: Essays in Honour of Michael Halliday (Vol. 2, pp. 601–27). Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company.
64. Thibault, P. (2001). ‘Multimodality and the school science textbook’. In C. T. Torsello, G. Brunetti and N. Penello (eds), Corpora Testuali per Ricerca, Traduzione e Apprendimento Linguistico (pp. 293–35). Padova: Unipress.
65. Thüring, M., Haake, J. M., and Hannemann, J. (1991). ‘What’s Eliza doing in the Chinese room? Incoherent hyperdocuments – and how to avoid them’. Proceedings of the ACM Hypertext’91 Conference, 161–77.
66. Unsworth, L. (1999). ‘Explaining school science in book and CD-ROM formats: using semiotic analyses to compare the textual construction of knowledge’. International Journal of Instructional Media, 26 (2): 159–79.
67. Unsworth, L. (2001). Teaching Multiliteracies Across the Curriculum: Changing Contexts of Text and Image in Classroom Practice. Buckingham/Philadelphia: Open University Press.
68. Unsworth, L. (2004). ‘Comparing school science explanations in books and computer-based formats’. International Journal of Instructional Media, 31 (3): 283–301.
69. Unsworth, L. (2006). E-literature for Children: Enhancing Digital Literacy Learning. London/New York: Routledge.
70. Van Leeuwen, T. (1999). Speech, Music, Sound. London: Macmillan Press Ltd.
71. Van Leeuwen, T. (2005). Introducing Social Semiotics. London/New York: Routledge.
72. Veen, J. (2000). The Art and Science of Web Design. Indianopolis, IN: New Riders.
73. Ventola, E., Charles, C., and Kaltenbacher, M. (eds). (2004). Perspectives on Multimodality. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company.
74. Zammit, K. and Callow, J. (1999). ‘Ideology and technology: a visual and textual analysis of two popular CD-ROM programs’. Linguistics and Education, 10 (1): 89–105.
75. Zammit, K. and Downes, T. (2002). ‘New learning environments and the multiliterate individual: a framework for educators’. Australian Journal of Language and Literacy, 25 (2): 24–36.