Moral deliberation in psychiatric nursing practice

Nursing Ethics

Volumn 13, Issue 5, 2006, Pages 546-557

  Abma, Tineke A ^a   Widdershoven, Guy A M ^a  

^a MAASTRICHT UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

CARE model; Coercion; Dialogue; Moral deliberation; Narrative; Psychiatry

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; COOPERATION; ETHICS; FORENSIC PSYCHIATRY; HEALTH PERSONNEL ATTITUDE; HEALTH SERVICE; HUMAN; INTERPERSONAL COMMUNICATION; MENTAL HOSPITAL; MODEL; MORALITY; NETHERLANDS; NURSE ATTITUDE; NURSE PATIENT RELATIONSHIP; NURSING ASSESSMENT; NURSING PROCESS; NURSING STAFF; ORGANIZATION; ORGANIZATION AND MANAGEMENT; PATIENT ADVOCACY; PATIENT CARE; PATIENT COMPLIANCE; PSYCHIATRIC NURSING; PSYCHOLOGICAL ASPECT; THINKING; TRUST; VERBAL COMMUNICATION;

ATTITUDE OF HEALTH PERSONNEL; COMMITMENT OF MENTALLY ILL; COMMUNICATION; COOPERATIVE BEHAVIOR; HEALTH SERVICES NEEDS AND DEMAND; HOSPITALS, PSYCHIATRIC; HUMANS; MODELS, NURSING; MORALS; NARRATION; NETHERLANDS; NURSE'S ROLE; NURSE-PATIENT RELATIONS; NURSING ASSESSMENT; NURSING PROCESS; NURSING STAFF, HOSPITAL; ORGANIZATIONAL CULTURE; PATIENT ADVOCACY; PATIENT COMPLIANCE; PATIENT ISOLATION; PSYCHIATRIC NURSING; THINKING; TRUST;

EID: 33748439633     PISSN: 09697330     EISSN: 14770989     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1191/0969733006nej892oa     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. Arend AJG van der, Remmers-van den Hurk CHM. Moral problems among Dutch nurses: a survey. Nurs Ethics 1999; 6: 468-82.
2. Gracia D. Ethical case deliberation and decision making. Med Health Care Philos 2003; 6: 227-33.
3. Janssens MJ, Rooij MF van, ten Have HA, Kortmann FA, Wijmen FC van. Pressure and coercion in the care for the addicted: ethical perspectives. J Med Ethics 2004; 30: 453-58.
4. Manschot H, Dartel H van eds. In gesprek over goede zorg. (Conversations about good care.) Boom, 2003.
5. Steinkamp NL. European debates on ethical case deliberation. Med Health Care Philos 2003; 6: 225-26.
6. Verkerk M, Lindemann Nelson H, Maeckelberghe E, Feenstra E, Harttough R, De Bree M. Enhancing reflection: an interpersonal exercise in ethics education. Hastings Cent Rep 2004; 34(6): 31-38.
7. Steinkamp N, Gordijn B. Ethical case deliberation on the ward. A comparison of four models. Med Health Care Philos 2003; 6: 235-46.
8. Walker M. Keeping moral space open; new images of ethics consulting. Hastings Cent Rep 1993; 23(2): 33-40.
9. Widdershoven GAM, Abma TA. Moreel beraad als dialoog. Dialogische ethiek en responsieve evaluatie als grondslagen voor moreel beraad. (Moral deliberation as dialogue. Dialogical ethics and responsive evaluation as foundations for moral deliberation.) In: Manschot H, Dartel H van eds. In gesprek over goede zorg. (Conversations about good care.) Boom, 2003: 191-202.
10. Widdershoven GAM. Ethiek in de kliniek. (Ethics in the clinic.) Boom, 2000.
11. Widdershoven GAM. Interpretation and dialogue in hermeneutic ethics. In: Ashcroft R, Lucassen A, Parker M, Verkerk M, Widdershoven G eds. Case analysis in clinical ethics. Cambridge University Press, 2005: 57-76.
12. Schneider GW, Snell L. CARE: an approach for teaching ethics in medicine. Soc Sci Med 2000; 51: 1563-67.
13. Sjøstedt E, Dahlstrand A, Severinsson E, Lützén K. The first nurse-patient encounter in a psychiatric setting: discovering a moral commitment in nursing. Nurs Ethics 2001; 8: 313-27.
14. Leung W-C. Why the professional-client ethic is inadequate in mental health care. Nurs Ethics 2002; 9: 51-60.
15. Nussbaum M. Love's knowledge. Oxford University Press, 1990.
16. Bruner J. Actual minds, possible worlds. Harvard University Press, 1986.
17. Widdershoven GAM, Sohl C. Interpretation, action and communication: four stories about a supported employment program. In: Abma TA ed. Telling tales. On evaluation and narrative; advances in program evaluation, vol. 9. JAI Press, 1999: 109-30.
18. Abma TA, Widdershoven GAM. Sharing stories: narrative and dialogue in responsive nursing evaluation. Eval Health Prof 2005; 28: 90-109.
19. Cuba EG, Lincoln YS. Fourth generation evaluation. SAGE, 1989.
20. Greene J. Dialogue in evaluation; a relational perspective. Evaluation 2001; 7: 181-203.
21. Abma TA, Greene J, Karlsson O, Ryan K, Schwandt TS, Widdershoven G. Dialogue on dialogue. Evaluation 2001; 7: 164-80.
22. Widdershoven GAM. Dialogue in evaluation; a hermeneutic perspective. Evaluation 2001; 7: 253-63.
23. Berghmans R, Elfahmi D, Goldsteen M, Widdershoven GAM. Kwaliteit van dwang en drang in de psychiatrie. (Quality of compulsory care in psychiatry.) GGZ Nederland/Universiteit Maastricht, 2001.
24. Van der Werf B. Veiligheidsbeleid en gedwongen separatie in Europees perspectief. (Safety policies and seclusion in European perspectives.) Preacox 2001; (Dec): 11-15.
25. Vorselman A. Seclusion, fixation and medication. The application of coercive measures in adult psychiatry internationally compared [thesis]. University of Twente, 2003.
26. Reissman CK. Narrative analysis. (Qualitative research methods series, 30.) SAGE, 1993.
27. Stake RE. Case studies. In: Denzin N, Lincoln Y eds. Handbook of qualitative research. SAGE, 1994: 236-47
28. Moody H. Ethics in an aging society. Johns Hopkins University Press, 1992.
29. Schwandt TA. A postscript on thinking about dialogue. Evaluation 2001; 7: 264-76.