Public participation and new urbanism: A conflicting agenda?

Planning Theory and Practice

Volumn 8, Issue 4, 2007, Pages 449-472

  Bond, Sophie ^a   Thompson Fawcett, Michelle ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF GLASGOW   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF OTAGO   (New Zealand)

Author keywords

Charrette; Inclusivity; New Urbanism; Participatory planning

Indexed keywords

PARTICIPATORY APPROACH; PLANNING PROCESS; SUSTAINABILITY; URBAN PLANNING;

AUSTRALASIA; NEW ZEALAND;

EID: 37349059405     PISSN: 14649357     EISSN: 1470000X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/14649350701664689     Document Type: Article

References (75)

1. Albrechts, L. (2002) The planning community reflects on enhancing public involvement: Views from academics and reflective practitioners. Planning Theory and Research, 3, pp. 331-347.
2. Albrechts, L. and Denayer, W. (2001) Communicative planning, emancipatory politics and postmodernism. Handbook of Urban Studies, Sage, London
3. (1999) Planning Beyond 2000, John Wiley & Sons Ltd, Chichester
4. Allmendinger, P. and Tewdwr-Jones, M. (2002) The communicative turn in urban planning: Unravelling paradigmatic, imperialistic and moralistic dimensions. Space and Polity, 6:1, pp. 5-24.
5. Arnstein, S. (1969) A ladder of citizen participation. Journal of the American Planning Association, 35:4, pp. 216-224.
6. Barber, B. (1994) Strong Democracy. Participatory Politics for a New Age, University of California Press, Berkeley
7. Baum, H. S. (1999) Forgetting to plan. Journal of Planning Education and Research, 19, pp. 2-14.
8. Beauregard, R. (1996) Between modernity and postmodernity: The ambiguous position of US planning. Readings in Planning Theory, Blackwell, Oxford
9. Beauregard, R. (2000) Neither embedded nor embodied: Critical pragmatism and identity politics. Urban Planning in a Multicultural Society, Praeger, Westport CT
10. Beauregard, R. (2002) New Urbanism: Ambiguous certainties. Journal of Architectural and Planning Research, 19, pp. 181-194.
11. Beauregard, R. (2003) Democracy, storytelling, and the sustainable city. Story and Sustainability: Planning, Practice, and Possibility for American Cities, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA
12. Bond, S. and Thompson-Fawcett, M. (2006) Design-led participatory planning. Living Together: Towards Inclusive Communities in New Zealand, University of Otago Press, Dunedin
13. Bond, S. and Thompson-Fawcett, M. Multiplicities, interwoven threads, holistic paths: The phronetic long-haul approach. Qualitative Urban Analysis: An International Perspective, Elsevier, Oxford
14. Brewer, J. and Hunter, A. (1989) Multimethod Research, Sage Publications, Newbury Park
15. Brown, B. (2005) The "New Urbanist" company. Worthwhile, 1:4, pp. 35-37.
16. Campbell, H. and Marshall, R. (2000) Public involvement and planning: looking beyond the one to the many. International Planning Studies, 5:3, pp. 321-344.
17. Congress for the New Urbanism (2001) Charter of the New Urbanism, CNU, Chicago
18. Day, K. (2003) New Urbanism and the challenges of designing for diversity. Journal of Planning Education and Research, 23:1, pp. 83-95.
19. Dryzek, J. (1993) Policy analysis and planning: From science to argument. The Argumentative Turn in Policy Analysis and Planning, Duke University Press, Durham, NC
20. Dryzek, J. (2001) Legitimacy and economy in deliberative democracy. Political Theory, 29:5, pp. 651-669.
21. Duany, A. (2005) The way we are, actually. Online discussion post (used with permission of author), PRO-URB list, Wednesday, 31, p. 2005.
22. Fainstein, S. (2000) New directions in planning theory. Urban Affairs Review, 35, pp. 451-478.
23. Al-Hindi, K. Falconer (2001) The New Urbanism: Where to and for whom? Investigation of an emergent paradigm. Urban Geography, 22, pp. 202-219.
24. Al-Hindi, K. Falconer and Staddon, C. (1997) The hidden histories and geographies of neotraditional town planning: The case of Seaside, Florida. Environment and Planning D, 15, pp. 349-372.
25. Flyvbjerg, B. (1998) Habermas and Foucault: Thinkers for a civil society?. British Journal of Sociology, 49:2, pp. 210-233.
26. Flyvbjerg, B. (2001) Making Social Science Matter: Why Social Inquiry Fails and How it Can Succeed Again, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
27. Forester, J. (1989) Planning in the Face of Power, University of California Press, Los Angeles
28. Forester, J. (1993) Critical Theory, Public Policy and Planning Practice: Toward a Critical Pragmatism, State University of New York Press, Albany
29. Forester, J. (1999) The Deliberative Practitioner: Encouraging Participatory Planning Processes, MIT Press, London
30. Grant, J. (2006) Planning the Good Community: New Urbanism in Theory and Practice, Routledge, London
31. Hall, P. (1996) The city of theory. The City Reader, Routledge, London
32. Healey, P. (1997) Collaborative Planning: Shaping Places in Fragmented Societies, Macmillan, Basingstoke
33. Healey, P. (1998) Collaborative planning in a stakeholder society. Town Planning Review, 69:1, pp. 1-20.
34. Hillier, J. (1998) Beyond confused noise: Ideas toward communicative procedural justice. Journal of Planning Education and Research, 18, pp. 14-24.
35. Hillier, J. (2002) Shadows of Power. An Allegory of Prudence in Land-Use Planning, Routledge, London
36. Hillier, J. (2003) Agonising over consensus: Why Habermasian ideals cannot be "real". Planning Theory, 2:1, pp. 37-59.
