Organizing moral case deliberation experiences in two dutch nursing homes

Nursing Ethics

Volumn 18, Issue 3, 2011, Pages 327-340

  van der Dam, S ^a   Abma, T A ^b   Molewijk, A C ^a,d   Kardol, M J M ^c   Schols, J M G A ^a,c   Widdershoven, G A M ^b  

^a MAASTRICHT UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

^b VU UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER   (Netherlands)

^c Vughterstede ^*  (Netherlands)

^d GGNet Institute for Mental Health Care   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

everyday ethics; implementation; moral case deliberation; moral distress; multi disciplinary; nursing home

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; ETHICS; GROUP PROCESS; HEALTH CARE QUALITY; HUMAN; INTERDISCIPLINARY COMMUNICATION; MEDICAL ETHICS; NETHERLANDS; NURSING HOME;

ETHICS CONSULTATION; ETHICS, CLINICAL; GROUP PROCESSES; HUMANS; INTERDISCIPLINARY COMMUNICATION; NETHERLANDS; NURSING HOMES; QUALITY OF HEALTH CARE;

EID: 79955792220     PISSN: 09697330     EISSN: 14770989     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/0969733011400299     Document Type: Article

References (33)

1. Franklin LL, Ternestedt BM and Nordenfelt L. Views on dignity of elderly nursing home residents. Nursing Ethics 2006; 13(2): 130-46.
2. Teeri S., Leino-Kilpi H. and Valimaki M. Long-term nursing care of elderly people: identifying ethically problematic experiences among patients, relatives and nurses in Finland. Nursing Ethics 2006; 13(2): 116-29.
3. Haggstrom E. and Kihlgren A. Experiences of caregivers and relatives in public nursing home. Nursing Ethics 2007; 14(5): 691-701.
4. Bolmsjö I.Å, Edberg AK and Sandman L. Everyday ethical problems in dementia care: a teleological model. Nursing Ethics 2006; 13(4): 240-359.
5. Jakobsen R. and Sørlie V. Dignity of older people in a nursing home: narratives of care providers. Nursing Ethics 2010; 17(3): 289-300.
6. Bolmsjö IÅ, Sandman L. and Andersson E. Everyday ethics in the care of elderly people. Nursing Ethics 2006; 13(4): 249-63.
7. Kane RA and Caplan AL Everyday ethics: resolving dilemmas in nursing home life. New York: Springer, 1990.
8. Kardol MJM. Zorg voor zelfstandigheid [Care for independance]. Tilburg: Gianotten B.V., 2004.
9. Svantesson M., Anderzén-Carlsson A., Thorsén H.,et al.Interprofessional ethics rounds concerning dialysis patients: staff's ethical reflections before and after rounds. J Med Ethics 2008; 34: 407-13.
10. Molewijk AC, Abma T., Stolper M.,et al.Teaching ethics in the clinic: the theory and practice of moral case deliberation. J Med Ethics 2008; 34: 120-4.
11. Verkerk MA, Lindemann H., Maekelberghe E.,et al.Enhancing reflection: an interpersonal exercise in ethics education. Hastings Center Report 2004; 34(6): 31-8.
12. Abma TA and Widdershoven GAM. Moral deliberations in psychiatric nursing practice. Nursing Ethics 2006; 13(5): 546-57.
13. Vanlaere L., Coucke T. and Gastmans G. Experiential learning of empathy in a care-ethics lab. Nursing Ethics 2010; 17(3): 325-36.
14. Steinkamp N. and Gordijn B. Ethical case deliberation on the ward: a comparison of four methods. Med Health Care and Philos 2003; 6: 235-46.
15. Molewijk AC, Verkerk M., Milius H.,et al.Implementing mcd in a psychiatric hospital: process and outcome. Med Health Care and Philos 2008; 1: 34-56.
16. Molewijk B., Zadelhoff E van, Lendemeijer B., Widdershoven GAM. Implementing moral case deliberation in Dutch health care: improving moral competency of professionals and the quality of care. Bioethica Forum 2008; 1(1): 57-65.
17. Abma TA, Molewijk AC and Widdershoven GAM. Good care in ongoing dialogue: improving the quality of care through moral deliberation and responsive evaluation. Health Care Analysis 2009; 00: 1-00.
18. Gadamer HG Wahrheit und methode. Tübingen: J.C.B. Mohr, 1960.
19. Widdershoven GAM and Abma TA Hermeneutic ethics between practice and theory. In: Ashcroft R, Dawson A, Draper H,et al.(eds). Principles of health care ethics. New York: Wiley, 2007.
20. Dixon NM The organizational learning cycle: how we learn collectively. London: McCraw-Hill, 1994.
21. Svantesson M., Löfmark R., Thorsén H.,et al.Learning a way through ethical problems: Swedish nurses' and doctors' experiences from one model of ethics rounds. J Med Ethics 2008; 34: 399-406.
22. Argyris C. Overcoming organizational defenses - Facilitating organizational learning. Needham Heights, MA: Allyn and Bacon, 1990.
23. Bodenrieder I. Social architecture: a prerequisite for organizational learning. Management Report 38. Rotterdam School of Management, Erasmus University, 1998.
24. Geels FW Technological transitions as evolutionary reconfiguration processes: a multi-level perspective and a case-study. Research Policy 2002; 31: 1257-74.
25. Schols Jmga, Crebolder Hfjm and Van Weel C. Nursing home and nursing home physician: the Dutch experience. J Am Med Dir Assoc 2004; 5(3): 207-12.
26. Guba EG and Lincoln YS Effective evaluation. Beverly Hills, CA: SAGE, 1981.
27. Rubin BM Naturalistic evaluation: its tenets and application. Studies in Art Education 1982; 24(1): 57-62.
28. Greene JC, Kreider H. and Mayer E. Combining qualitative and quantitative methods in social inquiry. In: Somekh B and Lewin C (eds). Research methods in the social sciences. London: SAGE, 2005, p. 274-81.
29. Strauss A. and Corbin J. Basics of qualitative research techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory, second edition. London: SAGE, 1998.
30. Meadows LM and Morse J. Within-project validation. In: Morse J, Swanson J and Kuzel AJ (eds). Constructing evidence within the qualitative project. Newbury Park, CA: SAGE, 2001.
31. Habermas J. Volume 2: Lifeworld and system: A critique of functionalist reason. Cambridge: Polity Press, 1987.
32. Nussbaum MC The fragility of goodness. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1986.
33. Dartel H van. Van ethische commissie naar stuurgroep ethiek. Over de implementatie van moreel beraad in het kwaliteitsbeleid van instellingen voor gezondheidszorg [From ethics committee to steering committee. On the implementation of moral deliberation within the quality policy of health care institutions]. Utrecht: CELAZ/ Nederlandse Zorgfederatie, 1998.