37. Innes, J. (1996) Planning theory's emerging paradigm: Communicative action and interactive practice. Journal of Planning Education and Research, 14, pp. 128-135.
38. Innes, J. (1998) Information in communicative planning. Journal of the American Planning Association, 62, pp. 52-62.
39. Innes, J. and Booher, D. (2004) Reframing public participation: strategies for the 21st century. Planning Theory & Practice, 5:4, pp. 419-436.
40. Jackson, L. (2002) Consensus processes in land use planning in British Columbia: The nature of success. Progress in Planning, 57, pp. 1-90.
41. Jennings, J. (2004) Urban Planning, community participation, and the Roxbury Master Plan in Boston. The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 594, pp. 12-33. 594, pp. 12-33.
42. Knight, J. and Johnson, J. (1997) What sort of equality does deliberative democracy require?. Deliberative Democracy: Essays on Reason and Politic, The MIT Press, London
43. Lehrer, U. and Milgrom, R. (1996) New (Sub) Urbanism: Countersprawl or repackaging the product. Capitalism, Nature, Socialism, 7, pp. 49-64.
44. Lennertz, B. (2003) The charrette as an agent for change. New Urbanism: Comprehensive Report & Best Practices Guide, New Urban Publications, Ithaca
45. Lennertz, B. (2004) Dynamic planning and charrette overview. N C I Cross-disciplinary Public Involvement Report, National Charrette Institute, Oregon
46. Lennertz, B. and Lutzenhiser, A. (2003) Charrettes 101: Dynamic planning for community change. BuildingBlocks, 4:1
47. Lowndes, V., Pratchett, L. and Stoker, G. (2001) Trends in public participation: Part 1-Local government perspectives. Public Administration, 79:1, pp. 205-222.
48. Lowndes, V., Pratchett, L. and Stoker, G. (2001) Trends in public participation: Part 2-Citizen's perspectives. Public Administration, 79:2, pp. 445-455.
49. McCann, E. (1995) Neotraditional developments: The anatomy of a new urban form. Urban Geography, 16:3, pp. 210-233.
50. McGlynn, S. and Murrain, P. (1994) The politics of urban design. Planning Practice and Research, 9, pp. 311-319.
51. Maykut, P. and Morehouse, R. (1994) Beginning Qualitative Research. A Philosophic and Practical Guide, The Falmer Press, London
52. Morris, W. and Kaufman, J. (1996) The Charrette: An Alternative to Conventional Planning Processes, Ecologically Sustainable Design Pty Ltd, Melbourne
53. Morris, W. and Kaufman, J. (1998) The New Urbanism: An introduction to the movement and its potential impact on travel demand with an outline of its application in Western Australia. Urban Design International, 3, pp. 207-221.
54. Mouffe, C. (1999) Deliberative democracy or agonistic pluralism. Social Research, 66:3, pp. 745-758.
55. Robbins, E. (1998) The New Urbanism and the fallacy of singularity. Urban Design International, 3, pp. 33-42.
56. Sandercock, L. (2000) When strangers become neighbours: Managing cities of difference. Planning Theory & Practice, 1, pp. 13-30.
57. Sarkissian, W., Cook, A. and Walsh, K. (1997) Community Participation in Practice: A Practical Guide, Western Australia Institute for Science and Technology Policy, Murdoch
58. Silverman, D. (1985) Qualitative Methodology and Sociology: Describing the Social World, Gower, Aldershot
59. Stake, R. (2000) Case studies. The Handbook of Qualitative Research, Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks
60. Talen, E. (2000) New Urbanism and the culture of criticism. Urban Geography, 21:4, pp. 318-341.
61. Talen, E. (2005) New Urbanism and American Planning: The Conflict of Cultures, Routledge, New York
62. Tewdwr-Jones, M. and Allmendinger, P. (1998) Deconstructing communicative rationality: A critique of Habermasian collaborative planning. Environment and Planning A, 30, pp. 1975-1989.
63. Thompson-Fawcett, M. (2003) Engaging with a tenacious New Urbanism. Planning Theory & Practice, 4:2, pp. 216-224.
64. Thompson-Fawcett, M. (2003) Urbanist lived experience: Resident observations on life in Poundbury. Urban Design International, 8:12, pp. 67-84.
65. Thompson-Fawcett, M. (2003) A New Urbanist diffusion network: The Americo-European connection. Built Environment, 29:3, pp. 253-270.
66. Thompson-Fawcett, M. and Bond, S. (2003) Urbanist intentions for the built landscape: Examples of concept and practice in England, Canada and New Zealand. Progress in Planning, 60:2, pp. 147-234.
67. Thompson-Fawcett, M. and Bond, S. (2004) Participatory community planning, Urbanist style: Theory and practice at Poundbury. Open House International, 29:4, pp. 28-37.
68. (2006) Living Together: Towards Inclusive Communities in New Zealand, Otago University Press, Dunedin
69. Till, K. (1993) Neotraditional towns and urban villages: The cultural production of a geography of 'otherness'. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space, 11, pp. 709-732.
70. Tuxworth, B. (2000) The great LA21 experiment. Town and Country Planning, p. 160.
71. Warburton, D. (2000) Participation in the future. Town and Country Planning, pp. 148-149.
72. Wates, N. (1999) The Community Planning Handbook: How Can People Shape their Cities, Towns, and Villages in any Part of the World, Earthscan, London
73. Wild, A. and Marshall, R. (1999) Participatory practice in the context of Local Agenda 21: A case study evaluation of experience in three English local authorities. Sustainable Development, 7:3, pp. 151-162.
74. Young, I. (1996) Communication and the other: Beyond deliberative democracy. Democracy and Difference, Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ
75. Young, I. (2002) Inclusion and Democracy, Oxford University Press, Oxford